Variance analysis of the financial statements
This analysis provides a comparison between financial statements of two years by making calculations of change in financial figures from one year to another (Marshall, McManus, & Viele, 2004). It also calculates the percentage change in the financial figures from one year to another.
|
2017 |
2016 |
Variance $ |
Variance % |
|
|
|
Increase or (decrease) |
|
Sales |
$ 3,080 |
$ 2,660 |
$ 420 |
15.789% |
Cost of Goods Sold |
$(2,350) |
$(2,010) |
$ (340) |
-16.915% |
Gross Profit |
$ 730 |
$ 650 |
$ 80 |
12.308% |
Other Expenses |
$ (350) |
$ (390) |
$ 40 |
10.256% |
Interest |
$ (300) |
$ (120) |
$ (180) |
-150.000% |
Net Profit |
$ 80 |
$ 140 |
$ (60) |
42.857% |
|
2017 |
2016 |
Variance $ |
Variance % |
|
|
|
Increase or (decrease) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
Trade and other receivables |
$ 772 |
$ 660 |
$ 112 |
16.970% |
Inventory |
$ 680 |
$ 510 |
$ 170 |
33.333% |
Total current assets |
$ 1,452 |
$ 1,170 |
$ 282 |
24.103% |
Non-current assets |
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
$ 1,810 |
$ 1,500 |
$ 310 |
20.667% |
Intangible assets |
$ 40 |
$ – |
$ 40 |
∞ % |
Total non-current assets |
$ 1,850 |
$ 1,500 |
$ 350 |
23.333% |
Total assets |
$ 3,302 |
$ 2,670 |
$ 632 |
23.670% |
Liabilities and equity |
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Trade and other payables |
$ 835 |
$ 795 |
$ 40 |
5.031% |
Current borrowings – Bank Overdraft |
$ 52 |
$ 40 |
$ 12 |
30.000% |
Total current liabilities |
$ 887 |
$ 835 |
$ 52 |
6.228% |
Non-current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Non-current borrowings – Secured loan |
$ 1,500 |
$ 1,000 |
$ 500 |
50.000% |
Total liabilities |
$ 2,387 |
$ 1,835 |
$ 552 |
30.082% |
Net Assets |
$ 915 |
$ 835 |
$ 80 |
9.581% |
Equity |
|
|
|
|
Share capital |
$ 300 |
$ 300 |
$ – |
0.000% |
Retained earnings |
$ 615 |
$ 535 |
$ 80 |
14.953% |
Total Equity |
$ 915 |
$ 835 |
$ 80 |
9.581% |
This variance analysis raise various concerns related to the significant variance
Trend analysis is the financial analysis of calculating trends of historical financial balances (Guay, Samuels, & Taylor, 2016). Under this analysis, any significant change in such trend is observed by the auditor of the organization.
|
2017 |
2016 |
2015 |
2014 |
Sales |
100.00% |
100.00% |
100.00% |
100.00% |
Cost of Goods Sold |
-76.30% |
-75.56% |
-76.02% |
-73.97% |
Gross Profit |
23.70% |
24.44% |
23.98% |
26.03% |
Other Expenses |
-11.36% |
-14.66% |
-13.11% |
-10.69% |
Interest |
-9.74% |
-4.51% |
-3.40% |
-0.15% |
Net Profit (Loss) |
2.60% |
5.26% |
7.48% |
15.19% |
|
2017 |
2016 |
2015 |
2014 |
Assets |
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
Trade and other receivables |
23.38% |
24.72% |
25.38% |
39.92% |
Inventory |
20.59% |
19.10% |
20.56% |
21.42% |
Total current assets |
43.97% |
43.82% |
45.95% |
61.34% |
Non-current assets |
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
54.82% |
56.18% |
54.05% |
38.66% |
Intangible assets |
1.21% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
Total non-current assets |
56.03% |
56.18% |
54.05% |
38.66% |
Total assets |
100.00% |
100.00% |
100.00% |
100.00% |
Liabilities and equity |
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Trade and other payables |
25.29% |
29.78% |
28.55% |
41.80% |
Current borrowings – Bank Overdraft |
1.57% |
1.50% |
1.23% |
1.67% |
Total current liabilities |
26.86% |
31.27% |
29.79% |
43.47% |
Non-current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Non-current borrowings – Secured loan |
45.43% |
37.45% |
29.38% |
0.00% |
Total liabilities |
72.29% |
68.73% |
59.17% |
43.47% |
Net Assets |
27.71% |
31.27% |
40.83% |
56.53% |
Equity |
|
|
|
|
Share capital |
9.09% |
11.24% |
17.63% |
31.35% |
Retained earnings |
18.63% |
20.04% |
23.21% |
25.18% |
Total Equity |
27.71% |
31.27% |
40.83% |
56.53% |
This trend analysis raise various concerns related to significant trend variance
Ratio analysis is the analysis which shows profitability, liquidity, solvency etc. relationship between various financial figures (Weygandt, Kimmel, & Kieso, 2015).
