The concept of integrated reporting refers to the common interest of the global coalition among the parties which are seen with improving the communication based on value creation and evolution of corporate reporting. This is also based on listing of the contributions for the sustainable development and financial stability. The main coalition comprises of the global communities and entities along with the financial capital, policy makers, regulators and exchanges. In addition to this, the main concerns considered under the IR framework is depicted to be based on standard setters, civil society, and academia. The report aims to discover the responses of the South African institutional investment in the community and identify the position of the companies listed under Johannesburg Securities Exchange. The important findings of the report have been related to the several aspects of Integrated reporting in South Africa in 2012 as per viewpoints from South African investors (Flower 2015).
The analysis of the detailed interview process has been considered to find out the important findings of the IR in South Africa. This report is further conducive in designing about the respective theories which are associated to traditional and non-financial measures. The study will also explore about the relevant concepts of IR and interpretive styles which are associated to effective reporting standards. South Africa is considered as one of the first nations which was known to introduce de facto on a mandatory basis. In addition to this, some of the different types of the other mandates issued by the country relates to the economic and environmental challenges. Moreover, both “Integrated Reporting Committee of South Africa (IRCSA)” (2011) and “International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC)” are seen to be acknowledging the changes pertaining to the relevant culture of the country and reporting system (Thomson 2015).
The first components of IR in organizations is seen with examining the various perspectives of the stakeholders and first set of IR. In this theory the country’s main formal investors have responded to the IR project report and the way it needs to be dealt. The institutional investors in general are considered as the primary users of such a report. The main aspect of the study will examine the different form of the shifts in the attitudes of these investors based on the ESG, which is prevalent in investment communities around the world. They are also considered as the drivers of IR and the depictions are seen to be based their understanding of the obstacle to high quality reporting (De Villiers, Rinaldi and Unerman 2014).
Secondly, the retention aspect of the study has been considered with the opinions of key users for identification of the main points and its integration with the corporate governance community. The important discourse of the study is also able to know about the various types of the consideration which deals with the views of institutional investment community around the world. In addition to this, the research has been able to provide an initial framework for providing a detailed review of IR and publication of the frameworks issued by IIRC in 2013. This has been further able to emphasize on the capital providers as per IR of the project. It needs to be also seen that there is no effort made for the measuring up the quantum and quality of the disclosures (Dumay et al. 2016).
Thirdly, the important areas of the report have also acknowledged the study which is constrained to a single group of users. The perspectives of the report have been able to focus on the comprehensive review pertaining to the development of the ESG and IR as per the analysis of the results (Serafeim 2015).
The main limitation of the IR is evident among the finding out the net effect on the global investors. For instance, as per global investors perspectives it cannot be said that IR is an unprecedented experiment.
The previous studies of international framework are identified with the recent developments which are depicted with the integrated financial and non-financial measures done as per the primary communication with the stakeholders. This is depicted as the first point of agreement (Serafeim 2015).
Secondly, the objective of the IIRC is further embedded with the mainstream practice of the business which is seen to be based on the corporate reporting norm of IIRC 2012. The second code of the CG of most of the companies are based on the inclusion of the ESG framework which is given in the annual report of most companies of the world. The release of the King-III in 2009 has been however able to consider the non-financial aspect of reporting. In several types of the other cases the organizations have been able to define the key role for considering the information needs of the stakeholders and rising anticipation of the balanced financial and non-financial measures. The recent reports have been able to reveal about the different types of role of IR in terms of value it has contributed to ESG (Simnett and Huggins 2015).
Thirdly, factors such as ESG disclosures have provided the evidence taken from the business case associated to high quality reporting of the integrated reports. It needs to be also seen that the report does not provide a causal relationship among the variables thereby providing unfavorable correlation among the share price and corporate responsibility. This is further identified to be consistent among the American Multinationals which are seen to disclose more than a single financial indicator for the parameters which are establishes with the stakeholders. The financial case for the IR is depicted to be supported by emerging concern along with their interpretive reporting. This is also seen to go hand-in-hand with the institutional burdens and large investments coupled with the importance of the organizational legitimacy (Stubbs and Higgins 2014).
As per the data extracted from the global investors perspectives it cannot be said that IR is an unprecedented experiment. However, despite of the various types of the guidance of the report it needs to be identified that the various types of the considerations for the reporting needs to be identified as per the uncertainty in the structure of the IIRC framework.
