Analyzing Bowman’s Strategy Clock Model And Its Application By Microsoft Corporation

Microsoft Corporation

Write a brief description and profile of the specific organisation chosen within the industry sector.

Business management is a critical part of every organization. This report aims at analyzing various strategic models used by organizations to assist them in making right decisions. The model being assessed in this report is Bowman’s Strategy Clock and the organization is Microsoft.

Making various strategies and applying them in regular basis is the way of an association battles, or the strategy taken by associations to offer its things and organizations (Ledingham, 2000). Bowman’s Strategy Clock is an instrument to recognize the forceful position of the association, or how the associations make the customers agree to buy their things rather than other company’s products. Bowman’s Strategy Clock model is used as a piece of showcasing to get view the forceful position of an association in relationship to the offerings of contenders (Zuberbuhler et al, 2013). It was made by Cliff Bowman and David Faulkner. Moreover with Porter’s General Strategies, Bowman ponders distinct advantage in association with expense ideal position or partition advantage. Bowman’s Strategy Clock identifies with eight methodologies in four quadrants described by the tomahawks of quality and saw included worth. This made star shape of a clock face. An open market ceaselessly has various players fighting to offer the same thing or organization, and customers select the option they like the most (Bron, 2001). In such a business area, associations endeavor to build distinct advantage over their opponents, by giving the customer something that contender things don’t offer. For this case study, the working procedure and history of Microsoft Corporation will be analyzed to show how they have applied Bowman’s Principle. After analyzing the growth and the applied Bowman’s principle, the effectiveness of Bowman’s principle will be discussed. Before that, a little description about Microsoft Corporation is given below:

Microsoft Corporation is world’s biggest software making company which was founded by Bill Gates and Paul Allen. They started with the intention of making BASIC translators for Altair 8800. Microsoft Corporation is now $32 billion industry. The company got their huge success by completing order of IBM. They continued their journey by improving computer operating system. They made MS-DOS. They created major evolution by making Windows 95 as that kind of operating system was unbelievable at that time. After that many computer operating systems were came like Windows 98, Windows XP, Windows 7, Windows 8, and Windows 10. Every time, they made new and more attractive operating system. The company also got success in gaming products. They created another evolution by making browser named Internet Explorer.

Bowman’s Principle

Bowman’s Principle is a strategy which is consists of eight principles. They are used to get winning edge over other competitor and to successfully retain growth (Cohen, 2007). The principle of Bowman’s strategy is discussed here:

This strategy is applied by keeping the price lower than the price of competing companies. This potentially can increase sales sometimes but it can put pressure on revenue. It gives a company breathing space over the company’s adversaries (Butler, 2013). Shockingly it’s inclined to be brief resulting to the quality reduction may trigger a worth war as contenders who lose offer respond with their own particular worth diminishments. Here and there expense is a mediator measure for quality, where worth is difficult to study so a quality diminishment may moreover lessening the customer’s impression of worth offered by the thing (Barnett, 2006).

Firms don’t regularly choose to battle in this order. Low price/Low value strategy is implemented by creating products of lower value and selling them at lower price than other companies. This is not considered a good option to growth all the time. But, it can be fruitful when the customer themselves want products at lower price. The most ideal approach to “make it” here is through cost suitably offering volume, and by perseveringly pulling in new customers(Aldave and McLeod, 2001). The company won’t be winning any customer commitment challenges, yet the company may have the ability to oversee the company’s length of stay one stage before the buyer. Products are substandard however the expenses are adequately appealing to induce customers to endeavor them once (Debicki, 2009).

This is done by including customer regard or extending impression of customer quality through all the more capable welcoming and business segment exchanges. Since including customer worth sets aside more opportunity to duplicate, the company could hold the company’s distinct advantage notwithstanding the way that contenders could cut their expenses in light of return to the quality for money line (Purcell, 2010).

This move puts the company at an engaged weight unless the company’s opponents take after esteeming lead and grant industry expenses to climb. This is possible if customers are tolerating significantly more use quality than the worth they are paying – it’s what money related pros call the buyer flood (Rüling, 2003).

Hybrid strategic method can be done by implementing moderate partition to quality of products. This can give a healthy result as the little change can change the attitude of the customers toward the brand i.e. products. This can bring winning edge for a company over other companies in the same field. The quality and worth is extraordinary and the client is ensured of sensible expenses. This combination gathers customer commitment(Zuberbuhler et al, 2013).

Low Price

Focused detachment is the sort of partition that gives high regard at high or premium expenses, all the time concentrating on a claim to fame arrangement, and modifying for unlucky deficiency of volume by high edges. The high regard is frequently an outcome of acknowledgment, created through advertisements and wary determination of offers outlets rather than any liberal division in the honest to goodness thing (Lee, 2009). Subsequently, it is the kind of separation that gives high esteem at high or premium costs and make up for absence of volume by high edges. The high esteem is frequently an after effect of discernment, developed through ads and watchful choice of offers outlets as opposed to any significant separation in the genuine item.

Once in a while, associations fundamentally fabricate cost without expanding the estimation of the thing. The extended expense may be inferable from an addition of data costs, general parts, or whatever else. One association may stand out in making the move, with the discovering that others pretty much as affected by the same variables, would soon adhere to this same example. In diverse cases, the association may grow the expense to adventure some short lived computes, for instance, unsettling influence the contenders stock system, to rake in genuine cash with a whole deal move of disposing of the thing as a noteworthy part of a more broad essential goal (Giacalone, 2013).

In a forceful business segment, this system stays unsustainable for long if got with no genuine triggers or reason. Associations subjectively extending expenses soon lose bit of the pie, as customers move to contender things that offer the same worth at lower expenses.

