The present case facts brings forward the issue of accounting process and tax implications. As understood from the case of Frank Lloyd he began the business of architect. During the early phases Frank worked from garage before being appointed as the architect for the plan. Frank was even appointed as the architecture and soon began his business with the annual turnover amounted to $2.5 million.
According to the “ITAA 1997 section 6-5” the concept income comprises of the outcome resulting from carrying out the professional services and for commencing any business activities in a manner which results in reliable inflow of cash (Bushman et al., 2016). A business can record revenues either on cash basis or on accrual basis of accounting.
Under the accrual method of accounting the revenues are treated as the income irrespective of fact whether the income is earned (Ato.gov.au, 2018). Under accrual method of accounting the expenses are matched with the relevant revenues to reproduce the profit that is earned from the activities performed. While under the cash method of accounting the revenues and expenses are identified in the financial statement upon the realisation of cash.
According to the judgement of court in “Henderson v FCT (1970)”, the accrual method of accounting are held as the appropriate measurement of accounting for business (Pinto, 2013). However the court in “Carden v FCT (1938)” held that the cash basis of accounting can be followed by small business entrepreneurs whose revenue is low or does not possess sufficient level of knowledge in accrual basis of accounting (Barth et al., 2016). Hence, it is recommended that accrual method of accounting must be followed by the clients. Additionally, where the burden of loan is on the client then in such situation cash basis of accounting must not be considered.
According to the “Taxation Ruling of TR 98/1” the taxpayers are required to record their revenue based on the accrual method of accounting if the gross revenue does not goes past $10 million during the accounting year (Ato.gov.au, 2018). The payment of $75,000 that is received by Frank will be considered as income under the accrual basis of accounting. Other factors that should be included by a business in determining the accrual basis of accounting are given below;
Paragraph 8 and 9 of the “taxation ruling of TR 98/1” explains that a business should account for either cash basis or accrual basis (Ato.gov.au, 2018). In the present situation of Frank, the assesse is operating a medium level business. In such a situation the assesse has the power of selecting any desired accounting method since the gross total income of the business does not exceed greater than $10 million in agreement with the definition stated under “section 6-5 of the ITAA 1997”.
Paragraph 20 of the “taxation ruling 98/1” defines that the business must follow the accrual method of accounting (Ato.gov.au, 2018). Referring to the above stated discussion it is advisable that Frank should follow the accrual method of accounting.
According to the “taxation ruling of TR 98/1” a business that has the total annual turnover of greater than $10 million, the commissioner requires the business to account under the accrual basis of accounting (Ato.gov.au, 2018). On noting that the turnover not exceeding $10 million than the taxpayers has the right of choosing any method of accounting for preparing the income statement of the customers. The taxation commissioner in such situation does not has the authority of enforcing the accounting method (Bankman et al., 2017). Instead the taxation commissioner might request the assesse to follow the particular method of accounting. While in case of any conflict in interest the taxpayer and the commissioner of taxation will be guided by the tribunal.
In the present case study, Frank can change the method of accounting based on the explanations provided under the TR 98/1 since the gross revenue did not went past $10 million. However, to reflect the present position of the assesse it is recommended that the accrual method of accounting must be followed in preparing the financial statements in the following financial year (Murphy & Higgins, 2016). Furthermore, the business has outstanding amount of fees and has also engaged in loan. Therefore, it is advisable to follow the accrual method of accounting.
During the accounting year of 2016/17 Frank reported a revenue of $75,000 whereas in the following year of 2017/18 the annual turnover of the company stood $2.5 million. Hence for both the accounting year the revenues stood below the threshold limit of $10 million. Frank in such situation must follow the accrual basis of accounting since the annual turnover for both the accounting year stood lower than the ATO stated limit of $2 million and $10 million respectively.
The availability of the current software package makes the traditional method of accrual or cash basis of accounting irrelevant. The current software packages provides a business with different result than using the traditional method of accounting (Simmons et al., 2017). The cash method of accounting under the software packages are treated as highly relevant for the business that reports an annual turnover of less than $2 million.
