Environmental And Sustainable Design For Nature

Advantages and Disadvantages of Sustainable Development

Discuss about the Environmental and Sustainable Design for Nature.

Sustainable design is an outline approach set up to advance the environmental quality and the nature of building indoor condition by mitigating the negative effects on building and the regular habitat. Additionally, it is an outline rationality that looks to join the sustainable development idea as far as activities and qualities into economical building envelope plan (Roy et al., 2017). Nonetheless, the issue is with respect to what constitutes the sustainable idea required for sustainable envelope outline. It is also called green building and is the design and development of items that ration characteristic assets and apply the littlest conceivable effect on nature. Traditional building plans endeavor to limit cost and expand execution. Green building frequently brings about items that are neither the most pocket friendly nor the most durable, yet designers and buyers over the globe are understanding that sustainability is a basic element.

Some of the advantages of sustainable development include:

• Bring down working expenses through streamlined plan – particularly as far as energy, cleaning and upkeep,
• An image boost for proprietors and clients: sustainable development as a major aspect of the corporate procedure (corporate social obligation, atmosphere lack of bias system, fulfilled clients on account of essentially more elevated amounts of comfort)
• Higher consistency and better structural integrity,
• Enhanced marketing options (courtesy of more client comfort and lower costs for clients) bring down opportunity rates, increase the property’s market value, and increase rental rates.

As with any technological advancement however, there are always a few disadvantages. While national measures are a beginning stage there is a genuine danger of making a beeline for the most reduced common element – with normal results. To be honest any change to the present lodging stock would be a decent move (Häkkinen and Belloni, 2011). Creative thoughts should be encouraged. The basic issue is an absence of expertise among the experts and inside the more extensive group despite the fact that a significant number of the manageability ideas are exceptionally straightforward: like confronting structural design the correct way or expanding the measure of warm mass, protection, ventilation and characteristic lighting (Hoyer et al., 2011).

Another issue occurs with engineers. They create houses and flats available to be purchased or rent while normally seeing no advantages in actualizing measures to decrease the running expenses or enhance the solace levels. At present, a larger number of the buyers aren’t sufficiently wise to welcome the genuine advantages of sustainable structures (Åstebøl et al., 2004).

One of the major aims of the sustainable management plan is to ensure the effective reduction of greenhouse gases. This not only reduces the overall economic aspect of the residency but also protects the environment. As an environmental conservation effort, sustainability is achieved when need for carbon fuels and for energy generation are needed (Burton et al., 2003).

This is the quality that describes the occupational condition of a building with respect to the occupants of the building (Watson, 2003). The IEQ of any residential structure can be increased using a wide array of sustainable means which include:

Reduction of Carbon Emissions

Use of daylight: this alternative to electrical lighting tackles both economic sustainability, environmental friendliness and occupant comfort at a go. As an alternative to electricity, it can be exploited during the time of day when the sun is out which reducing the cost of lighting. This in turn saves on the natural resources e.g. environmentally pollutant fossil fuels used to generate this electricity and reduces the overall cost of lighting as it is free.

Use of natural ventilation: this includes providing the rooms of the structure with accessible openings that can actually be opened and closed at will. In a residential structure like this one, ventilation holes could be provided to allow for smooth flow of air into and out of the building without human interruption.

Ergonomics: this includes the furniture in use by the building’s occupants. It provides for a sustainable environment by increasing user comfort and health at no extra expense. The only cost and natural resource implication would be a one-time payment happening just once.

Cleanliness: a clean environment reduces the chance of getting sick and overall user discomfort due to unpleasant scents. This allows for the occupants to spend more time in the building and enjoy the environment in it.

This is achieved by substituting appliances and applications that would otherwise consume high amounts of electricity power with other alternatives that depend either wholly on naturally occurring resources or methods and appliances that consume less energy than the former. As seen in the indoor environmental energy generation and usage patterns, most energy used in the house can be replaced by renewable energy sources e.g. solar panels. Presently, the design of the house attached includes a flat roof to provide for solar panel installation (Chance, 2009).

