Whether Chloe can be imposed with duty of care against Peter?
The law of negligence is a tort law that imposes duty on the defendant to act so that no damage/loss is incurred to the plaintiff because of his acts (Donoghue v. Stevenson [1932]).
Negligent misstatements
A statement is considered to be negligently made when a statement is made by the defendant in good faith but without adequate care. The defendant is in a superior position than from the plaintiff because he possess with skill/knowledge upon which the plaintiff is relying. The defendant being aware of the fact that the plaintiff is relying on his sense of judgment made a statement carelessly. The plaintiff relied on the statement and suffers injury (Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd [1964].
Duty of care – When any defendant is making statement to the plaintiff, then, he must be assure that the statement that is made does not impact the plaintiff negatively. But, to prove duty there must be presence of two elements;
That the defendant and plaintiff must be in a proximate relationship so that the statement made by the defendant will impact the plaintiff directly (Esanda Finance Corporation Ltd v Peat Marwick Hungerfords (1997). Also, that the plaintiff is resemble foreseeable and is not remotely present (Mutual Life and Citizens Assurance Co Ltd v Evatt (1968).
Chloe is thinking to open a mediation studio. Before signing a 2 year lease she wanted to make sure that there was any structure mechanism scheduled near her intended premises as she wants a silence environment. She thus visited the Burnside Council.
It is submitted that Chloe shares a special relationship with the attendant of the council. The council is aware of the actual position of whether there are chances of any building work or not and Chloe is not aware of the same. Chloe is relying on the information provided by the attendant before entering into any contract.
It is submitted that since the attendants and Chloe are sharing special relationship, thus, the attends owns a duty against Chloe.
Whether the duty is violated?
Breach – It is necessary that the defendant must be aware that the plaintiff is relying on his sense of judgment and on the statements made by him before entering into any contractual relationship and the defendant has acted without adequate care resulting in breach. The duty is violated when the standard/level of precaution/care that is expected from the defendant is not met like a normal prudent man in the similar circumstances (Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW v Refrigerated Roadways Pty Limited [2009]
The duty of care is not met by the attendant as when Chloe shared her concern with the attendant then the attendant checked the computer with superficial glance and submitted that there is no building work scheduled. So, the level of care that is expected from the attendant is not met.
Are there any damages caused because of breach of duty?
Loss – The plaintiff must have suffered some kind of loss because of such reliance. The loss that is sustained by the plaintiff must be because of the misstatements made by the defendant (causation) and the loss so caused must not be remote in nature (remoteness) (Lindeman Ltd V Colvin [1946])
Special relationship – Once the duty is imposed which is breached by the defendant and loss is suffered, it is necessary to prove that both defendant and plaintiff share special relationship, that is: (Hocking 1999, p77)
In Shaddock& Associates Pty Ltd V Parramatta City Council [1981], the plaintiff intends to enter into some kind of property transaction and wants information regarding the road widening plan and thus relied on the advice of the defendant. The agent of the defendant submitted that the property is not covered under the road widening plan and thus he must go ahead with his contract. But, the plaintiff suffers injuries. It is sublimed that the agent and the plaintiff are in special relationship because the agent is aware that the plaintiff is relying on his advice before entering into contract and the advice furnished was made carelessly. Thus, the duty was held to be complying not in adequate manner making the agent negligent in his actions.
Further, San Sebastian Pty Ltd V Minister Adminstering The Enviromental Planning And Assessment Act (1986), when the parties are not sharing special relationship, then the defendant cannot be held liable for making any kind of negligent misstatement.
Based on the advice, a 2 year lease signed is sign by Chloe. But, after 6 months a major construction work started. The noise has caused problem to Chloe to carry out his work. She suffered nervous disorder.
Thus, because of breach of duty of care loss is caused to the Chloe. However, the council is not liable for the nervous disorder of Chloe as the loss is too remote.
Whether Chloe can sue Burnside Council for his nervous disorder?
When any act of negligence is caused then it is necessary that the acts of the defendant must have caused loss to the plaintiff. It is necessary that there is legal duty of care imposed upon the defendant who is not complying with by him resulting in loss to the plaintiff.
However, there are two elements to be proved:
Because of the attendant Chloe has suffered losses and thus Chloe has moved out of the premises.
The loss that is caused to Chloe, mental disorder, is though caused by the acts of the council but the loss is too remote for the council to predict. So, there is remoteness in the loss that is caused to Chloe and council cannot be held liable for such losses.
Conclusion
Chloe can sue the council for negligence as the advice was made negligently. But, Chloe cannot sue for the loss of nervous disorder as the same is too remote.
References
Hocking, B. (1999). Liability for negligent words. Sydney: Federation Press.
ALEXANDER, D. (2010). Material Misstatement of What? A Comment on Smieliauskas et Abacus, 46(4). < https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2010.00327.x>.
Case law
Bank Line Ltd v Arthur Capel & Co [1919].
Donoghue v. Stevenson [1932]).
Esanda Finance Corporation Ltd v Peat Marwick Hungerfords (1997) 188 CLR 241 (HCA);
Hedley Byrne & Co Ltd v Heller & Partners Ltd [1964] AC 465.
Mutual Life and Citizens Assurance Co Ltd v Evatt (1968) 122 CLR 566.
Roads and Traffic Authority of NSW v Refrigerated Roadways Pty Limited [2009]
Shaddock& Associates Pty Ltd V Parramatta City Council [1981] HCA 59.
South Australia Asset Management Corp v York Montague Ltd, [1997] 1 A.C. 191 HL
San Sebastian Pty Ltd V Minister Adminstering The Enviromental Planning And Assessment Act (1986).
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download
