Question:
Discuss about the Impact of Performance Risk on the Strategic Alliance.
The strategic alliance can be referred to the agreement among various parties regarding pursuing a collection of agreed upon goals and objectives required. Overseeing risk in key cooperation is more mind boggling in joint wander firms than in singular firms. My endeavor in this paper is to set up a far reaching and coordinated system by broadening the current speculations about risk administration in vital organization together. This paper distinguishes two essential sorts of risk in between firm collusion social risk and execution chance[1].
The study includes the description of the risks of strategic alliance, especially performance and relational risks along with the issues regarding the decentralized decision making.
Performance Risk:
Performance risk is the probability which, intended strategic objectives of an merger probably may not obtain. It may cause even if relationship and cooperation among the partners are adequate. Their risk sources incorporate ecological variables such as war, financial subsidence and approach advertise factors such as rivalry and request variance and interior components such as calculated framework and machines. Execution chance is a piece of each key choice. It is a Firm-Environment communication. The essential refinement between social risk and execution is that while social risk is made when manufacturing between firm organizations together, some execution risk can be shared and alleviated through between firm collusions. Moreover, same as social risk three fundamental factors that may add to an abnormal state of execution chance[2].
In comparison with the other mergers, performance risk will be assumed to be a greater in inter-firm mergers along with a distributed research and development entity. On account of the eccentric idea of R&D exercises, execution risk in collusions, which manage R&D, is significantly higher than those without R&D segments[3]. There is no territory inside which instability is higher and the need to facilitate more noteworthy than in the improvement and commercialization of new innovation.
The performance risk is proportional to the non-recoverability of the investment. One important source of performance risk in inter-firm alliances appears to be the non-recoverable investments made in a particular alliance. These non-recoverable investments cause higher performance risk, since their value will be significantly discounted if employed for purposes other than the initial alliance[4].
Risk Mitigation: The following are the process of mitigating the performance risk in strategic alliance.
Control: Control assumes the part of checking and ensuring that exercises are being done by design, and in partnerships, control can be accomplished through administration structures, authoritative determinations, administrative courses of action, and other more casual instruments. In this manner, powerful control fills in as a key determinant of impeccable collusion execution. Output control fills in as an alert, which reminds the supervisors when the level of execution risk ascends to unsafe levels. Henceforth: the yield control is extremely applicable for overseeing execution chance.
Financial Investor’s Responsibility: The financial investor makes sure that the alliance is making enough profit. Financial investor ensures the investment recoverability. He/she also distributes the technology to the users[5].
Technology Investor’s Responsibility: the technical investor improves the utility of the technology. This is achieved by the modifying the technology constantly and spreading technology to more users.
Physical Investor’s Responsibility: Enhance responsiveness and flexibility to market. Constructing competence trust is also a vital process of this investor.
Managerial Investor’s Responsibility: The managerial investor makes sure that managerial efficiency is properly done.
Relational Risk:
Relational Risk is referred to the worry that organizations may not work towards the shared interests of the accomplices, consequently, they may not collaborate in a way indicated in the collusion course of action or of course by their accomplices, and the thought processes of such harsh conduct can be either judicious or silly.
Mitigation: The mitigation process is as following.
Behavior control and risk will make managers capable of monitoring the staffs, thereby avoiding opportunistic behaviours, which in turn will lower the relational risk.
A major equity position is taken by the financial investor
Technical investor protects the technology
Physical investor is responsible for embedding the partners
Managerial investors construct goodwill trust
Decentralized Decision Making in Supply Chain:
In supply chain management producing stream lines comprise of at least two work territories, masterminded in arrangement as well as in parallel, with halfway capacity regions. The principal work region forms crude things and the last work range produces end things or items, which are put away in a capacity region in expectation of future request[6]. Right off the bat directors ought to dissect and compose the long haul generation advancing the creation arranging of the production network. Also, they need to upgrade the transient generation breaking down and sorting out the creation booking of the production network lastly thinking about the stochasticity of this present reality, chiefs need to dissect and compose the execution of the store network receiving the best control strategy[7]. In store network administration creation arranging is the way toward deciding a speculative arrangement for how much generation will happen in the following a few eras, amid an interim of time called the arranging skyline.
Leadership in Decentralized Decision Making:
The main issue regarding leadership in the decentralized decision making is creating a shared purpose. It is a dependable fact that Millennials are, well, unique. They are propelled in an unexpected way, they convey distinctively and they settle on choices in an unexpected way. Cognizant free enterprise – where organizations concentrate on conveying long haul an incentive through reason, energy and shared goals is the long-diversion methodology to pulling in the present best ability[8].
Another challenge regarding the leadership is that there is no constant definition of success. The leaders could not understand which defines the success of the decision making. This leads to another issue such as building trust. The definition of success can be different for different personnel and executives and clash of ideas can be issue regarding trust building.
Mitigation Process: There are several processes through which the leadership related issues can be mitigated effectively and efficiently. The processes are as following.
Developing a shared purpose for the leaders and personnel helps facing leadership issues in decentralized decision making. The top management executives will conduct meeting with the leaders and recognize the proper way of shared purpose. The purpose will be developed in such way that it will assist the organization to achieve its objectives[9].
The higher management will communicate with all the leaders about the objectives and processes they are carrying out to make individual procedure successful. As the CEO and other management staff will have data regarding every organizational process, they will analyze all the decisions that leaders make and decide whether the decision is able to achieve success for the organization or not.
Problem 1: Pricing Problem:
The pricing problem in closed loop supply chain is because of one retailer and a dominant manufacturer. The variations of the remanufacturing cost and collection cost of user products are very uncertain in the closed supply chain system[10]. There are no detailed discussion regarding the problems of symmetric and asymmetric information in closed up loop supply chain. There is also lack of providing the information of the processes that can be used by the retailers for dealing with this problem.
