Capital Acquisition, Project Proposal, And Project Financing: A Management Report

Scenario 1- Capital acquisition

This report can be considered as a management report as it has been described in various activities that the business manager is required to conduct during the production of goods and services. Capital financing is one of the most essential parts of business management as it helps in providing cost efficient to the source of financing for business operations. It is very important that overall benefits achieved through capital financing are exceeding the overall cost of capital. This report will discuss critical information that will be required in making capital acquisition decisions according to a given scenario. This report will also use different capital appraisal techniques for evaluating the financial viability of a particular project presented such as net present value, payback period method and internal rate of return (Peirson et.al, 2014). In addition to that theoretical aspect of this method will also be discussed in this report. At last cost of capital for a particular scenario will be calculated which is called a weighted average cost of capital. The main objective of this report is to evaluate the practical and theoretical aspects of capital financing.

In the given scenario a request of replacing a particular part of the equipment is presented. The details provided in relation to spare part and reason for replacement is very limited as the team member is assuming that the request will be approved automatically. This type of practices was very common before the predecessor was in-charge of equipment acquisition. This type of practice can be very harmful for the financial position of the company (Lengu, Syntetos and Babai, 2014). It is important that proper requisition is made in case there is a requirement for new equipment or part of the equipment. Machinery used in business organizations are very costly and it is important to conduct financial viability analysis before making any decision in relation to such equipment. Following are some of the information that should be provided by a team member before making replacement request for part of equipment-

Details of the spare part

First and foremost detailed information in relation to a spare part should be provided by the team member. This information should include details in relation to model number, nature of machinery, the procedure of machinery, the name of the manufacturer, expected cost etc. This type of information is necessary because this information will be helpful in making sure that spare part of the machinery is still available in the market. This information will also be helpful in case manager is required to make inquiries in relation to price and quality of the spare part (Hu et.al, 2018).

Scenario 2- Project proposal

The expected life of the machinery

It is already discussed to that the cost of spare parts in machinery can be very expensive, therefore it is important to evaluate whether it would be more efficient to purchase new machinery or to replace the spare part. For example, if the life of the machinery is only one year then it would not be very beneficial for the organization to purchase very costly spare part of such machinery (Gu, 2013). Instead, management of the company can purchase new machinery which would have a new life as a company has to incur this cost next year. In such scenario the expenditure incurred by the company on purchase of spare part will be of no beneficial value as the spare part will have no use in the business and resale value would not be able to cover the overall cost of the spare part (Driessen et.al, 2015). Identifying the expected life of messenger will also help in making decisions in relation to purchasing of a new spare part or second-hand spare part as second-hand spare part can be very helpful if the life of machinery is limited.

Reason of replacement

It is also important for a manager to understand the reason for which the spare part is being replaced. Understanding this reason will helpful for future references. For example, if machinery is worn out due to overloading of machinery then the manager should evaluate whether the purchase of new machinery will be a viable option or not. In addition to that the manager of the company can also evaluate whether the maintenance procedures adopted by the company have any benefits on the machinery and equipment or not (Van Houtum and Kranenburg, 2015).

Formal requisition letter

It is also important for a team member to present a formal requisition letter for making a request in relation to the purchase of spare part. It is important for management to maintain proper documentation in relation to each and every spare part required for plant and machinery. This type of documentation is very important as it helps business managers in the future. It is not essential that same business manager will continue in a particular organization for an indefinite period of time (Cordes and Hellingrath, 2014). Therefore this documentation will help the next manager to take effective and efficient decision in relation to spare part management.

A. NPV, IRR and Payback period

Scenario 3- Project financing

Statement showing net cash inflow from the proposed project–

Particular	Year 0	Year 1	Year 2	Year 3	Year 4	Year 5	Year 6	Year 7	Year 8	Year 9	Year 10
Cash outflow
Furniture and equipment	4500000
Machinery	1500000
Research and development cost	300000
Principal payment		361887	387219	414325	443327	474360	507565	543095	581112	621790	665315
Total outflow	6300000	361887	387219	414325	443327	474360	507565	543095	581112	621790	665315
Cash inflow
Salvage value						500000
Cash inflow from operations (WN1)	0	117500	455333	811438	993391	1193772	990091	1160142	1257668	1360603	1469254
Total inflow	0	117500	455333	811438	993391	1693772	990091	1160142	1257668	1360603	1469254
Net inflow	-6300000	-244387	68114	397113	550064	1219412	482526	617047	676556	738813	803939
[email protected]%	1	0.893	0.797	0.712	0.636	0.567	0.507	0.452	0.404	0.361	0.322
PV of net inflow	-6300000	-218238	54287	282744	349841	691406	244641	278905	273329	266712	258868

