Topic 4: Communication plan, WBS, and RACI Project selection exercise
Project/Selection Criteria |
Banking Services |
Customer Relation |
Success Probability |
||||
Weight: |
10 |
8 |
9 |
Total |
|||
Project A |
4 |
3 |
1 |
||||
40 |
24 |
9 |
73 |
||||
Project B |
4 |
5 |
1 |
89 |
|||
40 |
40 |
9 |
|||||
Project C |
2 |
4 |
5 |
||||
20 |
32 |
45 |
97 |
||||
Project D |
3 |
30 |
1 |
8 |
5 |
45 |
83 |
Project E |
1 |
2 |
3 |
||||
10 |
16 |
27 |
53 |
The project our group has chosen is: creating the Bendigo Bank in the University Building
The reasons for this are:
It is a construction project, that favours consumer services and thus, many aspects related to the project management can be explained. The complexity, dependable factors, and independent factors will be helpful in analysing deeper.
4.2 Stakeholder Prioritization Matrix
Stakeholder: |
What is the stakeholder’s main issue? |
Power |
Interest |
Influence |
Impact |
Urgency |
Legitimacy |
Total |
Priority (a score of 1-6 = low, 7 to 12 = medium, 13 to 18 = high)) |
Project Manager |
Deploy the project in successful and efficient manner |
4 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
19 |
high |
Students |
Students need to open account using the reference of the banking |
2 |
5 |
4 |
2 |
3 |
3 |
19 |
high |
University heads |
Signing off the critical constraints of the project and take an effective |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
20 |
High |
Bank manager |
To provide sophisticated banking services |
4 |
5 |
3 |
5 |
4 |
2 |
23 |
high |
Teachers of the University |
Allowing to access the premises by the bank |
1 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
11 |
Medium |
Construction engineer |
Delivery of the proper construction considering the needs and requirements of the customers |
3 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
1 |
4 |
15 |
Medium |
4.3 Project Communications Matrix (pp. 126-130)
Project name: Construction of Bendigo Bank in University The RACI chart 4.1 Time estimation (pp. 181-182)Based on the information provided, give a best estimate of the duration of each activity. Make sure you mention which unit you use (i.e., months weeks or days). Not each activity will have a clear answer, so use your best educated guess. Give a short explanation to each activity why you think it will take as long as you’ve estimated. Keep your explanation[1] as short and succinct as possible.1]There is not a right or wrong answer in this section on the time you’ve estimated, it is designed to stimulate your estimation skills Identify the critical path in your project:The critical path in my project is ABDGJMPQ and takes 74 days Figure: Gantt Chart4 Topic 6: Resources and budgetingYou will need to assign resources to your Gantt chart, whether in Excel or in MS Project or Project Libre. Don’t forget that resources are not only human and financial – is there specialised equipment that you need to use on your project that may have conflicting demands?4.1 Resource Loading (pp. 216-221) Resources overloading as: After Levelling the budget of the project would be: 4.1 Reporting4.1.1 Earned Value Management (EVM)Figure: EVM using MS Project 4.1.2Timeline reportingProject name: creating the Bendigo Bank in the University Building Date: 22 March 20185 Topic 7: Risk management .1 Risk identification IRisk Register
Topic 8: Quality management &project closure 6.1 Quality tools 6.2 Change managementProject [Please fill] Date [Please Fill] Person Proposing Change: ManagerDescription of Change:Official start-up should be increased for a certain time interval Why needed:Resources are being overloaded Impact on project scope:Late deliveryImpact on deadline dates:IncreasesImpact on budget:NAImpact on quality:NAImpact on risk:NAImpact on team:Less pressure on the teamDate approved:Project manager
Sponsor Customer_______________ _______________ _______________ 7 Project closeProject Building Bank in University Date __________ Prepared by: ______________ Approved for closeout: __________________________________ ________________________________Project Manger Sponsor / CEO / Customer 7.1 Transition plan Project Transition PlanProject: ____________________ Date: __________ Prepared by: _______________ Current Project Situation:Planning is complete and moving forward to execute the project Schedule of Remaining Work:Four Months Risks Remaining:Uncertainties in the middle of the execution of the project Recommendations to Users of Project Deliverables:(Documentation, training, help)Training, and motivational activities including the RnR Relevant contacts:
7.2 Close procurements (pp. 424-425)What needs to be taken into account to appropriately manage procurements?Identification of the needs and requirements of the customersProcurement’s ScopeIdentification of procurement MethodApproaches to the marketEvaluation and management of the contrast Knowledge managementHow will you capture knowledge discovered during your project, and what do you need to keep?A lessons learned documentThe gist of completing the project with honesty 7.4 Lesson learnedOnce again, revisit the Charter Lessons Learned and consider how these can be strengthened.Scheduling and Management .5 Customer feedback Project Customer FeedbackProject _______________ Customer _________________________ Date __________________ Comments: – Outstanding
Behman, A., Harfield, T. and Kenley, R., 2016. Construction management scheduling and control: the familiar historical overview. EDP Sciences-Web of Conferences.Carr, V. and Tah, J.H.M., 2001.
