Blast-Resistant Design of Steel Structures Free Essay Example

In earlier periods, the blast-resistant structures were only employed for military-based structures, however, threats of bomb blasts on important buildings are increasing dramatically (Cormie, Mays, and Smith 2009). The attack on twin towers of the USA provoked the chaotic situation in the whole world regarding the safety of other publicly important buildings. This, in turn, riveted attention to avail blast resistant concepts in other important structures as well. In case of explosion, the death of residents of the building is not only spawned by the blast and “primary projectiles” triggered to movement by the blast, but also by the “secondary projectiles” which are detached from the building due to the blast (US 7406806B2.

pdf n.d.). To minimize this effect, the research community modified the single-layered facade of a building to double-layered facade systems, where insulating or energy absorbing fillers can be placed between the two panels (Ngo et al. 2015). The outer layer performs a uniform distribution of blast pressure to the inner layer.

Blast protection can be enriched by using the proposed energy connector between the energy absorbing fa?ade and structure (refer Fig. 1). This arrangement reduces the peak load transferred to the structure in a controlled manner and eventually prevent the catastrophic failure of the load-bearing members. Furthermore, this connector can prohibit the rigid fixing of the fa?ade to the building for better protection. The propounded energy connector is the assembly of mild-steel metal plates on the faces and polyurethane foam as the core element. The metal plates and foam absorb energy by plastic deformation and compression respectively.

In such an arrangement, the metal plates not only help to absorb energy but also act as a confinement member for foam and withstand the gravity load of the fa?ade.

Since several decades, the metal tubes have been used excessively for energy assimilating process (Abramowicz and Jones 1986). This has also been supported in recent studies which state that kinetic energy of crash can be engrossed by energy structures in a considerable amount by progressive and controllable plastic deformation modes (Asanjarani, Dibajian, and Mahdian 2017; K?l??aslan 2015). Similar motto has had been the benchmark for many theoretical, experimental and numerical studies related to energy absorbing structures. The history of energy absorbing structures (EAS) dates back to 1959 when the theoretical expression for obtaining axial crushing load of thin-walled (TW) circular steel tubes without considering load path was obtained by Alexander (Alexander 1960). In early 1990s, with added improvements, effective models for computing progressive crushing of prismatic columns and cylinders were developed (Wierzbicki et al. 1992). An analytical formulation for the auguring of bending collapse and crumpling movement along with energy absorption (EA) capacity was trotted out by Kim and Reid (Kim and Reid 2001). Abramowicz (Abramowicz 2003) focused on crushing process of thin-walled structures (TWS) along with instances for designing EAS. Despite demonstrating well mechanical properties, traditional circular metal tubes have higher initial crushing force(Gupta 1998) and it is difficult to maximizes their efficiency(Jiang and Yang 2009), but better improved geometry can make the results better. Findings on pyramidical, triangular, rectangular, square, hexagonal, cylindrical and frusta were performed by Nia et al. (Nia and Hamedani 2010). Ample of geometric modifications like- grooves (Hosseinipour and Daneshi 2003; Salehghaffari et al. 2010; Zhang and Huh 2009), tapering (Gan et al. 2016; Wierzbicki and Abramowicz 1983) and corrugations (Alkhatib et al. 2018; Mozafari, Eyvazian, et al. 2018; Mozafari, Lin, et al. 2018). They have revealed outcomes by retarding the initial peak force (IPF) and compressive force fluctuations.

Euler’s buckling can be noticed in TW metal tubes very easily (Bammann et al. 2010; Reid 1993) and an increase in EA can be achieved by increasing the wall thickness (Ahmad and Thambiratnam 2009b; Niknejad and Rahmani 2014; Toksoy and G?den 2010; Wang et al. 2018). However, this will remarkably increase the weight. For increasing the energy-absorbing properties of TWS, foam elements can be used as fillers without increasing the volume and weight significantly (Seitzberger et al. 2000; Yang and Qi 2013). There are many varieties of foams that can be used to meet this requirements (Ahmad and Thambiratnam 2009a; Karagiozova, Alves, and Jones 2000). The effects of metallic and nonmetallic foams have been studied by researchers (Toksoy and G?den 2005; Zarei and Kr?ger 2008) with the conclusion that foam filling increased the number of folds with progressive buckling mechanism increasing the amount of energy absorbed when compared to empty tubes. For EA performance, foam-filled columns demonstrated smaller cross-sectional and lower weight than hollow (Hanssen, Langseth, and Hopperstad 2001). The increase in crushing force due to the use of foam was noticed (Costas et al. 2016; Palanivelu et al. 2010; Santosa et al. 2000; Yan, Chouw, and Jayaraman 2014) and prevention of the catastrophic failure of the empty metal tubes can achieved by using foam as fillers (Palanivelu et al. 2010). Among different foam types, polyurethane foam (PUF) is found to have better strength to weight ratio (Meguid, Attia, and Monfort 2004), which has been concentrically supported by a set experiments which revealed that the specific EA of PUF filled tubes exceeds that of Aluminum foam (AlF) filled tubes along with PUF being cheaper and easy processing (Gan et al. 2016). There has been an increasing demand of polymeric foams for enhancing EA performances of traditional light weight structures (Bin et al. 2015; Han et al. 2015; Yazici et al. 2015). EA capability of PUF is directionally proportional to the density (Niknejad, Elahi, and Liaghat 2012; Onsalung, Thinvongpituk, and Pianthong 2014; S Kanna, Subramaniyan Shahruddin et al. 2013), but probability of the foam fracture goes high with foam density (Niknejad, Elahi, and Liaghat 2012; Zhou et al. 2016) and can also lead to premature fracture (Zhou et al. 2016), which can base a conclusion that selecting proper density of PUF plays a very vital role (Ahmad and Thambiratnam 2009b).