WN 1- Statement showing net cash flow from operations  

Statement of expected profit	Year 0	Year 1	Year 2	Year 3	Year 4	Year 5	Year 6	Year 7	Year 8	Year 9	Year 10
Sales		3050000	4000000	5000000	5500000	6050000	6655000	7320500	7686525	8070851	8474394
Variable cost (65% of sales)		1982500	2600000	3250000	3575000	3932500	4325750	4758325	4996241	5246053	5508356
Fixed cost		400000	420000	441000	463050	486203	510513	536038	562840	590982	620531
Allocated expense		200000	200000	200000	200000	200000	200000	200000	200000	200000	200000
Interest cost		350000	324667	297562	268559	237526	204321	168791	130775	90097	46572
Depreciation		1100000	1100000	1100000	1100000	1100000
Total cost		4032500	4644667	5288562	5606609	5956229	5240584	5663154	5889856	6127132	6375459
Net profit		-982500	-644667	-288562	-106609	93772	1414416	1657346	1796669	1943719	2098935
Tax @ 30%							424325	497204	539001	583116	629680
NPAT		-982500	-644667	-288562	-106609	93772	990091	1160142	1257668	1360603	1469254
(+) Depreciation		1100000	1100000	1100000	1100000	1100000	0	0	0	0	0
Cash inflow		117500	455333	811438	993391	1193772	990091	1160142	1257668	1360603	1469254

Statement showing NPV, IRR and Payback period

Particular	Rate/ Amount
NPV	-3817504
IRR	-2%
Payback period	–

On the basis of this calculation, it can be said that this project should not be accepted by the company as it has negative NPV and IRR. In addition to that 0 payback period shows that the company would not be able to recover the initial cost of investment during the life of the project (Gotze, Northcott and Schuster, 2016).   

It is provided in the case scenario that currently financiers are using the rate of 12% after corporate tax for the purpose of calculating net present value. It can be said that it is the correct rate after evaluating the business scenario under consideration. It is important for management to use correct and market relevant discount rate for the purpose of evaluating the present value of cash inflow and outflow. Correct discount rate helps in including the concept of time value of money in the project appraisal method which is one of the most important to the method while calculating the financial viability of a project. It is not possible that the current value of money will remain the same in future as the value of money decreases constantly due to inflation (Baum and Crosby, 2014). If the present value of cash inflows and outflows is calculated with the help of wrong discount rate then there is a probability that decisions made will have a negative impact on the overall financial performance of the company in future.

Net present value method

This is a method in which the present value of net cash inflow is calculated by subtracting the net present value of cash outflow from the net present value of cash inflow. This method helps in estimating the overall cash to be generated from a proposed project.

Advantages- the Main advantage of this method is that it is very simple to calculate and analysis of the result is also very simple. This method also considers the concept of the time value of money which is one of the most essential concepts while calculating the financial viability of a project that will be happening in future. A final advantage of this method is that it considers both of the important aspects in investment appraisal i.e. risk and cost of capital through the use of discounted rate (Aggarwal and Thakur, 2013).

Disadvantage- This method is based on various assumptions and wrong assumptions can result in a negative impact on the business organization and project. For example, the wrong estimation of a discounted rate or expected revenue can have a significant impact on the decision taken.

Payback period method

This method helps in estimating the time that will be taken by a particular project in recovering its overall initial cost.

Advantages- the Main advantage of this method is that it is very simple to calculate and can be calculated without the help of any professional. This method gives more importance to the liquidity position of a particular project what is essential for the generation of cash. This method can be very helpful in the initial screening of numerous projects.

Disadvantages- Main and primary disadvantage of this method is that it does not consider the time value of money (Ghahremani, Aghaie and Abedzadeh, 2012). This project is generally not used by business managers to evaluate the financial viability of the project due to its inconclusive results in certain cases.

The internal rate of return

This method calculates a rate of return that will be provided by a particular project and then such rate is compared with the overall cost of capital to make decisions in relation to financial viability.

Advantages- This method also considers the concept of the time value of money which is its one of while evaluating the rate of return. With the help of this method, comparison can be made with the cost of capital of the company that will help in understanding whether a search project will be financially viable in the future or not (Finnerty, 2013).

Disadvantages- Calculation of this internal rate of return where is very complex as it is based on various assumptions and wrong assumptions can lead to wrong decision making. Type of method will not be usable in identifying the financial viability of mutually exclusive projects.

Change management

It is important to evaluate whether current business processes of the organization will be able to handle the new project or not. In case current resources are not sufficient then management to should you decide whether it would be financially viable to employer new resources or not.

Market consideration

The business market is very dynamic and preference of consumers changes on a regular basis. In such a dynamic environment, it is important that business organization considers the viability of the project in the future by evaluating trends and preferences of the customer.

Legal obligations

This is a non-financial factor that should be considered as a business organization should perform within the legal framework applicable to such business organization. Therefore management should evaluate whether the new project is allowable according to the legislature is applicable.

A. Calculation of WACC

Debt to capital ratio is 1:1

Cost of debt

Debentures- rate of debenture (1-tax rate) (Frank and Shen, 2016).

