1.The purpose of this paper is to discuss the main types of business structures that exist in Australia and recommend a business structure that can be considered to be suitable to Meghan, Kate, William and Harry. This paper will also discuss the advantages, disadvantages of each of the business structures.
It can be stated that there are different types of business structures that exist on Australia. Some of the main business structures existing in Australia include the following:
Company- A Company can be considered to be a separate legal entity from the owners of the company. A company is formed by its members for the purpose of carrying on the business of its members under a separate legal name. A company can be both public and private.
The directors of a private company have more control over the operation of the company as compared to a public company. However, in Australia a private company cannot have more than fifty members whereas public company can have unlimited number of members. A private company is not allowed to raise capital by issuing shares to the public. A pubic company can do so. Therefore the scope of growth and expansion is higher for a public company as compared to a private company. However a public company has a higher cost of complying with the regulatory requirements.
A company has many advantages and disadvantages:
The advantages of the company include the following:
The main disadvantages of a company are:
A sole proprietorship can be defined as a business structure in which the sole trader carries on the business and is solely responsible for the liabilities of the business. However, the positive side of sole proprietorship is that a sole trader enjoys all the profits made from the business. He does not have to share the profits with anyone else. The sole trader does not have a separate legal entity as opposed to a company.
The main advantages of a sole trader are as follows:
The main disadvantages of a sole proprietorship include the following:
This is a type of business structure in which two or more people are responsible for carrying on the operations of the business. A partnership has the obligation to comply with the terms that are mentioned in the partnership agreement. A partnership is not considered to be separate legal entity and therefore the partners can be held liable for the liabilities incurred by the partnership.
The main advantages of a partnership include the following:
The main disadvantages of a partnership are:
2.The relevant laws that are applicable to the business structures as discussed above will be discussed in this answer. The best suited business structure for the parties as mentioned in the case will also be recommended in this answer.
The operations of companies are governed by the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) in Australia. This legislation is prevalent in both Federal as well as interstate level. It can be stated that a company only comes into existence after it has been registered with the Australian Securities and Investment commission (ASIC). It has been provided in the Corporations Act that company is to be treated as separate legal entity and therefore the owners of the company will not incur unlimited liability for the operations of the company. It can be stated that a company is required to incorporate the principles of corporate governance which has been provided in the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX). It is also the responsibility of a company to notify the ASX if it does not incorporate the principles of corporate governance providing appropriate reason for not doing so. It has been stated in section 9 of the Corporations Act that a director or an office holder of a company must be a natural person. The directors of companies are responsible for the operations of the same and therefore they have several duties to the shareholders of the companies and the public in general which are provided section 180- 184 of the aforementioned act. A company has several other obligations such as the obligation to disclose the financial statements of the company and the obligation of complying with auditing requirements. A company can only exist if it has a constitution. The constitution of the company provides sets out the powers of the company.
A sole proprietorship is not a separate legal entity as a company and therefore Sole proprietors are not subjected to any specific regulations which govern the operations of the sole trader. The Sole trader must be registered for the Goods and Service Tax if the income of such sole trader is more than 75,000 dollars. However, a Sole proprietor for the purpose of carrying on the business is required to acquire Australian Business Number. It can be stated that a sole trader although is in charge of the operations of the sole proprietorship, has the right to employ other people to conduct the operations of the sole proprietorship. A sole proprietorship has to comply with the employment regulations such as the Fair Works. General laws of business are applicable on the sole proprietorship.
The legislation Partnership Act gives the rules and the regulations of Partnerships. The Partnership Act prevalent in the Federal level. However, each of the states of Australia has separate legislation which deals with the laws of Partnership. A partnership is held to be established in all jurisdictions in Australia once an agreement between two or persons has been made. Such agreement must contain the purpose of the partnership which is to carry on business with the common intention of making profit.
The definition of a partner has been provided in section 6 of the partnership Act. Thus whether a person can be considered to be a partner can be assessed by the application of the definition as provided in section of the aforementioned Act. It can be mentioned that the liabilities of the partners in a partnership firm are significantly higher than that of companies. The partners in a partnership are joint and severally liable for the liabilities of all the partners. It can be said that partners in a partnership are generally treated as the principal and agent of the business. In the notable case John Grimes Partnership Ltd v Gubbins, it had been held by the court that all the partners in a partnership are both legally and financially responsible for the actions of the other partners that are conducted in general course of business. Therefore it can be stated that all the partners will be liable for the negligent act of any of the partners in the partnership. The value of shares held by the partners in a partnership is not considered when determining the liability of the partners. In case a partner has acted beyond his authority and the third party did not have any idea that such partner was acting beyond the scope of his authority, all the partners would be jointly liable.