One of the early studies of PUF filled tubes was commenced by Thornton (Thornton 1980) who conclude that filling foam can be weight effective for structures made up of mild steel; and is preferable to thicken the walls of the tube (Darvizeh et al. 2013; Lampinen and Jeryan 1982; Reid, Reddy, and Gray 1986). Niknejad et al. (Niknejad, Elahi, and Liaghat 2012) studied the effects on sidelong plastic deformation of cylindric tubes due to PUF under radial quasi-static loading and confirmed PUF accelerated the load-bearing capacity. The effectiveness of low density and low strength PUF on grooved TW circular tube was performed by Darvish et al. (Darvizeh et al. 2013). In their study, it was revealed that specific EA and structural effectiveness nearly doubled after filling the tubes with foam. It has been well established that benefit of PUF filling is inversely proportional to the tube wall thickness and is directly proportional to the diameter of the tube (Niknejad, Elahi, and Liaghat 2012; Reid, Reddy, and Gray 1986). PUF filling remarkably enhanced the EA characteristics of composite tubes (Othman et al. 2016; Rezaei et al. 2015). In the experiment In axial crushing of brass bi-tubular tubes, PUF filling decreased dynamic amplification factor with increasing EA capacity (Azarakhsh et al. 2015). Elahi et al. (Elahi et al. 2017) concluded that PUF filing played a story modifying role by changing the EA mechanism by hinge lines to absorption by PUF itself making hinge lines absorb the least energy.

Abramowicz, W. 2003. “Thin-Walled Structures as Impact Energy Absorbers.” Thin-Walled Structures 41(23): 91’107.

Abramowicz, W., and N. Jones. 1986. “Dynamic Progressive Buckling of Circular and Square Tubes.” International Journal of Impact Engineering 4(4): 243’70.

Ahmad, Z., and D. P. Thambiratnam. 2009a. “Dynamic Computer Simulation and Energy Absorption of Foam-Filled Conical Tubes under Axial Impact Loading.” Computers and Structures 87(3-4): 186-97.

Ahmad, Z., and D.P. Thambiratnam. 2009b. “Crushing Response of Foam-Filled Conical Tubes under Quasi-Static Axial Loading.”Materials & Design 30(7): 2393-2403.

Alexander, J. M. 1960. “An Approximate Analysis of the Collapse of Thin Cylindrical Shells under Axial Loading.” Quarterly Journal of Mechanics and Applied Mathematics 13(1): 10-15.

Alkhatib, Sami E., Faris Tarlochan, Ahmed Hashem, and Sadok Sassi. 2018. “Collapse Behavior of Thin-Walled Corrugated Tapered Tubes under Oblique Impact.” Thin-Walled Structures 122(November 2017): 510-28.

Asanjarani, A., S. H. Dibajian, and A. Mahdian. 2017. “Multi Objective Crashworthiness Optimization of Tapered Thin-Walled Square Tubes with Indentations.” Thin-Walled Structures 116: 26-36.

Azarakhsh, Sajad, Abbas Rahi, Ali Ghamarian, and Hamed Motamedi. 2015. “Axial Crushing Analysis of Empty and Foam-Filled Brass Bitubular Cylinder Tubes.” Thin-Walled Structures 95: 60-72.

Bammann, D, M Chiesa, Mark Horstemeyer, and L Weingarten. 2010. Structural Crashworthiness and Failure Failure in Ductile Materials Using Finite Element Methods.

Bin, Han et al. 2015. “Foam Filling Radically Enhances Transverse Shear Response of Corrugated Sandwich Plates.” Materials and Design 77: 132-41.

Cormie, David, Geof Mays, and Peter Smith. 2009. Blast Effects on Buildings. ICE Publishing, United Kingdom.