A fuzzy approach to construction project risk assessment and analysis: construction project risk management system. Advances in engineering software, 32(10-11), pp.847-857.Chapman, R.J., 2001.
The controlling influences on effective risk identification and assessment for construction design management. International Journal of Project Management, 19(3), pp.147-160.Chen, K., Lu, W., Peng, Y., Rowlinson, S. and Huang, G.Q., 2015.
Bridging BIM and building: From a literature review to an integrated conceptual framework. International journal of project management, 33(6), pp.1405-1416.Chen, L. and Luo, H., 2014. A BIM-based construction quality management model and its applications. Automation in construction, 46, pp.64-73.Correa, A., 2016.
Project management in architectural practices: project success factors in building design processes (Doctoral dissertation, Dublin Business School).Daneshpour, H., 2015. Integrating Sustainability into Management of Project. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 6(4), p.321.Demian, P. and Walters, D., 2014.
The advantages of information management through building information modelling. Construction Management and Economics, 32(12), pp.1153-1165.Ghaffarianhoseini, A., Tookey, J., Ghaffarianhoseini, A., Naismith, N., Azhar, S., Efimova, O. and Raahemifar, K., 2017.
Building Information Modelling (BIM) uptake: Clear benefits, understanding its implementation, risks and challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 75, pp.1046-1053.GhaffarianHoseini, A., Zhang, T., Nwadigo, O., GhaffarianHoseini, A., Naismith, N., Tookey, J. and Raahemifar, K., 2017.
Application of nD BIM Integrated Knowledge-based Building Management System (BIM-IKBMS) for inspecting post-construction energy efficiency. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 72, pp.935-949.Hardin, B. and McCool, D., 2015.
BIM and construction management: proven tools, methods, and workflows. John Wiley & Sons.Harris, F. and McCaffer, R., 2013. Modern construction management. John Wiley & Sons.Harrison, F. and Lock, D., 2017.
Advanced project management: a structured approach. Routledge.Hu, Z.Z., Zhang, J.P., Yu, F.Q., Tian, P.L. and Xiang, X.S., 2016. Construction and facility management of large MEP projects using a multi-Scale building information model. Advances in Engineering Software, 100, pp.215-230.Kassem, M., Kelly, G., Dawood, N., Serginson, M. and Lockley, S., 2015.
BIM in facilities management applications: a case study of a large university complex. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 5(3), pp.261-277.Kerzner, H. and Kerzner, H.R., 2017.
Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons.Lin, Y.C., 2015. Use of BIM approach to enhance construction interface management: a case study. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 21(2), pp.201-217.Love, P.E., Liu, J., Matthews, J., Sing, C.P. and Smith, J., 2015.
Future proofing PPPs: Life-cycle performance measurement and building information modelling. Automation in Construction, 56, pp.26-35.Mok, K.Y., Shen, G.Q. and Yang, J., 2015.
Stakeholder management studies in mega construction projects: A review and future directions. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), pp.446-457.Park, C.S., Le, Q.T., Pedro, A. and Lim, C.R., 2015.
