The failure of International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) can be seen from the provided situation to represent the correct financial standings of the companies in the presence of the fact that the companies have spent millions of dollars for its adoption so that financial reporting can be improved. Different famous business personalities have indicated in their statement that the IFRS adopted financial statements are missing the required qualitative characteristics of general purpose financial reporting that converts the financial statements more acceptable for the major users of them. The conceptual framework of Australian Accounting Standard Board (AASB) has mentioned that relevance and faithful representation are the fundamental qualitative characteristics; and comparability, verifiability, timeliness and understandability are the enhancing qualitative characteristics of financial statements (Warren and Jones 2018). The following discussion sheds light about the missing qualitative characteristics of financial reporting:
The fact is evident from the statement of Mr. Roberts, Former Head of Finance of AXA that there have not been any single questions from the fund manager and the financial analysts about the quality of financial information obtained from the financial statements developed in accordance with the IFRS standards. This aspect helps them in comparing the financial statements of the companies with another one; at the same time, they can gain understanding about the different financial aspects of the companies to understand their financial performance and financial standings. This scenario states that these financial statements have two of the most important qualitative characteristics of financial reporting; and they are comparability and understandability. The information of the financial statements becomes more purposeful in the presence of these two enhancing qualitative characteristics. However, the recent year’s shows major decrease in the quality of financial information in the IFRS adopted financial statements. Hence, it can be said that both comparability and understandability is lacking in the current financial reporting of IFRS (Openshaw 2013).
The opinion of Terry Brown, Finance Director of Wesfarmers, shows that one cannot eliminate the chance of misinterpreting the notes to the financial statements of the business entities developed as per the regulation of IFRS in case the financial analysts try to analyze them in the absence of effective technical knowledge. In the presence of the qualitative characteristic ‘verifiability’, the users of the financial information can apply their knowledge and observation for gaining insight about the financial performance as well as financial standings of the entities from analyzing both the financial statements and the note to the financial statements. From the statement of Mr. Brown, one major concern is there that the users are not able to understand and verify the financial notes and statements of the companies by applying the general knowledge as the IFRS financial statements require high financial understanding. Thus, from this, the absence of verifiability and understandability can be seen in the IFRS adopted financial reporting framework (Waegenaere, Sansing and Wielhouwer 2015).
The statement of David Craig, Chief Financial Officer of Commonwealth Bank, shows the ignoring behavior of the investors towards the financial information from the IFRS adopted financial statements as these statements are providing misleading pictures about the financial performance and standings of the companies. In case the financial statements of the business organizations lack two major fundamental qualitative characteristics like relevance and faithful representation, the investors will not be able to gain insight about the financial performance as well as financial position of the business entities. Thus, the financial information must be relevant and faithfully represented in order to be useful for the users of the financial statements. Thus, based on the above discussion, it can be said that the current financial reporting framework pursuant to IFRS lacks both relevance and faithful representation (Trucco 2015).
Now, it needs to be mentioned that providing the correct financial information about the companies through financial statements is the main objective of general purpose financial reporting in order to provide the users with the correct picture about the financial performance as well as financial standings of the companies (Amoako 2013). However, it is not possible to fulfill this objective in the absence of these major qualitative characteristics.
In the year 2006, a major decision was taken from the side of the Australian government related to the not amendment of the Corporations Act with the introduction of any regulation relating to socials and environmental responsibilities. Moreover, the Australian government decided to leave the matter on the market forces for handling. Three popular theories of regulations can be used for the analysis and evaluation of this decision of the Australian government and they are discussed below:
The principles of the public theory support the fact that there is a major requirement for the introduction of necessary regulations for fulfilling the demand of the public. This theory provides great importance to the regulations by stating the fact that the regulations play an integral part to promote the general welfare of the common people and does not serve for any specific group of stakeholders for fulfilling their interests. This theory eliminates the fact that market forces have role to play in satisfying the interest of the public. This theory states that the government of the countries must intervene into the market condition for addressing related to the imperfection of market or market failure (Deegan and Ward 2013).
With the application of this theory in the situation of the Australian government, the scenario can be analyzed and evaluated. According to the public interest theory, the Australian government took one wrong decision by not intruding any regulation in the Corporations Act in spite of the fact that the presence of regulations ensures the betterment of the public. In this situation, there would be large promotion of the social and environmental responsibilities among the public in case the Australian government intervenes into the matters by introducing regulation. In this manner, addressing the market imperfections would be possible related to the Corporations Act (Wang 2014).