Costas, M. et al. 2016. “Axial Crushing of Aluminum Extrusions Filled with PET Foam and GFRP. An Experimental Investigation.” Thin-Walled Structures 99: 45-57.

Darvizeh, Abolfazl, Mansour Darvizeh, Reza Ansari, and Ata Meshkinzar. 2013. Effect of Low Density, Low Strength Polyurethane Foam on the Energy Absorption Characteristics of Circumferentially Grooved Thick-Walled Circular Tubes. Thin-Walled Structures 71: 81-90.

Elahi, Seyed Ali, Jafar Rouzegar, Abbas Niknejad, and Hassan Assaee. 2017. Theoretical Study of Absorbed Energy by Empty and Foam-Filled Composite Tubes under Lateral Compression. Thin Walled Structures 114(January): 1-10.

Gan, Nianfei et al. 2016. Quasi-Static Axial Crushing Experiment Study of Foam-Filled CFRP and Aluminum Alloy Thin-Walled Structures. Composite Structures 157: 303-19.

Gupta, N.K. 1998. Some Aspects of Axial Collapse of Cylindrical Thin-Walled Tubes. Thin-Walled Structures 32(1-3): 111-26.

Han, Bin et al. 2015. Design Optimization of Foam-Reinforced Corrugated Sandwich Beams. Composite Structures 130: 51-62.

Hanssen, A. G., M. Langseth, and O. S. Hopperstad. 2001. Optimum Design for Energy Absorption of Square Aluminum Columns with Aluminum Foam Filler. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 43(1): 153-76.

Hosseinipour, S. J., and G. H. Daneshi. 2003. Energy Absorbtion and Mean Crushing Load of Thin-Walled Grooved Tubes under Axial Compression. Thin-Walled Structures 41(1): 31-46.

Jiang, W., and J.L. Yang. 2009. Energy-Absorption Behavior of a Metallic Double-Sine-Wave Beam under Axial Crushing. Thin-Walled Structures 47(11): 1168-76.

Karagiozova, D., M. Alves, and Norman Jones. 2000. Inertia Effects in Axisymmetrically Deformed Cylindrical Shells under Axial Impact. International Journal of Impact Engineering 24(10): 1083-1115.

Kim, T. H., and S. R. Reid. 2001. Bending Collapse of Thin-Walled Rectangular Section Columns. Computers and Structures 79(20-21): 1897-1911.

K?l??aslan, Cenk. 2015. Numerical Crushing Analysis of Aluminum Foam-Filled Corrugated Single- and Double-Circular Tubes Subjected to Axial Impact Loading. Thin-Walled Structures 96: 82-94.

Lampinen, B. E., and R. A. Jeryan. 1982. Effectiveness of Polyurethane Foam in Energy Absorbing Structures.

Meguid, S. A., M. S. Attia, and A. Monfort. 2004. On the Crush Behaviour of Ultralight Foam-Filled Structures. Materials and Design 25(3): 183-89.

Mozafari, Hozhabr, Arameh Eyvazian, et al. 2018. Numerical and Experimental Investigation of Corrugated Tubes under Lateral Compression. International Journal of Crashworthiness 23(4): 461-73.

Mozafari, Hozhabr, Shengmao Lin, Gary C.P. Tsui, and Linxia Gu. 2018. Controllable Energy Absorption of Double Sided Corrugated Tubes under Axial Crushing. Composites Part B: Engineering 134: 9-17.

Ngo, Tuan et al. 2015. Structural Performance of Double-Skin Faade Systems Subjected to Blast Pressures. Journal of Structural Engineering 141(12): 04015064.

Nia, Ali Alavi, and Jamal Haddad Hamedani. 2010. Comparative Analysis of Energy Absorption and Deformations of Thin Walled Tubes with Various Section Geometries. Thin-Walled Structures 48(12): 946-54.

Niknejad, Abbas, Seyed Ali Elahi, and Gholam Hossein Liaghat. 2012. Experimental Investigation on the Lateral Compression in the Foam-Filled Circular Tubes. Materials and Design 36: 24-34.

Niknejad, Abbas, and Danesh M. Rahmani. 2014. Experimental and Theoretical Study of the Lateral Compression Process on the Empty and Foam-Filled Hexagonal Columns. Materials & Design 53(22): 250-61.

Onsalung, Nirut, Chawalit Thinvongpituk, and Kulachate Pianthong. 2014. “Impact Response of Circular Aluminum Tube Filled with Polyurethane Foam. 55(1).

Othman, A., S. Abdullah, A. K. Ariffin, and N. A.N. Mohamed. 2016. “Investigating the Crushing Behavior of Quasi-Static Oblique Loading on Polymeric Foam Filled Pultruded Composite Square Tubes.” Composites Part B: Engineering 95: 493-514.