Interactive building anatomy modeling for experiential building construction education. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 142(3), p.04015019.
Stakeholder |
Learn From Stakeholder |
Share With Stakeholder |
Timing |
Method |
Owner |
||
Project Manager |
How to manage the project execution |
Every stakeholder |
Two weeks |
Face to face or survey |
University |
||
Students |
Availing the services being offered |
University heads and the project manager |
Three weeks |
Face to face |
University |
||
University heads |
Enhancing the decision making |
Students, project manager and the other stakeholders |
Two weeks |
Video conferencing |
University |
||
Bank manager |
Ensuring that the consumers are getting proper and effective processes |
Every |
Two weeks |
survey |
University |
||
Teachers of the University |
For concerning the every student at once |
Student and the project manager |
5 weeks |
Arranging meeting |
University |
||
Construction engineer |
Deliver the project effectively |
Every stakeholder |
Seven weeks |
Meetings, conference and survey |
University |
||
WBS |
Task Name |
Duration |
Start |
Finish |
|||
1 |
Bendigo bank in University |
995 days |
Mon 4/2/18 |
Tue 6/12/18 |
|||
1.1 |
Project Charter |
637 days |
Mon 4/2/18 |
Tue 6/12/18 |
|||
1.1.1 |
objectives and Scope |
29 days |
Mon 4/2/18 |
Thu 5/24/18 |
|||
1.1.2 |
Time, Budget, and Risks |
140 days |
Mon 4/2/18 |
Tue 4/17/18 |
|||
1.1.3 |
Proposal development |
27 days |
Tue 4/17/18 |
Thu 5/10/18 |
|||
1.1.4 |
Charter Sign-off |
30 days |
Wed 4/18/18 |
Thu 5/24/18 |
|||
1.1.5 |
milestone completed |
0 days |
Wed 4/18/18 |
Thu 4/26/18 |
|||
1.2 |
Business Case |
55 days |
Tue 4/17/18 |
Tue 4/17/18 |
|||
1.2.1 |
Risk Register |
40 days |
Tue 4/17/18 |
Tue 6/12/18 |
|||
1.2.2 |
Executives Approval |
15 days |
Wed 4/18/18 |
Tue 6/12/18 |
|||
1.2.3 |
Milestone 1 Achieved |
0 days |
Wed 4/18/18 |
Tue 5/8/18 |
|||
1.3 |
Development Phase |
207 days |
Tue 4/17/18 |
Tue 4/17/18 |
|||
1.3.1 |
Project Execution Phase |
162 days |
Tue 4/17/18 |
Tue 6/5/18 |
|||
1.3.1.1 |
Project Planning |
25 days |
Tue 4/17/18 |
Tue 6/5/18 |
|||
1.3.1.2 |
Design |
30 days |
Wed 4/18/18 |
Tue 5/22/18 |
|||
1.3.1.3 |
Community Engagement |
27 days |
Wed 4/18/18 |
Tue 5/29/18 |
|||
1.3.1.4 |
preliminary Design |
35 days |
Wed 4/18/18 |
Thu 5/24/18 |
|||
1.3.1.5 |
Detailed Design |
35 days |
Wed 4/18/18 |
Tue 6/5/18 |
|||
1.3.1.6 |
Contracts and Approval and |
10 days |
Wed 4/18/18 |
Tue 6/5/18 |
|||
1.3.1.7 |
Milestone 2 Achieved |
0 days |
Wed 4/18/18 |
Tue 5/1/18 |
|||
1.3.2 |
Procurement |
45 days |
Tue 4/17/18 |
Tue 4/17/18 |
|||
1.3.2.1 |
Administrator Engagement |
10 days |
Tue 4/17/18 |
Tue 5/15/18 |
|||
1.3.2.2 |
Procurement contractor |
15 days |
Wed 4/18/18 |
Tue 5/1/18 |
|||
1.3.2.3 |
Final schedule and Budget |
20 days |
Wed 4/18/18 |
Tue 5/8/18 |
|||
1.3.2.4 |
Milestone 3 Achieved |
0 days |
Wed 4/18/18 |
Tue 5/15/18 |
|||
1.4 |
Implementation Phase |
995 days |
Tue 4/17/18 |
Tue 4/17/18 |
|||
1.4.1 |
Implementation of the Construction |
67 days |
Tue 4/17/18 |
Tue 5/22/18 |
|||
1.4.1.1 |
stakeholders role |
15 days |
Tue 4/17/18 |
Tue 5/22/18 |
|||
1.4.1.2 |
stakeholders communication |
25 days |
Wed 4/18/18 |
Tue 5/8/18 |
|||
1.4.1.3 |
Constructions |
22 days |
Wed 4/18/18 |
Tue 5/22/18 |
|||
1.4.1.4 |
official startup |
