Anti-Federalist V. Federalist Ratifying the Constitution Free Essay Example

Many controversial domestic issues have divided the American people. The United States government has taken action to address the ratification of the constitution. The controversial issue that the United States was going through was with the Anti-Federalist that opposed the Ratification of the Constitution.

Since the Federalist wanted strong central government and the Anti-Federalist wanted a state government. I will be addressing the controversial between the Federalists and the Anti-federalist and how they opposed and came to a compromise, having the Bill of Right that became part of the Constitution.

Since the controversial with the constitution, Anti-Federalist thought that if they were to have a strong central government there could be another king or ruler that would dominate the country. The most important event that led up to this problem was because of the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation was made weak and it was decided that there would be no more king. Under the Articles of Confederation, there were laws but it did not have an executive branch that would enforce the laws and because of this there was no one to stop the Shay’s Rebellion.

During that time this impacted the societies economic and the unity of everyone because every state function independently thinking about their own interest instead of the nation as a whole and as well as the votes that were determining on the state’s population. The point of view of those who supported the constitution is that it balanced the power between the state and national government.

Those that opposed ratifying the constitution thought that having a central government would only serve the interest of politician and abuse the power of the constitution.

The Anti-Federalist wanted to secure the rights of the people and they knew that it lacked of protection for individual rights. I think the groups voiced their disagreement because they wanted to prevent anything from happening before it’s too late to change anything. The action that was taken to address this issue was the Bill of Rights; it was adapted to the Constitution, since the Constitution weakened and it needed a national Bill of Rights that guarantee the people would have freedom of speech, religion and press.

The constitution granted a limited amount of power to the national government so that it would not be abuse the rights of the state or the people. The constitution later created the checks and balance system that would check each other making sure that one branch does not dominate another it would also protect the citizens from the government with absolute power. The lasting impact of the governmental action was the checks and balance it holds the branched in check for overruling one another and the Bill of Rights.

For all of the reasons the Anti-federalist thought of the risks that were being taken and were thinking about the people instead of themselves. For the individuals that cannot stand up on their own, so I think that the Anti-Federalist spoke for them. With the Articles of Confederation in power there were just many problems that arose during that period of time. Many people disagreed with the Articles of Confederation being replaced because they don’t want a ruler and because of many things they wanted to create something that the country would not go through again.

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get a custom paper by one of our expert writers.

Get your custom essay

Helping students since 2015