Sustainability is defined as the practice of using the resources judiciously, so that the future generation gets adequate resources for the fulfilment of their needs, demands and requirements. Within this, challenges are an inevitable, which acts as an obstacle in the performing the activities (Fischer 2015). Systems prove effective in upgrading the approach of the personnel towards the execution of the allocated duties and responsibilities. Information technology enhances the thought process and knowledge horizons towards the aspects, which they have to deal in their workplace. In terms of resolving the challenges, system thinking is an effective option. Herein lays the complementary nature of the variables system thinking and sustainability issues. This essay attempts to discuss the role of system thinking towards resolving the challenges towards sustainability from the perspective of ageing workforce in the threshold of Australia.
Systems can be considered as a separate parts, working towards a common goal. These systems add value to the thought process of the humans. The three important parts of a system are purpose, elements and functions. The first part of the system is the system test, which enhances the awareness regarding the purpose for which the system has been adopted. The second part relates to the different aspects of system thinking. The final step is the projection of interrelationship between the different parts of the system (Bocken, Rana and Short 2015).
These steps are essential in terms of solving the issues, which the individuals encounter in the process of executing the basic activities. In terms of solving the sustainability issues also, system thinking plays a vital role. The diversified feature of the systems expands the scope and arena of traditional thinking, which confines the individuals within a boundary. This obstructs the mental growth and development of ageing people. System thinking presents the broader version of the things, which expands the thought horizons for the individuals (Plack et al. 2018).
According to the previous researches, it has been found that system thinking has overpowered traditional thinking. This is in terms of its diverse application in various fields regarding the achievement of effective solutions for the complex problems. The issue of ageing workforce in Australia is taken as the wicked problem to be discussed in this essay.
Ageing workforce are tenured. Their experience helps them in enhancing their professional development. Their old age is sometimes problematic in terms of memorizing the aspects in terms of executing the activities. However, systems need to be credited for assisting the individuals in gaining effective solutions to the complex problems (Clayton and Radcliffe 2015). Upon gaining complicated projects, the most immediate expression of the old age personnel is panicking, which leads to negative results. For the achievement of success, the sustainability challenges need to be addressed in a logical and rational manner. Herein lays the effectiveness of system thinking, which establishes essential relationship between technology, humans and environmental impacts.
Owing to the globalization, there has been a radical change in the thought processes. From computational thinking, the focus has been shifted to system thinking. Computational thinking is limited within the algorithmic calculations, which cannot solve the challenges like climactic changes (Missimer, Robèrt and Broman 2017). On the other hand, system thinking possesses the flexibility to formulate interactions between the essential constituents of the aspects. Typical example of this can be the search engine optimization towards dealing with the sudden climactic changes. This helps the old staffs in gaining knowledge on the aspects, which they might forget while performing the tasks.
According to Fischer (2015), ageing factor in the old personnel necessitates the need for developing automatic tools for enhancing their professional experience. Design thinking is applied in the design engineering and business, which provides the staffs with efficient and effective solutions for the complicated problems like checking the benefit, which they would get for working on holidays. Here, system thinking indicates the usage of logical inference for solving these type of critical issues. Logical inference includes observation, theoretical considerations, which helps in the projection of collaborative output. Consciousness towards this approach is termed as abductive reasoning, which requires the decision maker to adopt innovative solutions. This type of reasoning is effective for the ageing workforce in terms of exposing logical approach towards execution of the tasks (Bocken et al. 2014). Typical example of this can awareness programs, which informs the people about the precautionary measures, which they are to take for preventing the destructions through climactic changes.
Elements of system thinking is flexible enough for increasing the adapatability towards the challenges, which the individuals encounter. System thinking is usually a set of skills and process, into which technology adds value. The application of scientific method towards understanding enhances the skills, capabilities and learning. Applying this process enhances the confidence of the staffs regarding resolving the sustainability issues in an efficient and effective manner (Bhamra and Lofthouse 2016). System thinking broadens the horizons of skills for the individuals, which enables them to think of diversified solutions for the sustainability issues. These skills are dynamic thinking, system-as-cause thinking, operational thinking, feedback loop thinking among others, which sharpens the memories of the ageing workforce in the companies and organizations of Australia.
