Case Study On “Smart Heating System”

Overview of SHHS User Interface Features

Case Study on “Smart Heating System”. 

To develop the interface, this involves the information about SHHS (Smart Home Heating Solution). The standard functionality of the suggested application is significantly maintained by the each of the interfaces that are developed in the respect project. To showcase the usage of the located application, there are interface modules which are a total of nine that are well prepared with the required solution. The daily temperature measurement or a fact of the equipment has been displayed in Home interface, and it shows the data about the present temperature and the activity of the device. Four internal parts of interfaces are internally connected with profile interface it has been used to plan out various modified configuration for further usage or utilization. For the better usage or usability, the original outline is also connected with the confirmed interface. A system module that is defined as the next conspire displays the various warming process where there is a particular functionality order of warming which can be selected by the user. The order of warming can be Electric or Water based warming etc.  The automatically configured process is enabled by the fast activation factor that is also being known as the last or final module.

Smart home thermostat profile of user interface design, menus and modules of the system and show the effectiveness of various methods of heating systems; Menu home and home heating process, the temperature profile is shown in the schedule. The overall idea of the proposal is to suggest a designing proposal for the required product. 

2.1. Project Aim

The aim of the project are to build up a user interface Smart Home Thermostat that helps reduce the usage of power, gives natural advantages to pre-set the framework with a specific end goal to keep the room warms. SHT (Smart Home Thermostat) graphical user interface designing projects main objective as mentioned below.

1. The design skills need to be accessed based on the evaluation of Graphical user-interface system.
2. A GUI (Graphical user interface) for the SHT (Smart Home Thermostat) needs to be developed and designed.

2.2 Project Objective

The primary goals of the task are:

1. The organization and user need to be meet easily by the designed GUI (graphical user interface).
2. The Smart home thermostat controlling capabilities need to be designed using a GUI (Graphical user-interface).

2.3 Project Scope

The workings or activities within the external and internal project scope that has been presented in a tabular view below:

External Scope activities	Internal Scope activities
Make sure that there is a power supply for the thermostat.	Graphical User-Interface needs to be designed and developed.
Making changes to the existing control panels that are proposed to the clients.	If required, changes need to be done in Graphical User-interface so that it can meet the needs of the customer.
The thermostat hardware elements need to be redesigned.	The proposed designed needs to be evaluated.

Table 1: Scope of the Project

3.1 Requirements of Business

1. To ensure that the capabilities of the latest designed GUI (graphical user-interface) such as environment-friendly and power consumption savings should be known by the targeted clients or customers.
2. To ensure that the efficiency of the latest designed GUI (graphical user-interface)e is enhanced which will improve the significant of product sale.
3. For the better assisting the users for operation part of the Smart home treatment, a user-friendly designed is use in the GUI (Graphical user-interface)

3.2 Requirements of User

1. The operation of the thermostat is based on the GUI (graphical user interface) design which allows it to operate it in four modes that are:
2. Electricity
3. Steam
4. Hot water
5. Hot air
6. For each different household area’s such as hall room, bedroom, etc. the client should be able to set a particular temperature zones.

• The capability or the functionality should be there for the users to override any amount of temperature that is already chosen or set.

1. The major targeted customers for the manufacturing enterprise of Smart home thermostat are the families that belong to mid-salaried groups.
2. The assumptions are made that in the climate cloud regions the first designed graphical user-interface should be launched and hence the primary project phase is highlighted on the graphical user interface designing which will provide the users to warm up their selected areas in their house.

5. 1 Case one: Room Temperature is set by user

Case Description	The customer does set the room temperature.
Example	Not Applicable
Participator	The Client or Customer
Clients	The graphical user interface designed and the customer or user.
Prerequisite	The installation of the graphical user-interface is already done.
Prediction	The client is equipped to perform the operation
Triggers	The room temperature gets change.
Events Flow	The users use the graphical user-interface, and the particular room temperature settings can be changed by the user. Moreover, the room temperature is changed.
Rule of Business	The graphical user-interface has been operating effectively and efficiently.

Table 2: Heating mode is changed 

5. 2 Case Two: Heating mode is changed

Case Description	The method of warming is changed that is been used by the customer.
Example	The Electricity method of warming is selected by the clients.
Participator	The Client or Customer
Clients	The graphical user interface designed and the customer or user.
Prerequisite	The installation of the graphical user-interface is already done, and the user is able of utilizing it.
Prediction	The client is equipped to perform the operation
Triggers	The heating method gets change.
Events Flow	The users use the graphical user-interface, and the particular heating mode settings can be changed by the user.
Rule of Business	The graphical user-interface has been operating effectively and efficiently.

Table 3: Heating mode is changed 

5. 3 Case three:  Temperature zone created by user

Case Description	The temperature zone that has been created by the customer.
Example	The temperature zone that has been created by the customer for the big room section and use it.
Participator	The Client or Customer
Clients	The graphical user interface designed and the customer or user.
Prerequisite	The installation of the graphical user-interface is already done, and the user is able of utilizing it.
Prediction	The temperature zone has been set up.
Triggers	The client is fit for utilizing the temperature zone
Events Flow	The users use the graphical user-interface, and the temperature zone has been created by the user, and the temperature zone has been employed by the user.
Rule of Business	The graphical user-interface has been operating effectively and efficiently.

