The report aims in providing a list of suggestion to the Murasaki Aircraft Corporation (MAC) on basis of the mistakes and issues faced by Airbus A380 and The Boeing 787 Dreamliner. The essay investigates and collects information about both the case studies to analyze the aspects that could have been improved so it can be used as a lesson learnt for MAC. The examination of both the case has been undertaken as the CEO of MAC, Lisanne wishes to grow the company to the next level by entering into a medium size passenger jet marker (Clark 2019). Therefore, the issues and the manufacturing risks that can follow with this decision is needed to be identified so that those issues can be mitigated. The following paragraphs discusses the detailed lesson learnt from the Boeing’s 787 Dreamliner and Airbus A 380 case study. There were a number of issues linked with the Boeing’s 787 Dreamliner and Airbus A380 that are discussed in the essay. The essay concludes with a detailed recommendation of the steps to be taken by MAC so that the issues faces in the two case studies are not repeated.
In this section of the essay, critical analysis of the Boeing’s 787 Dreamliner and Airbus A380 case will be presented. This lesson learnt will help MAC to address the issues that can be faced while moving on to a new venture.
The Boeing 787 Dreamliner case is related to development of an aircraft that was expected to change the dynamics of the aviation industry. The main issue that was observed in this particular innovation project was a delay of 14 months. The development of Bowing 787 promised to be the next evolution in flight technology (Nolan 2012). However, right from the introduction of the aircraft, the plane had faced certain crippling malfunctions. This indicate that the quality and safety of the aircraft was not properly accessed.
The 787 Dreamliner was mainly built for stimulating the revenue growth and market response of Boeing. However, several issues were identified with the Boeing 787 Dreamliner. The issues are indicated as follows-
The main issue that could be identified with the Dreamliner, apart from the schedule issue involves the safety issue (Elahi, Sheikhzadeh and Lamba 2014). As speculated earlier, the safety issues were not related to the plane’s batteries and instead, it is mostly related to the items that were left in the planes by workers. Those include metal shaving and other debris that were found in the wiring for flight controls (Denning 2013). It is a situation of negligence as there was high possibility that the shavings could pierce the wiring to cause some major problems.
Therefore, the main problem related to the Dreamliner project is related to project management. Each phase of project lifecycle could have been managed in a different manner so that the issues can be avoided. In the planning phase a suitable and feasible project plan was needed to be developed so that the schedule delays in delivery of the project could have been avoided (The Boeing 787 Broken Dreams, 2019). The execution phase needed more appropriate supervision so that the safety issues could have been identified and mitigated. Lack of proper monitoring and control could be identified in the Dreamliner’s case that multiplied the existing problems.
Similar to the Dreamliner case, various schedule issues could be identified in Airbus A 380 case. The delivery of the project was two years behind the schedule. Apart from the schedule issue, various issues were identified in relation to the manufacturing of the Airbus A 380 (Dörfler & Baumann 2014). The wiring of the Airbus was not following the routing that was expected, that is through the fuselage and thus, when wiring of one part ended, it was not long enough to meet up the connectors of the next section. This indicates the presence of a faulty plan and the calculations were wrong. This was a serious issue as during the execution phase everything were needed to be ripped out to start from the scratch.
Apart from that, in autumn 2004, the assembly line managers had reported problems in the progress of the project. However, although the problems were identified in an earlier stage, the project team did not consider those issues significant enough to highlight it to the top management. This was the major issue that was identified in the execution phase of the project. A number of smaller problems in design and implementation lead to a cumulative problem, which Airbus did not acknowledge till six months of project execution (Dörfler and Baumann 2014.). This is another significant reason behind the delay in the Airbus project, which in turn was diminished and downplayed. Thus, it can be said that the issues faced by Airbus could have been avoided if the proper emphasis were given to appropriate planning and execution of the project. There were several issues with the design and the planning phase that was one significant reason behind the wiring problem that was faced. Along with that several issues were identified in the execution phase. The Airbus project as a whole failed to execute as per the plan leading to serious schedule issue. This is one of the primary reason behind A380 being considered to be the most complex commercial jet project (Avdzhieva et al. 2014). The failure of the Airbus A 380 project had a large impact on the company as well. The main reason behind the failure of A380 was the underestimated schedule and cost.
