Total Peripherals Group (TPG) was inaugurated in 1986 and is Australia (TPG, 2017). Total Peripherals Group (TPG) operates in telecommunication and IT industry with strong customer based in Personal, Small business and large corporations.TPG is second largest provider of internet service in Australia with more than 1500 employees. Total Peripherals Group (TPG) is listed at Australian Stock Exchange with stock exchange code of TPM (TPG, 2017). TPG also owns end-to-end networking infrastructure that increases the quality and coverage. TPG operates in three main business segments that include iiNet, corporate and TPG consumer (TPG Annual Reports 2016).
Total Peripherals Group (TPG) is growing and profitable firm from the first year of incorporation. In 2010, TPG fully acquired the PIPE networks with the consent of shareholders and other related bodies. TPG acquired PIPE network with scheme arrangements for $373 Million. In 2011, TPG announced its interest to fully acquire IntraPower for $13 Million and acquisition process was completed in August (Computer World News, 2011). IntraPower allowed TPG to get control of trusted cloud. After two years of acquisition of IntraPower, in December 2013, TPG acquired AAPT from Telecom NZ at cost of $450 Million (Reuters, 2013). In 2015, the most important step taken by TGP owners to purchase largest ISP named iiNet for $1.4 Billion. Apart from these acquisition, TGP initiated acquisitions of many other small and medium businesses. These acquisitions clearly states that TGP is pursuing stable growth strategy due to increase in profit and operations internationally.
In order to get insights into the growth prospects of TGP analysis of financial statements is very helpful. TGP financial statements followed increasing trend in revenue, assets and net income. Horizontal and vertical analysis of financial statements is given below to understand the growth trend of TGP.
Horizontal Analysis |
|||||
2014-07 |
2015-07 |
2016-07 |
Growth |
Growth |
|
Particulars |
|||||
Assets |
|||||
Current assets |
|||||
Cash |
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
24 |
24 |
39 |
0% |
63% |
Short-term investments |
99 |
152 |
144 |
54% |
-5% |
Total cash |
123 |
175 |
184 |
42% |
5% |
Receivables |
86 |
64 |
145 |
-26% |
127% |
Inventories |
5 |
12 |
24 |
140% |
100% |
Prepaid expenses |
21 |
18 |
28 |
-14% |
56% |
Other current assets |
-13 |
-15 |
-22 |
15% |
47% |
Total current assets |
221 |
254 |
359 |
15% |
41% |
Non-current assets |
|||||
Property, plant and equipment |
|||||
Gross property, plant and equipment |
1108 |
2065 |
2943 |
86% |
43% |
Accumulated Depreciation |
-879 |
-1153 |
31% |
||
Net property, plant and equipment |
1108 |
1186 |
1790 |
7% |
51% |
Equity and other investments |
7 |
116 |
23 |
1557% |
-80% |
Goodwill |
1098 |
1092 |
3822 |
-1% |
250% |
Intangible assets |
326 |
279 |
1148 |
-14% |
311% |
Other long-term assets |
-1252 |
-1272 |
-3371 |
2% |
165% |
Total non-current assets |
1288 |
1400 |
3412 |
9% |
144% |
Total assets |
1509 |
1654 |
3771 |
10% |
128% |
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity |
|||||
Liabilities |
|||||
Current liabilities |
|||||
Capital leases |
0 |
0 |
54 |
0% |
|
Accounts payable |
125 |
153 |
424 |
22% |
177% |
Deferred income taxes |
34 |
25 |
-26% |
-100% |
|
Deferred revenues |
158 |
125 |
285 |
-21% |
128% |
Other current liabilities |
-60 |
-45 |
-250 |
-25% |
456% |
Total current liabilities |
258 |
258 |
514 |
0% |
99% |
Non-current liabilities |
|||||
Long-term debt |
693 |
655 |
2632 |
-5% |
302% |
Capital leases |
0 |
69 |
|||
Deferred taxes liabilities |
36 |
34 |
125 |
-6% |
268% |
Other long-term liabilities |
-311 |
-297 |
-1338 |
-5% |
351% |
Total non-current liabilities |
419 |
392 |
1488 |
-6% |
280% |
Total liabilities |
677 |
651 |
2002 |
-4% |
208% |
Stockholders’ equity |
|||||
Common stock |
517 |
517 |
1052 |
0% |
103% |
Retained earnings |
267 |
410 |
681 |
54% |
66% |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
48 |
76 |
36 |
58% |
-53% |
Total stockholders’ equity |
832 |
1003 |
1769 |
21% |
76% |
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity |
1509 |
1654 |
3771 |
10% |
128% |
Above table shows horizontal analysis of balance sheet which clearly states that TGP is growing and profitable firm. Income statement of TGP also shows positive growth trend in revenue and net income. Following table shows the growth trend of income statement of TGP.