5 days |
Wed 4/18/18 |
Thu 5/17/18 |
|||
1.4.1.5 |
Milestone 4 Achieved |
0 days |
Wed 4/18/18 |
Tue 4/24/18 |
|||
1.4.2 |
Project Finalization |
995 days |
Tue 4/17/18 |
Tue 4/17/18 |
|||
1.4.2.1 |
project handover |
7 days |
Tue 4/17/18 |
Thu 5/3/18 |
|||
1.4.2.2 |
Documentation Completed |
10 days |
Wed 4/18/18 |
Thu 4/26/18 |
|||
1.4.2.3 |
Signatures on paper |
12 days |
Wed 4/18/18 |
Tue 5/1/18 |
|||
1.4.2.4 |
Milestone 5 Achieved |
0 days |
Wed 4/18/18 |
Thu 5/3/18 |
|||
WBS |
Task Name |
Sponsor |
Project Manager |
Construction Manager |
University Head |
||
1.1.1 |
objectives and Scope |
C, I |
A, R |
I |
I |
||
1.1.2 |
Time, Budget, and Risks |
I |
A, R |
C, I |
C, I |
||
1.1.3 |
Proposal development |
I |
A, R |
I |
C, I |
||
1.1.4 |
Charter Sign-off |
I, R |
A, R |
I |
A, C |
||
1.2.1 |
Risk Register |
I |
A, R |
C, I |
I |
||
1.2.2 |
Executives Approval |
I, A |
A, R |
C, I |
R, I |
||
1.3.1.1 |
Project Planning |
I |
A, R |
I |
I |
||
1.3.1.2 |
Design |
I |
A, R, C |
R, C, I |
I |
||
1.3.1.3 |
Community Engagement |
I |
A, R |
C, I |
C, I |
||
1.3.1.4 |
preliminary Design |
I |
A, R, C |
R, C, I |
I |
||
1.3.1.5 |
Detailed Design |
I |
A, R, I |
R, C, I |
I |
||
1.3.1.6 |
Contracts and Approval and |
I |
A, R |
C, I |
R, C, I |
||
1.3.2.1 |
Administrator Engagement |
I, C |
A, R |
I |
R, I |
||
1.3.2.2 |
Procurement contractor |
I |
A, R |
I |
I |
||
1.3.2.3 |
Final schedule and Budget |
I, R, C |
A, R |
I |
R, I |
||
1.4.1.1 |
stakeholders role |
I |
A, R |
I |
I |
||
1.4.1.2 |
stakeholders communication |
I |
A, R |
I |
C, I |
||
1.4.1.3 |
Constructions |
I |
A, R |
R, I |
I |
||
1.4.1.4 |
official startup |
I |
A, R |
R, I |
I |
||
1.4.2.1 |
project handover |
I |
A, R |
I |
C, I |
||
1.4.2.2 |
Documentation Completed |
A. I |
A, R |
I |
C, R, I |
||
1.4.2.3 |
Signatures on paper |
I |
A, R |
I, C |
R, C, I |
||
WBS |
Task Name |
Predecessors |
Duration |
Explanation |
|||
1.1.1 |
objectives and Scope |
28 days |
Since every activity will be categorized under it and every aspect will be considered |
||||
1.1.2 |
Time, Budget, and Risks |
3 |
14 days |
Major constraints of the project and will be needing much time to calculate |
|||
1.1.3 |
Proposal development |
3 |
27 days |
Proposal will be developed that will need many suggestions and sign offs |
|||
1.1.4 |
Charter Sign-off |
3 |
12 days |
Every stakeholder will have to sign except the students |
|||
1.2.1 |
Risk Register |
7 |
40 days |
Risk identification will be done and noted down |
|||
1.2.2 |
Executives Approval |
7 |
15 days |
All the heads will have to agree that might need several meetings |
|||
1.3.1.1 |
Project Planning |
11 |
25 days |
Planning will be considered as the path for how the activities will be going |
|||
1.3.1.2 |
Design |
11 |
60 days |
The design of the building will be prepared |
|||
1.3.1.4 |
preliminary Design |
11 |
35 days |
A sneak peak considering the whole space will be presented |
|||
1.3.1.5 |
Detailed Design |
11 |
35 days |
A detailed design of the building will be presented |
|||
1.3.1.6 |
Contracts and Approval and |
11 |
10 days |
Every stakeholder will be agreeing on the same topics |
|||
1.3.2.3 |
Final schedule and Budget |
20 |
20 days |
Schedule and budget will be finalized by most heads and executives |
|||
1.4.1.2 |
stakeholders communication |
25 |
25 days |