= 12 (1-.30)

= 8.4%

Bank bills

{(Face value- current value) face value}* 360/90

=   .096 or 9.6%

Bank overdraft= One percent above bank bill i.e. 10.6% (1+9.6)

Overall cost of debt (Ratio of overdraft to bank bill to debenture is 1:2:3)

Therefore, cost of debt-

= {(10.6*1) + (9.6*2) + (8.4*3)}/ 6

= 9.166%

Cost of equity

= Ke = (D1 / P0) + g

Here Ke is cost of equity, D1 dividend to be paid in net year, P0 is current price of equity share and g is dividend growth rate.

= {(1.10+ 6%)/ 8} + 6%

= 6.1457%

Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC)

= {(Cost of equity* weight of equity) + (cost of debt* weight of debt)}/ combined weight of debt and equity (Hann, Ogneva and Ozbas, 2013).

= (9.166*1) + (6.1457*1)/ 2

= 7.6558%

Therefore WACC of WBC is 7.6558%.   

There are various sources of financing available in the market and cost associated with each of such resources different from each other. Cost of capital is totally dependent on the risk associated with such capital. For example the cost of debt, capital is lower as compared to equity capital because the risk associated in debt capital is limited. The weighted average cost of capital helps in identifying the overall cost of capital employed in a business organization.

This method can be used in the given scenario because the capital of the company is the composition of the different type of capital i.e. debt and equity. In addition to that, that capital of the company is also the composition of three different types of debt instruments i.e. overdraft bank, bank bill, and debentures. For the evaluation of any project, it is important to calculate the cost of capital to compare it with the rate of return that will be provided by such project. The rate of return of a particular project cannot be compared with each and every capital of the company separately. Therefore it is important to calculate a particular rate of return that will represent the overall cost of capital. It can be said that in the given scenario calculation of the weighted average cost of capital will be a viable option (Hou, Van Dijk and Zhang, 2012).

The weighted average cost of capital cannot be used in each and every situation and some of the limitations of this method are as follows-

• This method should not be used when the cost of capital is changing on a constant basis as it will result in the wrong calculation of the cost of capital.
• This method also cannot be used in situations where the market rate of capital is not available.
• Evaluation of financial viability with the help of this method becomes very difficult when the expected internal rate of return in a particular project is not available.

Conclusion

It can be concluded that selection of an effective and efficient to the source of financing for a business organization is very important. In addition to that, it is also important to evaluate the financial viability of a particular project before integration of such project in the organization. Any new project started by the organization requires a large amount of resources and failure of the project can result in a significant negative impact on the overall performance of the organization. This report has described the various aspects of project financial management. It is important that business managers should consider all the calculations provided in this project before making any decisions in relation to the given scenario.

References 

Aggarwal, A. and Thakur, G.S.M., 2013. Techniques of performance appraisal-a review. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT), 2(3), pp.617-621.

Baum, A.E. and Crosby, N., 2014. Property investment appraisal. John Wiley & Sons.

Cordes, A.K. and Hellingrath, B., 2014, July. Conceptual approach for integrating tactical spare parts inventory management and transport planning. In Industrial Informatics (INDIN), 2014 12th IEEE International Conference on (pp. 548-553). IEEE.

Driessen, M., Arts, J., van Houtum, G.J., Rustenburg, J.W. and Huisman, B., 2015. Maintenance spare parts planning and control: a framework for control and agenda for future research. Production Planning & Control, 26(5), pp.407-426.

Finnerty, J.D., 2013. Project financing: Asset-based financial engineering. John Wiley & Sons.

Frank, M.Z. and Shen, T., 2016. Investment and the weighted average cost of capital. Journal of Financial Economics, 119(2), pp.300-315.

Ghahremani, M., Aghaie, A. and Abedzadeh, M., 2012. Capital budgeting technique selection through four decades: with a great focus on real option. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(17), p.98.

Gotze, U., Northcott, D. and Schuster, P., 2016. INVESTMENT APPRAISAL. SPRINGER-VERLAG BERLIN AN.

Gu, J., 2013. Proactive and Efficient Spare Parts Inventory Management Policies Considering Reliability Issues.

Hann, R.N., Ogneva, M. and Ozbas, O., 2013. Corporate diversification and the cost of capital. The journal of finance, 68(5), pp.1961-1999.

Hou, K., Van Dijk, M.A. and Zhang, Y., 2012. The implied cost of capital: A new approach. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 53(3), pp.504-526.

Hu, Q., Boylan, J.E., Chen, H. and Labib, A., 2018. OR in spare parts management: A review. European Journal of Operational Research, 266(2), pp.395-414.

Lengu, D., Syntetos, A.A. and Babai, M.Z., 2014. Spare parts management: Linking distributional assumptions to demand classification. European Journal of Operational Research, 235(3), pp.624-635.

Peirson, G., Brown, R., Easton, S. and Howard, P., 2014. Business finance. McGraw-Hill Education Australia.

Van Houtum, G.J. and Kranenburg, B., 2015. Spare parts inventory control under system availability constraints (Vol. 227). Springer.