Horizontal Analysis |
|||||
2014-07 |
2015-07 |
2016-07 |
Growth |
Growth |
|
Particulars |
|||||
Revenue |
971 |
1271 |
2388 |
30.90% |
87.88% |
Gross profit |
971 |
1271 |
2388 |
30.90% |
87.88% |
Operating expenses |
|||||
Sales, General and administrative |
207 |
278 |
547 |
34.30% |
96.76% |
Other operating expenses |
510 |
657 |
1278 |
28.82% |
94.52% |
Total operating expenses |
718 |
936 |
1825 |
30.36% |
94.98% |
Operating income |
253 |
335 |
563 |
32.41% |
68.06% |
Interest Expense |
22 |
42 |
169 |
90.91% |
302.38% |
Other income (expense) |
262 |
345 |
634 |
31.68% |
83.77% |
Income before taxes |
494 |
638 |
1028 |
29.15% |
61.13% |
Provision for income taxes |
322 |
414 |
644 |
28.57% |
55.56% |
Net income from continuing operations |
172 |
224 |
385 |
30.23% |
71.88% |
Other |
-5 |
||||
Net income |
172 |
224 |
380 |
30.23% |
69.64% |
From 2014 to 2015, revenue increase by 30% while from 2015 to 2016 revenue growth reached to above 87%. Net income increased by 30% in 2015 and about 70% in 2016 due to stable operating expenses. Dedicated top level management, hostile takeover of small companies and latest technology is strength of TPG. Weakness of TPG is risky capital structure with more debt that can increase the chances of bankruptcy and fear among investors. Growing trend of using internet among small and medium enterprises is opportunity for TPG to increase customer base in Australia and other countries. Due to more profits and growing demand of internet, many new competitors can enter into telecom industry which is threat for TPG. In order to avoid threat of new entrants, TPG should devise new strategies and provide latest and cheaper system solutions to its individual and corporate clients.
Financial statements are very necessary for public limited companies because these statements are major sources of information for investors, government, creditors, tax authorities and customer (Barth, 2006). Every users of financial statement use financial data to analyze the attractiveness of the firm. Although financial statement is prepared on standard method but it contains very difficult information which is not easy to understand. Financial ratios are used to analyze the information of financial statements (Lewellen, 2004). Five major categories of financial ratios are used to analyze the financial health and performance of TPG. Liquidity ratios, capital structure ratios, asset management efficiency, profitability and market value ratios will be looked into to understand the health of TPG. Liquidity position of TPG is below industry average because firm has more current liability as compared t current assets. Working capital of TPG is negative and this will create difficult situation to repay short-term obligations (Padachi, 2006). As discussed in SWOT analysis that capital structure of TPG contain more debt compared to equity which can lead to risk of bankruptcy. Debt to equity ratios of TPG is well below industry average because TPG has more debt than industry. Interest coverage ratio is also below telecom industry which is 20. Interest coverage ratio shows the ability of firm to pay its interest and it must be 20 times to avoid risk of bankruptcy. Efficiency ratios show the ability of firm to generate revenue through use of assets available to the firm. Net asset turnover ratio is very attractive because TPG is effective and efficient in utilizing firm’s assets. Receivables turnover ratio shows the ability of firm to collects outstanding receivables and receivables turnover is above industry average. Operating profit margin is well above the industry average. Price to earnings ratio is also above industry average due to future growth prospects.
