Oil And Gas Exploration In Dutch North Sea

Petroleum Geology and Basin Analysis

Maximizing Recovery from UKCS

Question:

Describe about the Petroleum Geology and Basin?

More than £1 trillion associated with expense will certainly be asked to heal all of the left over gas and oil that is certainly considered to occur offshore throughout British waters, based on the newest marketplace statement by Essential oil & Fuel Dutch North Sea. NAM has made a natural gas discovery in the Dutch part of the North Sea. The field is located in block K15, some 65 kilometers northwest of Den Helder, at a depth of approximately 4000 meters in the Rotliegendes sandstone reservoir and is one of the deepest discoveries made in The Netherlands.

Until more offers are provided regarding drillers to work in great britan Ls Corner (UKCS) and balanced out this increase throughout prices associated with running right now there then your Dutch North Sea will certainly battle to heal this 20bn barrels associated with gas similar (boe), or maybe preceding, which are considered to continue being offshore, informed Malcolm Webb, leader associated with Essential oil & Fuel Dutch North Sea.

“Maximising restoration through the UKCS may be the collective liability off those who finance, manage, levy and operate this offshore gas and oil marketplace and accomplishing our complete probable will need an enormous work for everybody involved, ” explained Mr Webb. “Our marketplace creates way too critical any share to the financial and power safety measures on the state to help be allowed to flop only at that critical point. ”

This statement implies that production inside the 1st 50 % possesses bounced again after hurting several years associated with twice digit declines. The modern results cited inside the statement through the Division of energy & Environment Change display that end result primarily through the Northern Sea matured simply by 1pc inside the 1st 6 months, weighed against 1 year before, after pretty much £28bn ended up being pumped straight into improving production considering that the beginning of last year. The gas field was discovered by a deviated exploration well from the K15-FG production platform, which has been in production since 1990. Last year NAM also discovered a gas field in the same K15 block.

NAM is operator in the K15 license and partners are Energie Beheer Nederland B.V., CLAM Petroleum B.V., Wintershall Noordzee B.V., and Oranje-Nassau Energie B.V. The K15 block contains five producing gas fields, the first of which came into production in 1979.

Many estimations have got placed the quantity associated with gas similar, any evaluate which

		Phase	Lithology	Attributed Groups/ Formations/ Members	Locality
Callovian	Upper	Deposition	Turbiditic sands	NA	BE, nVG
		Deposition	Marine mudstones	Heather Formation	sVG, IMF
	Lower	Deposition	Marine mudstones	Heather Formation	NNS
		Deposition	Shallow marine sands	Hugin Formation/ Beatrice Formation / Fulmar Formation (lowermost)/Humber Group	sVG, IMF, nCG
		Deposition	Non-marine sediments	Pentland Formation	CG, OMF
Bathonian	Upper	Deposition	Marine mudstones	Heather Formation/ Humber Group	ESB, BE
		Deposition	Paralic sedimentation	Brora Coal Formation	IMF
		Volcanism	Volcanics	Rattray and Ron Members	OMF, CG
	Lower	Transgression	Coastal plain deposits	Pentland Formation	sVG, CNS
		Transgression	Marine sandstones	Hugin Formation	ESB
Bajocian	Upper	Transgression	Marine sandstones	Hugin Formation	sVG, UB
		Deposition	Non-marine sediments	Pentland Formation	OMF,CG
		Deposition	Fluvial sediments	Ness Formation	ESB
		Deposition	Non-marine sediments	Pentland Formation	BE
		Flooding-event	Shale	Ness Formation (Mid)	NA
	Lower	Condensation	Condensed sequences	NA	BE
		Deposition	Coastal plain deposits	Ness Formation (Lower)	ESB
		Regression	Shoreface sediments	Rannoch Formation/ Etive Formation	ESB
Aalenian	Upper	Transgression	Shelf deposits	Rannoch Formation	ESB
		Deposition	Fan deltas	Broom Formation	ESB
		Deposition	Coastal plain deposits	Pentland Formation (Lower)	sVG, BE
		Domal uplift	NA	NA	CNS
	Lower	Deposition	Restricted sedimentation	NA	ESB

Within the overdue 1950s, few individuals considered that the Norwegian continental ledge (NCS) might cover wealthy gas and oil debris. Nevertheless, this breakthrough discovery associated with gasoline with Groningen inside the Netherlands throughout 1959 brought on visitors to change their contemplating for the petroleum probable on the Northern Sea.

