Analyzing The Complexity Of Lewis And Clark Bridge Deck Replacement Project

Design Structure Matrix of Bridge Deck Replacement Project

The successful management of the complex projects has been largely dependent on the continuation of the works and the formation of the successful implication management. The major requirements of the complex project includes fundamental changes in the existing processes of the project.

The complex project managers are responsible for the ultimately optimizing of the resource availability and technical performance. The following assignment had been developed on the case study of Lewis and Clark Bridge Deck Replacement Project, which is a complex project. The completion of the report would help in understanding the complexity level of the project using the design structure matrix (DSM), identification of the constraints and limitation of the project, and tools helpful for management of the varieties of the project.

Design structure matrix of Bridge Deck Replacement Project

The design structure matrix (DSM) is a tool helpful for evaluating the complexity of the Lewis and Clark Bridge Deck Replacement Project. The tool utilizes the task dependencies and using the dependence factor it maps complexity level. The relationship between the complexities of the project can be understood as given in the matrix below,

Phase Save Time On Research and Writing Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper. Get My Paper Tasks	Initialization	Execution	Monitoring	Closing
Project Delivery Method Selection	X	X
Construction of the 5478 feet long bridge	X	X	X	X
Safety and Modulation	X	X	X	X
Addressing to public need	X		X	X

According to the DSM made for the bridge replacement project, the analysis had resulted in identifying that the project delivery method selection and safety and modulation is the most important of all. These two have importance for all the activities of the project considering that the bridge is the final deliverable and its safety development is a crucial aspect. The compilation of the work would be effectively done for constructing the bridge and repairing it. The addressing to the public needs is also important as the construction process might result in traffic issues. Hence, the project should be done in the least possible time, considering the safety factors, and quality of the bridge must be improved.

Peer review Information

Many contractor, project managers, and construction company’s owners should be reviewed while developing the construction of the bridge. The information would provide the option for the grading of the complexities and the formation of the smart information development. The list of the people who helped in providing information for evaluation of the DSM are given below,

First Name	Last Name	Contact Number	Email
Allen	Leigh	+41-*********	[email protected]****mail.com
Rose	White	+41-*********	[email protected]****mail.com
Augrey	Keith	+41-*********	[email protected]****mail.com
Shannon	Jones	+41-*********	[email protected]****mail.com
Barry	Cooper	+41-*********	[email protected]****mail.com
Jill	Jones	+41-*********	[email protected]****mail.com

Constraints and Limitation of Bridge Deck Replacement Project

The Lewis and Clark Bridge Deck Replacement Project involves the construction of the bridge using complex project management concepts and principles. However, the construction of the bridge is not a simple work and it requires the involvement of the work depicted with innovation for adjusting the construction of the works. The constraints and limitations for the project include huge work load, disruption in traffic, treaty between two cities, lack of design build procurement, and cost of work.

Peer review Information

Explanation of the Constraints and Limitation

The following are the constraints and limitations of the Lewis and Clark Bridge Deck Replacement Project,

Constraints	Explanation
Huge Work Load	The project involved the construction of the 5478 feet long bridge between the two cities and hence it required huge amount of work and resources. The undertaking of such work was not a piece of cake.
Disruption in traffic	The bridge allowed the travelling conveyance between Washington and Oregon and on an average of 21,000 vehicles per day use the bridge for traveling. The project would disrupt such load of traffic.
Treaty between two Cities	The project was done after mutual agreement between the two cities of Washington and Oregon and hence, it required negotiations from both the cities.
Lack of Design Build procurement	The design bid build procurement was used as design build procurement was not available then. It resulted in bringing problems for the effective work completion.
Cost of work	The project consumes a huge sum of money for constructing the Lewis and Clark Bridge Deck. The deck replacement involved the cost of materials and labors also.

Reason for varieties in the Project

The major reasons for the varieties of the Lewis and Clark Bridge Deck Replacement Project include,

Complexity Issues: The project involved the construction of the 5478 feet long bridge between the two cities and hence it comprises of site clearing, safety considerations, and information alignment.

Cost Variance Issues: The issues of cost variance is another major factor resulting in issues to the completion of the project. The variance of the cost is based on any requirement change or resource price hike.

Schedule Issues: The completion of the project in tight schedule as the longer project runs, the longer it would impact the transportation on the bridge would also bring about issues in completion of the work.

Tools helpful for Absorption of varieties

The tools helpful for the absorption of the varieties of Lewis and Clark Bridge Deck Replacement Project are,

Incentive Provision: the incentive provision with the bid packages would be helpful for cost controlling and scheduling during the planning and implementation activities.  

Utilization of SPMT: The SPMT would be helpful for transporting the new deck panel from the fabrication site to bridge by inclusion of new technologies.

Communication Plan: Communication plan allowed the sharing of the information and the deployment of the improve activities for the project team.

Graph of External affairs vs. recommended actions

Summary of the complexity of Bridge Deck Replacement Project

The Lewis and Clark Bridge Deck Replacement Project involves the construction of the bridge using complex project management concepts and principles. The project involved the construction of the 5478 feet long bridge between the two cities and hence it required huge amount of work and resources. The bridge allowed the travelling conveyance between Washington and Oregon and on an average of 21,000 vehicles per day use the bridge for traveling. The design bid build procurement was used as design build procurement was not available then.

Conclusion

However, the construction of the bridge was not a simple work and it requires the involvement of the work depicted with innovation for adjusting the construction of the works. The issues of the Lewis and Clark Bridge Deck Replacement Project were Schedule Issues, Complexity Issues, and Cost Issues. The use of Incentive Provision, Utilization of SPMT, and Communication Plan had been helpful for developing effective understanding of the works.

Browning, T. R. (2014). Managing complex project process models with a process architecture framework. International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), 229-241.

Browning, T. R. (2016). Design structure matrix extensions and innovations: a survey and new opportunities. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 63(1), 27-52.

Cooke-Davies, T. (2011, August). Aspects of complexity: Managing projects in a complex world. Project Management Institute.

Fisher, C. M., Pillemer, J., & Amabile, T. M. (2018). Deep help in complex project work: Guiding and path-clearing across difficult terrain. Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), 1524-1553.

Jun, J. H. (2018). An abductive approach to Design Structure Matrix (DSM) partitioning using frequency domain scoring(Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).

Rose, K. H. (2012). Aspects of Complexity: Managing Projects in a Complex World. Project Management Journal, 43(3), 77-77.

Yao, X., Zhou, J., Li, Y., & Liu, E. (2016). An Enhanced Collaborative Optimization Approach with Design Structure Matrix Algorithms to Group and Decouple Multidisciplines. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2016.