This falls into the reduction of carbon emissions category simply because of the residential dwelling set-up. Naturally, urban ecology is the footprint human being leave on nature during the settlement process. It is the practices of human beings interacting with a delicate environment as the natural state of this environment reduces further to pave way for a growing human population and settlement scheme. The design of the house provided seeks to reduce this effect by employing reasonable space utility with ample space allocated for naturally green activities. As the house has maximized the horizontal space by going upwards instead of laterally, tree planting and vegetation growth can happen within the space and allow for more carbon intake by the plants. This ultimately reduces carbon emissions and allows for a more oxygenated and healthy environment (Grant, 2012).

Indoor Environmental Quality

While the name suggests that this is the process of reducing the building materials of the construction, it also means increasing the quality of the structure so as to prevent further repairs and replacements. It also means the reduction of the materials and resources used by the occupants of the building during the day to day practices occurring within the building (Seyfang, 2010). Some of these practices include:

Presently, the major products of the extraction industry apart from energy generating plants are building and appliance materials. As such, it can be noted that one of the highest contributors to environmental degradation is the human settlement practice. As this happens, trees are usually cut while other materials mined to produce an end product that not only caters for construction needs but is also strong. This house however is designed with the provision of accommodating a wide variety of environmental friendly materials. These materials can be precast structures, reclaimed building material and recycled materials too. This will help bearing the environmentally conscious attitude during a construction site (Fowler, 2006).

Transport to and from the house during the construction and occupation period should remain sustainable. This is means that, the distance travelled to and from the main destination areas including work and school should be such that, minimal travel time is used or travel distance is covered. During the construction process, the proximity of the site to the source of materials is usually a factor to consider as it may affect the total overall cost of haulage. The travel distance also ultimately determines the amount of fuel used in commuting to and from the points of interests and this leads to more or less carbon emissions depending on the distance.

The process of managing the construction of the building and the site itself offers a variety of ways in which proper material saving techniques. As mentioned earlier, the practice of using materials more than once either by reclamation or by recycling provides for the reduction of wastes in the sites. This results in a better building energy efficiently. The methods of waste disposal in this case can also aid in the reduction of building costs and the carbon footprints. Site health and safety operations are also activities that keep a site sustainable as the employees are the main partakers of practices that increase sustainability in construction.

The use of water in a residential house is a fundamental part of ensuring that the water is conserved and is used in a sustainable fashion. In such a building, there are various options to provide for the water needed for the various needs in the house. It is important to therefore draw up the 2 levels of sanitation needed for the various purposes for which the water will be required (Morrison, 2010).

Energy Efficiency

In the first level of cleanliness, clean drinking water is required. This can be obtained from the rain through the use of a gutter system provided the roofing material is safe. The rainwater in most cases only contains a few compounds which are only mixed into the water during the precipitation process. While this is free, it also helps reduce pressure on the state or government provided water. While the residents may not fully switch to rain as the source of clean drinking water, it can be a good supplement to buying (Bauer et al., 2009).

In the other level of cleanliness, the water required need not be totally free from pathogens. It can therefore be supplied from a nearby detention basin in case the local area administration or local authorities provide for such a feature. This would not only aid in the preservation of the environment by protecting the soil from erosion, it also saves up on the cost of water. A waste sanitization system e.g. bio digester and septic tank could also be used to provide water that is clean to a certain degree that can be used for a variety of external applications e.g. plan watering, agriculture, vehicle washing etc. (Kilbert, 2016).

With the current technological trends currently being seen in the market, sustainability is fairly possible depending one’s preference. In this case, the developer could choose to go with a prefabricated structure made up of materials that have either been reclaimed, recycled or sourced from a renewable source. This helps ease up the pressure on material extraction.

There are also some building management systems that allow for smart monitoring of the energy usage in building and regulation to control power. These are recommendable for this building to maximize on its overall sustainability (Maliene and Malys, 2009).

Waste management incorporates all exercises and administrations that rotate around gathering, arranging and reducing waste. In managing the waste generated and disposed, the designers tries to utilize the best advancements and strategies available while also attempting to secure natural and public health. Generally, where there are such a significant number of clean, elective approaches to create control that the risk of depleting our characteristic assets is everlastingly put to rest (Kennedy, 2009). The management practices can be applied: 

• Where “reduce, reuse, and recycle” turn into the watchwords of each family and friends in the region.
• Where organizations take an initiative position by putting resources into cleaner innovations with the goal that air contamination turns into a relic of times gone by.
• Where the earth is regarded and each activity is gone for recuperation and rebuilding.
• Where Waste Management accomplices with its clients to utilize our insight and experience to their advantage and the advantage of the planet, driving them to new, economical arrangements and working with each connection in the inventory network to address the whole life cycle of an item.
• Where Waste Management’s sense of duty regarding brilliance and administration has situated us to convey enduring answers for the natural difficulties our planet will look in the 21st century.