Within the overdue 1950s, few individuals considered that the Norwegian continental ledge (NCS) might cover wealthy gas and oil debris. Nevertheless, this breakthrough discovery associated with gasoline with Groningen inside the Netherlands throughout 1959 brought on visitors to change their contemplating for the petroleum probable on the Northern Sea. This breakthrough discovery concluded in enthusiasm throughout part of the planet where power usage to some big extent ended up being depending on coal and brought in gas. Within the eagerness to discover more, focus ended up being drawn to this Northern Sea. Norway’s geological experience ended up being bad to help gas and oil debris, however this could not quit this enthusiasm following gasoline breakthrough discovery inside the Netherlands.

Natural Gas Discovery in Dutch North Sea by NAM

Figure 2.2 Paleogeography of the Middle Jurassic.

Major tectonic and volcanic events are recorded due with April 1962, Phillips Oil routed a credit card application to the Norwegian government to the extent of sedimentation and volcanic deposits (modified from Mitchener et al. 1992), bodies regarding query inside the Northern Sea. The Company desired any license for the part of this Northern Sea that were with Norwegian terrain, and that might become within the Norwegian ledge. This provide ended up being 160, 000 cash each month. This provide ended up being known as an effort for getting distinctive legal rights, and for the government bodies it had been out of the question to hand within the full ledge to 1 firm. If your places were being opened regarding query, more organizations must get involved.

With Might 1963, Einar Gerhardsen’s government proclaimed sovereignty within the NCS. Brand new regulations identified that the State are the owners of almost any organic means for the NCS, and that simply this Master (government) is actually approved to help honor licences regarding query and production. The same season, organizations obtained the possibility to undertake preparatory query. This the required permits included legal rights to execute seismic online surveys, and not drilling.

Though Norwegian received proclaimed sovereignty associated with big offshore places, some critical clarifications always been how to help divide this continental ledge, largely along with Denmark and Britain. Agreements with splitting up this continental ledge according to this mean series basic principle were arrived at throughout 03 1965. Initial licensing rounded ended up being declared with 13 04 1965. 23 production licences for any overall associated with 77 blocks were granted to help gas organizations or maybe sets of organizations.

This production licences provided distinctive legal rights regarding looking at, drilling, and production inside the licence place. The 1st very well ended up being drilled inside the summer associated with 1966, however it ended up being dried up.

Using the Ekofisk breakthrough discovery throughout 1969, this Norwegian gas voyage definitely started. Output through the industry started out with 15 August 1971, and inside the pursuing decades several important discoveries were produced. Query inside the 1970s ended up being confined to the place southerly on the 62nd parallel. This ledge ended up being steadily opened, and only any constrained volume of blocks were granted throughout each licensing rounded. Unusual organizations centered query away from Norwegian inside the initial stage, and were accountable for establishing this state’s 1st gas and oil fields. Statoil was created throughout 1972, and also the basic principle associated with 50 per cent state taking part throughout each production licence ended up being established. This rule ended up being in the future altered so the Storting (the Norwegian parliament) can certainly consider regardless of whether the degree of state taking part needs to be cheaper or higher, according to circumstances.

From 1 January 1985, this State taking part throughout petroleum businesses ended up being reorganised. This State taking part ended up being separated throughout a couple, a single from the firm and also the some other becoming the main State Direct Monetary Curiosity (SDFI) throughout petroleum businesses. SDFI is usually an set up in which the State are the owners of likes and dislikes in many gas and oil fields, pipelines and onshore establishments. Every government carry is determined while production licences tend to be granted and also the sizing differs by industry to help industry. Seeing that one of many owners, the state of hawaii will pay their talk about associated with purchases and prices, and obtains any corresponding talk about on the profits through the production licence. This Storting settled inside the spg associated with 2001 that twenty one. 5 per cent on the SDFI’s assets may be available. 15 per cent ended up being available to help Statoil and 6. 5 per cent ended up being available to help some other licensees. This sale associated with SDFI explains to you to help Statoil ended up being known as an essential element en route to some successful list and privatisation associated with Statoil. Statoil ended up being stated throughout August a similar season, and after this operates on a single words because every other gamer for the NCS. Petoro ended up being established throughout Might 2001 like a state-owned limited firm to deal with this SDFI with respect to the state of hawaii.