Difficult learning system obstructs the way of thinking for the common people, who do not have access to the latest and modern technologies. The old age people lack the skills of surfing the latest and modern technologies, which limits their scope and arena of expertise. At this stage, improving the performance becomes mere hope, as it aggravates the complexities in terms of estimating the outcomes. Moreover, dynamic complexities degrades the capabilities towards mental simulation (Stafford et al. 2017). Herein lays the need for training, which enhances the preconceived skills, expertise and knowledge of the employees. Technological training proves beneficial in upgrading the mental simulation of the staffs. Proper guidance and motivation enables the staffs to project appropriate approach towards system thinking.
According to the arguments of Doppelt (2017), at the initial stage, framing the issue is crucial in terms of attaching proper value to the sustainability issue, which is to be dealt. In the next step, awareness about the issue is created, so that the actual operations towards resolving the issues can be commenced. After this, testing the understanding of the staffs is important. This assessment is crucial in terms of making estimates towards the projects and their completion. Meetings come next for communicating and implementing the proposed plans and strategies. Here, proper and relevant communication is important for gaining the trust, loyalty and dependence of the service users (Andrews 2015). Taking into consideration social media helps in transmitting the messages to large number of audience at the same time. Group discussions on social media can enhance the knowledge of the ageing workforce in Australia.
In the present business context, sustainability is gaining prominence. In order to enhance the efficiency, the personnel need to incorporate system thinking for the achievement of sustainable development. As a matter of specification, catering to the needs of the stakeholders reflects the conscious approach towards enhancing the parameters of economic, social and environmental. Ensuring the presence of value creation within the process of decision making is considered as sustainable business thinking. Usage of business models assists in projecting innovative approach towards the sustaining the resources for the future generation (Kerkhoff, L., 2014). Typical components of the business model are design, production, supply chains, partnership and distribution channels. These components together form important role in planning the knowledge enrichment of the old age workforce in Australia.
Value mapping tool has gained popularity in terms of practicising sustainable business model innovation. Value mapping is assistance in terms of gaining awareness towards the value created for the stakeholders through the suggestion of prospective solutions for preserving the memory of the old age staffs from getting destroyed.
According to Broman. and Robèrt (2017), system thinking is a wonderful aspect in terms of catering to the health needs of the people. The aged staffs can check for solutions to improve their health conditions on the internet. Now trainings are organized for the old age staffs, which enhances their thought process. Making use of the systems to find solutions for the health issues is now easy, as they have the system to find latest and modern medicines to cure the diseases and ailments of the older people. For the trainers, systems are the means for improving the quality of the curriculum (Mochizuki and Bryan 2015). On the other hand, the ageing workforce is of the opinion that the systems prove beneficial in providing them with interprofessional education. This is because they can indulge in conferences with the professors regarding clearing the doubts, which they are facing in the process of availing the system thinking.
Systems are also used for mitigating the errors within the execution of the allocated activities. Along with this, systems thinking, in terms of health, also relates to the advocacy in terms of ensuring that proper and relevant medication is provided to the ageing workforce, who have been affected with memory loss, cardiac arrest among others (Kläy, Zimmermann and Schneider 2015). Using internet access enhances the preconceived knowledge of the people towards the medicines, which possesses flexibility to cure the diseases and ailments of such ageing workforce.
The model is used for its conformity with the conventional divisions of the disciplines, where the empirical knowledge is transmitted. There are three components of the model- natural system, social system and economic system. Conglomeration of natural and social system results in the socio-ecological interactions, which bestows effective solutions for preserving the ecological biodiversity. Typical example of this is the interaction between the environmentalists for making plans to detect the climactic changes and issue prior warnings.
Social and economic systems combine to form socio-economic interactions. Typical example of this is the preparation of budget, which enhances the awareness towards the expenditures towards taking the training of the ageing workforce (Xu, Marinova and Guo 2015). As a matter of specification, it results in intergenerational and intragenerational equity. One of the limitations of the model is the graphical representations, which most of the ageing staffs do not have access to the technologies. This is due to the lack of training. Triple bottom lines along with the overlapping between the circles indicate equal weightage between the systems. This equality fails to properly project the basic essence of sustainability (Marshall, Coleman and Reason 2017).