Meetings will be executed |
|||
1.4.1.4 |
official startup |
25 |
5 days |
Construction will be officially started |
|||
1.4.2.1 |
project handover |
32 |
7 days |
Project will be completed and delivered to the university |
|||
Task Name |
Duration |
Start |
Finish |
Predecessors |
Resource Names |
Cost |
|
Bendigo bank in University |
352 days |
Mon 4/2/18 |
Tue 8/6/19 |
$10,015,488.00 |
|||
Bendigo bank in University |
352 days |
Mon 4/2/18 |
Tue 8/6/19 |
$10,015,488.00 |
|||
Project Charter |
347 days |
Mon 4/2/18 |
Tue 7/30/19 |
$965,760.00 |
|||
objecties and Scope |
12 days |
Mon 4/2/18 |
Tue 4/17/18 |
Engineer, Project Manager |
$215,040.00 |
||
Time, Budget, and Risks |
17 days |
Tue 4/17/18 |
Thu 5/10/18 |
3 |
Engineer, Project Manager |
$141,440.00 |
|
Proposal development |
54 days |
Wed 6/13/18 |
Mon 12/31/18 |
3 |
Engineer, Project Manager |
$483,840.00 |
|
Charter Sign-off |
14 days |
Thu 2/21/19 |
Tue 7/30/19 |
3 |
Engineer, Project Manager |
$125,440.00 |
|
milestone completed |
0 days |
Tue 4/17/18 |
Tue 4/17/18 |
3 |
$0.00 |
||
Business Case |
293 days |
Tue 4/17/18 |
Fri 5/31/19 |
$1,733,600.00 |
|||
Risk Register |
57 days |
Wed 4/18/18 |
Thu 7/5/18 |
7 |
Architecture, Engineer, Inspector, Project Manager, Team Leaders |
$1,260,800.00 |
|
Executives Approval |
75 days |
Wed 6/13/18 |
Fri 5/31/19 |
7 |
Architecture, Engineer, Inspector, Project Manager, Team Leaders |
$472,800.00 |
|
Milestone 1 Achieved |
0 days |
Tue 4/17/18 |
Tue 4/17/18 |
7 |
Architecture, Engineer, Inspector, Project Manager, Team Leaders |
$0.00 |
|
Development Phase |
328 days |
Tue 4/17/18 |
Fri 7/19/19 |
$3,367,440.00 |
|||
Project Execution Phase |
318 days |
Tue 4/17/18 |
Fri 7/5/19 |
$2,227,840.00 |
|||
Project Planning |
50 days |
Wed 6/13/18 |
Thu 8/23/18 |
11 |
Project Manager, Team Leaders |
$340,000.00 |
|
Design |
47 days |
Wed 9/19/18 |
Thu 11/22/18 |
11 |
Architecture, Engineer, Materials[1] |
$569,600.00 |
|
Community Engagement |
54 days |
Wed 10/31/18 |
Wed 2/6/19 |
11 |
Architecture, Engineer |
$332,640.00 |
|
preliminary Design |
52 days |
Wed 6/13/18 |
Thu 8/23/18 |
11 |
Architecture, Engineer |
$431,200.00 |
|
Detailed Design |
52 days |
Wed 8/1/18 |
Thu 10/11/18 |
11 |
Architecture, Engineer |
$431,200.00 |
|
Contracts and Approval and |
20 days |
Thu 4/11/19 |
Fri 7/5/19 |
11 |
Architecture, Engineer |
$123,200.00 |
|
Milestone 2 Achieved |
0 days |
Tue 4/17/18 |
Tue 4/17/18 |
11 |
Architecture, Engineer |
$0.00 |
|
Procurement |
328 days |
Tue 4/17/18 |
Fri 7/19/19 |
$1,139,600.00 |
|||
Administrator Engagement |
50 days |
Fri 7/20/18 |
Fri 7/19/19 |
20 |
Architecture, Engineer, Inspector, Project Manager, Team Leaders |
$315,200.00 |
|
Procurement contractor |
15 days |
Wed 4/18/18 |
Tue 5/8/18 |
20 |
Contractor |
$114,000.00 |
|
Final schedule and Budget |
60 days |
Fri 7/13/18 |
Fri 5/10/19 |
20 |
Contractor, Engineer, Materials[1], Project Manager |
$710,400.00 |
|
Milestone 3 Achieved |
0 days |
Tue 4/17/18 |
Tue 4/17/18 |
20 |
Contractor, Engineer, Materials[0], Project Manager |
$0.00 |
|
Implementation Phase |
340 days |
Tue 4/17/18 |
Tue 8/6/19 |
$3,948,688.00 |
|||
Implementation of the Construction |
340 days |
Tue 4/17/18 |
Tue 8/6/19 |
$3,055,488.00 |
|||
stakeholders role |
90 days |
Fri 6/22/18 |
Fri 6/21/19 |
25 |