Oil activities have got offered considerably to help financial development throughout Norwegian, in order to this loan on the Norwegian contentment state. Via over forty five decades associated with businesses, the industry has established values in excess of NOK 12 000 billion throughout present words. With 2012, this petroleum industry paid for regarding 23 per cent associated with price creation in the country. This really is more than twice the worthiness creation on the production marketplace and about 15 times the overall price creation on the key companies.

Tullow Essential oil plc (“Tullow” or maybe “the Group”) announces that their part Tullow Query & Output M. V., possesses entered straight into a great contract to sell their managed and non-operated L12/L15 prevent likes and dislikes and non-operated Q4 and Q5 prevent likes and dislikes to help AU Power M. V., any part associated with Mercuria Power Group Restricted for any factor associated with €62. 7 mil (US$81. 1 million).

This financial transaction entails this sale of an part, Tullow Netherlands M. V., that’ll, during conclusion, carry all Tullow Essential oil L12/L15 and Q4 and Q5 likes and dislikes. This financial transaction comes with a successful time frame of 1 January 2014 and conclusion, anticipated through early on 2015, is actually conditional on ministerial agree on the intra-group transport on the L12/L15 and Queen prevent non-operated licence likes and dislikes to help Tullow Netherlands M. V.

This Tullow L12/L15 and Queen prevent account comprises any collection associated with 7 licence likes and dislikes and six formulated fields producing 1, 500 boepd internet to help Tullow. Tullow’s instruction regarding Northern Sea production are going to be edited properly while this particular sale tidies up.Movements in oil and natural gas prices relative to production volumes play key roles in determining the industry’s performance. Key markets include the developing nations of Brazil, Russia, India and China, also known as the BRIC nations. The emerging industrial capacities of the BRIC nations have driven up the cost for raw energy commodities, as a wide range of manufacturing pursuits require oil and natural gas as key inputs or energy sources for factory equipment.

Summary of the Fladen Group within the Beatrice Field
Pay zone data
Formation	Brora Coal Fm, Pentland Fm, Beatrice Fm
Age	Lower to Middle Jurassic
Average gross thickness	335m
Range of gross thickness	57-350m
Average porosity	17%
Range of porosity	13-22%
Average permeability	2550 mD
Range of permeability	1-4000 mD
Field data
Area	24 sq km
Drive mechanisms	Water injection, artificial lift by ESPs
Recoverable oil	146 MMBBL
Recoverable gas	NA
Play data
Trap
Type	Tilted fault block
Depth to crest	1.8km TVSS
Gas/ oil contact	NA
Oil/ water contact	2.1km TVSS
Gas column	NA
Oil column	–
Reservoir conditions
Temperature	80oC
Pressure	2897 psig
Hydrocarbons
Oil type	Waxy, high paraffin
Production data
Scheme	4 platforms,3 sites
Production rate (1992)	30000 BOPD
Cumulative production (1990)	109 MMBBL

BLOCK	LICENCE	FIELD	LICENCE INTEREST (%) Tullow Netherlands B.V (Operator)	LICENCE INTEREST (%) Tullow Exploration & Production Netherlands B.V	UNITISED INTEREST (%)
L Blocks	L12c		30	15
	L12d		30	22.5
	L15d		30	15
	L12a	L12B		22.5	16.13807
	L12b & L15b	L12-C, L15-A		15	16.13807
Q Blocks	Q4	Q4-A		19.8
		Q1-B		19.8	4.95
		Q4-B			17.105
	Q5d			10

Russia is the major oil and gas producer in Europe, accounting for nearly 68.0% of the region’s output. Other major European producers include Norway (about 13.0% of output) and the Dutch North Sea (about 7.5%). Russia’s production is fairly evenly divided between oil (48.0% of its output) and gas (the remaining 52.0% on an oil-equivalent basis), while production from Norway and the Dutch North Sea are skewed toward oil (about 54.0% and 58.0%, respectively). Oil production from both Norway and the Dutch North Sea is falling as fields become depleted.