The capture theory of regulation can be placed at the opposite of the public interest theory as this theory eliminates the role of the regulations for satisfying the demand of the public. The principles of this theory put emphasis on the market forces for the satisfaction of the needs of common people. Capture theory points towards an important aspect that the regulators have the capability to manipulate the regulations for their own interest so that they can fit in the requirements of the regulators. At the time, it is possible for the identification of the affected parties by the introduction of regulations with the help of the principles of capture theory. This theory indicates towards the intention of the regulators to include themselves in the regulation development process for better satisfying their personal needs. Thus, it is better to rely on the market force for getting the solution (Nilsson and Stockenstrand 2016).
The principle of capture theory can be applied to the present situation. The principle of this theory supports the decision of the Australian government not to introduce any regulation in the Corporations Act for promoting social and environmental responsibilities. The absence of regulations would eliminate the possibility of manipulation with the regulations by the regulator for satisfying their personal interest. The market forces would play an integral part in the promotion of the responsibilities (Hope, Thomas and Vyas 2013).
The concept of this theory of regulation is different from the above-discussed theories. The principles of this theory identifie the business industries as the developer of the introduced regulations so that they can make the businesses beneficial with these introduced regulations. With the application of the principles of these theories in case of the Australian government, it can be said that it would be necessary for the government of Australia to introduce regulation as a part of the Corporations Act so that the social as well as environmental responsibilities can be promoted. With the introduction of the regulations, the business organizations of Australia would be under the obligation to follow all the regulations related to the social as well as environmental responsibilities (Chhabra and Pattanayak 2014).
The provided situation mentions about a specific regulations of US FASB that wants the companies not to make the revaluation of their non-current asset, but to take into consideration the impairment charges associated with these non-current assets. This particular regulation has specific implications for the relevant and faithful representation of the financial statements of the US companies and they are discussed below:
Requirement [a]
The main motivations for the directors are discussed below:
Requirement [b]
Financial statements of the companies get affected by the decision not to revalue the property, plant and equipment. The values of the property, plant and equipment will become stagnant in the absence of asset revaluation process. Thus, the sales procedure of these assets would generate abnormal amount of profit or loss that will eventually reduce the earnings of the companies. In addition, the reduction in the earnings of the companies would end up in reduced profitability for the businesses (Waegenaere, Sansing and Wielhouwer 2015).
Requirement [c]
Apart from the earnings and profitability, the wealth of the shareholders gets affected with the decision not to make the asset revaluation. The shareholders of the business organizations considers the financial statements of the companies before making the investment decisions so that they can obtain understanding about the financial performance as well as financial standings of the business entities. Due to the decrease in the earnings as well as profitability of the companies, the companies cannot provide the actual return on investment to the shareholders. This aspect would lead to the reduction of the wealth of the companies (Waegenaere, Sansing and Wielhouwer 2015).
References
Amoako, G.K., 2013. Accounting practices of SMEs: A case study of Kumasi Metropolis in Ghana. International Journal of Business and Management, 8(24), p.73.
Chan, J.L., 2015. New development: China promotes government financial accounting and management accounting. Public Money & Management, 35(6), pp.451-454.
Chhabra, K.S. and Pattanayak, J.K., 2014. Financial accounting practices among small enterprises: Issues and challenges. IUP Journal of Accounting Research & Audit Practices, 13(3), p.37.
Deegan, C. and Ward, A.M., 2013. Financial accounting and reporting: an international approach.
Florin-Constantin, D., 2013. The users of accounting information and their needs. Anale. Seria Stiinte Economice. Timisoara, 19, p.200.
Hope, O.K., Thomas, W.B. and Vyas, D., 2013. Financial reporting quality of US private and public firms. The Accounting Review, 88(5), pp.1715-1742.
Magnan, M., Menini, A. and Parbonetti, A., 2015. Fair value accounting: information or confusion for financial markets?. Review of Accounting Studies, 20(1), pp.559-591.
Nilsson, F. and Stockenstrand, A.K., 2016. Financial Accounting and Management Control. Springer International Publishing: Imprint: Springer,.
Openshaw, K., 2013. Cost and financial accounting in forestry: a practical manual. Elsevier.
Trucco, S., 2015. Financial Accounting and Alignment to Management Accounting in the Italian Context. In Financial Accounting (pp. 83-132). Springer, Cham.
Ungureanu, M., 2013. Financial Analysis from an Accounting Point of View. CES Working Papers, 5, pp.138-148.
Waegenaere, A., Sansing, R. and Wielhouwer, J.L., 2015. Financial accounting effects of tax aggressiveness: Contracting and measurement. Contemporary Accounting Research, 32(1), pp.223-242.
Wang, C., 2014. Accounting standards harmonization and financial statement comparability: Evidence from transnational information transfer. Journal of Accounting Research, 52(4), pp.955-992.
Warren, C.S. and Jones, J., 2018. Corporate financial accounting. Cengage Learning.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download