In the particular assignment the analyst has taken up the business organsiation of Sasij business firm which works out in the segment of manufacturing the small range of goods. At the earlier point of time only three products were used to manufacture by the company. The firm used the tradition approach of recognising the overheads among the existing range of products.
Over the evolution of time the company started manufacturing the wide range of products. Still recognising the traditional approach of single recovery rate using the machine hour approach is not a feasible idea. the company should work out with the Activity based costing approach such that the individual overhead use both unit and non unit based cost drivers to assign cost to the cost object by primarily allocating the cost to the various activities and then according to the nature of utilisation of those activities the cost to be allocated to the products manufactured by the business firm
Traditional approach of costing
In the current context business firm of Sasij organsiation is working with the traditional approach using the single machine hour based recovery rate. Total cost incurred by the organisation towards the indirect expenses is $8,196,400. This cost as in the present approach is divided by the total machine hours utilised by the various business activities totalled to 9000 hours. This provides us a unit cost of $819.64 as a single recovery rate for the all range of products.
The approach of using the traditional recovery rate in the case of multiple ranges of products is a wrong practise and the company cannot determine the actual cost of the individual range of products. This might further affect the profitability of the complete concern (Innes, et. al., 2000).
Activity based costing
Activity based costing approach is a system based planning model utilised in the case where the business concern is dealing in variety of products and services and common overheads are utilised (Kapi?, 2014). These overheads are primarily classified on the basis of total activities and then transferred to the individual product costing on the basis on level of activities utilised by them (Turney, 1991). There are mainly two phase’s works out in the process of activity based costing.
Statement of cost pool
Cost category |
Cost |
Basis |
No. of activity |
Cost per activity |
Wages |
$5,952,000 |
Number of employees |
3 + 12 + 2 + 31 + 31 + 24 + 12 + 9 |
$48,000 |
Building costs |
$620,000 |
Floor space |
200 + 500 + 500 + 1000 + 1000 + 1000 + 500 + 300 |
$124 |
Depreciation |
$1,240,000 |
Machine hours |
0 + 0 + 0 + 4000 + 5000 + 1000 + 0 + 0 |
$124 |
Consumables |
$62,000 |
Orders placed by centre |
10 + 20 + 0 + 190 + 120 + 190 + 60 + 30 |
$100 |
Energy |
$260,400 |
Kilowatt hours used |
0 + 0 + 0 + 250000 + 370000 + 250000 + 0 + 0 |
$0.2993 |
Other |
$62,000 |
Number of employees |
3 + 12 + 2 + 31 + 31 + 24 + 12 + 9 |
$500 |
Total |
$8,196,400 |
Traditional approach of Machine hours |
0 + 0 + 0 + 4000 + 5000 + 1000 + 0 + 0 |
$819.64 |
Total cost of activities
Activities |
Total Cost Of Activities |
New Product Development |
$171,300 |
Sales and dispatch |
$646,000 |
Inspecting |
$159,000 |
Mincing |
$2,217,328 |
Mixing |
$2,370,245 |
Smoking and Packing |
$1,505,828 |
Administration |
$650,000 |
Corporate management |
$476,700 |
Activities and resource drivers used – Inspecting |
Wages cost |
Building cost |
||
Activity |
Percentage of labour time |
Percentage of floor space |
||
Inspect meat |
30% |
$1,785,600 |
50% |
$ 310,000.00 |
Disposal of substandard meat |
10% |
$595,200 |
10% |
$ 62,000.00 |
Move to mincing room |
10% |
$595,200 |
10% |
$ 62,000.00 |
Inspect finished products |
30% |
$1,785,600 |
10% |
$ 62,000.00 |
Disposal of substandard product |
10% |
$595,200 |
10% |
$ 62,000.00 |
Reports to Health Dept |
10% |
$595,200 |
10% |
$ 62,000.00 |
Total |
100% |
$5,952,000 |
100% |
$ 620,000.00 |
Activity |
Activity cost |
Activity driver |
Annual quantity of activity driver |
Allocated cost of activity |
Annual quantity of activity driver |
Allocated cost of activity |
Corporate management |
$476,700 |
Assigned directly to products |
$95,628 |
$95,628 |
$11,533 |
$11,533 |
Process receivables |
$260,000 |
No. of invoices |
600 |
$25,161.29 |
200 |
$8,387.10 |
Process payables |
$253,800 |
No. of purchase orders |
200 |
$16,374.19 |
100 |
$8,187.10 |
Production planning |
$136,200 |
No. of production schedules |
100 |
$10,983.87 |
60 |
$6,590.32 |
Reports to Health Dept |
$657,200 |
No. of production schedules |
100 |