This technique incorporates permeable asphalt, clearing stones or blocks of concrete. All of these pervious materials enable precipitation to permeate through ranges that would generally be impenetrable and rather the tempest water invades through to the dirt beneath. The infiltration limit of the local soil is a key outline thought for deciding the depth of base material for storm water stockpiling and deciding regardless of whether an under deplete framework is required. These pervious surfaces permit groundwater recharging, while catching the contaminants (Water, 2014).

Urban Ecology

Conclusion

For the residential property shown in the drawing, the possibilities of sustainability are sufficient with the option to pursue one or more of those sustainable management plans. It is noteworthy that these plans are mutually independent of each other and while they may complement each other, they can work without each other. As such, the sustainability of the entire development could either be cheaper or more expensive depending on the options and choices a developer would go with.

References:

Åstebøl, S.O., Hvitved-Jacobsen, T. and Simonsen, Ø., 2004. Sustainable storm water management at Fornebu—from an airport to an industrial and residential area of the city of Oslo, Norway. Science of the total environment, 334, pp.239-249.

Barbosa, A.E., Fernandes, J.N. and David, L.M., 2012. Key issues for sustainable urban storm water management. Water research, 46(20), pp.6787-6798.

Bauer, M., Mösle, P. and Schwarz, M., 2009. Green building: guidebook for sustainable architecture. Springer Science & Business Media.

Burton, E., Jenks, M. and Williams, K. eds., 2003. The compact city: a sustainable urban form? Routledge.

Chance, T., 2009. Towards sustainable residential communities; the Beddington Zero Energy Development (BedZED) and beyond. Environment and Urbanization, 21(2), pp.527-544.

Energy, S.O., 2013. Sources of energy.

Fowler, K.M. and Rauch, E.M., 2006. Sustainable building rating systems summary (No. PNNL-15858). Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (US).

Friedman, A., 2007. Sustainable residential development. McGraw-Hill.

Grant, G., 2012. Ecosystem services come to town: greening cities by working with nature. John Wiley & Sons.

Häkkinen, T. and Belloni, K., 2011. Barriers and drivers for sustainable building. Building Research & Information, 39(3), pp.239-255.

Hoyer, J., Dickhaut, W., Kronawitter, L. and Weber, B., 2011. Water sensitive urban design: principles and inspiration for sustainable storm water management in the city of the future. Hamburg, Germany: Jovis.

Kennedy, J. ed., 2009. Building Without Borders: sustainable construction for the global village. New Society Publishers.

Kibert, C.J., 2016. Sustainable construction: green building design and delivery. John Wiley & Sons.

Maliene, V. and Malys, N., 2009. High-quality housing—A key issue in delivering sustainable communities. Building and Environment, 44(2), pp.426-430.

Morison, P., 2010. Management of Urban Storm water: Advancing Program Design and Evaluation, School of Geography and Environmental Science. Monash University, Melbourne.

Roy, A.H., Wenger, S.J., Fletcher, T.D., Walsh, C.J., Ladson, A.R., Shuster, W.D., Thurston, H.W. and Brown, R.R., 2008. Impediments and solutions to sustainable, watershed-scale urban storm water management: lessons from Australia and the United States. Environmental management, 42(2), pp.344-359.

Seyfang, G., 2010. Community action for sustainable housing: Building a low-carbon future. Energy Policy, 38(12), pp.7624-7633.

Water, M., 2014. Water sensitive urban design. Retrieved from https://www.wsud.melbournewater.com.au.

Watson, D., Plattus, A.J., Shibley, R.G. and Watson, D., 2003. Time-saver standards for urban design. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Wong, P., Rann, M. and Maywald, K., 2009. Media release-Go ahead for $150 million in storm water projects. Government of South Australia (Ed.), Adelaide, Australia.