It is done by lowering value of certain product and keep standard price. Any association that looks for after this kind of strategy will lose bit of the general business. If the company has a low principle, then they can do such thing. Some companies do this as they can’t offer day-old bread at new expenses (Podsakoff, 2008).

Microsoft applied the principles of Bowman from when it was established by Paul Allen and Bill Gates on April 4, 1975, they wanted to create differentiate in technologies by making BASIC translators for Altair 8800. Creating differentiate in technologies which is Bowman’s one of the strategy, make them successful. It created revolution in the computer operating system market with MS-DOS in the mid-1980s, trailed by Microsoft Windows. This was an innovative approach, which is one of important criteria to get advancement according to the Bowman’s principle. They got success in 1986, it can be said the innovative approach by Paul Allen and Bill Gates helped them to get success. Since the 1990s, it has progressively broadened from the working framework showcase and has made acquisitions offering huge money to the companies. In 1972 they established their first organization, named Microsoft. They got the name from the words microcomputer and programming and this was another innovative approach which was taken by Bill Gates. Amid the following couple of years, they refined BASIC and created other programming dialects which offered a simple PC that followed and broke down car activity information to get competitive edge from others and this improving the features of product is also an important strategy which is mentioned in Bowman’s strategy. Allen went to get a degree in software engineering at Washington State University and he joined later to the school of Honeywell. Microsoft acquired a working framework from another organization, changed it, and renamed it MS-DOS. Microsoft extended its position in working frameworks with Windows, a graphical client interface whose third form, discharged in 1990. Therefore, adding value to company’s product or services was always the intention of Microsoft. By adding value which is also a part of Bowman’s strategy is one of the important key of success to Microsoft. In 1992, Microsoft Windows released 3.1. In 1995 the organization made Windows 95, which interestingly completely coordinated MS-DOS with Windows. They likewise made the Windows XP which made advancement in PC working framework. There most as of late discharges are Windows 7, Windows 8 and the most recent Windows 10. They likewise served to begin upset by making new web program which was web pioneer. Therefore, they always had Focused Differentiation to get winning edge over the other companies, which is also an important strategy which can be found on Bowman’s strategy. Bowman’s strategy for keeping the price lower can be seen in Microsoft in 2001 when Microsoft made the Xbox by which they tried to catch better place in the feature gaming business. In 2009 the organization cut the cost of the Xbox 360 Elite by as much as 25 percent with a specific end goal to get piece of the overall industry. Microsoft continued the strategy of innovative differentiation and Microsoft proceeded with OS predominance and its snappy recuperation in the “program wars” did not rehash itself in the web index market, where Microsoft’s web crawler, Live Search, trailed well behind those of Google Inc., the new business goliath, and Yahoo! Inc., the strong Internet entry website (Metters, 2007). Microsoft would have liked to change the business progress in 2009 by making new search engine Bing.

Low Price/Low Value

Conclusion

After this case study, it can be concluded that Bowman’s Principle can make a company very successful in terms of getting winning edge over other companies. This Bowman’s Principle is consists of differentiation, low value, high price, Focused Differentiation etc. By this essay, how Microsoft Corporation has been developing success using Bowman’s principle has been discussed. They mainly applied the differentiation technique to improve their sales. Sometimes they also applied the low value methods, especially when they faced difficulty in selling gaming products. It can be said that, improving quality of service or product was the key features for the Microsoft. Therefore, according to the Bowman’s principle and practical example it can be said that to get success and to retain high growth, a company should always needs to improve their products and always offer a better solution to the customers. The other principle like low value or keep the price lower than other companies can also work well in some condition. Moderate worth/moderate partition is also an important concept to the management of every company although it works well in certain conditions only. Therefore, at last, it can be said that applying the methods of Bowman’s principle can develop success and growth for a company.

References

Purcell, K. (2010). An analysis of adolescent involvement at public horticulture institutions.

Zuberbuhler, B., Tuft, S., Gartry, D. and Spokes, D. (2013). Corneal Surgery. Dordrecht: Springer.

Aldave, A. and McLeod, S. (2001). The Molecular Genetics of Bowman’s Layer Dystrophies. Cornea, 20(6), p.672.

Bron, A. (2001). The Molecular Genetics of Bowman’s Layer Dystrophies. Cornea, 20(6), pp.672-674.

Butler, D. (2013). Isaiah Bowman’s Forest Physiography. Progress in Physical Geography, 37(6), pp.855-858.

Ledingham, J. A. (2000). Public relations as relationship management: A relational approach to the study and practice of public relations. Routledge.

Cohen, D. J. (2007). The very separate worlds of academic and practitioner publications in human resource management: Reasons for the divide and concrete solutions for bridging the gap. Academy of Management Journal,50(5), 1013-1019.

Barnett, M. L.(2006). Corporate reputation: The definitional landscape. Corporate reputation review, 9(1), 26-38.

Debicki, B. J. (2009). Family business research in the new millennium an overview of the who, the where, the what, and the why. Family Business Review, 22(2), 151-166.

Rüling, C. C. (2005). Popular concepts and the business management press.Scandinavian Journal of Management, 21(2), 177-195.

Lee, R. (2009). Social capital and business and management: Setting a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(3), 247-273.

Giacalone, R. A. (2013). Impression management in the organization. Psychology Press.

Podsakoff, P. M. (2008). Scholarly influence in the field of management: A bibliometric analysis of the determinants of university and author impact in the management literature in the past quarter century. Journal of Management, 34(4), 641-720.

Kimes, S. E. (1989). The basics of yield management.

Metters, R. (2007). Service Management—Academic Issues and Scholarly Reflections from Operations Management Researchers*. Decision Sciences, 38(2), 195-214.