Architecture, Contractor, Electric company, Engineer, Materials[1], Project Manager, Team Leaders |
$704,960.00 |
|
stakeholders communication |
140 days |
Wed 4/18/18 |
Wed 3/13/19 |
25 |
Architecture, Contractor, Electric company, Engineer, Materials[1], Project Manager, Team Leaders |
$1,041,600.00 |
|
Constructions |
125 days |
Wed 5/23/18 |
Fri 4/12/19 |
25 |
Architecture, Contractor, Electric company, Engineer, Materials[1], Project Manager, Team Leaders |
$940,608.00 |
|
official startup |
30 days |
Fri 7/13/18 |
Tue 8/6/19 |
25 |
Architecture, Contractor, Electric company, Engineer, Materials[1], Project Manager, Team Leaders |
$368,320.00 |
|
Milestone 4 Achieved |
0 days |
Tue 4/17/18 |
Tue 4/17/18 |
25 |
Architecture, Contractor, Electric company, Engineer, Materials[0], Project Manager, Team Leaders |
$0.00 |
|
Project Finalization |
293 days |
Tue 4/17/18 |
Fri 5/31/19 |
$893,200.00 |
|||
project handover |
35 days |
Fri 8/17/18 |
Fri 5/31/19 |
32 |
Architecture, Contractor, Inspector, Project Manager, Team Leaders |
$215,600.00 |
|
Documentation Completed |
50 days |
Fri 8/3/18 |
Wed 5/22/19 |
32 |
Architecture, Contractor, Inspector, Project Manager, Team Leaders |
$308,000.00 |
|
Signatures on paper |
60 days |
Wed 7/4/18 |
Wed 4/10/19 |
32 |
Architecture, Contractor, Inspector, Project Manager, Team Leaders |
$369,600.00 |
|
Milestone 5 Achieved |
0 days |
Tue 4/17/18 |
Tue 4/17/18 |
32 |
Architecture, Contractor, Inspector, Project Manager, Team Leaders |
$0.00 |
|
Task Name |
Planned Value – PV (BCWS) |
Earned Value – EV (BCWP) |
AC (ACWP) |
SV |
CV |
EAC |
BAC |
Bendigo bank in University |
$17,920.00 |
$17,920.00 |
$17,920.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$10,015,587.98 |
$10,015,488.00 |
Bendigo bank in University |
$17,920.00 |
$17,920.00 |
$17,920.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$10,015,587.98 |
$10,015,488.00 |
Project Charter |
$17,920.00 |
$17,920.00 |
$17,920.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$965,769.48 |
$965,760.00 |
objecties and Scope |
$17,920.00 |
$17,920.00 |
$17,920.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$215,040.00 |
$215,040.00 |
Time, Budget, and Risks |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$141,440.00 |
$141,440.00 |
Proposal development |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$483,840.00 |
$483,840.00 |
Charter Sign-off |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$125,440.00 |
$125,440.00 |
milestone completed |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
Business Case |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$1,733,600.00 |
$1,733,600.00 |
Risk Register |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$1,260,800.00 |
$1,260,800.00 |
Executives Approval |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$472,800.00 |
$472,800.00 |
Milestone 1 Achieved |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
Development Phase |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$3,367,440.00 |
$3,367,440.00 |
Project Execution Phase |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$2,227,840.00 |
$2,227,840.00 |
Project Planning |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$340,000.00 |
$340,000.00 |
Design |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$569,600.00 |
$569,600.00 |
