Analyzing The Relationship Between Prisoner Post-Release Experiences And Assumptions Of Success

Assumptions Related to Successful Post-Release Result

Discuss About The Offender Therapy Comparative Criminology.

There are a series of assumptions in relation to what makes up successful post-release result and they mainly relate to institutional, criminological and official practices and disclosures. Correctional practices, programs and policies have been shaped up by such assumptions. However there have been a few criticisms which have been directed towards them. The purpose of this paper is to analyse the question that to what extent are prisoner post-release experiences reflected in dominant understandings and assumptions about success. The analysis has been done in the light of various theoretical concepts and knowledge such as desistance, reintegration, success, social marginalisation, recidivism measures and other relevant examples. The paper also analyses the question based upon key theories like that of Michele Foucault – The carceral archipelago to derive a suitable conclusion.  The paper provides an argument that success related assumptions do not adequately reflect prisoner post-release experiences.

As stated by Wallace et al. (2016), it is not a easy job to re integrate a prisoner into the society either on the part of the agencies who have the role of carrying out these functions or on the party of the prisoners who attempt to re reintegrated into the society.  The post release experience of a prisoner is vital towards understanding the he or she would depict desistance or not. As stated by Souza (2015), in the sector of criminology desistance commonly refers to the cessation of antisocial and offending behaviour. There have been several researches which have been carried out towards depicting that the prisoner post-release experiences depends upon what they perceive and assume about success. The agencies also determine whether a prisoner has been successfully reintegrated into the society or not based in the assumptions of success. It has been agued by Brunton-Smith, I. and Hopkins (2016), that success related assumptions do not adequately reflect prisoner post-release experiences.  This study was related to a situation of the reintegration of women into the society. The paper made three success related assumptions which included that the imprisonment of women is a discrete episode; a difference is made by the gender responsive support program and post release outcomes for women are enhanced by it and one of the useful factors for the purpose of measuring women post release outcome and success and recidivism.

It can be stated that the first assumption that the paper makes about post release experiences of a female prisoner is that the phase of imprisonment and release are two different chapters of a woman’s life.  It can be stated that imprisonment can be considered to be a past event in woman’s life and the release from imprisonment marks the start of a new journey in a woman’s life (Carlton and Segrave 2016). Therefore, it can be inferred that the process of integration can be difficult and problematic in many ways. Majority of the women who are convicted are sentenced to imprisonment several times in their lives, therefore assessing the experience of imprisonment as a discrete event becomes problematic (Carlton and Segrave 2016). It has been pointed out by several researchers that who have conducted researches in different nations that since the experiences of imprisonment are often recurring, it is important to recognize the cumulative effect of each of the periods spent in prison rather than taking into account each sentence as a discrete episode. The second problem that is associated with the assumption is that it presumes there is a difference between the imprisonment and release. It can be assumed that the imprisonment and release of women are different from institutional intervention and control. It is worth mentioning that the assumption that imprisonment is somewhat distinct or separate from practices of state intervention which range from childhood experiences of welfare systems to post imprisonment parole have been criticized. It has been proposed by Maidment in her Canadian study of released women that the interconnectedness between post release regulation and support and institutionalization must be examined thoroughly. Her research focused on the ways the various forms of control and intervention are exercised and practised through post-release support agencies and programs which extend the experience and boundaries of imprisonment. 

Theoretical Concepts of Desistance, Reintegration, and Recidivism Measures

The second assumption that has been made in this paper about the post release experiences of women prisoners is that the Gender responsive initiatives are expected to produce better results for women. The assumption that the gender responsive practices have produced better post release support system for women for breaking the cycles of serial incarceration has been contested. As opined by Healy (2017),gender responsive discourse is often referred to the recognition that offending is deeply embedded in the contexts of lives of women and that

The theory of desistance is a criminological phenomenon that states how criminals and offenders stop taking involvement in criminal activities. In the literal meaning of the world, to desist means to refrain or abstain from doing something. The theories of desistance try to provide explanation of the process by which criminal offenders live free from criminality. It is worth mentioning that prisoners after being released from conviction face many challenges which are socio economical in nature. These challenges include meeting the basic needs of the prisoners such food, shelter, building social connections and reconnecting with their families and friends.  Conventional bonds of the society which include housing, quality of social relationships and work are greatly influenced. Spending some time in prison is expected to reduce the chances of the prisoner being involved in criminal activities in future as assessed from economical deterrence perspective. The rationale behind this is the cost of the time served in the prison generally deters the prisoner from taking involvement in criminal activities in future. As suggested by Mears, Cochran and Cullen (2015) prisoners after their release in the early desistance phase start to think differently about themselves. It is important to perceive oneself differently in order to refrain from being involved in criminal activity and choosing a different way of life.  According to Healy (2017), an individual’s perception of a desired and feared self contributes to the primary motivation for change. 

