The perpetual shift of dynamics in the use of space prompts anatomy of a development that portrays traits of continual evolution over its life time. The premise in focus is the ‘Bayshore Town Centre‘ located in Glendale, Milwaukee, originally conceived in 1954 as an outdoor strip of retail shops. Located amidst the suburbs of Milwaukee, the project provides stellar opportunities to study and analyze critical drivers of architecture, infrastructure and efficiency on a more macro level such as the logic of Capital, and possibly explores ways in which it influences the consumption of a city.
(Anonymous, ULI Case Studies – Bayshore Town Center 2009)
The contents of this paper are bifold. First, To identify and critically analyze forces that led Bayshore mall to evolve into a diaspora of varying spatial typologies over its lifetime and secondly, to identify specific mechanisms employed to perpetuate its financial viability. In order to get there, it is critical to understand the context that we are setting this argument in, followed by carefully enlisting every course of transmutation that took place and identifying the stimuli behind each of those.
This can be achieved by looking into the statistics of socio-economic capital, the corresponding stratifications and drawing comparative parallels between projects of similar stature. This would be followed by analyzing user experience during various standpoints through visual surveys, user testimonials and scholarly texts. Ultimately, the conclusion would attempt to draw coherent inferences regarding the cause and effect relationship that exists between the stimuli and the response. (Buffamonte 2018)
The genesis of this discourse necessitates a peek into the history and the socio-economic landscape of Milwaukee in order to assimilate factors that triggered these events.
Wisconsin is one the largest city alongside lake Michigan that has over four centuries of historical wealth. Milwaukee’s vicinity to the lake has always enthralled traders and opportunists to explore this territory and setup their industrial and manufacturing units to feed other parts of the country. (Collections 1996) This has been one of the key m?tiers in Wisconsin till the beginning of twentieth century when the great depression of 1929 hit the United States and trade began to plunge. Thereafter, The onset of World War two again turned tables and skyrocketed the trade and industry of Milwaukee and possibly led to the rise of Bourgeoise around the 1950’s. This led to creation of newer radical building types to serve the growing population of the city. (Collections 1996) It is also riveting to note that this is precisely the time wherein the first ever shopping mall opened in the United States in Edina, Minnesota. Both of these were in Mid-West but clearly, Minnesota manifests a completely distinct user profile which led it to embrace the ‘enclosed’ mall typology as against the outdoor strip character of the Bayshore mall. (Anonymous, Birth, death and shopping 2007)
Even though this shift was evident much before in Europe, It really proliferated at a pace of its own depending upon the development dynamics of a specific city. (Curtis 1982) Since Milwaukee was predominantly a base for machinery and brewing industries, It pulled in people from far and wide, especially the south into Milwaukee. These new household set up their families and posed an increased demand for retail in the city. Here, It is interesting to note how the summation of newer population which resonate well with the technological development such as the use of automobiles and also ascertain the need for budget and luxury retail, stipulates the genesis of a completely inexistent typology in the city of Milwaukee i.e. an automobile oriented mixed-use strip of shops. This is precisely when the city was flanked with the centers of mass consumption along with already existing setups of mass production. Developments like these also possibly boosted the entrepreneurial acumen in the city as it coincides with inception of the now national retail brands such as Kohl’s and Boston Stores.
Majorly a public initiative, Bayshore mall stood unaltered until the mid-1970’s wherein it felt a strong need for an aesthetic upheaval for its facade and interior to follow up with the zeitgeist. It is this aspect of the development that is highly precarious due to lack of any fa?ade control across typologies until lately. This allowed the tenants to personalize their exterior elevations resulting in the creation of an overall visual clutter and discomfort. This was the first ever renovation/ remodeling endeavor that struck Bayshore to reinstate its footfall.