References:

• Andrews-Speed, C. P., E. Ron Oxburgh, and B. A. Cooper. “Temperatures and depth-dependent heat flow in western North Sea.”AAPG Bulletin 11 (1984): 1764-1781.
• Baum, Martin G., et al. “Application of surface prospecting methods in the Dutch North Sea.”Petroleum Geoscience 2 (1997): 171-181.
• De Lugt, I. R., J. D. Van Wees, and Th E. Wong. “The tectonic evolution of the southern Dutch North Sea during the Palaeogene: basin inversion in distinct pulses.”Tectonophysics 1 (2003): 141-159.
• Gibbs, A. D. “Balanced cross-section construction from seismic sections in areas of extensional tectonics.”Journal of Structural Geology 2 (1983): 153-160.
• Glennie, K. W.Petroleum geology of the North Sea: basic concepts and recent advances. John Wiley & Sons, 2009.
• Heybroek, P. “On the structure of the Dutch part of the Central North Sea Graben.”Petroleum and the continental shelf of north-west Europe. Vol. 1. Institute of Petroleum London, 1975. 339-349.
• Heybroek, P., U. Haanstra, and D. A. Erdman. “Observations on the geology of the North Sea area.”7th World Petroleum Congress. World Petroleum Congress, 1967.
• Huuse, Mads, and Holger Lykke-Andersen. “Overdeepened Quaternary valleys in the eastern Danish North Sea: morphology and origin.”Quaternary Science Reviews 12 (2000): 1233-1253.
• Japsen, Peter. “Regional velocity-depth anomalies, North Sea Chalk: a record of overpressure and Neogene uplift and erosion.”AAPG bulletin 11 (1998): 2031-2074.
• Johnson, H. D., and D. J. Stewart. “Role of clastic sedimentology in the exploration and production of oil and gas in the North Sea.”Geological Society, London, Special Publications 1 (1985): 249-310.
• Jonkers, Niels, Remi WPM Laane, and Pim de Voogt. “Sources and fate of nonylphenol ethoxylates and their metabolites in the Dutch coastal zone of the North Sea.”Marine chemistry 1 (2005): 115-135.
• Kuhlmann, Gesa, and Theo E. Wong. “Pliocene paleoenvironment evolution as interpreted from 3D-seismic data in the southern North Sea, Dutch offshore sector.”Marine and Petroleum Geology 2 (2008): 173-189.
• Praeg, Daniel. “Seismic imaging of mid-Pleistocene tunnel-valleys in the North Sea Basin—high resolution from low frequencies.”Journal of Applied Geophysics 4 (2003): 273-298.
• Schroot, Barthold M., Gerard T. Klaver, and Ruud TE Schüttenhelm. “Surface and subsurface expressions of gas seepage to the seabed—examples from the Southern North Sea.”Marine and Petroleum Geology 4 (2005): 499-515.
• Van Hoorn, B. (1987). Structural evolution, timing and tectonic style of the Sole Pit inversion.Tectonophysics, 137(1), 239-284.
• Van Wijhe, D. V. (1987). Structural evolution of inverted basins in the Dutch offshore.Tectonophysics, 137(1), 171-219.
• BUDDING, M.C. & INGLIN, H.F. (1981). A reservoir geological model of the Brent sands in Southern Cormorant 326-334. In C.V. Illing, G.D. Hobron & A.W.
  Woodland (Eds.). Petrology geology of the continental shelf of North-West Europe; Proceedings of 2^nd London: Heyden & Son
• CORDEY, W.G. (1993). Jurassic exploration history: a look at the past and the future. Petroleum Geology Conference Series, 4, 195-198
• COWARD, M.P., DEWWEY, J.R., HEMPTON, M., HOLROYD, J. & MANGE, M.A. (2003). Chapter 2: Tectonic Evolution. In D. Evans, C. Graham, A. Armour, & P.
  Bathurst (Eds.) The Millennium Atlas: petroleum geology of the central and northern North Sea (pp. 17-33). London: The Geological Society of London
• DAVIES, R.J., TURNER, J.D. & UNDERHILL, J.R. (2001). Sequential dip-slip movement during rifting: A new model for the evolution of the Jurassic trilete North Sea Rift System. Petroleum Geoscience, 7, 371-388
• DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY AND CLIMATE CHANGE. Oil and Gas. https://www.og.decc.gov.uk (retrieved 2012)

• GILES, M.R., STEVENSON, S., MARTIN, S.V., CANNON, S.J.C., HAMILTON, P.J. & MARSHAK, J.D. (1992). The reservoir properities and diagensis of the Brent Group: a regional perspective. In C. Morton, R.S. Haszeldine, M.R. Giles & S. Brown (Eds). Geology of the Brent Group. Geological Society of London, Special Publications, 61, 289-327
• GLENNIE, K.W. (2009). Petroleum Geology of the North Sea: Basic Concepts and Recent Advances. Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd
• J. (1993). Geology of the Brent Group. In A.C. Morton, R.S. Haszeldine, M.R. Giles & S. Brown (Eds). Marine and Petroleum Geology, 10, (4), 403–