The cash and the accrual method of accounting is regarded as the different from traditional accounting method since it enables the business in treating items that are different. The use of accounting software packages such as MYOB and XERO are created in a manner that suits more for the accrual basis or cash basis of accounting. The software packages are even helpful for business in determining their physical stock take (Miller & Oats, 2016). The availability of the accounting software packages helps in keeping track of the inflow and outflow of cash with better understanding of the business balances such as cash in hand and at bank.
a. According to the Australian taxation office general repairs means making something good by repairing defects, damage or deterioration of the rental property. According to the “subsection 25-10 (1)” repairs usually restores the efficiency and functions of the asset without causing any change or improving the character of the asset. Maintenance can be done to prevent the asset from deterioration in the future (Barkoczy, 2018). There are common examples stated by Australian Taxation Office of repairs which includes replacing of the guttering or windows that are damaged in storm and repairing of any electrical appliances.
As understood in the current case study of Ruby Pty Ltd, an expense was incurred for replacing the fittings of Kitchen together with the deteriorated cupboard that were damaged through water and wear and tear. “Section 25-10 (1) of the ITAA 1997” allows the taxpayer to claim deduction for the expenditure that is incurred in repairing the premises or the depreciating asset that is entirely for the producing the income (Grange et al., 2014). The cost that is incurred by Ruby Pty Ltd on repairing the kitchen fittings and cupboard will be allowed for deductions under “section 25-10 (1) of the ITAA 1997” since it involves restoring the efficiency and functions of the asset without causing any change or improving the character of the asset.
b. According to “section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997” certain legal expenditure that is occurred in producing the rental income are held deductible (James, 2014). These comprises of defending the damages for claims of injuries that is suffered by the third party on the rental property. As held in “FC of T v Snowden & Wilson Pty Ltd (1958)” taxpayer was allowed to claim deduction for all the losses or outgoings that up the amount that they are occurred in gaining the taxable earnings. A deduction is however denied to a taxpayer where the outgoings are of capital, private or domestic in nature or it is related in the derivation of exempted income. As held in “Herald & Weekly Times Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1991)” usually legal expenditure are held deductible given that the expenses have occurred as the consequence of taxpayer’s revenue generating activities given the legal expenditure are not capital, private or domestic in nature (Jover-Ledesma, 2014).
As obvious in the present situation the Ruby Pty Ltd incurred a legal expense for defending the damage relating to the case brought against the taxpayer by a visitor to the tenant that slipped on the rental property and suffered injuries. Referring to “Herald & Weekly Times Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1991)” the expenses incurred by Ruby Pty Ltd is from the risk which is generally present in the rental property (Pinto, 2013). The expenses can be allowed for deduction because it originated from letting the property to the tenants for producing taxable income. Referring to “FC of T v Snowden & Wilson Pty Ltd (1958)” the expenses can be adequately treated as having been occurred in the course of generating the taxable income. Hence, Ruby Pty Ltd are entitled to claim an allowable deductions under the “section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997” for the legal expenditure occurred in defending the damages claim.
c. As defined in “section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997” a taxpayer is allowed to claim a permissible deductions for the expenses that is associated to the losses or outgoings only to the amount that they are occurred in generating the chargeable earnings (Kenny et al., 2018). Expenses that are related to business penalties are not allowed as deductions under “section 26-5 of the ITAA 1997”. However, the taxpayers are denied deductions where the outlays are not incurred in producing the assessable income or in the nature of capital or derivation of exempted earnings. The commissioner in “Hallstroms Pty Ltd v FCT (1946)” held that nature of the expenses must be ascertaining while obtaining deduction under the provision of “section 8-1” (McCouat, 2018). The present case facts obtained from Ruby Pty Ltd it is understood that the company occurred expenses on paying claim for compensation damage. The taxpayer reached the settlement sum of $750,000 for the car producing firm.
