Analyzing DIPL’s Financial Report For The Audit Of Year Ending 30 June 2015

Applying Analytical Procedures to DIPL’s Financial Report Information

Analytical process is considered to be one of the adequate information providing systems, which allows the company to develop adequate audit plan.  The use of the audit plan mainly allows the auditor’s relevant steps that need to be conducted complete the audit operation. Arens, Elder and Beasley (2014) mentioned that with the help of audit plan, auditors are able to control and maintain the overall audit cost, which is needed to complete the overall audit procedures. However, DIPL need an adequate analytical approach for reviewing the overall financial information, which has been declared by the organisation. The analytical approach only allows the financial analyst and auditors to understand overall performance of the organisation and make relevant accounting and financial decisions. Furthermore, with the help of common size analytical approach, individuals are able to evaluate the financial declaration that has been conducted by the organisation. In this context, Arens et al. (2016) stated that the evaluation and comparison of different financial reports allows the financial analyst to understand the trend of the organisation.

There are different ways in which financial analyst and Accountants are able to evaluate the financial report of an organisation. The major analytical process that could be used by the analyst is the Benchmarking. This method directly allows the analyst to compare the financial condition of an organisation to its peers. Relevant variance could be identified with the help of benchmarking process, which could directly pinpointing causes of the variance and performance between the company and its competitors. Furthermore, the use of ratios also allows the financial analyst to evaluate the financial information provided by an organisation.  The evaluation conducted by the ratios allows the organisation to compare the performance of the organisation with not only its competitors but also with the previous fiscal year performance. According to Becker, Stead and Stead (2016), ratios are considered to be one of the measures, which are used by auditors and analyst to evaluate performance of the organisation in different timelines.

Particulars	2013	2014 Save Time On Research and Writing Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper. Get My Paper	2015
Current assets	5,385,938	7,509,150	9,600,929
Current liabilities	3,780,000	5,120,250	6,397,500
Revenue	34,212,000	37,699,500	43,459,500
Net profit	2,359,190	2,291,362	2,972,183
Depreciation	249,375	274,312	472,688
Total liabilities	3,780,000	5,120,250	13,897,500
Current ratio	1.42	1.47	1.50
Profit margin	6.90%	6.08%	6.84%
Solvency ratio	69.01%	50.11%	24.79%

The above table many helps in identifying the relevant ratios such as current ratio, profit margin, and solvency ratio for DIPL. Relevant improvement in the current ratio is seen, whereas decline is seen in both profit margin and solvency ratio from 2013 to 2015 (Cohen and Simnett 2014). The analytical process mainly identifies the relevant expenses, income, and effectiveness of the budget that is used by the organisation. Ratios are one of the adequate analytical tools that could be used by the auditors in conducting analysis of DIPL.

Furthermore, the use of ratios mainly allows the organisation to understand the actual financial performance of the organisation. The auditor’s would eventually detect the actual financial health of the organisation and its trend with the help of financial ratio. Use of ratios also allows the analysis to understand the desirable and undesirable condition what the company’s current financial position. However, the current case of DIPL is relatively undesirable, as the organisations performance has rapidly declined over the period of three years. The performance of the organisations have deteriorated over the period of three fiscal years, which directly imposes the overall corrective measures that needs to be conducted by the organisation for increasing its future performance (Cohen and Simnett 2015). Thus, it could be evaluated that the above mentioned reasons have relevant significance, which forces the organisation to use analytical process on its financial information.

Identifying Inherent Risk Factors Arising from DIPL’s Business Operations

There are two types of inheritance that could be identified from the operations of DIPL, which is hindering the operational capability of the organisation. However there are certain risk that could be evaluated first to understand the risk factors that is hampering the operations of the DIPL. Evaluation of a case study mainly helps in understanding that the accounts department of the organisation have conducted different types of omission in Record Keeping.  The omissions of the transaction mainly increase the inconsistency in the planning and marketing phase for the organisation. Moreover, it is seen that the organisation failed to achieve the targeted revenue and profit level, which was set by the analyst. The other risk comprises of the inconsistency and ineffectiveness of the company’s management, which is hampering the overall operations of the organisation (Earley et al. 2016). Moreover, management was not able to comprehend the risk identified from micro and macroeconomic factors such as economic, political, and social. Therefore, declining profit margin and revenue mainly increased the inheritance risk of the organisation.

The second inheritance risk mainly comprises of the employees currently working in DIPL, who are not having the adequate experience and proficiency level to increase productivity of the organisation. The evaluation of the study mainly states the inexperienced employees working in DIPL, which could increase mistakes that might directly raise the inheritance risk. Another way of finding the inheritance risk is by evaluating succession of the so, which was conducted by an ineffective process (Eilifsen et al. 2013). This has directly influenced inheritance risk of the organisation, which is affecting its operation and productivity. Furthermore, the organisation does not have adequate workforce to handle the business operations, which is also the reason why accountant are not able to record all the transactions and are making relevant  omission. The second inheritance risk that could be identified from the case study is mainly the business operations of the organisation.

