Compare And Contrast Three Business Research Papers On Findings Presentation And Publication

The Purpose and Steps of Business Research

Question:

Compare and contrast three business research papers as to describe how the researchers presented their findings and prepared their publications or report.

Explain why the researchers exhibited similarities and differences in how they presented their findings and prepared their publications or report.

In this scenario the book named as research methods for the business (the approach of skill building) is on basically about the business research, that can described as the organized and systematic effort to investigate the specific problem uncounted into the setting of work. That to need solution, this is basically comprises the step of series of the steps that are executed and designed with the finding answer to reach the desired goal. This means that the very first step of the research is basically to know whether the areas of the problem that exist into the organization. Onto the other hand into the second segment the research is all about to suspend the momentarily discussion of the MIS and instated focus on the research. Already the numerous research traditions already were existence before long MIS came ever into certainly and begging before the research of MIS (Chatterjee, Sinha, Pal & Basu, 2012).

The research can undertake for the different two purposes. One is basically for solve the present problem that to faced by the work setting manager, a timely solution determination. For the example of a product that not may be well selling and the manager that might want to find the reasons for the order that to take the action correct. Such these kinds of research are called the research applied. The other is basically is to body generate of the knowledge for trying to comprehend how the problems that to organizational occurrence can solve. This is basically called the basic research (‘Editorial Board’, 2014).

On to the other hand, in the second link the positivism is in the practice, that is basically the constructed socially world, populated with the researches of social science that to shared the benefits inclusion of what to have the described and portrayed. The researcher who to studies and appropriates what are the three steps of the world that refer to the logic, in turn that basically appropriated by the positivism world and to become thereby to instrument of it’s or the agent.

The brainstorm ideas and to develop the statement of these is for that particular paper are the basically ideas of small kinds of business that often to come about after the series of the session brainstorming. This is basically works well at the time of several people doing this together, because of that will allow that to ideas bouncing back and stimulate and forth consideration and comments (Decker, Kipping & Wadhwani, 2015).

The first and main point is the objective defining. That is basically needed to know that what to know about what kind of hope to gain for the brainstorming.

The next important thing is the decide what to want from the idea of the business, that basically might be for the product to sell, money to make and the new service to introduce for the utilization of the technologies new. Then after the point that came to the picture that is ideas and suggestions for the search, this can done in the variety of the ways, and this often to help for the inclusion of other type of people. The next import topic is the suggestions and ideas of the entire Honor, this brainstorming work cannot if the limitations are to put on to the process creative. The ideas to consider regardless of the impossible they seem (Downs, 2015).

Positivism and Research Appropriation

The ideas that have to gather is like this, Explanation of meant by the investigation scientifically, have to give the example of the both investigation of scientific and non-scientific. The next important point that to include that is Eight hallmarks of the science to explain. The next to include that is explained briefly about the behavior of organizational research and the areas of management that scientifically cannot complete. Next one is the seven steps of hypothetico-deductive method, deduction and induction process to describe. The next important thing is the advantages of appreciate of knowledge about the investigation scientifically (Duran, 2015).

Managers are in general faced frequently issues that to call for the decision making critically. The decision that to base on the managerial is based on to the scientific result research that tend to be effective. In general the organized, systematic and the based on data research, critical, scientific inquiry objective into the problem specific that to need for the solution. Basically the decision is based onto the result of the research scientifically that basically effective trend to be. The research defining as an the decisions based on to the result of the study of the well done scientific tend to desired yield results. This is understand necessarily that the scientific term means, the research scientific focuses on to the problem solving and step by step logical, methods of rigorous and organized method to problem identification, data to gather, them analyze, and the valid conclusion is drawn from that (‘Editorial Board’, 2015).   

The approach of anecdotal is the basically this is the important one that the study of result and the recommendation for the problem solving are communicated effectively to the sponsor. That’s why the made suggestion are implemented and accepted. On to the other hand all of the hitherto effort that are expanded on to the investigation that have been in the vain. Concisely to write this report, with the clarity and convincingly is basically perhaps as the important one. Here the throughout well written report and the presentation oral are critical (Gonzalez-Brambila, Jenkins & Lloret, 2015).

There are the approach of funnel strategy in the skill building method are explain briefly in this area. The focal sales strategy funnels have for serving decades as the model general for looking any one to get most of the out of the lead given pool. By the break down the process in to the series of steps starting at the end wide of the funnel and narrower end working, the sales people are effectively more to their target effectively customers potential and to see the higher growth (Laitila, 2012).

The first step is the funnel mouth, this capturing the attention more, the most enlarge part of the funnel that to the demands of the amount greatest of leads possible to the work, and as per the result of that must be step up the efforts that to the greatest number appeal of the people. This is basically the process of straight forewarned, this take the time of significant amount. Usually on to the order on the months just to the sense break.

The next important thing is the middle level of the funnel, the main work in this stage is the most of the relevant audience filtering. Into the funnel middle this is basically responsible for the through shorting, the stream first of the leaders and out filtering some of the relevant less audience members (Hodgkinson, 2011).

The next important part is the ending position of the funnel. The main job of this is the appealing to the leads of most interesting. At the end of the funnel, introduction is to the leads of the highly qualified to purchase (Hütten, 2011). 

Conclusion

At the end of this study this is clearly seen that there are the result of this study is to confirm that the considered variables into the theoretical framework these are the important one. By the focus of number of the working hours, ignoring the work done quality the organization is the not harnessing perhaps the potential full and to the development of encouraging of the women talents adequately CPAs (Holgate, 2011).

Reference list

Chatterjee, D., Sinha, A., Pal, A., & Basu, A. (2012). An Iterative Methodolgy to Improve TV Onscreen Keyboard Layout Design through Evaluation of User Studies. AC, 2(5), 81-91. doi:10.5923/j.ac.20120205.03

Decker, S., Kipping, M., & Wadhwani, R. (2015). New business histories! Plurality in business history research methods. Business History, 57(1), 30-40. doi:10.1080/00076791.2014.977870

Downs, C. (2015). Selling hope: Gambling entrepreneurs in Britain 1906–1960. Journal Of Business Research. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.03.022

Duran, K. (2015). Reviewer Acknowledgements for International Business Research, Vol. 8, No. 3. IBR, 8(3). doi:10.5539/ibr.v8n3p221

Editorial Board. (2014). Journal Of Business Research, 67(8), ii-iv. doi:10.1016/s0148-2963(14)00145-3

Editorial Board. (2015). Journal Of Business Research, 68(1), ii-iv. doi:10.1016/s0148-2963(14)00331-2

Gonzalez-Brambila, C., Jenkins, M., & Lloret, A. (2015). Challenges for scholarly business research in Latin America. Journal Of Business Research. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.042

Hodgkinson, R. (2011). Introduction. Accounting And Business Research, 41(3), 203-205. doi:10.1080/00014788.2011.575580

Holgate, P. (2011). Discussion. Accounting And Business Research, 41(3), 267-268. doi:10.1080/00014788.2011.575301

Hütten, C. (2011). Discussion. Accounting And Business Research, 41(3), 287-289. doi:10.1080/00014788.2011.575302

Laitila, J. (2012). Methodolgy for choice of harvesting system for energy wood from early thinning. Dissertationes Forestales, 1. doi:10.14214/df.143