The carceral archipelago by Michele Foucault talks about the Mettray prison colony and it completes the carceral system of punishment. The colony system of punishment is the harshest system which aims at the most extreme form of punishment. The prison system is known for being headed by the chiefs and the deputies at the Mettray prison who were the guardians of behavior and they aimed at uniform punishment at its harshest degree. The goal of the prison system was to enhance the punishment regime and also make bodies that are docile and are open to change and adaptability (German 2015). This Mettray prison system is a new kind of punishment framework that also gave rise to a new kind of supervision. This marks the very inception of modern art of punishment that the Mettray Prison system was the very inception of the series of carceral institution. The punishment system revolved around confinement of the prisoners and also enhanced judicial punishment and embarked on the new age punishment system that strikes at the institutionalizing discipline. The method of punishment of this system is different and the technique followed is innovative because the prison system has been turned into penitentiary technique which gave out very different results. The result showed impact on the 19^th century delinquents and they were made to move from the offense system to the established system of norm. The initial power hungry delinquents were made to submit to the rules and the overall political and societal system went an overhauling. The Michele Foucault system weaves the thread around punishment and also forming new ideas that have a societal impact (Brown 2014). This gave rise to a new and modern system of punishment and also formed the “carceral city”

Impact of Feminist and Gender Responsive Initiatives on Post-Release Support System

Inmate recidivism was seen as a measure to make the private prison fall in line with the already established norms. There was a sudden growth of the private correction system and the industry was basing its interest on eliciting interest by comparing the way the state and the private prisons were functioning (Mitchell et al. 2017). The way to gauge the performance and the quality of the prison system was to track the behavior and the performance of the prisoners after they were released from prison. After analyzing the known covariates, it was revealed that the performance and the behavior of the prisoners post release depended on the way the reincarcerated inmates were subject to multiples exposure and how they were made to behave in a comparison group (Entrop and Sattarova 2016). This system is a back to track the behavior of the prisoners in the future and the impact of the prison system will have on the future behavior of the criminals. The way to track the success of the prisoners post their release is to first identify the effects that the prison system has and if they have chances of re-offending (Schnepel 2018). These measures should be seen as having negative impact on the possibility of the inmates of recidivism. Therefore, the success rate is seen as how the prison conditions might have harsh and adverse impact on the prisoners and how they can cope up with the conditions.

In the context of criminal justice system, the process of reintegration refers to the process of re entry of the persons who had been prison or incarcerated into the society. The process of reintegration involves the inclusion of reinstatement of the freedom which had previously not been enjoyed by the persons when in prison.   

 Reintegration of prisoners after their release successfully in the society involves two key aspects: confronting with the victim, which eventually leads to shaming and including people who care and respect about the offender. Offenders should be able to see their criminal act beyond their own perspective of the act and take into account the harm or damage such act has caused to the others. The perspective of the victim about the criminal activity is essential and invaluable in rejecting the justification of the offender behind committing the crime.  

Conclusion

Thus to conclude, it can be stated that prisoners after their release face many challenges while going through the process of reintegration. The post release experience of a prisoner is vital towards understanding the he or she would depict desistance or not. The theories of desistance try to provide explanation of the process by which criminal offenders live free from criminality. There have been several researches which have been carried out towards depicting that the prisoner post-release experiences depends upon what they perceive and assume about success. The agencies also determine whether a prisoner has been successfully reintegrated into the society or not based in the assumptions of success.

Reference List:

Brown, M., 2014. Visual criminology and carceral studies: Counter-images in the carceral age. Theoretical Criminology, 18(2), pp.176-197.

Brunton-Smith, I. and Hopkins, K., 2016. The impact of experience in prison on the employment status of longer-sentenced prisoners after release.

Carlton, B. and Segrave, M., 2016. Rethinking women’s post-release reintegration and ‘success’. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 49(2), pp.281-299.

Entorf, H. and Sattarova, L., 2016. The Analysis of Prison-Prisoner Data Using Cluster-Sample Econometrics: Prison Conditions and Prisoners’ Assessments of the Future.

German, T., 2015. A reflection on using the work of Michel Foucault in Christian educational research. Being Christian in Education: Faith perspectives on practice and policy, p.234.

Healy, D., 2017. The dynamics of desistance: Charting pathways through change. Willan.

Mears, D.P., Cochran, J.C. and Cullen, F.T., 2015. Incarceration heterogeneity and its implications for assessing the effectiveness of imprisonment on recidivism. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 26(7), pp.691-712.

Mitchell, O., Cochran, J.C., Mears, D.P. and Bales, W.D., 2017. Examining prison effects on recidivism: A regression discontinuity approach. Justice Quarterly, 34(4), pp.571-596.

Schnepel, K.T., 2018. Good jobs and recidivism. The Economic Journal, 128(608), pp.447-469.

Souza, K.A., Lösel, F., Markson, L. and Lanskey, C., 2015. Pre?release expectations and post?release experiences of prisoners and their (ex?) partners. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 20(2), pp.306-323.

Triplett, R., 2018. The Handbook of the History and Philosophy of Criminology. John Wiley & Sons.

Wallace, D., Fahmy, C., Cotton, L., Jimmons, C., McKay, R., Stoffer, S. and Syed, S., 2016. Examining the role of familial support during prison and after release on post-incarceration mental health. International journal of offender therapy and comparative criminology, 60(1), pp.3-20.