The preliminary analysis of the study has revealed that IR has found significant number of repetitions which is stated with promoting of reforms for the engagement of the stakeholder in various countries across the world. Moreover, the preliminary analysis of the study has been able to able to discern that in the first set of the launch of the IR there are significant number of the issues which often relates to risk of legalistic style of application of the framework. However, the limitation is depicted with ESG reporting space considered with managing the expectations of the stakeholders which is often limited to the operating practices.
In a similar way both the investees and investors need to employ the stage impression which is done for creating dual myth for environmental and social accountability. The initial research suggests that there is a considerable emphasis as per demonstrable acts of compliance rather than communicating on the way an organization which are managed with the sustainability concerns. Till date the limited context of the research is often based on the significant nature of the users and preparers of the report (Simnett and Huggins 2015).
Firstly, the main agreement of the shift in ESG among the entities with the IR journal is seen with interviews presented along with incorporation of ESG, which is segregated into several investment decisions-making factors which are gradually considered with the local capital market.
Secondly, the way the respondents have opined about the ESG disclosure with increasing efficiency are directly related to the IR journal (Eccles and Krzus 2014).
Thirdly, from the journal it can be inferred that the ESG among the investment companies are depicted as per addressing the social norms in a country. The more critical form of the reviews pertaining to the investors has been able to disclose about the real financial implication of IR. The critical investors have taken additional initiative for incorporating several types of measures in the investment and decision-making process. This finding was not unexpected as it is seen with a unique relationship among them especially at the time of evaluating the non-financial and financial measures. It needs to be further stressed the respondents did not deny of the significance of the ESG issues in the IR. There are also large number of concerns which are often identified with the additional insights of the ESG issues with a more specific perspective of the macro-economic forces. Therefore, as per the journal of IR all discussions about the Shift in the attitude to the ESG among the investment companies cannot be agreed. For instance, it needs understood that there may be several types of the consideration for water related problems in various countries which is particularly having a detrimental impact on the construction sector of the country. It needs to be also made clear that climate change is often seen with number of issues which are considered with the issue of sustainability in the Platinum Sector. This will be able to provide a more refined opinion on the market dynamics and how the same will be able to impact on the long-term performance of the organization (Perego, Kennedy and Whiteman 2016).
Regardless of the critic’s opinion, the general position in the companies are often depicted with the appreciation of the ESG issues which are often considered with the “soft” or “non-financial” which are needed depicted as per the financial analysis. A leading form of the asset manager will be further able to provide a real example of the ESG issues as per the procedure of valuation. There are also seen to be greater emphasis on the number of ESG issues which are often traditionally viewed with evidence of the long-term assessment by the investment houses. There had been several numbers of the individuals who were of the opinion about the industry.
Despite of the development in the IR and emergence of the leading discussions for describing the stakeholder message in SA are viewed to be same as per accountable investment practice (Alfiero et al. 2017).
The interviewees have also indicated about the differentiation strategy as per the findings which are needed to be complied as per CRISA and active appointment with their investees. The similar nature of the differences in the responsible investments are dependent on the pressures exerted from various types of the other stakeholders (Higgins, Stubbs and Love 2014).
Firstly, as per the journal the investors, the interviewees have defined about the integrated reporting in the light of risks of opportunities pertaining to the communication among the stakeholder. For example, these are consistently viewed as the major emerging body addressing the relevant risk and issues of IR. This shows that the reporting needs to be done as per deep understanding of decision-making process (Burke and Clark 2016).
Secondly, the positive aspect of IR as a good communication is considered as key part of the combined investigation where the companies are able to act in a more comprehensive manner.
Thirdly, the main perspectives of the IR emerged during the interview process and these are concerned with multidimensional perspective, forward looking of the integrated thinking and enhancing the corporate accountability to the stakeholders. It is also depicted with creating a link among the ESG issues and financial performance. In addition to this, the main perspectives of the IR emerged during the interview process are also concerned with vehicle for revealing the risks and opportunities and creating a balance among financial and non-financial measures (Dumay et al. 2017).
In contemporary terms the interview has emphasized on the financial orientation of the IR along with balancing of the realization of the broad range of users who are engaged in the IR for several reasons. It is also seen that in many cases the integrated reporting is identified with the mechanism of acting in a greater manner for the stakeholders and accountability which is required for communicating with the information providers as per suggested by IIRC. It Is also important to mention potential investors also play an important role (De Villiers et al. 2017). The information provided by the interviewees has been able to stress about the importance of the stakeholder-centric reporting which is a part of capitalist system. In such an instance the sustainability and accountability are often identified as a part under the entrepreneurial system. Therefore, it needs to be mentioned that the only disagreement of the IR as communication to the investors is mainly associated to the long-term sustainability of the companies which are particularly bearing an economic issue. If business is not depicted to be economical then it may not be sustainable. In case a business is not seen as worth of the discounted value the IR is able to specify the appropriate value of the future cash flow available.