Mentioning the decision of commissioner in “Sun Newspaper Ltd v FCT (1938)” it was decided that outgoings that are dedicated for the structural improvements rather than incurring for the functional purpose, the expenses in such situations are not allowed as deductions (Miller & Oats, 2016). The compensation expenses that is occurred by Ruby Pty Ltd constitutes a business penalties which is a non-allowable deductions under “section 26-5 of the ITAA 1997”.
d. As stated by the Australian Taxation Office expenses that are occurred for creating business provisions are held as non-deductible expenses (Ato.gov.au, 2018). In order to claim deductions for the taxpayers under “section 63 of the ITAA 1997” the expenses must be existent prior to claiming deductions (Sadiq, 2018). An individual taxpayer is allowed to claim deduction under “subsection 63 (1)” of the act if the expenses are written off by the taxpayer.
Referring to the present situation of Ruby Pty Ltd, the company has set aside the provision of $100,000 in accounts during the income year ended 30 June. As a general rule, business expenses of provisional nature are non-allowable deductions because they are not occurred in producing the taxable income and therefore non-allowable for deduction under the general provision of “section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997”.
e: The common provision of “section 8-1” explains that the losses or outgoings which are preliminary in the beginning of the revenue producing activities are not allowed for deductions. The reason for being the expenses held as non-deductible is because they are incurred in the course of business activity (Murphy & Higgins, 2016). A decision of the court in “Softwood Pulp & Paper v FCT (1976)” can be cited by stating that the company reported an expense related to feasibility study and certain other costs to ascertain whether the taxpayer can establish a new production mill (Simmons et al., 2017). The commissioner of taxation deprived the taxpayer from claiming the allowable deductions because everything that was done by the taxpayer was preliminary to beginning of business.
Similarly, in the present situation of Ruby Pty Ltd, the company incurred the investigation expenses of $220,000 to determine the probable entry in the car manufacturing industry. The expenses which was incurred by the firm to commencement of business and not in the course of producing assessable income. Hence, the market study expenses will not be allowed for deductions under “section 8-1 of the ITAA 1997”.
References:
Accounting methods. (2018). Retrieved from https://www.ato.gov.au/Business/Income-and-deductions-for-business/Assessable-income/Accounting-methods/
Bankman, J., Shaviro, D. N., Stark, K. J., & Kleinbard, E. D. (2017). Federal Income Taxation. Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.
Barkoczy, S. (2018). Australian Tax Casebook 2018 14e ebook. Melbourne: OUPANZ.
Barth, M. E., Clinch, G., & Israeli, D. (2016). What do accruals tell us about future cash flows?. Review of Accounting Studies, 21(3), 768-807.
Bushman, R. M., Lerman, A., & Zhang, X. F. (2016). The changing landscape of accrual accounting. Journal of Accounting Research, 54(1), 41-78.
Grange, J., Jover-Ledesma, G., & Maydew, G. 2014 principles of business taxation.
James, S. (2014) The economics of taxation.
Jover-Ledesma, G. (2014). Principles of business taxation 2015. [Place of publication not identified]: Cch Incorporated.
Kenny, P., Blissenden, M., & Villios, S. (2018) Australian Tax.
Legal Database. (2018). Retrieved from https://www.ato.gov.au/law/view/document?DocID=TXR/TR981/NAT/ATO/00001&PiT=99991231235958
McCouat, P. (2018) Australian master GST guide.
Miller, A., & Oats, L. (2016). Principles of international taxation. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Murphy, K. E., & Higgins, M. (2016). Concepts in Federal Taxation 2017. Cengage Learning.
Pinto, D. (2013). State taxes. In Australian Taxation Law (pp. 1763-1762). CCH Australia Limited.
Sadiq, K. (2018). Australian taxation law cases 2018. Pyrmont, NSW: Thomson Reuters.
Simmons, D. L., McMahon, M. J., Borden, B. T., & Ventry, D. J. (2017). Federal Income Taxation. Foundation Press.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download