As provided by the facts of the case it can be stated that Harry and William plan to start a business. They want to involve William and Kate to raise capital. However, Kate and William do not want to take involvement in management of the business. They also want to limit their liabilities. Therefore after analyzing the facts of the case it can be stated that the best suitable business structure for the parties would be a private company limited by shares. Further it has been provided that 50% of the profits of the business would be directed to the Homeless Australians. Thus the business structure can only be registered as a nonprofit organization which undertakes charitable actions. The likelihood of getting public funding for the company would be difficult as 50% of the profits made by the company would be used for charitable purposes. Thus in this given scenario the only feasible option that can be considered by the parties is a private company which is limited by shares. In this business structure Kate and William will not have to take involvement in the management of the company and can only remain as shareholders of the company. They can even exist as non-executive directors. The liability of KATE AND William would only be limited to the value of the shares held by them. Further it can be stated that Meghan and Harry would remain in charge of the operations of the company and would be able to direct 50% percent of the profits earned by the business for charitable purposes without much intervention from any other party
3.The rights, duties and the obligations of the parties involved in the private company are to be discussed in this answer. As discussed above The Corporations Act governs the operations of companies in Australia. The aforementioned act specifically sets out the duties and the obligations of the directors of the company. The rights and the liabilities of the directors of the companies are also based on the common law provisions. It can be stated that directors of companies in Australia have both equitable and statutory duties. The duties of directors have been provided in sections 180-184 if the Corporations Act. In accordance with provisions as provided in the aforementioned sections it can be stated that the first and foremost duty that imposed on a director of a company is to act in good faith and proper purpose so as to ensure the company’s best interest. This duty has been provided in the section 181 of the Corporations Act . Thus it can be stated that Harry, Meghan, William and Kate must act in good faith and in a manner which is fit for the purpose of the company while discharging their duties as directors of the company.
Further it can be stated that the aforementioned parties would also have the duty to act with due care and diligence. The duty of directors to act with due care and diligence has been provided in section 180 of the Corporations Act 2001. This section has clearly provided that a test can be applied in order to assess whether the directors of the company as complied with a specific duty. This test is consistent with the objective test at common law. The purpose of this test is to assess whether any reasonable person acting in the same circumstances as the director would have acted in the same manner as the director or would have taken additional care. If the answer to the aforementioned question is found to be yes, such director would be considered to have reached this specific duty.
In section 182 and 183 of the aforementioned Act it has been provided that directors have equitable duties to not misuse their position in the company. This section states that the directors must not misuse any information which has been obtained by them by the powers vested in them due to their position in the company for personal interest or interest of third parties. It can be stated that at common law directors are required to give priority to the interest of the company over personal interest or interest of third parties whenever a conflict of interest arises. Directors have a fiduciary relation to the company. Such duties are imposed not only on active directors but also on non executve directors as held in the notable case ASIC v Healey & Ors
Therefore in this given situation Harry, Meghan, William, and Kate must ensure that they give priority to the interest of the company and not misuse their powers for personal interest or interest of the third parties. Therefore by the application of the principle of ASIC v Healey, it can be stated that Kate and Willam will also be bound by this specific duty. Further it can be stated in accordance with section 191 of the aforementioned act, in case of conflict of personal interest and the interest of the company, the directors are required to disclose the conflict of interest to the board of directors of the company.
As provided in section 180(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 the directors have the right to make decision which is in the best interest of the company. However it has also been provided that the right of the directors to make business decision is subjected to the business judgment rule. The business judgment rule states that if any director of a company makes any decision which would not have been made by any other director of the company, such director would be considered to have breached his duty. Directors have the right to receive appropriate remuneration for their efforts to manage the business. Thus in relation to this given case study it, can be said that Harry and Meghan will have the right to receive remuneration for managing the affairs of the company and also have the right to make decision for the company.
Further it has been provided in section 588G of the Corporations Act 2001 that directors must not carry put any business activity which might make the copy insolvent or it is reasonably believed by the other directors that such decision has a probability of making the company insolvent. This duty seeks to protect the right of the creditors and the investors. Specific defenses to directors are provided in section 588H. A director can become personally liable to pay the debts of the company if it is established that such director breached his duty.
Reference List:
ASIC v Healey & Ors [2011] FCA 717 – JWS
Corporation Act 2001 (Cth)
Davidson, Daniel V., Lynn M. Forsythe, and Brenda E. Knowles. Business law: Principles and cases in the legal environment. Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2015.
Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)
Hannigan, Brenda. Company law. Oxford University Press, USA, 2015.
Jones, L. (2017). Introduction to business law. Oxford University Press.
Kubasek, Nancy, et al. Dynamic business law. McGraw-Hill Education, 2015.
Lowry, John P., and Alan Dignam. Company Law. Oxford University Press, 2016.
MacIntyre, Ewan. Business law. Pearson UK, 2018.
Partnership Act 1963 (Cth)
Stout, Lynn, et al. “The modern corporation statement on company law.” (2016)
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download