In the present time of globalized business environment, it is pivotal for the organizations to agree to tenets and controls and set norms to direct the business exercises because of open mindfulness and lawful inconveniences. Bookkeeping is also a vital region of business that requires reasonable and straightforward practices due to having worries towards the partners including clients, financial specialists, workers and society. This report expects to examine the definite understanding of social contract to legitimacy hypothesis in bookkeeping at various ranges. This report is isolated into various parts which demonstrate the detailed investigation of every single viewpoint. In the main segment, it exhibits the idea of social contract hypothesis. In second segment, it introduces the significance of legitimacy practices of bookkeeping and its significance in business. Besides, in further areas, it examines the significance and reactions of social contract hypothesis for the business and society in connection to bookkeeping hones.
In addition, it clarifies that how social contract hypothesis sets an understanding between the business and society to take after the moral and good models in bookkeeping practices and advantages to the general public and group. Moreover, it likewise shows diverse execution procedures to receive the social contract hypothesis in bookkeeping to build the dependability and legitimacy of the budgetary detailing so that the association can advance the interests of their interior and outer stakeholders.
This exploration study is more profitable, successful, and advantageous for the researchers, student learners and analysts since it straightforwardly or in a roundabout way enhance understanding about the diverse ideas, applications and standards related with the social contract and social hypothesis, legitimacy theory, corporate social duties, stakeholder’s speculations. Also, this exploration paper is described with more extensive degree since it addresses and proposes different research themes for the further research in a compelling and legitimate way. In addition to this, this exploration paper is additionally manages a few research targets that would be accomplished amid the investigation of this examination paper with a specific end goal to achieve legitimate results of the review. In the meantime, with regards to this exploration consider, the optional wellspring of data is utilized as an auxiliary technique for information accumulation keeping in mind the end goal to satisfy the points and targets related with this examination paper. For instance, to adequately gather the precise, solid and important data towards the examination theme, scholarly books, explore articles, business articles, scholastic material and others optional sources are utilized as a part of request to achieve a substantial conclusion.
Keeping in mind the end goal to comprehend the ramifications of social contract to legitimacy hypothesis of bookkeeping, it is fundamental to comprehend the importance of social contract and legitimacy of the bookkeeping. With the assistance of this, a researcher can interlink both social contract and authenticity of bookkeeping legitimately.
From the investigation of Frynas, & Stephens, (2015), it can be assessed that the idea of social contract gives the structure of norms and laws for how the administration and individuals ought to communicate. Living in a general public, it is required for the general population to take after a few principles and laws to stay with the general public. Singular lives in the general public and get insurance from outcasts. Consequently, it is vital for them to get certain opportunity and add to society in making it more steady, rich and glad. In general, this hypothesis is more critical and noteworthy keeping in mind the end goal to comprehend the regular guidelines and models in a powerful and appropriate way.
As indicated by Hamid, & Atan, (2011), social contract hypothesis is imperative for the today’s changing business atmosphere. According to the investigation of McKinsey and Co 2012 in USA it uncovered that numerous little and huge organizations take dynamic part in the social, ecological and political issues. The social contract hypothesis empowers the business to satisfy its obligations towards their groups and it helps the battling individuals and not-for-profit associations to fulfill the requests of the general population. In the meantime, it can likewise be said that, business associations should adequately take after the CSR capacities to achieve their key objectives as well as accomplish upper hands from the aggressive market condition.
Additionally, the social hypothesis includes more in their nearby groups and connects with the general public in regards to their wellbeing. The business gains adequate benefits and gives numerous assets to the groups through a gift in foundations and volunteering exercises in schools and universities.
A large portion of the organizations give items and run naturally amicable crusades. Likewise, business firms are additionally leads a few sorts of social work keeping in mind the end goal to enhance their corporate picture and incentive in the front of key partners. This is imperative in light of the fact that an organization could straightforwardly or in a roundabout way upgrade the level of benefit and attractiveness in a powerful and legitimate way. A few expenses could likewise be diminished by the organization in the event that it satisfy CSR capacities innovatively and legitimately. These exercises and cases showed the pertinence of social contract hypothesis in business that recognizes the benefit of giving back.
