Jim Kouzes and Barry Posner have been collaborating together for more than thirty years and they have been studying the leaders, conducting leadership development and researching leadership in various capacities. The award-winning book ‘The Leadership Challenges’ has its origin in the intensive research project and the authors assumed that by enquiring ordinary people to explaining the extraordinary experiences, the authors could find the patterns of the success. The context of the book deals with the analysis of hundreds of case studies of the leadership based on the personal-best and the experiences of the people recalled about the peak-leadership experiences. This book contains some preliminary research based on leadership survey and the questionnaire is of twelve pages and it has thirty-eight open-ended questions as well. The stories of leadership do not sound like the textbook management; however, these logical cases do not also have the context of organizing, staffing, directing and controlling. These stories of personal leadership have the tales of dynamic change with bold actions associated with this.
Kouzes and Posner in their book shared a vision is an idea and unique image of the future for the common good. The purpose of the book is to share the success stories from the experiences they believed to be shared. The readers can find the success stories from the profit based firms, mining, agriculture and non-profit firms also. The purpose of the authors is to affirm the relationship between positive work attitudes and the leadership. The authors articulated the aspiration theme and the authors identified the trends affecting the work. The authors made connections with others’ leadership as people don’t believe that everyone can make the difference in leadership. The authors’ purpose is to break the myths that leadership is that if an individual does not have the leadership skill, they cannot learn the leadership.
Kouzes and Posner used case studies in order to investigate the five practices of exemplary leadership. The first surveys for the five practices began in the year 1983 and over the 30 years, the authors had conducted many interviews. Kouzes and Posner recognized five common concepts in the survey and the five practices are associated with ‘model the way’, ‘inspire a shared vision’, ‘challenge the process’, ‘encourage the heart’ and ‘enable others to act’. The concept of the leadership focused on being sincere and it is included the sincere celebration devoted towards the leaders as well as employees’ success. The authors also suggested that leaders can behave the exact way they encourage others to act with their own values and voices. The authors shared that developing series of objectives so that it may show that organization can care with clear understanding. The practice of ‘challenge the processes shared that the leaders move outside the boundaries in order to be innovative to make the alteration process. The leadership process can be trust based so that it can encourage leaders to make the safe and trusting environment for the employees to collaborate. Leadership challenges continuously include evolving circumstances. However, the individual and his capacities are the common factors to lead that individual. All leaders confront numerous difficulties. While these difficulties can emerge anytime in a supervisor’s vocation, they can be especially common for more up to date or first-time leaders. They have accumulated a convenient rundown of these difficulties with tips on the best way to battle them, turn into the most ideal supervisor, and bolster employees’ group on their approach to progress. To have enthusiastic knowledge is to act naturally mindful, have the capacity to self-direct, to have social mindfulness and social control.
The authors believed that leadership can be learned and the leadership is not something to born with. The authors looked at traits which can be seen in extrovert and introvert personalities and investigated the process to develop the leadership and the leadership skills. (Kouzes & Posner, 2006) stated that honesty is most respected personality and the three others personalities are forward thinking, competency and inspiration. Leaders can represent themselves through the speaking on behalf of the large organization. The authors discussed that the leaders have the total personal faith and absolute dreams to make the extraordinary things happen. Each organization start with vision and employees need to believe that leaders can understand their needs. Leaders can enlist the common vision and leadership is the dialogue rather a monologue. In order to enlist support; leaders can intimate the knowledge of people’s dream, aspirations and values. In addition, leaders face issues and despite the inevitability of the failures and mistakes; leaders proceed with the tasks. The authors argued that leaders foster partnership work and they build the trust. It has been observed that leaders make the work possible and exemplary leaders make the employees strong. Leaders can recognize the contribution to many of the people and the leaders can show the appreciation to create the workplace culture. Leadership is less simple to spot than administration. Its quality or nonattendance in a circumstance is more subtle than the more particular exercises of administration. The initiative is more detected or felt. The leadership of the organization which practices servant leadership believes that the best way to assist and support the subordinates is to enable the subordinates to grow as an individual in the organization and therefore achieve their true potential and derive maximum benefit from the organization in the process.
The transactional leadership is a style of leadership which concentrates on the aspect of supervision, organization as well as enhancing the performance of the organization. The transactional leadership focuses on the aspect of promoting the clients based on their ability to conform to a given situation and whether or not the clients are able to respond to the needs and requirement of the jobs and the profession which they are entitled to perform (De Matthews & Mawhinney, 2014). The transactional leaders assess the performance of the subordinates and the workers and they motivate the best performing employees and the subordinates by awarding and giving recognition to such employees and workers. The transactional leaders try to manage the organizational hierarchy by allocating specific roles to the employees and the organizational leaders who follow the transactional form of leadership reprimand the workers and the workers who have not been able to perform to the best of their abilities (De Paoli & Ropo, 2015). The transactional form of leadership entails the necessity to utilize the potential of the workers and the subordinates in the various aspects of the organization and these nuances, which are significant aspect s of the organization, play a dominant role in the running of the organization. Kouzes and Posner stated that transactional leaders essentially motivate the subordinates that exchange the performance of the leaders.