Another sustainable trigger that could be identified during the first mutation would be the constant tweaks in the programmatic structure of the center in order to boost its commercial viability. Soon after the opening of first ever multiplex in United States in 1963 (Missouri), Bayshore Centre was one of the first in the Midwest to follow. The incredibly long and solvent course of this mall has certainly these minute tweaks accountable. It should be noted that the period between the middle till the end of twentieth century was when the dependence on automobiles rose and eventually began to saturate as a part of a global consciousness monitoring the impact on nature. (Curtis 1982) The initially auto-centered development in the late twenty first century began to sketch plans for a pedestrian oriented mixed-use development that almost doubles in scale and magnitude in forage to keep up with the competition. Developed by Steiner & Associates, Who had experience of developing similar complexes prior in Ohio and Cincinnati, went ahead after a careful analysis of the possible growth potential from this mall. They came up with a unique typology that seamlessly blends shopping, entertainment, housing, offices and Parking. This was certainly a beginning for a new typology of malls nationwide. (architect 2016) (Anonymous, ULI Case Studies – Bayshore Town Center 2009)
This redevelopment was certainly one of the major emendations to break ground at Bayshore Center that attempted to transform the mall into a state-of-the-art town center. It did involve intensive feasibility studies that would resurrect the mall off its financial plunge and enhance its the commercial viability. Primarily driven by Steiner and Associates along with EUA and Meacham and Apel architects, The proposal carefully identified the deficiencies of the existing facility such ineffective access, lack of pedestrian friendliness, parking facility and the need for an additional programme with the assumption that almost 70 percent of the foot fall shall elicit from the north side suburbs of Milwaukee. It is also interesting to note that drawing comparative parallels is a relatively quick and effective way to assess the revenue potential of a setup. This was perhaps what exactly Steiner would have contemplated and followed lessons learnt from their similar precedent in Ohio (Easton). They proposed to enhance the site area from 36 to 52 acres vouching for the stirring potential of this possibly underserved market. The proposal, indeed had a plethora of peculiarities to address and a few radical stipulations to innovate. (Anonymous, ULI Case Studies – Bayshore Town Center 2009)
At an urban planning level, In order to ameliorate viability, the proposal focused on two key areas i.e. enhancing connectivity and approachability. This was done through a number of ways, such as providing prominent entrance vistas from the two major streets to characterize those as sheer extensions woven into the city fabric. Each of these entrances would symbolized with distinct identifiers such as a rotunda along the Southern entrance and an interactive plaza known as the Bayshore square along the east entrance. (Anonymous, ULI Case Studies – Bayshore Town Center 2009) Additionally, The emphasis on making the entire complex as pedestrian friendly as possible was highly evident and critical. There were 11 feet wide sidewalks with benches, lamp posts and ambient music to completely articulate pedestrian experience. Another key consideration was the strategic location of various typology of functions so that they could add as magnets for pulling in customers. The aforementioned location of departmental stores was reinforced with additional areas followed by an enticing location for the food joints which would again enhance footfall. The multi-faceted genre of this redevelopment also included multiple areas of community development which I opine allowed this center to serve as the downtown of Glendale. A number of these consideration allow Bayshore Town Centre to qualify as a contemporary example of ‘New Urbanism’ deciphered into a sub urban sprawl that works reasonably well. (Anonymous, ULI Case Studies – Bayshore Town Center 2009) (Curtis 1982)
Primarily mixed use, The complex today undoubtedly comes across as a farrago of overlapping typologies and architectural styles that are unified by a seamless pedestrian lattice and shop window store front at grade level. Post contemplation, One would agree that this organic vernacular vibe is what might work the best for a center that is so rooted within a dense suburban fabric. The planning and design of retail is aimed to target various genres and groups of population depending on the end user profile. This is what exactly Steiner attempted to create while determining the new service profile for Bayshore. (Anonymous, ULI Case Studies – Bayshore Town Center 2009)
Apart from analyzing what it did right, It would be pretty insightful to understand what went wrong that triggered Bayshore Town Centre to perform not as effectively as other similar developments led by the same developer. In a parallel context such as the Easton Town Centre in Ohio, which rendered significantly better outcomes showed no further need to renovate till date, whereas Bayshore Town Centre is prepping up for another major redevelopment due immediately. (Davenport 2018) Even though every maneuver by the state and the developer was thoughtfully proposed and executed, there was definitely something which went wrong. One of the possible inadequacies could be a lack of an aberrant or an innovation in a spatial or programmatic typology that could set this development apart from the models developing elsewhere in the nearby suburbs. This could be inferred from the testimony of various users of this place. Another aspect could be the extravagant nature of the redevelopment in an already sprawling context which probably turned out to be a misfit and resulted in waning its footfall and absolve the viability of the investment put in. Such an exaggeration in the proposal could possibly be a reason why the present revamp focusses on creating a more tightly knit spatial genre. (Davenport 2018) (Daykin 2018)
To sum it up, the existence of this center has endured an exceptionally stimulating and turbulent journey, constantly mutating, morphing and responding to every modulation in the dynamics of the immediate and the broader context. (Anonymous, ULI Case Studies – Bayshore Town Center 2009) Additionally, the course of this development allows us to infer that the logic of capital for a particular development relies on a multitude of architectural, planning and programmatic facets that can completely revolutionize the use and the value of a space. It also testifies that every epoch exhibits its own ubiquitous yearning towards a specific spatial and programmatic typology which need to be responded aptly for the optimal functional and economic outcome. Thus, it becomes extremely inevitable to react to the zeitgeist in order to allow people develop placeness and pursue interest.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download