According to the perspectives of Lee, Walter?Drop, & Wiesel, (2014), the social contract hypothesis ensures the enthusiasm of the partners through compelling bookkeeping rehearses. Partners are any gathering or person who can impact the destinations of the association essentially. The reasonable bookkeeping rehearses and moral contemplations ensure the enthusiasm of the partners in an association. The social contract hypothesis empowers business or organizations to satisfy their commitments towards the distinctive partners. The parcel of individuals can be the partners for the organization including administrators, representatives, clients, workers and providers.
The social contract hypothesis builds up the feeling of trusts and convenience among the different partners in the organization (Leonard, & Samantar, M. S. (2011). The trusts can be creates through show the reasonable data in regards to the organizations approaches and items before them. It guarantees that associations take after the moral practices and all data are ought to reasonably show to the partners as indicated by the necessity and need. As indicated by the
Mäkelä, & Näsi, (2010), the social contract hypothesis is a vital angle for the business to take after moral practices. Without this social contract, there would be no structure of the general public and everybody can fly like a free winged creature noticeable all around with no limitations and good values. The basic idea of this hypothesis is to avert society or association to take after the exploitative practices and terrible tenets that are against the general public and the administration. In this hypothesis, it involves the arrangement of models which takes after by the people, organizations, and society that endorses that how they utilized each other for the common advantages on the condition that others take after those same standards and practice them. The significance of social contract hypothesis in a worldwide setting that demonstrates the record of political authenticity, grounded in the possibility that actually free and every single individual an equivalent energy to practice more than each other, aside from as per the rule of shared assent (Perks, Farache, Shukla, & Berry, 2013).
According to the perspectives of Wagiciengo, & Belal, (2012), expressed that the essential components of the social contract with respect to society it plainly demonstrates that all people are equivalent, they are altogether identified with each other, and they have some impetus to leave the underlying circumstance for some relative preferred standpoint picked up by the section into the common society. The second component alludes that the regularizing qualities of the gatherings to the agreement. The gatherings depicted as they are spurred by their own particular assent and they will just consent to the social contract on the off chance that they see any advantage from the social cooperation. There are two measurements in the social contract hypothesis one is an exact measurement and other is a regulating measurement (Wiseman, Cuevas?Rodríguez, & Gomez?Mejia, 2012).
The observational measurements identified with the historical backdrop of starting points of the state and regularizing measurements of the social contract hypothesis depend on tenets and rule that make the state genuine.
In addition, under regulating measurement, the social contract hypothesis addresses two more inquiries like what are guidelines or standards of equity that dilemma the natives in connection to each other and besides under what conditions may the state really go about as a definitive judge in the connection among nationals. In addition, the social contract hypothesis prompted the characteristic freedom to the responsibility for human rights. This idea is creating from the myth and expressed that the people lived in a characteristic condition and portrayed with the condition of nature (Salihin, Fatima, & Anam Ousama, 2014).). In Free State of nature, all people are allowed to live and characteristic of all religions. There is no limitation or courtroom over the people. These regular qualities showed that the social contract hypothesis empowers people to live free as indicated by the condition of nature. The law of the condition of nature demonstrated that person lives for peace and social contract hypothesis brings peace through freedom, not through brutality.
Slater & Tonkiss, (2013) communicated that social contract hypothesis in organizations is distinctive. In business, it is an unwritten and entirely theoretical understanding not to abuse the ethical standards. All individuals from the general public are said to consent to this agreement essentially by taking an interest in the general public. There are three primary speculations of business morals. The stockholder hypothesis holds that the organization has no commitments to society other than to procure tremendous benefits for the stockholders under the business morals cutoff points and law. According to the stockholder hypothesis, it alludes that organization is ethically obliged to all gatherings with a stake subsequently of its operations. The social contract hypothesis holds that all business works are bound with the agreement with the groups and social orders and the general public permits the organizations just when they get the advantages from the operations (Vladu, Salas, & Matis, 2012).