In the planning phase, no feasible plan was prepared and the schedule and the cost of the project was underestimated. Also, in the execution phase, with an aim of developing the largest commercial jet, the manufacturing process was further complicated resulting in increase in delay of the project. The unexpected delay in the execution of the project had incurred additional costs.
Airbus A 380 further failed because of failure of establishing an appropriate control over the requirements of the project (Simons 2014). An effective control and monitoring of the project increases the success rate of the project. Apart from that, a lack of communication among the project team members were identified during the execution of the project, which indicate that the issues persisting in the project were not communicated to the higher officials in a timely manner.
Analysis of the Dreamliner’s case and A380 case, helps in examining the feasibility of Lisanne’s concept of making use of the light weight technology employed for Boeing 787 and A 380.
On analyzing the cases of Boeing 787 and A 380, several areas could be identified that needs attention. Lissane’s concept can be termed as feasible only if the issues identified from both the cases are addressed.
As analyzed from the cases, both the project had issues with the plan. The plan developed were not technically feasible that lead to delay in both the project. Thus, MAC needs to research about the feasible time needed for execution and use of the similar technology to develop a feasible project plan (Williard et al. 2013). Along with that, it is recommended that experienced individuals are to be hired who will supervise the entire execution process, so that the chances of project failure is reduced.
Secondly, issues were identified in project monitoring and control. Mostly in A 380 project, lack of proper monitoring increased the complexity of the project leading to project failure. Thus Lissanne needs to invest of effective project monitoring and control to successfully execute the project.
The third issue that was highlighted involves the issue of communication gap among the team members and the higher officials, due to which the major issues persisting in those projects were not communicated. The project manager needs to establish effective communication among the team so that the issues are communicated to the higher officials. Communication gap tend to establish in international projects, which might be a result of presence of a cross cultural team.
Conclusion
The essay embarks in a critical analysis of Boeing’s 787 Dreamliner and Airbus A 380 case, to identify the main issues that led to the failure of the project. Among the several issues, the most prominent issues that were common in both the case were the schedule issues, lack of effective monitoring and control and communication issues. MAC needs to address the identified issues and constraints to ascertain that their new venture is a success.
References
Avdzhieva, A., Manhart, A., Krupp, A., Brackmann, H., Mathews, J., Kamperis, S. and Nigam, N., 2014. Efficient airline boarding strategies on the Airbus A380. 6th OCCAM Graduate Modelling Camp, pp.2-18.
Clark, N. 2019, The Airbus saga: Crossed wires and a multibillion-euro delay – Business – International Herald Tribune. [online] Nytimes.com. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/11/business/worldbusiness/11iht-airbus.3860198.html [Accessed 2 Nov. 2019].
Denning, S. 2013. What went wrong at boeing. Strategy & Leadership. 41(3): 36-41.
Dörfler, I. & Baumann, O. 2014. Learning from a Drastic Failure: The Case of the Airbus A380 Program. Industry and Innovation, 21(3): 197-214.
Dörfler, I. and Baumann, O., 2014. Learning from a drastic failure: the case of the Airbus A380 program. Industry and Innovation, 21(3), pp.197-214.
Elahi, E., Sheikhzadeh, M. and Lamba, N. 2014. An Integrated Outsourcing Framework: Analyzing Boeing’s Outsourcing Program for Dreamliner (B787). Knowledge and Process Management. 21(1): 13–28
MarketLine Case Study. 2012. Boeing Case Study. The 787 Dreamliner. Accessed 22 February, 2016.
Nolan, R.L., 2012. Ubiquitous IT: The case of the Boeing 787 and implications for strategic IT research. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 21(2), pp.91-102.
Shenhar, A. J., Holzmann, V., Melamed, B. and Zhao, Y. 2016. The Challenge of Innovation in Highly Complex Projects: What Can We Learn from Boeing’s Dreamliner Experience?. Project Management Journal. 47(2): 62–78.
Simons, G., 2014. The Airbus A380: A History. Pen and Sword.
The Boeing 787: Broken Dreams Al Jazeera Investigations. 2019. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvkEpstd9os&feature=youtu.be [Accessed 2 Nov. 2019].
Williard, N., He, W., Hendricks, C. and Pecht, M., 2013. Lessons learned from the 787 dreamliner issue on lithium-ion battery reliability. Energies, 6(9), pp.4682-4695.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download