In the given scenario the issue that is said to exist is whether the terms of the contract that had been signed between Barry and Angelo were misrepresented and whether the contract was a valid one.
Misrepresentation in the terms of a contract can be defined as a false statement or expression given by either of the parties to the contract on which the other party relies. Misrepresentation negates the validity of the terms of the contract. In case party relies on the misrepresentation and su9bsequetly suffers a loss, the aggrieved party is entitled to rescind the contract and claim damages. The case Money v Westpac Banking Corporation (1988) ATPR (Digest) 46-038misleading and deceptive conduct. It had been held in this case that a party has the right to enter into another contract if he has been a victim of misrepresentation.
In the case Demagogue Pty Ltd v Ramensky (1992) 39 FCR 31 it had been held that for any person to take action against misrepresentation, it must be proved by such person that the statement on which he relied and the statement which constituted misrepresentation was false in nature and different from normal state. However it can be stated that a person is not allowed to take action against any misrepresentation made by a party which is in relation to a future event or an upcoming event, as held in the case Edgington v Fitzmaurice. However, there is one exception to this rule which gives the right to the aggrieved party to take actions against the misrepresenting party in relation to future upcoming events only when the misrepresented terms are formed in the contract.
The notable case Smith v Land & House Property Corp deals with misrepresentation which is constituted by false statement of fact. In this case it had been held that any person giving a false statement in the form of an opinion, who was in a position to know that the true facts of the case, his opinion would constitute a false statement of facts. In the case Solle v Butcher it had been held by the court that where any misrepresentation has been constituted by a statement of law, the aggrieved party will not have the right to take actions against such misrepresentation.
As held in the case Lambert v Co-Operative Insurance misrepresentation can be constituted by a statement which has the capacity to encourage the other party to enter into the contract due to such false statement. In this case it had been provided that if any of the parties to the contract who had strong knowledge about the truth of the facts, fails to disclose a material fact the other party who relied on such information would be entitled to avoid the contract.
Misrepresentation can be categorized in to three categories which are Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Negligent misrepresentation and wholly innocent misrepresentation.
Fraudulent Misrepresentation is of particular importance in this given scenario. Fraudulent misrepresentation had been illustrated in the case Derry v Peek as a statement of fact which is false in nature and which was given knowingly by the misrepresenting party or without belief to be true or recklessly. In such a case the plaintiff who asserts the fraud will have the burden of proof. In case an actionable misrepresentation has been established the aggrieved party has the right to set the contract aside as held in the case Car & Universal Finance v Caldwell. Further it has been provided in the case Doyle v Olby (Ironmongers) Ltd [1969] 2 QB 158 that the aggrieved party has the right to claim damages for fraudulent misrepresentation.
In this given scenario it has been provided that Angelo had given an advertisement for the sale of is vegetable shop. It was particularly mentioned in the advertisement that the farm had no competitors and that it had a turnover of 20,000 dollars. Barry had relied on the advertisement and bought the farm, however it was later discovered that terms of the advertisements were false. Therefore as per the decision of the case Smith v Land & House Property Corp, it can be stated that the conduct of Angelo constituted misrepresentation by false statement of facts. Further by the application of the decision of the Lambert v Co-Operative Insurance case it can be stated that Barry has the right to avoid the contract as Angelo had strong knowledge of the truth of the statements which he misrepresented. Thus the contract is voidable by Barry. By the application of the Derry v Peek case it can be stated that the advertisement constituted fraudulent misrepresentation as Angelo had given a false statement of facts knowingly with the intention to induce Barry to enter into the contract. Further by the application of the Doyle v Olby (Ironmongers) Ltd case it can be stated that in addition to setting the contract aside the Barry will have the right to claim damages from Angelo due to Fraudulent misrepresentation.
Conclusion
Thus in conclusion it can be stated that the contract is voidable by Barry. Barry can also claim damages from Angelo for misrepresenting the facts.
In the given scenario the issue that has been identified is what actions Barry can take for breach contract with Angelo.
The Competition and Consumer Act 2010 governs certain provisions of the Sale of Goods Act 1954 in Australia. The sale of goods act is applicable to those consumers who purchase goods within the territory of Australia. In accordance with the provisions of the Australian Consumer Law which has been provided in schedule 2 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 it can be stated that any person who purchases any product for household or domestic consumption and any product whose worth is less than 40,000 dollars can be defined as a consumer. However it is worth mentioning that any product or good purchased outside the territory of Australia does not fall under the purview of the Australian Consumer Law.
It can be stated that the provisions of common law legislation imply certain terms to a contract so as to ensure that express terms of the contract are carried out in an efficient manner. Such terms that are assessed by the courts to be existing in the contract are known as implied terms. It had been held in the case Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Barker [2013] FCAFC 83 that implied terms are added to the contract for the purpose of adding efficacy to the contract and make it more effective. The case, Con-Stan Industries of Australia Pty Ltd v Norwich Winterthur (Australia) Ltd deals with the terms that are implied in contracts due to custom or trade usage. In this case the criteria for implying terms in contracts had been set out by the court. Further it has been provided in section 19 of the Sale of Goods Act 1954, that sellers have the implied obligation to deliver products that are assessed to be of reasonable quality by the purchaser even when there are no terms in the contract which determine the quality of the goods.
It can be stated that there are several remedies available to the purchaser which are granted to the consumers by the provisions of common law legislation in case of breach of contract. Some of the remedies available to the consumers for breach of contract are specific performance, injunction, recession and claiming damages. As held in the case Doyle v Olby (Ironmongers) Ltd it can be said that it is the duty of the seller to provide damages to the consumer, that have been sustained by him due to the breach of the contract.
In this given scenario it is evident that Barry and Angelo had entered into a contract which was duly signed by the parties. It is worth mentioning that the contract between the parties had many terms incorporated in it. It was clearly provided through the terms of the contract that Barry would be given a loader and van by the seller. However after the purchase Barry came to know that the van was on lease and he had to pay 500 dollars if he wanted to us the same. Subsequently the cost of managing the business by Barry increased to 8500, which was originally promised to be 8000. It was realized by Barry that the loader was broken and the cost of fixing the loader was more than its original cost. Thus in this case it is clearly evident that Angelo had breached the terms of the contract as the loader was not of acceptable quality according to the application of section 19 of the Sale of Goods Act 1954.
Further in accordance with the judgment of the notable case Doyle v Olby (Ironmongers) Ltd [1969] 2 QB 158, it can be stated that the Barry can claim damages from Angelo for the rent of the van which had not been disclosed to him fraudulently by Angelo.
Conclusion
Thus to conclude, it can be stated that Barry can claim damages from Angelo for fixing the loader and can also claim damages for leasing the van.
Reference List:
Money v Westpac Banking Corporation (1988) ATPR (Digest) 46-038
Demagogue Pty Ltd v Ramensky (1992) 39 FCR 31
Edgington v Fitzmaurice (1885) 29 Ch D 459
Smith v Land & House Property Corp (1884) 28 Ch D 7
Solle v Butcher [1950] 1 KB 671
Lambert v Co-Operative Insurance [1975] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 485
Car & Universal Finance v Caldwell [1965] 1 QB 525
Competition and Consumer act 2010
Sale of Goods Act 1954
Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Barker [2013] FCAFC 83
Con-Stan Industries of Australia Pty Ltd v Norwich Winterthur (Australia) Ltd (1986) 160 CLR 226
Doyle v Olby (Ironmongers) Ltd [1969] 2 QB 158
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download