The expanding significance of reasonable bookkeeping hones after a few tricks and embarrassments over the world has likewise raised the prerequisite of legitimate of true blue records by the organizations. It is on the grounds that legitimate of the bookkeeping practices is urgent in diminishing such tricks and embarrassments and maintaining a strategic distance from money related vulnerabilities. Consequently, it is obligatory to present the legitimate hypothesis and standards into the bookkeeping rehearse. As detailed by Taylor, Walton, & Young, (2013), authenticity hypothesis is critical to deal with the dangers related with the business and keep up the straightforwardness and decency in the business. This hypothesis holds that it is obligatory for the organizations to reveal the right and pertinent data about their money related position without concealing any data to the speculators and different partners. It restricts the organizations to exhibit the false and wrong budgetary data since it might prompt inability to finish the premiums of the partners (Smith, 2014).
In the words of Rhodes, & Mény, (2016), Legitimacy hypothesis is related with the decency and straightforwardness of the money related records of the organization. There ought to be legitimate responsibility of the budgetary detailing by a person of the organization. There are various stakeholders including bookkeeping firms, monetary examiners, clients, showcase controllers, expansive firms, bookkeeping offices and reviewers, who utilize the money related reports of the organizations to settle on their own choices. Be that as it may, reasonable and straightforward revealing empowers them to use sound judgment in connection to the satisfaction of their interests (Matuszak, Ró?a?ska, and Macuda, 2015).
As indicated by Nicholls, (2010), the legitimacy hypothesis likewise accentuates organizations and corporate to take after the moral practices towards their group. The business primary point is to acquire most extreme benefits for their partners and workers. The legitimacy hypothesis puts the laws, compliances, uprightness and arrangements in regards to their method for procuring benefits. The business needs to take after the conventions to procure the benefits. These conventions are moral gauges, codes and reasonable practices in the business operations towards their groups, representatives, and society. Legitimacy is vital in each business to manufacture the goodwill in the market for a more extended timeframe. In the event that any business does not take after the conventions and not get together the desires of the general public then it would consider that the rupture of social contract with the general public. Legitimacy hypothesis of bookkeeping is utilized as a part of the social bookkeeping (Orij, 2010).
This hypothesis contends that any association or business just exists when its operations are legitimate towards people in general or society. Association a can confront many difficulties or dangers to their authenticity (e.g. a genuine mishap, significant contamination release or a money related embarrassment) and in outcome, may utilize wide legitimate methodologies to lessen that danger. Legitimate hypothesis offers critical bits of knowledge into social bookkeeping rehearses. In social bookkeeping rehearses, the organization needs to take after every one of the models like corporate detailing and ecological announcing. Authenticity hypothesis upgrades the trust between the inner and outside individuals. The business can gain trust on the off chance that it is by and large reasonable and mindful in all that they do. The organizations are extending step by step and there is a requirement for authenticity is imperative in business towards the triple main concern of the organization (Mäkelä, & Näsi, 2010). The triple main concern components like social, conservative and ecological obligations of the business. The real practices upgrade the execution of these triple primary concern components.
According to the investigation of Li, Gupta, Zhang, & Sarathy, (2014), the present part of bookkeeping is impacted by the ecological issues of the business. To lessen these issues the ramifications of legitimacy hypothesis is essential in bookkeeping to build up a far reaching report of ecological bookkeeping and ought to answer to their shareholders. Legitimacy hypothesis is upheld by the social contract as been perceived as an informative apparatus in regards to the intention of ecological announcing by business associations. The association proceeds with requirements to work inside the particular standards and cutoff points of their separate social orders.
The organization needs to alter its approaches and revealing structures time to time with respect to their obligations towards CSR and manageability to guarantee a general public that they are receiving the reasonable practices (Lanis, & Richardson, 2012).