Strategies act as a central doctrine for the businesses in terms of systemtatizing the activities according to the priority. Memory loss and the other health issues are a challenge in terms of productivity of the organization. The issue needs to be resolved immediately for the prevention of further damages in the reputation of the companies and organizations. One of the innovations in this field is the adoption of information technology, which has revolutionized the thought process of the ageing workforce. According to the opinions of Xu, Marinova and Guo (2015), inclusion of business model canvas in this direction has enhanced the awareness towards the key resources, partners and the channels, which are crucial for achieving success. This awareness has also been fruitful in terms of acquiring prospective solutions for the challenges related to sustainability.
Meetings, discussions and open forums is crucial in terms of gaining an insight into the approaches of the clients and the customers towards preserving the experience of the ageing workforce in Australia. These sources provide a platform to voice out the issues.
Conclusion
System thinking is a new addition in the field of information technology. It has altered the range of thought process for the individuals, indicating creativity and innovation within the activities. The aspect of sustainability challenges in the thought process of the ageing workforce in Australia has been chosen for indicating the diversified application of system thinking. The theories and models used enhances the awareness towards the interactions between the systems, which expands the scope and arena of their knowledge horizons. The aspect can be used as a discourse in the academic field for enhancing the learning and thought process of the old age personnel. Providing technical training would be beneficial in terms of enhancing their learning process.
References
Andrews, D., 2015. The circular economy, design thinking and education for sustainability. Local Economy, 30(3), pp.305-315.
Bhamra, T. and Lofthouse, V., 2016. Design for sustainability: a practical approach. Routledge.
Bocken, N.M., Short, S.W., Rana, P. and Evans, S., 2014. A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of cleaner production, 65, pp.42-56.
Bocken, N.M.P., Rana, P. and Short, S.W., 2015. Value mapping for sustainable business thinking. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 32(1), pp.67-81.
Broman, G.I. and Robèrt, K.H., 2017. A framework for strategic sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, pp.17-31.
Clayton, T. and Radcliffe, N., 2015. Sustainability: a systems approach. Routledge.
Doppelt, B., 2017. Leading change toward sustainability: A change-management guide for business, government and civil society. Routledge.
Fischer, M., 2015. Design it! Solving sustainability problems by applying design thinking. GAIA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 24(3), pp.174-178.
Kläy, A., Zimmermann, A.B. and Schneider, F., 2015. Rethinking science for sustainable development: Reflexive interaction for a paradigm transformation. Futures, 65, pp.72-85.
Marshall, J., Coleman, G. and Reason, P., 2017. Leadership for sustainability: An action research approach. Routledge.
Missimer, M., Robèrt, K.H. and Broman, G., 2017. A strategic approach to social sustainability–Part 1: exploring the social system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, pp.32-41.
Mochizuki, Y. and Bryan, A., 2015. Climate change education in the context of education for sustainable development: Rationale and principles. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 9(1), pp.4-26.
Plack, M.M., Goldman, E.F., Scott, A.R., Pintz, C., Herrmann, D., Kline, K., Thompson, T. and Brundage, S.B., 2018. Systems Thinking and Systems-Based Practice Across the Health Professions: An Inquiry Into Definitions, Teaching Practices, and Assessment. Teaching and learning in medicine, 30(3), pp.242-254.
Stafford-Smith, M., Griggs, D., Gaffney, O., Ullah, F., Reyers, B., Kanie, N., Stigson, B., Shrivastava, P., Leach, M. and O’Connell, D., 2017. Integration: the key to implementing the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability Science, 12(6), pp.911-919.
Van Kerkhoff, L., 2014. Developing integrative research for sustainability science through a complexity principles-based approach. Sustainability Science, 9(2), pp.143-155.
Xu, L., Marinova, D. and Guo, X., 2015. Resilience thinking: a renewed system approach for sustainability science. Sustainability Science, 10(1), pp.123-138.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download