$53,000.00 |
60 |
$31,800.00 |
Process sales order |
$400,000 |
No. of sales orders |
620 |
$50,000.00 |
190 |
$15,322.58 |
Dispatch sales order |
$246,000 |
No. of dispatches |
500 |
$39,677.42 |
100 |
$7,935.48 |
New Product Development |
$171,300 |
Assigned directly to new products lines |
$0 |
$0.00 |
$56,529 |
$56,529.00 |
Inspect meat |
$2,095,600 |
No. of batches |
100 |
$169,000.00 |
60 |
$101,400.00 |
Disposal of substandard meat |
$657,200 |
No. of batches |
100 |
$53,000.00 |
60 |
$31,800.00 |
Move to mincing room |
$657,200 |
No. of batches |
100 |
$53,000.00 |
60 |
$31,800.00 |
Set up mincer |
$156,550 |
No. of batches |
100 |
$12,625.00 |
60 |
$7,575.00 |
Load mincer |
$156,550 |
No. of batches |
100 |
$12,625.00 |
60 |
$7,575.00 |
Operate mincer |
$1,278,028 |
No. of kilograms |
49,750 |
$256,378.60 |
12,000 |
$61,840.06 |
Unload mincer |
$306,900 |
No. of batches |
100 |
$24,750.00 |
60 |
$14,850.00 |
Clean mincer |
$156,550 |
No. of batches |
100 |
$12,625.00 |
60 |
$7,575.00 |
Move to mixing room |
$162,750 |
No. of batches |
100 |
$13,125.00 |
60 |
$7,875.00 |
Set up scales |
$81,375 |
No. of batches |
100 |
$6,562.50 |
60 |
$3,937.50 |
Weigh ingredients |
$156,550 |
No. of batches |
100 |
$12,625.00 |
60 |
$7,575.00 |
Load mixers |
$313,100 |
No. of batches |
100 |
$25,250.00 |
60 |
$15,150.00 |
Operate mixers |
$1,568,895 |
No. of kilograms |
49,750 |
$314,727.93 |
12,000 |
$75,914.27 |
Clean mixers |
$162,750 |
No. of batches |
100 |
$13,125.00 |
60 |
$7,875.00 |
Move mixture to smokehouse |
$87,575 |
No. of kilograms |
49,750 |
$17,567.97 |
12,000 |
$4,237.50 |
Pack into skins |
$322,000 |
No. of products |
198,400 |
$64,400.00 |
24,800 |
$8,050.00 |
Setup smokehouse |
$122,600 |
No. of trays |
1,990 |
$12,297.08 |
500 |
$3,089.72 |
Move to smokehouse |
$64,400 |
No. of trays |
1,990 |
$6,459.48 |
500 |
$1,622.98 |
Smoke products |
$861,828 |
No. of trays |
1,990 |
$86,443.43 |
500 |
$21,719.46 |
Unload smokehouse |
$64,400 |
No. of trays |
1,990 |
$6,459.48 |
500 |
$1,622.98 |
Inspect finished products |
$1,847,600 |
No. of trays |
– |
500 |
$46,562.50 |
|
Disposal of substandard product |
$657,200 |
No. of trays |
– |
500 |
$16,562.50 |
|
Move to truck |
$70,600 |
No. of trays |
1,990 |
$7,453.26 |
480 |
$1,797.77 |
In the current approach of activity based costing overhead cost is primarily assigned to the cost activity and then to the respective product to be manufactured. Various factors are determined in the particular case that comprehends the analyst to determine the cost of a business activity.
Certain activities cost is not available which is evaluated using the previous table. On the later part cost of each activity is collected, these are also referred as cost pools (Pohlen, & La Londe, 1994). The approach of traditional costing works out with the fact when the company is manufacturing the limited number of products but with the growth and development of business concern the company should gradually move over to the activity based costing systems (Shields, 1995).
Conclusion
This assignment refers to the situation in which the business concern of Sasij which is dealing out in the wide range of product manufacturing process. Current approach of traditional overhead distribution is utilised by the business concern which placed a negative impact over the profitability of the concern. This is due to the fact of improper distribution of overhead cost. The analyst in the above assignment showcased the utilisation of activity based costing approach using the current financial data of the Sasij group taking the overheads of two products into account.
References
Innes, J., Mitchell, F., & Sinclair, D. (2000). Activity-based costing in the UK’s largest companies: a comparison of 1994 and 1999 survey results. Management accounting research, 11(3), 349-362.
Turney, P. B. (1991). Common cents: The ABC performance breakthrough: How to succeed with activity-based costing. Cost Technology.
Pohlen, T. L., & La Londe, B. J. (1994). Implementing activity-based costing (ABC) in logistics. Journal of Business Logistics, 15(2), 1.
Kapi?, J. (2014). ACTIVITY BASED COSTING-ABC. Business Consultant/Poslovni Konsultant, 6(32).
Shields, M. D. (1995). An empirical analysis of firms’ implementation experiences with activity-based costing. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 7, 148.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order formOnce we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignmentAs soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download