Liquidity Ratios |
|||
|
Jul-14 |
Jul-15 |
Jul-16 |
Current Ratio |
|
|
|
Current Assets |
221 |
254 |
359 |
Current Liabilities |
258 |
258 |
514 |
Current Assets /Current Liabilities |
0.857 |
0.984 |
0.698 |
Acid Test Ratio |
|
|
|
Current Assets |
221 |
254 |
359 |
Inventory |
5 |
12 |
24 |
Current Liabilities |
258 |
258 |
514 |
Current Assets – Inventory/Current Liabilities |
0.837 |
0.938 |
0.652 |
Capital Structure Ratios |
|||
Debt to Equity ratios |
|
|
|
Total Debt |
677 |
651 |
2002 |
Total Equity |
832 |
1003 |
1769 |
Total Debt/Total Equity |
0.814 |
0.649 |
1.132 |
Gearing Ratio |
|
|
|
Total Long term liability |
419 |
392 |
1488 |
Equity |
832 |
1003 |
1769 |
Long Term Liability |
419 |
392 |
1488 |
Capital Employed (Equity + Long Term Liability) |
1251 |
1395 |
3257 |
Total Long term liability/ Capital Employed |
0.335 |
0.281 |
0.457 |
Interest Coverage Ratio |
|
|
|
PBIT |
253 |
335 |
563 |
Interest Expense |
22 |
42 |
169 |
PBIT/Interest Expense |
11.500 |
7.976 |
3.331 |
Efficiency Ratios |
|||
Net Assets Turnover Ratio |
|
|
|
Revenue |
971 |
1271 |
2388 |
Equity |
832 |
1003 |
1769 |
Long Term Liability |
419 |
392 |
1488 |
Capital Employed (Equity + Long Term Liability) |
1251 |
1395 |
3257 |
Revenue/ Capital Employed |
0.776 |
0.911 |
0.733 |
Receivables Turnover |
|
|
|
Receivables |
86 |
64 |
145 |
Revenue |
971 |
1271 |
2388 |
Receivables *365/Revenue |
32.327 |
18.379 |
22.163 |
|
|
|
|
Fixed Asset Turnover |
|
|
|
Sales |
971 |
1271 |
2388 |
Net Fixed Assets |
1288 |
1400 |
3412 |
Sales/Net Fixed Assets |
0.753882 |
0.907857 |
0.699883 |
|
|
|
|
Total Assets Turnover |
|
|
|
Sales |
971 |
1271 |
2388 |
Total Assets |
1509 |
1654 |
3771 |
Sales / Total Assets |
0.643472 |
0.76844 |
0.633254 |
Profitability |
|||
Gross Margin |
|
|
|
Gross profit |
971 |
1271 |
2388 |
Revenue |
971 |
1271 |
2388 |
Gross profit x 100/ Sales |
100.000 |
100.000 |
100.000 |
Operating Profit Margin |
|
|
|
Operating Profit |
253 |
335 |
563 |
Revenue |
971 |
1271 |
2388 |
Operating Profit / Revenue |
0.2606 |
0.2636 |
0.2358 |
Net Profit Margin |
` |
|
|
Net Income |
172 |
224 |
380 |
Revenue |
971 |
1271 |
2388 |
Net Income/Revenue |
0.177 |
0.176 |
0.159 |
|
|
|
|
Investment Ratios |
|||
Dividend Yield |
|
|
|
Dividend |
0.12 |
0.14 |
0.18 |
Market value of shares |
5.42 |
9.34 |
12.61 |
Dividend*100 /Market Value of share |
0.0221 |
0.0150 |
0.0143 |
Earnings per share (EPS) |
|
|
|
Profit After Tax |
172 |
224 |
380 |
Shares Outstanding |
1616 |
1616 |
1706 |
Profit After Tax / Shares Outstanding |
0.106 |
0.139 |
0.223 |
Price/earnings ratio |
|
|
|
Share Price |
5.42 |
9.34 |
12.61 |
Earnings per share (EPS) |
0.106436 |
0.138614 |
0.222743 |
Share price/Earnings Per Share |
50.923 |
67.381 |
56.612 |
Risk and return
In a competitive market risk is directly associated with return (Cochrane, 2005). Higher risk always yields higher return if information is symmetric. Investor use share prices to calculate the risk and return trend of stock and invest if risk is lower than return. TPG is publicly traded firm and its share prices history can be used to calculate the risk-return tradeoff. There are different methods to determine risk and return of any stock and in this report mean-variance approach is used to calculate risk and return of the TPG stock. Risk can be categorized as individual or market risk (Dohmen, et.al, 2011). Individual risk is risk associated with particular stock while market risk is difficult to mitigate as it is associated with macro-economic factors. 3 years price data is utilized to calculate the risk and return of TPG which is give in table below.