The transformational leadership is this leadership wherein the leaders inspire the subordinates to perform at the best of their potential and the leaders transform the subordinates as well as the employees of the organization to realize their maximum potential. The transformational leadership enables the free flow of the ability to effectively utilize the leadership skills in order to maximize the potential and the ability of the subordinate and the workers to realize their true potential and therefore maximize the impact of their work and efficiency (Hopkins et al., 2014). Kouzes and Posner talked about Transformational Leadership that provides practical guidance on leading the people with a practical suggestion.
The Servant Leadership is the traditional leadership design which is used to exercise the power at the top of the pyramid basis and emphasizes on the servant leader sharing of power analysis. The relationship amongst the servant leaders in the organizational management enables the efficiency of the organization to function in a very effective and efficient manner (Carter & Baghurst, 2014). When the leaders shift their mindset from the above-allocated services, then the activities which are served by the people for the welfare of the servants and the employees are known as the servant leadership. The existence of the servant leadership is of prime importance for the organizational leadership because the best type of the leaders is the one whose existence makes the people secure and the subordinates, as well as the people at the bottom of the hierarchy; love the rulers and the leaders at the top of the pyramid.
The authors stated that envision the future by imagining ennobling possibility can be the shared vision of the leaders. The authors also discussed on enlisting common vision by the shared aspirations and appealing stories. The leaders must have the clear vision in mind and the authors can clear the process why the leadership is important. Furthermore, the leaders can make it clear why they should matter to those to share the vision with. Kouzes and Posner concluded that leaders who are seen as very frequent can inspire on the shared vision and the authors further believed that the leaders can use the symbolic language to show the leadership. Symbolic language is more like the persuasion of the employees. The leaders’ positivity is very important to lead the productivity to have the satisfaction. In recent time, the charismatic, as well as the inspirational personality of the leaders, inspire as well as motivate the employees and the workers to perform like the leaders. The basic feature of the transformational leadership is to enable the organizational goals to align with the personal goals of the employees and the employees are inspired by the organizational leaders to achieve their maximum benefits accruing from the work and efficiency of the transformational leadership skills (Weisband, 2013). The organization with the best of the employees are considered successful in comparison to those organization where the chances of the organizational leadership following the aspects of the organizational leadership.
From the above analysis, it is clear that the leaders of an organization are very much important for the running of the organization in the long run and it is necessary that the leaders are held responsible for the effective administration as well as the efficiency of the organizational goals of the organization. The very important point to note is that the organizational behavior is extremely important for the leaders to follow in the long run and any discrimination which is shown towards the organizational leadership results in the establishment of a definite period of trials and tribulations for the members of the organization in the long run. The most important aspect of overcoming the challenge of increasing the efficiency of the employees depends on the aspect of increasing the efficiency as well as the effectiveness of the leaders of an organization. The individuals can use leadership as the personal endeavor and the people look forward to finding out the credibility in a leadership. The individuals find the component of envisioning in the future having the honest exploration in which one can involve to lead anything. Individuals can imagine articulating the future possibility to define the competence of the leaders. The individuals who would be future leaders can take help to develop the capacity to be forward-looking and the individuals can take help of the Leadership Practices Inventory (LPI) as it is a 360-degree questionnaire for assessing the leadership behaviour which is most widely used leadership assessment.
Reference List
AbuAlRub, R.F. & Nasrallah, M.A., (2017). Leadership behaviours, organizational culture and intention to stay amongst Jordanian nurses. International nursing review, 64(4), 520-527.
Carter, D., & Baghurst, T. (2014). The influence of servant leadership on restaurant employee engagement. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(3), 453-464.
De Paoli, D., & Ropo, A. (2015). Open plan offices–the response to leadership challenges of virtual project work?. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 17(1), 63-74.
DeMatthews, D., & Mawhinney, H. (2014). Social justice leadership and inclusion: Exploring challenges in an urban district struggling to address inequities. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(5), 844-881.
Hopkins, K., Meyer, M., Shera, W., & Peters, S. C. (2014). Leadership challenges facing nonprofit human service organizations in a post-recession era. Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership & Governance, 38(5), 419-422.
Kouzes, J.M. & Posner, B.Z., (2006). The leadership challenge (Vol. 3). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
Weisband, S. P. (Ed.). (2013). Leadership at a distance: research in technologically-supported work. London: Psychology Press.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