Problem 2: Pricing Decisions:
Making proper and effective pricing decision It is very important to the organizations because it shows assessment of the marketers about the value, which the people see in the products and services and what they are desiring to pay for that product [11]. The authors can concentrate on providing the name and details of the strategies regarding managing retail prices and collection prices. In the future work, more focus can be put into discussing why pricing decision relies on the product selection in the supply chain system.
Problem 3: Profit Maximization:
The Bullwhip effect is an essential part of the logistics. The authors in the future work commit their efforts in providing the information regarding the actors that contribute to the Bullwhip effect[12]. This will allow the others to interact with the term more properly.
Conclusion:
From the above study, it can be concluded that the performance risk has more impact on the strategic alliance than relational risk. The performance risk can also be mitigated through the trust factor along with control but control has better impact on the performance. Supply chain management is a crucial aspect of any business and proper decision making has a great impact on the processes of this part of an organization. The decentralized decision making is the future of the decision making. However, there are various issues that needs to be addressed before applying it to SCM.
Albers, Sascha, Franz Wohlgezogen, and Edward J. Zajac. “Strategic alliance structures: An organization design perspective.” Journal of Management 42, no. 3 (2016): 582-614.
Brouthers, Keith D., George Nakos, and Pavlos Dimitratos. “SME entrepreneurial orientation, international performance, and the moderating role of strategic alliances.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 39, no. 5 (2015): 1161-1187.
Champagne, François, Louise Lemieux-Charles, Marie-France Duranceau, Gail MacKean, and Trish Reay. “Organizational impact of evidence-informed decision making training initiatives: a case study comparison of two approaches.” Implementation Science 9, no. 1 (2014): 53.
Gomes, Emanuel, Bradley R. Barnes, and Tehmina Mahmood. “A 22 year review of strategic alliance research in the leading management journals.” International business review 25, no. 1 (2016): 15-27.
Hayashida, Karen Yukari, Andrea Bernardes, Vanessa Gomes Maziero, and Carmen Silvia Gabriel. “Decision-making of the nursing team after the revitalization of a decentralized management model.” Texto & Contexto-Enfermagem 23, no. 2 (2014): 286-293.
Jiang, Xu, Feifei Jiang, Xinlei Cai, and Heng Liu. “How does trust affect alliance performance? The mediating role of resource sharing.” Industrial Marketing Management 45 (2015): 128-138.
Schmitt, Amanda J., Siyuan Anthony Sun, Lawrence V. Snyder, and Zuo-Jun Max Shen. “Centralization versus decentralization: Risk pooling, risk diversification, and supply chain disruptions.” Omega 52 (2015): 201-212.
Stadtler, Hartmut. “Supply chain management: An overview.” In Supply chain management and advanced planning, pp. 3-28. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2015.
Xu, Nai-Ru, Jia-Bao Liu, De-Xun Li, and Jun Wang. “Research on evolutionary mechanism of agile supply chain network via complex network theory.” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2016.
Xua, X., Liub, J. Lid, Y &Zhoue, X. Pricing Strategy of Closed-Loop Supply Chain Under Disruptions. Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics,2016.
Zheng, Wang, &Liu. Retail Services and Pricing Decisions in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Remanufacturing. Sustainability, 2015.
journals.” International business review 25, no. 1 (2016): 15-27.
Brouthers, Keith D., George Nakos, and Pavlos Dimitratos. “SME entrepreneurial orientation, international performance, and the moderating role of strategic alliances.” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 39, no. 5 (2015): 1161-1187.
Jiang, Xu, Feifei Jiang, Xinlei Cai, and Heng Liu. “How does trust affect alliance performance? The mediating role of resource sharing.” Industrial Marketing Management 45 (2015): 128-138.
Albers, Sascha, Franz Wohlgezogen, and Edward J. Zajac. “Strategic alliance structures: An organization design perspective.” Journal of Management 42, no. 3 (2016): 582-614.
Gomes, Emanuel, Bradley R. Barnes, and Tehmina Mahmood. “A 22 year review of strategic alliance research in the leading management journals.” International business review 25, no. 1 (2016): 15-27.
Stadtler, Hartmut. “Supply chain management: An overview.” In Supply chain management and advanced planning, pp. 3-28. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2015.
Schmitt, Amanda J., Siyuan Anthony Sun, Lawrence V. Snyder, and Zuo-Jun Max Shen. “Centralization versus decentralization: Risk pooling, risk diversification, and supply chain disruptions.” Omega 52 (2015): 201-212.
Hayashida, Karen Yukari, Andrea Bernardes, Vanessa Gomes Maziero, and Carmen Silvia Gabriel. “Decision-making of the nursing team after the revitalization of a decentralized management model.” Texto & Contexto-Enfermagem 23, no. 2 (2014): 286-293.
Champagne, François, Louise Lemieux-Charles, Marie-France Duranceau, Gail MacKean, and Trish Reay. “Organizational impact of evidence-informed decision making training initiatives: a case study comparison of two approaches.” Implementation Science 9, no. 1 (2014): 53.
Zheng, Wang, &Liu. Retail Services and Pricing Decisions in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Remanufacturing. Sustainability, 2015.
Xua, X., Liub, J. Lid, Y &Zhoue, X. Pricing Strategy of Closed-Loop Supply Chain Under Disruptions. Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics,2016.
Xu, Nai-Ru, Jia-Bao Liu, De-Xun Li, and Jun Wang. “Research on evolutionary mechanism of agile supply chain network via complex network theory.” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2016.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