Month |
Monthly Prices (x) |
Mean (x¯) |
Monthly Prices (x) |
Mean (x¯) |
(x- x¯) |
(x- x¯)2 |
31/12/2016 |
6.7 |
6.7 |
8.41 |
-1.71 |
2.94 |
|
30/11/2016 |
7.02 |
7.02 |
8.41 |
-1.39 |
1.95 |
|
31/10/2016 |
7.43 |
7.43 |
8.41 |
-0.98 |
0.97 |
|
30/9/2016 |
8.47 |
8.47 |
8.41 |
0.06 |
0.00 |
|
31/8/2016 |
11.98 |
11.98 |
8.41 |
3.57 |
12.71 |
|
29/7/2016 |
12.61 |
12.61 |
8.41 |
4.20 |
17.60 |
|
30/6/2016 |
11.69 |
11.69 |
8.41 |
3.28 |
10.73 |
|
31/5/2016 |
12.1 |
12.1 |
8.41 |
3.69 |
13.58 |
|
29/4/2016 |
10.52 |
10.52 |
8.41 |
2.11 |
4.43 |
|
31/3/2016 |
11.14 |
11.14 |
8.41 |
2.73 |
7.43 |
|
29/2/2016 |
10.32 |
10.32 |
8.41 |
1.91 |
3.63 |
|
29/1/2016 |
9.87 |
9.87 |
8.41 |
1.46 |
2.12 |
|
31/12/2015 |
9.72 |
9.72 |
8.41 |
1.31 |
1.70 |
|
30/11/2015 |
10.15 |
10.15 |
8.41 |
1.74 |
3.01 |
|
30/10/2015 |
10.87 |
10.87 |
8.41 |
2.46 |
6.03 |
|
30/9/2015 |
10.67 |
10.67 |
8.41 |
2.26 |
5.09 |
|
31/8/2015 |
9.23 |
9.23 |
8.41 |
0.82 |
0.66 |
|
31/7/2015 |
9.34 |
9.34 |
8.41 |
0.93 |
0.86 |
|
31/6/2015 |
8.81 |
8.81 |
8.41 |
0.40 |
0.16 |
|
29/5/2015 |
8.88 |
8.88 |
8.41 |
0.47 |
0.22 |
|
30/4/2015 |
8.78 |
8.78 |
8.41 |
0.37 |
0.13 |
|
31/3/2015 |
9.01 |
9.01 |
8.41 |
0.60 |
0.35 |
|
27/2/2015 |
7.49 |
7.49 |
8.41 |
-0.92 |
0.86 |
|
30/1/2015 |
6.58 |
6.58 |
8.41 |
-1.83 |
3.37 |
|
31/12/2014 |
6.63 |
6.63 |
8.41 |
-1.78 |
3.19 |
|
28/11/2014 |
7.28 |
7.28 |
8.41 |
-1.13 |
1.29 |
|
31/10/2014 |
7.13 |
7.13 |
8.41 |
-1.28 |
1.65 |
|
30/9/2014 |
6.72 |
6.72 |
8.41 |
-1.69 |
2.87 |
|
29/8/2014 |
5.92 |
5.92 |
8.41 |
-2.49 |
6.22 |
|
31/7/2014 |
5.42 |
5.42 |
8.41 |
-2.99 |
8.97 |
|
30/6/2014 |
5.41 |
5.41 |
8.41 |
-3.00 |
9.03 |
|
30/5/2014 |
5.85 |
5.85 |
8.41 |
-2.56 |
6.58 |
|
30/4/2014 |
5.84 |
5.84 |
8.41 |
-2.57 |
6.63 |
|
31/3/2014 |
6.53 |
6.53 |
8.41 |
-1.88 |
3.55 |
|
28/2/2014 |
5.51 |
5.51 |
8.41 |
-2.90 |
8.44 |
|
31/1/2014 |
5.31 |
5.31 |
8.41 |
-3.10 |
9.64 |
|
Mean |
8.415 |
|||||
Variance |
4.682 |
|||||
Standard Deviation(Risk) |
2.164 |
Beta (β) of TPG
Beta coefficient is measure of systematic risk which can be calculated using Capital Asset Pricing Model CAPM) (Galagedera, 2007). In order to calculate Beta (β), expected return on particular stock, expected return on market and risk free rate are necessary. Expected return is same which is calculated in above section, market return is obtained from Australian index and risk free rate is obtained from Bloomberg (.
Beta Need To Find
Expected Return 0.08415
Risk Free Return 2.47%
Expected Market Return 7.79%
Formula of CAPM
E(R) =R f + β { E ( R m) – R f}
Rearrange the formula to get beta
β (TPG) =(ER – Rf) / (E (R m) – R f)
= 1.117
Weighted average cost of capital or WACC is discount rate which is average of costs of all sources of finances that is used by the firm (Farber, et.al, 2006). WACC is very reliable and is used in all valuation methods. Projects of firms are also evaluated using WACC due to its reliability and validity. Given below is the calculation of WACC of TPG (Fernandez, 2007).