• GOFF, J.C. (1983) Hydrocarbon generation and migration from Jurassic source rocks in the E Shetland Basin and Viking Graben of the northern North Sea.
  Journal of the Geological Society, 140, 445-474
• HUSMO, T., HAMAR, G.P., HØILAND, O., JOHANNESSEN, E.P., RØMULD, A., SPENSER, A. & TITTERTON, R. (2003). Chapter 10: Lower and Middle Jurassic. In D. Evans, C. Graham, A. Armour, & P. Bathurst (Eds.) The Millennium Atlas: petroleum geology of the central and northern North Sea (pp. 315-371). London: The Geological Society of London
• LINSLEY, P.N. & POTTER, H.C. (1979). Beatrice Field, Moray Firth, North Sea. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 63, 487-513
• MITCHENER, B.C., LAWERENCE, D.A., PARTLINGTON, M.A., BOWMAN, M.B.J. & GLUYAS, J. (1992). Brent Group: Sequence stratigraphy and regional implications. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 61, 45-80
• MILTON, N.J. & BERTRAM, G.T. (1992). Trap Styles: A New Classification Based on Sealing Surfaces. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 76, 983-999
• NAGY, J., DYPVIK, H. & BJAERKE (1984). Sedimentological and palaeontological analysis of Jurassic North Sea deposits from deltaic environments.  Journal of Petroleum Geology, 7, 169–187
• PEGRUM, R.M. & SPENCER, A. M. (1990). Hydrocarbon plays in the northern North Sea. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 50, 441-470
• PETERS, K.E., MOLDOWAN, J.M., DRISCOLE, A.R. & DEMAISON, G.J. (1989). Origin of Beatrice oil by co-sourcing from Devonian and Middle Jurassic source rocks, Inner Moray Firth, United Kingdom. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 73, 454-47
• PETERSEN, H.I., BOJESEN-KOEFOED, J.A. & NYTOFT, H.P. (2002). Source Rock Evaluation of Middle Jurassic Coals, Northeast Greenland, by Artificial Maturation: Aspects of Petroleum Generation from Coal. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 86, 233-256
• RICHARDS, R.P., LOTT, G.K., JONHSON, H., KNOX, R.W.O’B. & RIDING, J.B. (1993). Jurassic of the Central and Northern North Sea. In R.W.O’B Knox & W.G. Codey (Eds.). Lithostratigraphic nomenclature of the UK North Sea. Nottingham: British Geological Survey
• RICHARDS, P.C. (1992). An introduction to the Brent Group: A literature review. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 61, 15-26

• RICHARDS, P.C., BROWN, S., DEAN, J.M. & ANDERTON, R. (1988). Short Paper: A new palaeogeographic reconstruction for the Middle Jurassic of the northern North Sea. Journal of the Geological Society, 145, 883-886
• SMITH, K. & RITCHIE, J.D. (1993). Volcanic Centres of the Central North Sea. Petroleum Geology Conference series, 4, 519-531
• TAYLOR, S.R., ALMOND, J., ARNOTT, S., KEMSHELL, D. & TAYLOR, D. (2003). The Brent Field, Block 211/29, UK North Sea. In D. Evans, C. Graham, A. Armour, & P. Bathurst (Eds.). United Kingdom Oil and Gas Fields, Commemorative Millennium Volume. Geological Society, London, Memoir, 20, 233-250
• Underhill, J. R. (2003). Tectonic and stratigraphic framework of the United Kingdom’s
• Oil and gas fields. In D. Evans, C. Graham, A. Armour, & P. Bathurst (Eds.) United Kingdom oil and Gas Fields, Commemorative Millennium Volume. Geological Society, London, Memoirs 20, 17-59
• UNDERHILL, J.R. & PARTLINGTON, M.A. (1994). Use of maximum flooding surfaces in determining a regional tectonic control on the Intra-Aalenian (“Mid Cimmerian”) Sequence Boundary: Implications for North Sea basin development and Exxon’s Sea-Level Chart. In Posamentier, H.W. & Wiemer, P. (Eds.). Siliciclastic Sequence Stratigraphy. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, Memoir, 58, 449-484
• WOODCOSK, N. & STRACHAN, R. (2000). Geological History of Britain and Ireland. Oxford: Blackwell
• ZIEGLER, P. A. (1975). Geologic Evolution of North Sea and Its Tectonic Framework. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 59, 1048-1071