PART 1
The key objective of this section is to provide an overview of partnership and company as two feasible business structures along with noteworthy attributes.
The basis of partnership relationship is found in agency relationship which highlights the relation between principal and agent. In partnership, there are multiple owners who are called the partners. These partners tend to act in the capacity of agent when representing the other partners to other parties whereby act as principal when are being represented by other partners. Hence, owing to this inter-relationship within the partners, it is expected that the partners would act faithfully thereby safeguarding the interest of all the partners. This is because any contract which an authorised partner executes with any party, such a contract would be binding on the remaining partners as indicated in the Lang v James Morrison & Co Ltd case
From a legal perspective, the partnership firms need to comply with three conditions which have been specified in s.1 Partnership Act 1892 (NSW). One of these requires that partnerships conduct business on an ongoing basis rather than limiting to isolated transactions which usually is not regarded as partnership. The business ownership and operations need to be assumed as common whereby all the partners are collectively responsible. Also, in line with the judgement announced in the Bond Corporation Holdings Ltd & Anor v Grace Bros Holdings Ltd & Ors case, the partnership needs to be run with the motive of earning profit which is why clubs are not considered as partnerships
A key feature of a partnership firm is that it is recognised by the constituent partners and lacks a legal identify that is separate from that of partners. As a result, the contracts that the partnership firm enters for business are essentially entered by the partners. The consequence of this understanding is that the contractual rights and obligations arising from these contracts are also attributed to the partners. Hence, it is not surprising that partners would be held personally liable for any unsettled business liability of the partnership firm. It is noteworthy that this personal liability of the partners can potentially be limited if instead of general partnership, there is a limited partnership or Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) in place. Also, the partnership firm is dissolved if there is any change in the partners since it lacks an independent legal status. The formation of the partnership firm is based on the partnership agreement between the partners which governs all the major aspects of the partnership particularly profit sharing.
The various aspects of the company are defined by the Corporations Act 2001. A key characteristic of company is the separate legal; identity it enjoys that is independent of the owners. This implies that the assets and liabilities of the company and shareholders are separate. Further, the contractual relationships required to conduct the business are entered in company’s name and is enacted through the authorised agents in accordance with Corporations Act 2001. For these contracts, the rights and obligations are directed to the company and the owners are insulated. This understanding has been developed more than a century ago with the verdict in the Salomon v A Salomon and Co Ltd . However, over the years there has been a abuse of this separate identity where owners have tried to commit fraud and other wrongful activities. Thus, in such cases, the courts have resorted to piercing the veil thereby doing away with the limited immunity of the shareholders to understand the true relationship between the company and owner.
Considering that company existence is independent of the owners or shareholders, hence till the time of de-registration, a company theoretically continues to exist. This is facilitated by the share transfer which allows existing investors to exit and new investors to enter. Another aspect to be noticed about the company is that the incorporation of company is a tedious affair with mandatory ASIC registration coupled with unique name and clarity on internal management and directors. Also, for running the company, there are a host of regulations which need to be complied depending on the type of company incorporated.
PART 2
Advantages
Disadvantages
The optimal business structure for the clients would be partnership. The primarily reason for the same is that the partnership firm would allow the clients to establish a business at the earliest and thereby allow immediate entry into a competitive market. Also, the business is primarily service dominated with limited finance requirement which make partnership a suitable structure. Also, considering that clients are setting a new business, partnership firm would enable avoidance of compliance costs that are associated with company. Also, the nature of the business is regulated which would clearly demonstrate the applicable standards of customer conduct and hence help in avoiding claims and resolving the issue of personal liability for the partners.
PART 3
At the turn of the 21st century, there were some high profile bankruptcies in Australia involving established listed firms such as OneTel, ABC Learning and HIH Insurance. On close scrutiny in all these cases, the role of the directors stood out. As a result, when the Corporations Law 2001 was enacted, the duties of directors were included so as to provide it a statutory status and also prescribe punishments for breach of various duties. A prominent case involving potential breach of duties of directors after the statute had come into effect was the ASIC v Adler (2002) case.
In this case, the defendants were some directors of HIH Insurance including the managing director. This case was brought about by ASIC with the claim that the directors of the company had not been complaint with the directors duties outlined under statute law and also common law. As a result, it was felt that directors must be personally held responsible for the consequences and losses to the investors. This was imperative as in the past the directors typically were given only civil penalties. The critical aspects related to this case which are noteworthy for directors in general have been briefly discussed below.
One of the most important duties bestowed on directors is that they should take decisions after having conducted adequate diligence so that there is no negligent action on their part which may breach duty to care which directors owe to the owners. This is as per s.180(1) Corporations Act 2001. There was a clear breach of this duty in the Adler case as the conduct of the directors was driven not by company’s interests but by their own motives and to fulfil the same, the erring directors provided $10 million financial assistance without due discussion with the appropriate committee and board of directors. It was apparent that this failure on the part of the directors was not driven by circumstances or any rational prudence but on account of conflict of interest. In such a scenario, the defence of business judgement rule provided under s. 180(2) could not be granted to the erring directors.
The directors yield a high quantum of power with regards to decision making in company on crucial aspects and s. 182 expects that this power must not be abused in extending benefit to other parties at the company’s cost. The conduct of the directors clearly was in violation of the expectation as there was abuse of the power resulting in financial assistance extension for the sake of ensuring that the directors could liquidate their share holdings at a high price. Further, the directors may have access to private price sensitive information which as per s. 183 directors are not supposed to reap person benefits. In Adler case, crucial price sensitive information was passed on thereby allowing for share price manipulation which amounted to breach of this duty.
Another duty which Corporations Act 2001 bestows on the company’s directors is as per s. 181 which highlights that faithful conduct ought to be present. This is imperative as dishonest conduct is detrimental to the interest of shareholders and the company alike. The directors in HIH Insurance did not acted in good faith and took actions which were not driven by the shareholders’ interest but instead aimed for serving their own interest. It is apparent that in the Adler case, there were violations in accordance to s. 180, s. 181, s.182 and s.183. Owing to the above breaches, the court banned the erring directors from acting as director for period of 10 years and 20 years. Additionally, hefty fines were also imposed on the two erring directors. However, it is to be noted that in relation to duties of directors being breached, there are provisions with regards to capital punishment especially when fraud is involved.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download