Data
Value of Debt Vd 2,002,000,000
Weight of Debt Wd 53.09%
Cost of debt Kd 8.44%
Tax Rate st 62.59%
Value of Common Stock Vcs 1,769,000,000
Cost of common Stock Kcs 8.415%
Weight of Common Stock Wcs 46.91%
Value of Firm Vf $3,771,000,000.00
Formula of WACC
WACC = (Wcs* Kcs) + (Wd * Kd(1-T))
= 5.624%
Growth Forecast |
|
0.5 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.2 |
0.02 |
TV |
|
(Data In Mn) |
2015.0 |
2016.0 |
2017.0 |
2018.0 |
2019.0 |
2020.0 |
2021.0 |
|
Revenue |
1271.0 |
2388.0 |
3582.0 |
5014.8 |
7020.7 |
8424.9 |
8593.4 |
|
|
||||||||
Operating Cost |
936.0 |
1825.0 |
2098.8 |
2413.6 |
2654.9 |
2920.4 |
3066.4 |
|
|
335.0 |
563.0 |
1483.3 |
2601.2 |
4365.8 |
5504.5 |
5526.9 |
|
Taxes |
414.0 |
644.0 |
928.4 |
1628.1 |
2732.6 |
3445.2 |
3459.3 |
|
Net Investment |
308.0 |
562.0 |
597.8 |
698.1 |
908.7 |
993.0 |
1078.9 |
|
Change in WC |
-4.0 |
-155.0 |
100.0 |
50.0 |
30.0 |
40.0 |
60.0 |
|
FCF |
-383.0 |
-488.0 |
-142.9 |
225.0 |
694.5 |
1026.2 |
928.7 |
28189.2 |
WACC |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
Years |
1.0 |
2.0 |
3.0 |
4.0 |
5.0 |
5.0 |
||
Denominator |
1.1 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
1.2 |
1.2 |
1.3 |
1.3 |
|
PV of FCF |
-462.0 |
-135.3 |
201.7 |
589.4 |
824.5 |
706.4 |
21442.2 |
|
Enterprise Value |
23166.8 |
|||||||
Shares Outstanding |
1,706 |
|||||||
Fair Value |
13.58 |
Based on the discounted cash flow technique, it is recommended that investors should invest or buy shares of TPG because it is undervalued. Behavior finance claims that all stock return to intrinsic value after interaction of demand and supply (Chan, et.al, 2001). Current share price of TPG is AUD5.95 while Discounted Cash Flow analysis revealed fair value equal to AUD13.579. Therefore investors should invest in TPG because it is undervalue stock and when it return to fair value, investors will earn about AUD 7.6
References
Chan, L. K., Lakonishok, J., & Sougiannis, T. (2001). The stock market valuation of research and development expenditures. The Journal of Finance, 56(6), 2431-2456. Data retrieved from https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/11590147/research–development-expenditures.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A&Expires=1495183446&Signature=kXxLPkm3KumLVNo1Q0vIaJyelEQ%3D&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DThe_Stock_Market_Valuation_of_Research_a.pdf
Farber, A., Gillet, R. L., & Szafarz, A. (2006). A General Formula for the WACC. Data retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Roland_Gillet2/publication/46460102_A_general_formula_for_the_WACC/links/02e7e52660152cef41000000.pdf
Fernandez, P. (2007). A More Realistic Valuation: APV and WACC with constant book leverage ratio. Data retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/6536379.pdf