Table 4: Heating mode is changed

Different authors have suggested that the standard ISO 9241-210 motivates the usage of the designing processes mentioned UI (User-Interfaces). The ISO 13407 is also known as ISO 9241-210.

a. Identifying the clients and their particular needs.

Professionals in the niche of IT are of the viewpoint that the located of the major users of the device and their unique needs is each of the primary activities which need to be operated before the process of development is initiated in the design or plans of the described system. As per different researchers in the designing the User Interface, the same observations held true.

Smart Home Thermostat Profile of User Interface Design

b. Creating the navigational, compositional and structural design of the user interface:

Once the client’s needs have been identified, a blueprint of the UI (User-Interface) is created or developed: the features that are involved in these designs are fundamentally copied the user-system interaction that happens in the real world. Various researchers have given their feedback that it is the first move in which the scenario of interaction are classified as per their significance and icons, features, and the User interface needs to support the interactions that are planned. Finally, the arrangement of different areas of the user interface, as well as the program out of the various icons and the described sections or area is designed. 

c. Creating the front-end designs of the User Interface:

The frontend designs of the UI (user-interface), involves the choice of the fonts, icons, colors on the background and the graphics components to be used in the UI (user-interface) are concluded in the process of the planning phase. 

d. Creating the dummy model and analyze it:

In the final stage process of designing, the dummy models of the visual user interface are created. According to the researchers, the creation of the dummy model is necessary as the usage of the useful analysis methods on these dummy models advance to the classification of the issues and the defects that exist in the described design: Obviously, the outline of the User-Interface is reexamined in a repetitive way to override the issue distinguished.

The article study directed during the undertaking work accused that the ISO 9241-210 standards are used in best interface planning project: in this manner, the similar has been chosen in order to be utilizing in this task.

The accompanying table represents the ethics which should be satisfied to make the User-interface designing job a success.

SI No	Criteria for Success	Client’s needs met
1	All the amenities regulated by the thermostat is supported by GUI	The Graphical User Interface being planned should have the capacity to permit the client to operate the thermostat indoor in each of the four modes.
2	The shortcut setting that is created is supported by the graphical user interface.	For different household section, the user can have the ability to quickly set up the different temperature.
3	The process re-do are supported by the graphical user interface.	Once the temperature setting has been choose, then the client or user should have the functionalities to change it.

8.1 Evaluation Aims

The primary objective of the assessment process that is used for the task are:

1. To survey whether the outlined user interface is difficult to utilize or not to utilize.
2. To survey whether the outlined interface is fit for meeting the particular prerequisites of the organization and the user’s framework, as distinguished in the initial step of the configuration procedure.
3. To evaluate the uprightness of the clients interface that has been composed.
4. To survey the recurrence of faults that the device confers, such that the productivity of the device can be assessed.
5. To determine if the framework is equipped for decreasing the utilization of force or not

8.2 Evaluation Methodology

Different researchers are the estimation that the benefit assessment method is favored over the usability of use testing systems fundamentally on account of certainty that the previous procedure is reasonable when compared with the later, other than being significantly less consuming of time.

According to some researchers, the usability assessment is directed by specialists or group of usability professionals and the nature of the outcomes distributed by the specialists rely on upon the knowledge of the specialists included. The researchers have additionally remarked that given the objectives of the assessment procedure, assessment strategies are of the accompanying three types:

a.Heuristic evaluation:

As discussed by some researchers, Heuristic evaluation is led by a group of convenience specialists went for recognizing the engineering problems that depends on in the planned interface, other than revealing insight into the concern of the faults and their impacts on the effectiveness of the interface that’s being composed.

b. Cognitive Walkthrough:

As per various researchers, are of the conclusion that Cognitive Walkthrough can be characterized as that particular assessment strategy that utilizations possible measure for surveying the straightforwardness with that the interface can be used.

Primary Goals of the Project

Other than the evaluation forms that are mentioned above, the accompanying assessment strategies would be put to utilize:

c. Clients Feedbacks:

Customers who are right now using the framework would be asked for to audit the interface of the client structure outlined. The data accessible from these customers would be used to survey whether the planned that is done for the interface is equipped with meeting the desires of the customers.

d. Qualitative evaluation:

Qualitative Evaluation procedures are helpful in recognizing the issue sections of the interface being planned, other than making suppositions on the likely impacts of the problem areas on the effectiveness of the said interface. 

8.3 Test moral consideration and spectators selection

It has already been mentioned that the assessment of the interface will be managed by a board of usability specialists. It has been chosen that specialists outer to the administration project group would request be asked for to take an interest in the assessment project: such an evaluation system would be adequate to stay away from the partiality of any kind. The smart home thermostat focuses on the electronic business sector of the regions those are colder with a specific end goal to dispatch their user interface in the commercial marketplace. The moral considerations that are considered while planning the user interface are that the data those are gathered from the clients are critical, and it ought to be kept secured from the unapproved utilization of the clients. The customers can introduce the framework in their home after they feel that the structure ought to be gainful for their utilization.