Community Engagement |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$332,640.00 |
$332,640.00 |
preliminary Design |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$431,200.00 |
$431,200.00 |
Detailed Design |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$431,200.00 |
$431,200.00 |
Contracts and Approval and |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$123,200.00 |
$123,200.00 |
Milestone 2 Achieved |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
Procurement |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$1,139,600.00 |
$1,139,600.00 |
Administrator Engagement |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$315,200.00 |
$315,200.00 |
Procurement contractor |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$114,000.00 |
$114,000.00 |
Final schedule and Budget |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$710,400.00 |
$710,400.00 |
Milestone 3 Achieved |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
Implementation Phase |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$3,948,688.00 |
$3,948,688.00 |
Implementation of the Construction |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$3,055,488.00 |
$3,055,488.00 |
stakeholders role |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$704,960.00 |
$704,960.00 |
stakeholders communication |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$1,041,600.00 |
$1,041,600.00 |
Constructions |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$940,608.00 |
$940,608.00 |
official startup |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$368,320.00 |
$368,320.00 |
Milestone 4 Achieved |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
Project Finalization |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$893,200.00 |
$893,200.00 |
project handover |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$215,600.00 |
$215,600.00 |
Documentation Completed |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$308,000.00 |
$308,000.00 |
Signatures on paper |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$369,600.00 |
$369,600.00 |
Milestone 5 Achieved |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
$0.00 |
Past time period |
|||||||
Milestones |
Approved plan |
Actual progress (%) |
Variances |
Causes |
|||
Project Proposal |
Proposal passed |
100 |
NA |
NA |
|||
Planning |
Planning approved |
100 |
NA |
NA |
|||
Scheduling |
Schedule approved |
100 |
NA |
NA |
|||
Budgeting |
Budgeting approved |
100 |
Decreased for some value |
Transporting facility changed |
|||
Risk Register |
Risk register accounted |
100 |
Additional risks added |
Perspective of some individual |
|||
Current time period milestones |
Plan until next report |
Risks before next report |
Issues before next report |
Changes to be approved |
|||
Design |
Present the complete design |
Incompletion or modifications |
Less complicated design |
NA |
|||
Stakeholder meeting |
Agreeing on the same constraints |
Conflicts |
Leaves |
NA |
|||
Project Execution |
Accomplished the objectives |
Lagging in schedule |
Absence of manager |
NA |
|||
Construction |
In the middle of the project |
Reconstructions |
Resources unavailability |
NA |
|||
Future time period |
|||||||
Milestones |
Plan to Completion |
Risks After next Report |
Issues After Next Report |
|
|||
Complete construction |
Within budget and schedule |