The IIRC and IRCSA discussions have shown the intention of the IR to highlight the interconnection among the organizational and operational strategy (Adams et al. 2016).
The goals of the reporting have been further seen to be considered as per the useful decision making in the investor community.
The important respondents of the study have indicated about the various types of the concerns which are associated with the respondents who have complied with the introduction of the various elements of IR among different types of the companies (Haller and van Staden 2014).
The varied reactions pertaining to the IR is recognized with mixed response of investors who are seen to perceive both the positive and negative features pertaining to the IR. The overall evaluation of the interviewees is further considered as per the improvements are made over the outdated approach and preparing the oriented annual report which is complemented only by distinct report on sustainability (Reimsbach, Hahn and Gürtürk 2018).
Points to agree
Firstly, the agreement with the IR journal is depicted with the information which is published with normative recommendations pertaining to the acceleration of the decision relevant to the IR.
Secondly, the perceived level of the IR is further depicted to be resonated as per the environmental and social engagement of the investors. It is also interestingly seen that there are clear distinguishing factors made as per the activities which are in favor of the workers (Monciardini, Dumay and Biondi 2017).
Thirdly, the interviewees of the community engagement program are also seen to be actively taking part in the construction of the IR.
However, the disagreement can be depicted with the institutional not encouraging about the issues which are directly associated to the satisfaction of the needs. There is consistent and centric approach of reporting identified as per the recommendation of most of the interviews which will assist the companies in identifying the primary and secondary stakeholders and engaging with the same for appropriate reporting (Veltri and Silvestri 2015).
Conclusion
The overall depiction from the integrated reporting in SA have shown that the decision to introduce the IR to many companies has established a gradual shift for the acknowledgement of the importance of the ESG issues in the corporate reports. A large number of the individuals recognized that IR included the interconnections among the non-financial and financial procedures which the fund managers have stated in traditional terms in their analysis process. Other findings have been further able to reveal about the number of issues pertaining to the relevant level of the concerns which are portrayed with the interconnections among the financial and non-financial measures pertaining to the fund managers and who have traditionally incorporated the soft issues in their investment forecasting process. Due to such issues, there is number of findings which are concerned with the IR in the beginning of the comprehensive reporting philosophy along with integrated approach related to the business activities. The important financial and non-financial measures are further related to the identification of organization’s sustainability and performance. It needs to be also depicted that there is an increased requirement of avoiding the disclosure checklist and making assurance on the elements of the report which are needed for forward looking assessments. The most important aspect needs to be identified as per the formulating an active strategy which have been able to identify the relevant information of the stakeholder and ensure that the IR is able to provide an appropriate report on the generic disclosures associated to ESG and crossed referenced financial results. The final findings need to be considered with the engagement of the SA institutional investment in the community of the process along with improving the integrated reporting of SA listed companies. The research further adds to the number of concerns which are relevant to the examine the future prospect of the IR. In this particular aspect it needs to be defined that the IR concept is often identified with the relevant role which is related to the perception in a broader group of stakeholders.
Moreover, the findings of the previous studies have been able to show that the stakeholders perception consists of the various types of the strategies which are integrated in the viewpoint of the organizational systems and practices. Lastly, it can be said that the South African reporting has included IR based on conspicuous absence of the notions pertaining to the investors and monetary markets which may be integral aspect to financial stability, social injustice and environmental un-sustainability. In case the IIRC is looking for a true IR then it is important to consider the long-term sustainability and ideas and reporting aspects.