Apart from this, the present clients of the SHT (Smart home thermostat) would be requested to take part in the review: the said overview would be directed just at the customers who were willing in the assessment project.

The under detailed moral rules would be taken after during the evaluation procedure:

1. Only client’s volunteer from the project would be incorporated into the review.
2. No impact would be applied the customers who take an interest in the study.
3. The data gathered during the survey would be used just for graphic and analysis works inside to the assembling enterprise and do not be utilized for some other reason.
4. The names and personalities of the volunteers do not be revealed in broad daylight.

8.4 Evaluation experiments

The clients and the specialists evaluating the graphical user interface would be urged to carry out the accompanying exercises:

1. Browsing to every last segment of the graphical user interface.
2. Utilizing the interface framework altogether.
3. Contrasting the effectiveness of the structure and the other comparative frameworks accessible in the business place.

8.5 Analysis procedure and methodology

The mentioned methods and method are used while evaluating the user interface of the Smart home thermostat follows such as:

1. The data accessible from the clients will be analyzed.

2. The remarks made by the specialists would be contrasted and the observations made by the customers.

3. The outcome of the described above correlation would be used to recognize the problems leaving in the configuration.

4. It is most vital to do a possibility or probability examination of the project report.

5. It is additionally important that the user interface is given the respective functionalities.    

Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2015). Business research methods. Oxford University Press, USA.

Cockton, G. (2013). Usability evaluation. The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd Ed.

Fenton, N., & Bieman, J. (2014). Software metrics: a rigorous and practical approach. CRC Press.

Fleury, A., Pedersen, J. S., & Larsen, L. B. (2013). Evaluating user preferences for video transfer methods from a mobile device to a TV screen. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 9(2), 228-241.

Følstad, A., Law, E., & Hornbæk, K. (2012, May). Analysis in practical usability evaluation: a survey study. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2127-2136). ACM.

Galliers, R. D., & Leidner, D. E. (2014). Strategic information management: challenges and strategies in managing information systems. Routledge.

Goode, N., Salmon, P. M., Taylor, N. Z., Lenné, M. G., & Finch, C. F. (2015). Bridging the research-practice gap: validity of a software tool designed to support systemic accident analysis by risk managers. In Engineering Psychology and Cognitive Ergonomics (pp. 215-225). Springer International Publishing.

Harris, F., & McCaffer, R. (2013). Modern construction management. John Wiley & Sons.

Hasan, L., Morris, A., & Probets, S. (2013). E-commerce websites for developing countries-A usability evaluation framework. Online Information Review, 37(2), 231-251.

He, X. D., & Zhang, Y. Y. (2014, July). Study on Application of the Complexity Theory in Project Management. In Applied Mechanics and Materials (Vol. 584, pp. 2277-2281).

Heagney, J. (2012). Fundamentals of project management. AMACOM Div American Mgmt Assn.

Indelicato, G. (2012). Project Management Metrics, KPIs, and Dashboards: A Guide to Measuring and Monitoring Project Performance. Project Management Journal, 43(2), 102-102.

Jeston, J., & Nelis, J. (2014). Business process management. Routledge.

Kerzner, H. R. (2013). Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons.

Kübler, A., Zickler, C., Holz, E., Kaufmann, T., Riccio, A., & Mattia, D. (2013). Applying the user-centred design to evaluation of Brain-Computer Interface controlled applications. Biomedical Engineering/Biomedizinische Technik.

Mir, F. A., & Pinnington, A. H. (2014). Exploring the value of project management: linking project management performance and project success. International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), 202-217.

Mirnig, A. G., Meschtscherjakov, A., Wurhofer, D., Meneweger, T., & Tscheligi, M. (2015, April). A Formal Analysis of the ISO 9241-210 Definition of User Experience. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 437-450). ACM.

Paterno, F. (2012). Model-based design and evaluation of interactive applications. Springer Science & Business Media.

Petit, Y. (2012). Project portfolios in dynamic environments: Organizing for uncertainty. International Journal of Project Management, 30(5), 539-553.

Posavac, E. (2015). Program evaluation: Methods and case studies. Routledge.

Reynolds, D., & Wenburg, J. L. (2013). Project Proposal. Cell, 317, 627-4325.

Schwalbe, K. (2015). Information technology project management. Cengage Learning.

Serra, C. E. M., & Kunc, M. (2015). Benefits Realisation Management and its influence on project success and on the execution of business strategies. International Journal of Project Management, 33(1), 53-66.

Turner, J. R. (2014). The handbook of project-based management (Vol. 92). McGraw-hill.

Yu, C. H., Stacey, D., Sale, J., Hall, S., Kaplan, D. M., Ivers, N., … & Straus, S. E. (2014). Designing and evaluating an interprofessional shared decision-making and goal-setting decision aid for patients with diabetes in clinical care–systematic decision aid development and study protocol.