Galagedera, D. U. (2007). An alternative perspective on the relationship between downside beta and CAPM beta. Emerging Markets Review, 8(1), 4-19. Data retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1566014106000719
Bloomberg., (2016) market rates of Australian government bonds. From the official website of Bloomberg. Data retrieved from https://www.bloomberg.com/markets/rates-bonds/government-bonds/australia
Cochrane, J. H. (2005). The risk and return of venture capital. Journal of financial economics, 75(1), 3-52. Data retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7qm9h594
Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. G. (2011). Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(3), 522-550. Data retrieved from https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/46026687/j.1542-4774.2011.01015.x20160528-19725-1pl0zb4.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A&Expires=1495184187&Signature=1xdNaQqJnnXVxz2pt2sXJO3orLc%3D&response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%3DIndividual_Risk_Attitudes_Measurement_De.pdf
Lewellen, J. (2004). Predicting returns with financial ratios. Journal of Financial Economics, 74(2), 209-235. Data retrieved from https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/1805/4374-02.pdf
Padachi, K. (2006). Trends in working capital management and its impact on firms’ performance: an analysis of Mauritian small manufacturing firms. International Review of business research papers, 2(2), 45-58. Data retrieved from https://www.bizresearchpapers.com/Kesseven.pdf
Barth, M. E. (2006). Including estimates of the future in today’s financial statements. Accounting Horizons, 20(3), 271-285. Data retrieved from https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.494.5940&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Reuters., (2013) TPG Telecom preferred bidder for AAPT: source. From the official website of TPG. Data retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-aapt-tpg-idUSTRE6451N220100506
Computer World News., (2011) TPG to acquire IntraPower. From the official website of Computer World News. Data retrieved from https://www.computerworld.com.au/article/393570/tpg_acquire_intrapower/
TPG., (2017) About TPG: History of TPG. From the official Website of TPG. Data retrieved from https://www.tpg.com.au/about/profile.php
TPG., (2017) About TPG:Media Release. From the official Website of TPG. Data retrieved from https://www.tpg.com.au/about/media.php
TPG., (2017) TPG: Annual Reports 2016. From the official Website of TPG. Data retrieved from https://www.tpg.com.au/about/investorrelations.php
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order formOnce we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignmentAs soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download