Palanivelu, Sivakumar et al. 2010. Comparison of the Crushing Performance of Hollow and Foam-Filled Small-Scale Composite Tubes with Different Geometrical Shapes for Use in Sacrificial Cladding Structures. Composites Part B: Engineering 41(6): 434-45.

Reid, S. R., T. Y. Reddy, and M. D. Gray. 1986. Static and Dynamic Axial Crushing of Foam-Filled Sheet Metal Tubes. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 28(5): 295-322.

Reid, S R. 1993. Plastic Deformation Mechanisms in Axially Compressed Metal Tubes Used As Impact Energy Absorbers. 35(12): 1035-52.

Rezaei, B., A. Niknejad, H. Assaee, and G. H. Liaghat. 2015. Axial Splitting of Empty and Foam-Filled Circular Composite Tubes – An Experimental Study. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering 15(3): 650-62.

S Kanna, Subramaniyan Shahruddin, Mahzan, Mohd lmran Ghazali, Ahmad Mujahid Ahmad Zaidi, and Prasath Kesavan Prabagaransd. 2013. Energy Absorption Characteristics of Polyurethane Composite Foam- Filled Tubes Subjected to Quasi-Static Axial Loading. 315: 872-78.

Salehghaffari, S., M. Tajdari, M. Panahi, and F. Mokhtarnezhad. 2010. Attempts to Improve Energy Absorption Characteristics of Circular Metal Tubes Subjected to Axial Loading. Thin-Walled Structures 48(6): 379-90.

Santosa, Sigit P., Tomasz Wierzbicki, Arve G. Hanssen, and Magnus Langseth. 2000. Experimental and Numerical Studies of Foam-Filled Sections. International Journal of Impact Engineering 24(5): 509-34.

Seitzberger, M. et al. 2000. Experimental Studies on the Quasi-Static Axial Crushing of Steel Columns Filled with Aluminium Foam. International Journal of Solids and Structures 37(30): 4125-47.

Thornton, P.H. 1980. “Energy Absorption by Foam Filled Structures.” In: Presented at the Congress and Exposition Cobo Hall, Detroit, SAE Technical Paper.

Toksoy, A. K., and M. G?den. 2005. The Strengthening Effect of Polystyrene Foam Filling in Aluminum Thin-Walled Cylindrical Tubes. Thin-Walled Structures 43(2): 333-50.

2010. Partial Al Foam Filling of Commercial 1050H14 Al Crash Boxes: The Effect of Box Column Thickness and Foam Relative Density on Energy Absorption. Thin-Walled Structures 48(7): 482-94.

US 7406806B2.Pdf.

Wang, Yonghui, Ximei Zhai, Wenjian Ying, and Wei Wang. 2018. “Dynamic Crushing Response of an Energy Absorption Connector with Curved Plate and Aluminum Foam as Energy Absorber.” International Journal of Impact Engineering 121(July): 119-33.

Wierzbicki, T., S. U. Bhat, W. Abramowicz, and D. Brodkin. 1992. 29 International Journal of Solids and Structures Alexander Revisited-A Two Folding Elements Model of Progressive Crushing of Tubes.

Wierzbicki, T, and W Abramowicz. 1983. 50 Journal of Applied Mechanics-transactions of The Asme – J APPL MECH On the Crushing Mechanics of Thin-Walled Structures.

Yan, Libo, Nawawi Chouw, and Krishnan Jayaraman. 2014. “Effect of Triggering and Polyurethane Foam-Filler on Axial Crushing of Natural Flax/Epoxy Composite Tubes.” Materials and Design 56: 528-41.

Yang, Shu, and Chang Qi. 2013. “Multiobjective Optimization for Empty and Foam-Filled Square Columns under Oblique Impact Loading.” International Journal of Impact Engineering 54: 177-91.

Yazici, Murat, Jefferson Wright, Damien Bertin, and Arun Shukla. 2015. “Preferentially Filled Foam Core Corrugated Steel Sandwich Structures for Improved Blast Performance.” Journal of Applied Mechanics 82(6): 061005.

Zarei, H. R., and M. Kr?ger. 2008. “Optimization of the Foam-Filled Aluminum Tubes for Crush Box Application.” Thin-Walled Structures 46(2): 214-21.

Zhang, Xiong, and Hoon Huh. 2009. “Energy Absorption of Longitudinally Grooved Square Tubes under Axial Compression” Thin-Walled Structures 47(12): 1469-77.

Zhou, Ping et al. 2016. “Experimental Comparison of Energy Absorption Characteristics of Polyurethane Foam-Filled Magnesium and Steel Beams in Bending.” International Journal of Impact Engineering 93: 76-87.