Mr. Shepherd is an 82 year old man who was admitted to Princess Alexandra Hospital for two nights after he developed increased confusion since two days. As he was unable to ambulate using the wheelie walker and developed moderate left sided weakness, health assessment was done to indentify risk for fall and altered level of consciousness in patient. During the simulation experience, the health assessment that was conducted for Mr. Shepherd included neurological observation, assessment of consciousness by Glasgow coma scale (GCS) and ABCDE assessment was done.
The assessment of neurological observation was appropriate for Mr Shepherd because this might help to identify changes in brain function and interpret factors that could lead to increase in confusion and fall risk in patient. Increase in confusion is an indication of changes in mental status and confusions, disorientation and lethargy are some of the synonyms of altered mental state. Confusion is a symptom of delirium in elderly patients like Mr Shepherd.
Mr. Shepherd might be at risk of delirium because of fluctuating mental status evidenced by altered level of consciousness (Kennedy et al., 2014). Age of more than 65 years, acute illness, hospitalization, impaired ambulation and acute stress are some risk factors of developing confusion in elderly people (Han et al., 2014). Initial physical assessment for such patient involves assessment of neurological status as it helps to describe mental status of patients by the use of qualitative descriptors like confused, alert or orientated. This form of assessment is important to interpret neurological changes in patient (Zadravecz et al., 2015).
Altered mental status is one of the common causes of hospital admission. Han et al. (2014) justified the use of GCS as it can provide clues to the etiology of altered mental state. It is mainly done with the use of GCS to interpret verbal, motor and eye-opening response in patient. The three categories mentioned in GCS pertain to different areas of conscious state. As it was originally developed to evaluate conscious state of patient after traumatic brain injury, it’s use is justified whenever there is a need to evaluate conscious state of a person. In addition, ABCDE is a useful approach during initial assessment of patient to understand risk factors behind fall (Chikura, Conroy & Salvi, 2018).
For Mr. Shepherd, health assessment for fall risk was identified by means of neurological observation using GCS scale. However, as fall risk and altered mental status is associated with changes in gait, mobility and balance, there was a need to conduct Timed Up-and-Go Test for patient. It is a commonly used screening tool for fall risk in the inpatient setting.
The patient is time while they rise from an arm chair, walk on the floor and walk back to the chair and settle down again. During the test, patients are supposed to use their regular footwear and walking aid. Faster time is indicative of better functional performance, whereas timing of ≥13.5 seconds is used to identify those at increased risk of fall (Barry et al., 2014). Kang et al. (2017) justified that gait instability is a risk factor for falls and the Timed Up and Go Test is a validated tool to evaluate people who are at risk of fall. After adjusting for age and gender, cutoff value of 15.96 seconds is predictive of recurrent falls in elderly population.
In relation to the issue of fall risk and impaired safety for Mr. Shepherd, the goal of care is to prevent fall in patient and modify the environment around Shepherd so that his safety is maintained during hospital stay. Another goal of care is to provide him self-care assistance as he can no longer ambulate using the wheelie walker. To meet the above mentioned goals, two independent nursing actions that can be implemented for Mr. Shepherd are as follows:
Answer 2:
In relation to the priority problem of impaired safety for Mr. Shepherd, the following are the progress note for his condition.
Situation: Mr. Shepherd, an 82 year old man has been admitted to the hospital following 2 day history of increased confusion. After returning from the hospital, he had another fall while attempting to go to the toilet. He hit his head and suffered bruises to his right forehead.
Background: The patient has a history of hypertension, asthma, type II diabetes, glaucoma, AF and right sided CVA with left sided weakness. The patient has also complained of lower back pain which was relieved by the use of Panadol, heat packs and repositioning.
Assessment: After admission to the hospital, vital signs of Mr. Shepherd were recorded and his neurological observation was done every 15 minutes. His respiratory rate was found to be in a normal value and he had irregular pulse rate indicated by value of 80-90 beat per minute. His blood pressure was high. The patient is currently taking many medications like warfarin,, aspirin, atenolol and timolol eye drops. He was taking metformin for hyperglycemia and salbutamol for his asthma. Based on neurological observation of patient using GCS scale, the patient has been found to be in a confused state. The patient is requiring transfer aids in bed and during sit out. In response to fall risk, Mr. Shepherd was repositioned, provided specialised matrix and assessment of head wound was done.
Recommendation:
As the Mr. Shepherd has sustained head injury after fall, the plan is to provide proper wound care to patient. As he is at pressure injury state 1, the plan is to provide regular dressings to the injured area and assess the wound site each day for signs of recovery or deterioration. As patient is diabetes, it is recommended to take extra precautions while providing medications for wound healing. In response to poor vital signs, it is recommended to manage his blood pressure by regularly monitoring blood pressure every four hours and provide anti-hypertensive medication to patient (Tinetti et al., 2014).Diet changes needs to be prioritized and self-care support in the area of ambulation, feeding and toileting needs to be provided to patient (Barrett, Vizgirda & Zhou, 2017).
References:
Barrett, M. B., Vizgirda, V. M., & Zhou, Y. (2017). Registered Nurse and Patient Care Technician Perceptions of Toileting Patients at High Fall Risk. Medsurg Nursing, 26(5), 317-323.
Barry, E., Galvin, R., Keogh, C., Horgan, F., & Fahey, T. (2014). Is the Timed Up and Go test a useful predictor of risk of falls in community dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC geriatrics, 14(1), 14.
Chikura, G., Conroy, S., & Salvi, F. (2018). Clinical Assessment and Management of Older People: What’s Different?. In Geriatric Emergency Medicine (pp. 75-90). Springer, Cham.
Han, J. H., Wilson, A., Graves, A. J., Shintani, A., Schnelle, J. F., Dittus, R. S., … & Ely, E. W. (2014). Validation of the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit in older emergency department patients. Academic Emergency Medicine, 21(2), 180-187.
Kang, L., Han, P., Wang, J., Ma, Y., Jia, L., Fu, L., … & Guo, Q. (2017). Timed Up and Go Test can predict recurrent falls: a longitudinal study of the community-dwelling elderly in China. Clinical interventions in aging, 12, 2009.
Kennedy, M., Enander, R. A., Tadiri, S. P., Wolfe, R. E., Shapiro, N. I., & Marcantonio, E. R. (2014). Delirium risk prediction, healthcare use and mortality of elderly adults in the emergency department. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 62(3), 462-469.
Luzia, M. D. F., Almeida, M. D. A., & Lucena, A. D. F. (2014). Nursing care mapping for patients at risk of falls in the Nursing Interventions Classification. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, 48(4), 632-640.
Tinetti, M. E., Han, L., Lee, D. S., McAvay, G. J., Peduzzi, P., Gross, C. P., … & Lin, H. (2014). Antihypertensive medications and serious fall injuries in a nationally representative sample of older adults. JAMA internal medicine, 174(4), 588-595.
Zadravecz, F. J., Tien, L., Robertson?Dick, B. J., Yuen, T. C., Twu, N. M., Churpek, M. M., & Edelson, D. P. (2015). Comparison of mental?status scales for predicting mortality on the general wards. Journal of hospital medicine, 10(10), 658-663.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order formOnce we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignmentAs soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download