The organization needs to reveal data to the general public and partners in regards to the ecological effects keeping in mind the end goal to fit in with social discernments. Authenticity underpins the idea that the organizations change their detailing strategies with a specific end goal to guarantee that their operations are up to norms and gainful for the general public. Legitimacy hypothesis is one of the critical speculations that clarifies the social bookkeeping rehearses. The social bookkeeping rehearses clarify the explanation for the natural revealing and social contract (Khan, Muttakin, & Siddiqui, 2013).
In the perspectives of Delanty, (2013), legitimacy is imperative for the association and also for business. The word legitimacy alludes that the ethical models, codes, and values taken after by the business and association to gives better outcomes to the general public. The social contract hypothesis advances the enthusiasm of people in general in bookkeeping guidelines. The legitimacy is vital for a business to decrease the instabilities and untrustworthy practices taken after by the organization or individual. The social contract hypothesis dependably underlines to association to keep up the coordination between the clients and clients. The primary point target of the social contract is to the general welfare of the general public through the reception of genuine practices in bookkeeping (Crane, 2013).
As indicated by Evans, Baskerville, & Nara, (2015), social contract hypothesis stresses to the bookkeepers and experts to give the reasonable revelation of all the answering to its clients of the business. It incorporates partners, representatives, providers, and society. Each individual has its own necessity to utilize the data of the business essentially. For e.g. Society needs that the association ought to satisfy the obligations towards CSR matters. The social contract hypothesis bolsters associations and top administration to take after moral and reasonable practices in their bookkeeping in the range of CSR and Sustainability, so that the general public gets a few advantages from these practices. The legitimacy hypothesis underpins the thought of the organization that they take after the standards and controls of the business according to the desires of the business (Colman, 2013).
As expressed by Christensen, Nikolaev, & Wittenberg?Moerman, (2016), social contract hypothesis impacts the dependability and legitimacy of the bookkeeping works. The significance of social contract hypothesis is to build the request of the stakeholders of the organization that can be costly for the organization.
The social contract to honest to goodness hones in bookkeeping prompts increment the enthusiasm of partners of the organization to accomplish the vital objectives of the organization. With the level of the stakeholder, control builds the significance of taking care of partner’s requests additionally increments. The principle goal of the social contract hypothesis is to adjust between the business and society and creates most extreme income all the while accomplishing the social duties of the business. As indicated by Bebbington, Unerman, & O’Dwyer, (2014), without legitimacy in bookkeeping there is no presence of business for quite a while. The business without a social contract and moral practices can’t get by in the today’s aggressive world. Presently a day’s numerous huge associations and organizations concentrate on their social duties and honest to goodness hones. At last society is the base for any business without society or social contract there is no establishment of business in today’s fast evolving. In the perspectives of Carnegie & Napier, (2010), social contract is an assertion that is made between the social individuals and worker of the association. Notwithstanding, it is not considered as a genuine contract but rather it advocates for moral and political accountabilities of a person. Social contract consolidates corporate administration, corporate social duty and corporate generosity.
Every one of these viewpoints assumes a noteworthy part in guaranteeing the authenticity of the bookkeeping rehearses inside the organizations. It is on the grounds that legitimacy hypothesis holds the usage of the legitimate codes and principles and models in taking care of bookkeeping practices. The thought of social contact in the legitimacy hypothesis of the bookkeeping is very viable for the welfare of the business and society also. It is on the grounds that social contract makes it compulsory for the included individuals to make the bookkeeping rehearses authentic by considering all moral and social parts of the bookkeeping. The reasonableness and straightforwardness in bookkeeping through social contract is useful to diminish the hazard and vulnerabilities inside the business. Social contract demonstrates the responsibility of the bookkeeper towards the general public while setting up the records of the organization (Annisette, & Richardson, 2011).
Without it, there might be plausibility that the bookkeepers may take after out of line and false practices in bookkeeping that may mislead the partners in regards to the monetary position of the organization. Social contract authorizes the organizations to create economical revealing that considers diverse natural, social and money related parts of the organization. It likewise guarantees that organizations are announcing their money related perspectives with thought of standards and limits in regards to their separate social orders. The social standards and limits have dynamic nature as they continue changing over the time (Aribi & Gao, 2010).