Year ending |
2016 |
2017 |
Profitability ratios |
|
|
Net Profit margin |
5.26% |
2.60% |
Operating Profit Margin |
9.77% |
12.34% |
Return on common stock equity |
16.77% |
8.74% |
Return on Total Assets |
5.24% |
2.42% |
Efficiency ratio |
|
|
Accounts receivable turnover ratio |
4.09 |
4.04 |
Average collection period ratio |
87.97 |
89.06 |
Accounts Payable turnover ratio |
3.58 |
3.85 |
Accounts Payable turnover in days ratio |
100.69 |
93.39 |
Fixed asset turnover ratio |
1.77 |
1.66 |
Total asset turnover ratio |
1.00 |
0.93 |
Long-term solvency ratio |
|
|
Debt Ratio |
68.73% |
72.29% |
Times interest ratio |
2.17 |
1.27 |
Liquidity ratio |
|
|
Current ratio |
1.40 |
1.64 |
Going concern is a significant accounting assumption. As per this assumption, every analyst for the economic business assumes that such business will continues till the end of unforeseeable future period (Amin, Krishnan, & Yang, 2014). Every organization prepares financial statements using historical values due to this concept. The organizations which are not expected to remain going concern in future will make their financial statements by using realization values in place of historical value.
Moreover, if an organization shows some indicators effecting going concern assumption adversely for the organization then such organization does not expect to remain going concern. Such indicators can be accumulated losses, nonpayment of dues, loss of market etc.
Furthermore, in the present case, the organization is having additions in the long term as well as short-term liabilities. Additionally, net income generated by the organization is showing a significant decline hence it can assume that organization may have some going concern issues.
Following Account, balances have a potential risk of misstatement
Account balance |
Justification |
Net income |
a. Significant negative variances b. The significant declining trend is a risk for going concern |
Receivables |
a. Significant increase in variance, b. significant increase in current ratio |
Total liabilities |
a. Increase in debt ratio, b. continually increasing trend is a risk for going concern |
Noncurrent assets |
a. Significant variance, b. Significant increasing trend, c. on the other side, asset turnover ratios have declining trend |
Following assertions are of primary interest
Account balance |
Justification |
Net income |
|
Operating expenses |
Unexpected declining trend and unexpected increasing operating margin ratio emerge the risk of understatement of operating expenses. |
Income expenses |
a. A significant increase in variance and trend b. Percentage Variance change for interest balances is higher than the percentage variance change in debt liabilities |
Receivables |
|
Gross account balance |
A significant increase in variance and current ratio hence doubt of overstatement of the account balance |
Provision for doubtful receivables |
A significant increase in the variance of gross amount and current ratio hence doubt of underestimation of provisioning |
Total liabilities |
|
Bank liabilities |
The significant increasing trend, increasing debt ratio emerges the doubt regarding the utilization of funds from such external funding |
Payables |
Payables have an unexpected declining trend and declining payable turnover ratio hence emerges doubt of payment for payables by an increase in bank liabilities |
Noncurrent assets |
|
Plant property and equipment |
Showing a declining trend even after having a huge investment in this asset |
Intangibles |
This asset emerges from the current year hence need to make extensive procedures regarding this |
Key control
Segregation of duties |
The organization required this internal control for the execution of the transaction. Single-handed execution of cash transaction emerges the risk of cash theft and cash fraud (Kobelsky, 2014). In the present case receipts of cash cheques is made by office assistant and recoding is done by the bookkeeper. |
Policies and procedure identification |
The organization needs to identify policies and procedures for the significant financial transaction. Service charge calculation is the significant procedure for the organization. In the present case, the organization defined the procedure for making calculations of service charges i.e. 300% of hourly rates. This control helps in fairly and accurate service revenue calculation. |
Approval for contract cancellation |
Every organization must have approval policies for the significant transactions. A service contract is a significant business activity for the clinic. In the present case acceptance and cancellation of any service contract is made by managing director. Hence it seems that organization is having control of policies and procedures. |
Recording and reconciling cash |
Real-time recording of cash transaction and periodical reconciliation of cash transaction results in a reduction in a misstatement of cash. In the present case, such recording and reconciliation are made by the bookkeeper. |
Test of controls
Test of controls are the procedures which performed by the auditor for testing actually the internal control is working appropriately or not (Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, 2013).