From the evaluation of the case study it is seen that poor bookkeeping is been conducted due to excessive workloads imposed by the organisation. Furthermore, there is a lack of adequate interpretation by the management, which increases the inheritance risk of the organisation. Both the identified inheritance could directly increase the material misstatement in the annual report, which in turn could reduce viability of the financial statement (Junior, Best and Cotter 2014).

Risk identified from the case	Evaluating the risk
Fraud risk	The first risk that could be identified from the Case study of DIPL is mainly the fraudulent Paris which might be conducted by employees of the organisation. the employees of the organisation is relatively that satisfied with the current operational capability, which might increase the fraudulent activities. The case study mainly states the pressure that was given to the Accountants of the organisation to use the new accounting system, which would increase the pressure on the employees. Thus, increasing pressure could eventually result in fraudulent activities conducted by the accountant, which in turn might increase material misstatement in the financial report. Moreover, inherent risk of the organisation could directly increase due to the mistakes conducted by accountant in drafting the financial report. Evaluation of the succession process of CEO could also help in identifying the inheritance risk that is affecting operations of the organisation. The management of DIPL is relatively lacking integrity and accountability in conducting relevant operations in your organisation, which is why the company is losing reputation in the business community (Kinney 2015).
The financial reporting process	The second major risk that could affect operation of the organisation can be identified from its financial reporting process. The overall financial statement process of the organisation could be manipulated and portray adequate risk. The analysis of the case study also states that DIPL mainly needs to maintain adequate current ratio of 1.5 and debt ratio below 1, as stated in its loan requirements. This restriction in the current ratio and debt ratio could eventually force the management to manipulate the overall financial report to support its loan obligation. If adequate measures of current ratio and debt ratio are not maintained by the organisation then it would not be able to obtain the loans provided from BDO Finance, which could directly affect its operational capability. This need of the fixed current ratio could eventually increase fraudulent actions and activities in DIPL, which might force them to manipulate the financial report. Therefore, it could be understood that relevant fraudulent activities might be conducted in the organisation and portray material misstatements in the financial report (Knechel and Salterio 2016).

The risk from fraudulent activities conducted by staff can be identified from the case study, where implementation of new system could eventually help in monitoring activities of the employees. For the more there is a problem with the valuation of raw materials, which is conducted on average cost method. The average cost method is relevantly not adequate, as the actual cost is higher than the average cost, which does not allow the organisation to determine the actual expenses conducted in purchasing the raw materials (Louwers et al. 2015). There is a relevant risk that can be seen in the financial reporting process, which needs to be evaluated by the auditor during the audit procedure.

Reference and Bibliography:

Arens, A., Elder, R. and Beasley, M., 2014. Auditing and assurance services-An integrated approach; includes coverage of international standards and global auditing issues, in addition to coverage of. Boston: Aufl.

Arens, A.A., Elder, R.J., Beasley, M.S. and Hogan, C.E., 2016. Auditing and assurance services. Pearson.

Becker, L.L., Stead, J.G. and Stead, W.E., 2016. Sustainability Assurance: A Strategic Opportunity for CPA Firms. Management Accounting Quarterly, 17(3), p.29.

Cohen, J.R. and Simnett, R., 2014. CSR and assurance services: A research agenda. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 34(1), pp.59-74.

Cohen, J.R. and Simnett, R., 2015. A forum on CSR and assurance services introduction.

Earley, C.E., Hooks, K.L., Joe, J.R., Polinski, P.W., Rezaee, Z., Roush, P.B., Sanderson, K.A. and Wu, Y.J., 2016. The Auditing Standards Committee of the Auditing Section of the American Accounting Association’s Response to the International Auditing and Assurance Standard’s Board’s Invitation to Comment: Enhancing Audit Quality in the Public Interest. Current Issues in Auditing, 11(1), pp.C1-C25.

Eilifsen, A., Messier, W.F., Glover, S.M. and Prawitt, D.F., 2013. Auditing and assurance services. McGraw-Hill.

Junior, R.M., Best, P.J. and Cotter, J., 2014. Sustainability reporting and assurance: A historical analysis on a world-wide phenomenon. Journal of Business Ethics, 120(1), pp.1-11.

Kinney Jr, W.R., 2015. GAAS 1963-2012: The Global Foundation of Independent Audits and Research in Auditing.

Knechel, W.R. and Salterio, S.E., 2016. Auditing: Assurance and risk. Taylor & Francis.

Louwers, T.J., Ramsay, R.J., Sinason, D.H., Strawser, J.R. and Thibodeau, J.C., 2015. Auditing & assurance services. McGraw-Hill Education.

Messier, W.F., Glover, S.M. and Prawitt, D.F., 2014. Auditing and Assurance Services: A Systematic Approach; Diterjemah oleh Denies Priantinah, Linda Kusumaning Wedari, 2014. Salemba Empat. Jakarta.

Simnett, R., Carson, E. and Vanstraelen, A., 2016. International Archival Auditing and Assurance Research: Trends, Methodological Issues, and Opportunities. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 35(3), pp.1-32.

William Jr, M., Glover, S. and Prawitt, D., 2016. Auditing and assurance services: A systematic approach. McGraw-Hill Education.