In this manner, it is likewise fundamental for the associations to roll out improvements in their money related revealing. Because of social contract, firms set up their money related reports with the thought of natural viewpoints and social recognitions. There are diverse angles like straightforwardness, decency, impartial interest in guaranteeing the authenticity of the bookkeeping rehearses by the organizations. Social contract authorizes every one of these viewpoints in monetary announcing that guarantee with respect to the authenticity of the bookkeeping hones. This makes it obligatory for the associations to unveil the all the data that may influence the interests of the general public. It implies that organizations should be predictable with the desires and interests of the general public (Carroll, and Shabana, 2010).
In the event that any firm takes after the principles and limits of the general public while announcing their monetary angles, then it might prompt legitimacy of the money related detailing. As per Albu, & Alexander, (2013), it is urgent for the organization to consider maintainability in announcing rehearses. Social contracts make it obligatory to consider the general public, government and financial specialists. It implies social contract drives the flexibility of maintainability in detailing. Maintainability hones in announcing involves about the organization’s drives towards the general public to make reasonable and straightforward business operations. It means such sorts of practices are viable to advance the legitimacy of the budgetary records of the organization.
In the investigation of Alawattage, (2011), it is investigated that social contract is viable to uphold the maintainable announcing that is a proof of commitment of the organization in the financial improvement of the nation. Because of this, it turns out to be simple for the organization to create trust and certainty among the partners. In the meantime, Ieng Chu, Chatterjee, & Brown, (2012) portrayed that social contract is likewise identified with corporate social sensibility of the organizations as firms are included in CSR exercises and report this data in their budgetary records then they attempt to wind up noticeably more reasonable and straightforward in their monetary records. They take after moral practices and standards while setting up the money related explanations and reports that outcome in the genuine budgetary revealing.
The investigation of Islam, (2014) highlights the social contract hypothesis and its suggestions in authenticity hypothesis of the monetary detailing by expressing that there is a critical relationship or social contract between the business and society that infers some aberrant commitments of business towards the general public. It likewise settles on the administration to take choice in a moral way that additionally causes authenticity in revealing. Moral thought in money related announcing guarantees that organization will take after the required norms and controls in budgetary reports that consequently encourage the legitimacy of detailing (Jacobs, 2012). As indicated by social contract hypothesis, the associations work by public consent to serve the necessities of the general public. As announced by Jahn & Brühl, (2016), the legitimacy hypothesis depends on the idea that there is a social contract between the association and society in which it works. In this way, the organizations attempt to legitimize their operations and exercises through CSR engagement to get endorsement from the general public to work together persistently. In the meantime, Wiseman, Cuevas?Rodríguez, &
Gomez?Mejia,(2012) portrayed that the social contract characterizes the desires of the general public with respect to how the firm need to lead its operations. Thus, legitimacy hypothesis depends on the possibility that it is required for the organizations to act inside the limits and standards of the general public to effectively and constantly work their business. Also, Wagiciengo, & Belal, (2012) contend that legitimacy of the money related detailing can be enhanced if the organizations keep up corresponding association with their partners with the satisfaction of commitments to meet their interests. A certain social contract between the general public and business makes it required for the organizations to uncover the CSR perspectives.
According to the perspectives of Salihin, A., Fatima, & Anam Ousama, (2014), legitimacy hypothesis is upheld by the idea of the social contract as it is expressed that the associations to attempt legitimize by working inside the ‘socially adequate limits,’ to their revealing arrangements. The organizations uncover the data identified with natural effect of their business exercises keeping in mind the end goal to conform to the social observations. The investigation of Orij, (2010) found that corporate revelations like natural announcing are because of social contract between the business and society to legitimize the business operations. According to the legitimacy hypothesis, the organizations change their revealing approaches and practices to show that they take after the social standards and limits adequately.