Observation |
Segregation of duties can be tested by the auditor by making an observation. Under this auditor needs to observe how activities and operations are performed in the organization. In the present case, the auditor will observe how cash receipts and recoding of such receipts is actually performed in the organization. Are the receipts actually have control of segregation of duties or not? |
Analytical review procedure |
Analytical review procedures are ratio calculations, trend calculations and another financial number crunching (Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, 2009). In the present case service fee is charged at 300% of hourly rates. The auditor can make check service charge calculation by making analytical review procedures. |
Inspection |
In the present case acceptance and cancellation of any service contract is made by managing director. The auditor should check whether all cancellations of service contract and acceptance of service contracts have the approval of managing director or not. Hence for this test of control auditor should make an inspection of service contract file. |
Re-calculations |
In the present case, cash recording and reconciliation are made by the bookkeeper. The auditor needs to check whether such reconciliation is free from error or misstatement or not. Thus, for making this check auditor needs to make re-computation of the reconciliation statement. |
Concerns about the controls
Nonperformance parallel test |
Parallel test refers to the parallel running of the old and new system and makes identification of errors, wrong outputs, and bugs created by the new system. In the present case, the organization does not make this test hence new system have expectations of inefficient output. |
Inefficient access control |
In system implementation, access controls are most significant control. In the present case, the organization does not provide access to transaction file to the supervisor, the only master file can be accessed by supervisor. If a supervisor needs to access transaction file for making rechecking of any master file assertion then such access is denied by the system. |
Existence control for the occurrence of a transaction |
Organization’s application system should have an existence for all employee data which are currently working. Such data must be updated on each new recruitment and termination. Such data existence will help in the occurrence of payroll transactions for all current employees. |
Input controls for the accuracy of transactions |
The system must have input controls so that accuracy of transaction processing and output can be ensured. The organization can implement input controls of format check, check digit and reasonableness check. Such control helps in making an accurate input to the application system. |
The appropriate test of control for the application system is test data. Under this control auditor of the organization put some dummy data and observes the output from such dummy inputs. If such dummy inputs become eligible to provide expected correct output then it is concluded that application system is eligible to provide correct output otherwise not. In addition to this auditor can put some unacceptable input to check input controls.
Amin, K., Krishnan, J., & Yang, J. S. (2014). Going concern opinion and cost of equity. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory , 33 (1), 1-39.
Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. (2013, November 11). Auditing Standard ASA 315 Identifying and Assessing the Risks of Material Misstatement through Understanding the Entity and Its Environment. Retrieved April 30, 2018, from https://www.auasb.gov.au: https://www.auasb.gov.au/admin/file/content102/c3/Nov13_Compiled_Auditing_Standard_ASA_315.pdf
Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. (2009, October). Auditing Standard ASA 520 Analytical Procedures. Retrieved April 26, 2018, from https://www.auasb.gov.au/admin/file/content102/c3/ASA_520_27-10-09.pdf
Guay, W., Samuels, D., & Taylor, D. (2016). Guiding through the fog: Financial statement complexity and voluntary disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Economics , 62 (2-3), 234-269.
Kobelsky, K. (2014). A conceptual model for segregation of duties: Integrating theory and practice for manual and IT-supported processes. International Journal of Accounting Information , 15 (4), 304-322.
Marshall, D., McManus, W., & Viele, D. (2004). Accounting: What the numbers mean. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Weygandt, J., Kimmel, P., & Kieso, D. (2015). Financial & managerial accounting. John Wiley & Sons.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order formOnce we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignmentAs soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download