References
Adams, C.A., Potter, B., Singh, P.J. and York, J., 2016. Exploring the implications of integrated reporting for social investment (disclosures). The British Accounting Review, 48(3), pp.283-296. [Link: https://dro.dur.ac.uk/19005/1/19005.pdf]
Alfiero, S., Cane, M., Doronzo, R. and Esposito, A., 2017. Integrated reporting: the links between its adoption and board characteristics. In Integrated Reporting and Non-financial Information Assurance-SMEs vs Large Firms (pp. 6-21). ASPI Editore. [Link: https://bit.ly/2Qt5rJW]
Brown, J. and Dillard, J., 2014. Integrated reporting: On the need for broadening out and opening up. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), pp.1120-1156. [Link: https://brainmass.com/business/accounting/environmental-social-responsibility-financial-reporting-602022]
Burke, J.J. and Clark, C.E., 2016. The business case for integrated reporting: Insights from leading practitioners, regulators, and academics. Business Horizons, 59(3), pp.273-283. [Link: https://bit.ly/2zvSBks]
De Villiers, C., Rinaldi, L. and Unerman, J., 2014. Integrated Reporting: Insights, gaps and an agenda for future research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), pp.1042-1067. [Link: https://pure.royalholloway.ac.uk/portal/files/23085728/aaaj_integrated_reporting_pre_print_version.pdf]
De Villiers, C., Venter, E.R. and Hsiao, P.C.K., 2017. Integrated reporting: background, measurement issues, approaches and an agenda for future research. Accounting & Finance, 57(4), pp.937-959. [Link: https://bit.ly/2E3YsSi]
Dumay, J., Bernardi, C., Guthrie, J. and Demartini, P., 2016, September. Integrated reporting: a structured literature review. In Accounting Forum (Vol. 40, No. 3, pp. 166-185). Elsevier. [Link: https://bit.ly/2E45BBL]
Dumay, J., Bernardi, C., Guthrie, J. and La Torre, M., 2017. Barriers to implementing the International Integrated Reporting Framework: A contemporary academic perspective. Meditari Accountancy Research, 25(4), pp.461-480. [Link: https://oro.open.ac.uk/50201/1/50201.PDF]
Eccles, R.G. and Krzus, M.P., 2014. The integrated reporting movement: Meaning, momentum, motives, and materiality. John Wiley & Sons. [Link: https://www.erevalue.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Bob_Eccles_Branded_Chapters-Ch5_and_6.pdf]
Flower, J., 2015. The international integrated reporting council: a story of failure. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 27, pp.1-17. [Link: https://daneshyari.com/article/preview/1001409.pdf]
Haller, A. and van Staden, C., 2014. The value-added statement–an appropriate instrument for Integrated Reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), pp.1190-1216. [Link: https://www.latec.uff.br/mestrado/sites/default/files/documentos-de-apoio/chris_van_staden_2014_1.pdf]
Higgins, C., Stubbs, W. and Love, T., 2014. Walking the talk (s): Organisational narratives of integrated reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), pp.1090-1119. [Link: https://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30066415/higgins-walkingthe-post-2014.pdf]
Monciardini, D., Dumay, J. and Biondi, L., 2017. Integrated reporting and EU law. Competing, converging or complementary regulatory frameworks? [Link: https://bit.ly/2Q5jmqB]
Perego, P., Kennedy, S. and Whiteman, G., 2016. A lot of icing but little cake? Taking integrated reporting forward. Journal of cleaner production, 136, pp.53-64. [Link: https://eprints.lancs.ac.uk/78392/1/Perego_Kennedy_Whiteman_JCLEPRO_IR_16_2_.pdf]
Reimsbach, D., Hahn, R. and Gürtürk, A., 2018. Integrated reporting and assurance of sustainability information: An experimental study on professional investors’ information processing. European Accounting Review, 27(3), pp.559-581. [Link: https://repository.ubn.ru.nl/bitstream/handle/2066/167073/167073a.pdf]
Serafeim, G., 2015. Integrated reporting and investor clientele. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 27(2), pp.34-51. [Link: https://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/12111355/14-069%20(2).pdf?sequence=4]
Simnett, R. and Huggins, A.L., 2015. Integrated reporting and assurance: where can research add value?. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 6(1), pp.29-53. [Link: https://eprints.qut.edu.au/85015/7/85015.pdf]
Stubbs, W. and Higgins, C., 2014. Integrated reporting and internal mechanisms of change. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(7), pp.1068-1089. [Link: https://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30066414/stubbs-integratedreporting-post-2014.pdf]
Thomson, I., 2015. ‘But does sustainability need capitalism or an integrated report’a commentary on ‘The International Integrated Reporting Council: A story of failure’by Flower, J. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 27, pp.18-22. [Link: https://www.academia.edu/download/36255466/A_commentary_no_The_IIRC_a_story_of_failure.pdf]
Veltri, S. and Silvestri, A., 2015. The Free State University integrated reporting: a critical consideration. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16(2), pp.443-462. [Link: https://bit.ly/2SebFe2]
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download