It is condemned by Matuszak, Ró?a?ska, & Macuda, (2015), that social contract hypothesis causes clashes in enhancing legitimacy of the bookkeeping rehearses. It is on the grounds that the holding of agreement between the business and society has contrasts at various social levels. All partners have their own particular advantages that vary from each other and cause irreconcilable circumstances. Furthermore, contrasts in the demeanor, values, standards, recognition and ides may dishearten the key shareholders of an organization. In such circumstance, it might be troublesome for the organizations to consider the authenticity of the bookkeeping rehearses.
In support of this, Li, Gupta, Zhang & Sarathy, (2014) likewise asserted that organizations need to consider distinctive requirements and desires of various partners that might be conflicting to each other. This disagreement likewise appears in the monetary revealing that may influence the authenticity of the announcing. It is on the grounds that partners need that firm ought to expand benefits without creating high expenses of manageability practices while open and government require that organization needs to satisfy CSR hones with ecological assurance and social welfare. In this way, the contentions in these interests and desires make situation for the organization be bound with the social contract and upgrade the authenticity of the bookkeeping hones.
Jahn, & Brühl, (2016) contended that social contract hypothesis depends on hypothetical world as, all things considered; it is difficult to execute the social contract and bound to take after a few directions to satisfy the obligations towards the general public. Nobody has marked the social contract to take after profound quality and moral standards in the general public. Along these lines, speculative social contract can’t be connected in certifiable. Be that as it may, the discoveries of Hamid, Atan, (2011) uncover that it is not hard to take after the sensible standards as they are reasonable because of conceivable reality of the best enthusiasm for somebody. This hypothesis is gainful for the individuals who take after the agreement. Moreover, this hypothesis is likewise condemned for overlooking the privileges of somebody who does not profit the general public.
Carroll & Shabana, (2010) portrayed that social contract functions as deliberately exertion by the organizations to keep up supportability announcing prompting authenticity of the bookkeeping rehearses. In any case, it is viewed as that it is just a reason for growing better picture among the clients and conforming to the laws and controls. Because of open weight and law consistence, firms embrace such practices in bookkeeping as there is less effect of social contract in improving authenticity of the bookkeeping. In any case, in the meantime, Lanis and Richardson (2012) contended that there is thought process behind the authenticity of the announcing by the organizations to create solid brand picture among the clients and influence their purchasing conduct decidedly to build incomes and benefits. In this manner, social contract is not legitimate indicate clarify the authenticity of the bookkeeping hones received by the organizations.
Conclusion
According to the general examinations of the report, it can be inferred that social contract hypothesis viably assumes a vital part in business to take after the moral practices and gauges in its procedure. It can likewise locate that social contract hypothesis accentuates business to acquire a benefit and increment their riches to offer advantages to the general public too. Also, legitimacy hypothesis in bookkeeping portrays that good and moral practices are imperative for a business to make due in quite a while. In the meantime, it can likewise be reasoned that social contract is profitable to give more noteworthy advantage to guarantee serene society. Social contract guarantees peace, equity, insurance and solidness of the general public as it is significant for the bookkeepers to take after legitimacy of the bookkeeping practices to give such advantages.
Legitimate consistence with social duty and moral standards because of social contract gets authenticity bookkeeping rehearses. Also, a few people trust that social contract is speculative hypothesis as it is not material to upgrade authenticity of the bookkeeping. In any case, safeguards assert that if any levelheaded hypothesis acquires peace and reasonableness the general public, then there is no damage to tail it. As a rule, there are a few contentions in support and against this hypothesis, so its significance can’t be disregarded in contributing authenticity of the bookkeeping rehearses. Aside from that, it is additionally found that social contract hypothesis watches out for the associations to satisfy the social duties towards condition and supportability issues.
Then again, it can likewise be said that, this exploration think about had talked about different vital and noteworthy ideas and standards identified with the bookkeeping hypotheses that could be utilized and connected by the business firms so as to viably and legitimately maintain their business capacities and parts identified with the bookkeeping. In the meantime, this exploration study is additionally gives imaginative ways and strategies keeping in mind the end goal to bring advancement and improvement inside the present bookkeeping practices and techniques. Generally, such ideas ought to be received with a specific end goal to upgrade authoritative efficiency and benefit. Furthermore, it is likewise recommended to the organization that they ought to take after the standards and principals of manageability in putting forth and building up their money related expressions and records in a viable and legitimate way.