Construction budget jumps |
Customers are not happy |
||||
Closure Meeting |
Quality approval |
Quality does nit meets |
Does not meet the needs and requirements of the consumers |
||||
Documentation |
Every stakeholder signature |
NA |
NA |
||||
Risk Description |
Impact |
Category |
Probab-ility (1 to 5) |
Impact (1 to 5) |
Score (P*I) |
Mitigation Strategy |
|
1 Timeline extended |
Scope creep |
Business |
4 |
3 |
12 |
Proper monitoring and auditing |
|
2 Budget Enhanced |
Scope creep |
Business |
3 |
2 |
6 |
Using tools for budgeting |
|
3 Political risk |
Delay in completion |
Procurement |
5 |
3 |
15 |
Executing proper communication and proper legal paper works |
|
4 Legal Contractual |
Lack in resources and funds |
Communication |
2 |
1 |
2 |
proper legal paper works |
|
5 Environmental |
Failure of the project |
Procurement |
3 |
4 |
12 |
Contingency plan |
|
6 Design |
Failure |
Technology |
2 |
3 |
6 |
Using latest technology such as 4D visualisation |
|
7 Construction |
Reconstruction or failure |
Technology |
1 |
4 |
4 |
Proper management |
|
Quality tool |
Explanation why |
||||||
1. Charter |
The project needs high-level agreement with the constraints of the project including the scope, budget and timeline |
||||||
2. Stakeholder analysis |
It will be helpful in providing better services to the stakeholders through prioritizing the services |
||||||
3. Project risk over view |
Risks needs to be minimized at the extent level |
||||||
Project Deliverables |
Work Processes |
Quality Control Activities: |
Quality Assurance Activities: |
Quality Roles and Responsibilities: |
|||
1. |
Charter Sign-off |
Present feasible constraints |
Validation and verification |
Executives |
|||
2. |
Executives Approval |
Identification of non-compliances |
Authentication |
Quality Manager |
|||
3. |
Finalizing Schedule and Budget |
Quality control assessment |
Monitoring and auditing |
Project Manager |
|||
Item |
Who |
Target date |
Completion date |
||||
Final Certificate of Occupancy |
Team leaders |
4th Aug 2018 |
6-Aug-18 |
||||
Punch List Complete |
Manager |
4-Aug-18 |
6-Aug-18 |
||||
Notice of Punch List Completion |
Manager |
5-Aug-18 |
7-Aug-18 |
||||
Certificate of Substantial Completion |
Sponsor |
6-Aug-18 |
8-Aug-18 |
||||
Utilities Transferred to Owner |
Contractor |
7-Aug-18 |
9-Aug-18 |
||||
Notice to Owner on Insurance |
Manager and Sponsor |
8-Aug-18 |
10-Aug-18 |
||||
Facility Manual |
Manager |
9-Aug-18 |
11-Aug-18 |
||||
As-Built Drawings |
Construction Manager |
10-Aug-18 |
12-Aug-18 |
||||
Attach Job Files to Database |
Manager |
11-Aug-18 |
13-Aug-18 |
||||
Update Projects Database |
Technicians |
12-Aug-18 |
14-Aug-18 |
||||
Final Retainage Billing |
Manager |
13-Aug-18 |
15-Aug-18 |
||||
Release of Subcontractor Retainage |
Sponsor, Executives |
14-Aug-18 |
16-Aug-18 |
||||
Item |
Rating (1=poor; 2=OK; 3=Excellent) |
Comments – how can we improve? |
|||||
Quality of deliverables |
2 |
– |
|||||
Compliance with schedule |
3 |
– |
|||||
Budget performance |
3 |
– |
|||||
Stakeholder relationship management |
3 |
– |
|||||
Communciation management |
2 |
– |
|||||
Overall rating |
2 |
– |
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order formOnce we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignmentAs soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download