This could help an organization in enhancing its picture and esteem and enhancing the level of benefit, income, deals and piece of the pie specifically or in a roundabout way. In conclusion, it can be closed from the general discoveries that each business needs to take after the moral practices to stay focused in the long haul and to keep up great notoriety by coordinating social contract into authenticity of bookkeeping. It is on the grounds that the authenticity of the bookkeeping practices depends on the social get that makes the associations mindful to take after reasonable and straightforward practices in bookkeeping.
References:
Alawattage, C. (2011). The calculative reproduction of social structures–The field of gem mining in Sri Lanka. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 22(1), 1-19.
Albu, C. N., Albu, N., & Alexander, D. (2013). The true and fair view concept in Romania: A case study of concept transferability. In Accounting in Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 61-90). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Annisette, M., & Richardson, A. J. (2011). Justification and accounting: applying sociology of worth to accounting research. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 24(2), 229-249.
Aribi, Z.A. & Gao, S., (2010). Corporate social responsibility disclosure: A comparison between Islamic and conventional financial institutions. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 8(2), 72-91.
Bebbington, J., Unerman, J. and O’Dwyer, B. (2014). Sustainability Accounting and Accountability. UK: Routledge.
Bebbington, J., Unerman, J., & O’Dwyer, B. (2014). Sustainability accounting and accountability. UK: Routledge.
Bebbington, J., Unerman, J., & O’Dwyer, B. (2014). Sustainability accounting and accountability. UK: Routledge.
Carnegie, G.D. and Napier, C.J., (2010). Traditional accountants and business professionals: Portraying the accounting profession after Enron. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(3), 360-376.
Carroll, A. B., and Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International journal of management reviews, 12(1), pp. 85-105.
Christensen, H. B., Nikolaev, V. V., and Wittenberg?Moerman, R. (2016). Accounting information in financial contracting: The incomplete contract theory perspective. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(2), 397-435.
Colman, A. M. (2013). Game theory and its applications: In the social and biological sciences. UK: Psychology Press.
Colman, A. M. (2013). Game theory and its applications: In the social and biological sciences. UK: Psychology Press.
Crane, A. (2013). Modern slavery as a management practice: Exploring the conditions and capabilities for human exploitation. Academy of Management Review, 38(1), 49-69.
Delanty, G. (2013). Social theory in a changing world: Conceptions of modernity.USA: John Wiley & Sons.
Evans, L., Baskerville, R., & Nara, K. (2015). Colliding worlds: Issues relating to language translation in accounting and some lessons from other disciplines. Abacus, 51(1), 1-36.
Fernando, S., & Lawrence, S. (2014). A theoretical framework for CSR practices: integrating legitimacy theory, stakeholder theory and institutional theory. Journal of Theoretical Accounting Research, 10(1), 149-178.
Frynas, J. G., & Stephens, S. (2015). Political corporate social responsibility: Reviewing theories and setting new agendas. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17(4), 483-509.
Hamid, F. Z. A., & Atan, R. (2011). Corporate social responsibility by the Malaysian telecommunication firms. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(5), 198-208.
Ieng Chu, C., Chatterjee, B. and Brown, A., (2012). The current status of greenhouse gas reporting by Chinese companies: A test of legitimacy theory. Managerial Auditing Journal, 28(2), pp.114-139.
Islam, M. (2014). Social Compliance Accounting: Managing Legitimacy in Global Supply Chains. Germany: Springer.
Jacobs, K. (2012). Making sense of social practice: theoretical pluralism in public sector accounting research. Financial Accountability & Management, 28(1), 1-25.
Jahn, J., and Brühl, R. (2016). How Friedman’s View on Individual Freedom Relates to Stakeholder Theory and Social Contract Theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 1-12.
Jones, M. J. (2010). Accounting for the environment: Towards a theoretical perspective for environmental accounting and reporting. In Accounting Forum, 34(2), 123-138.
Khan, A., Muttakin, M. B., & Siddiqui, J. (2013). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosures: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of business ethics, 114(2), 207-223.
Khan, A., Muttakin, M. B., & Siddiqui, J. (2013). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosures: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of business ethics, 114(2), 207-223.
Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness: a test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(1), 75-100.
Lanis, R., & Richardson, G. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and tax aggressiveness: a test of legitimacy theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(1), 75-100.
Lee, M. M., Walter?Drop, G., & Wiesel, J. (2014). Taking the state (back) out? Statehood and the delivery of collective goods. Governance, 27(4), 635-654.
Leonard, D. K., & Samantar, M. S. (2011). What Does the Somali Experience Teach Us about the Social Contract and the State?. Development and Change, 42(2), 559-584.
Li, H., Gupta, A., Zhang, J., & Sarathy, R. (2014). Examining the decision to use standalone personal health record systems as a trust-enabled fair social contract. Decision Support Systems, 57, 376-386.
Mäkelä, H. & Näsi, S., (2010). Social responsibilities of MNCs in downsizing operations: A Finnish forest sector case analysed from the stakeholder, social contract and legitimacy theory point of view. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(2), 149-174.
Mäkelä, H. & Näsi, S., (2010). Social responsibilities of MNCs in downsizing operations: A Finnish forest sector case analysed from the stakeholder, social contract and legitimacy theory point of view. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(2), 149-174.
Mäkelä, H. & Näsi, S., (2010). Social responsibilities of MNCs in downsizing operations: A Finnish forest sector case analysed from the stakeholder, social contract and legitimacy theory point of view. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(2),149-174.
Matuszak, ?., Ró?a?ska, E., & Macuda, M. (2015). The concept of CSR in accounting theory and practice in Poland: an empirical study. Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowo?ci, (84), 115-138.
Nicholls, A., (2010). The legitimacy of social entrepreneurship: reflexive isomorphism in a pre?paradigmatic field. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 34(4), 611-633.
Orij, R. (2010). Corporate social disclosures in the context of national cultures and stakeholder theory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 23(7), 868-889.
Perks, K.J., Farache, F., Shukla, P. & Berry, A., (2013). Communicating responsibility-practicing irresponsibility in CSR advertisements. Journal of Business Research, 66(10),1881-1888.
Rhodes, M., & Mény, Y. (Eds.). (2016). The future of European welfare: a new social contract Germany: Springer.
Rhodes, M., & Mény, Y. (Eds.). (2016). The future of European welfare: a new social contract Germany: Springer.
Rossi, E. (2014). Legitimacy, Democracy and Public Justification: Rawls’ Political Liberalism Versus Gaus’ Justificatory Liberalism. Res Publica, 20(1), 9-25.
Salihin, A., Fatima, A. H., & Anam Ousama, A. (2014). An Islamic perspective on the true and fair view override principle. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 5(2), 142-157.
Slater, D., & Tonkiss, F. (2013). Market society: markets and modern social theory.USA: John Wiley & Sons.
Smith, M. (2014). Research methods in accounting.UK: Sage.
Taylor, I., Walton, P., & Young, J. (2013). The new criminology: For a social theory of deviance. UK: Routledge.
Vladu, A. B., Salas, O. A., and Matis, D. (2012).The Perception, Importance And Vulnerability Of True And Fair View In The Romanian Accounting Environment. AMIS 2012, 1404.
Wagiciengo, M. M., & Belal, A. R. (2012). Intellectual capital disclosures by South African companies: A longitudinal investigation. Advances in Accounting, 28(1), 111-119.
Wiseman, R. M., Cuevas?Rodríguez, G., & Gomez?Mejia, L. R. (2012). Towards a social theory of agency. Journal of Management Studies, 49(1), 202-222.
Yang, Z., Su, C., & Fam, K. S. (2012). Dealing with institutional distances in international marketing channels: Governance strategies that engender legitimacy and efficiency. Journal of Marketing, 76(3), 41-55.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download