Concept Of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) System In Delhi

Literature Review

Explain The concept of BRT system in Delhi.

Transportation contributes to the economy of a nation as it is considered as the backbone to develop the urban areas. It provides access and mobility for efficient functioning of the urban areas. This research focuses on the Bus Transportation systems as it has been the primary mode of transport and India uses the public transport systems most heavily in the world. The major problem faced by the urban areas of any country including India is passenger mobility and connecting with a central part of the city. The Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) systems have been introduced in the cities of various countries including India to avoid such major problem of mobilizing the passengers as well as connect with the central part of the city. Al (2013) states that BRT system aims to integrate the capacity and speed of light rail or metro with flexibility at lower costs. Hence, this study will demonstrate on the reasons behind the failure of such system in Delhi that was opened in 2008 by comparing with other cities. The concept of BRT system in Delhi has been criticized due to the difficulty of accessing bus platforms, which are in the middle of road as well as lack of administration.

Introduction
Presently, the whole world is finding the supportable answers for their availability and portability issues. The procedure is muddled because of the quick pace of urbanization, which is portrayed by mechanization, the concurrence of mechanized and non-mechanized modes, breaking down open transport administrations and foundations and crumbling air quality. The urban population in India has been 285 million out of 1027 million in 2001. As opined by Anderson & Ellis (2014), it has built up more pressure particularly in metropolitan cities. Urban transport is a nightmare in India so to overcome the problem Bus Rapid Transit systems have been implemented as the name implies “Rapid Transit”; it depicts a high-limit transport framework with its own privilege of-way, actualized utilizing transports through infrastructural and planning upgrades, to give an abnormal state of administration. BRT System is viewed as supportable, ecological inviting transport mode and is being executed in numerous urban communities of the world. Galicia and Cheu (2012), characterizes BRTS is a transport based travel framework which permits higher rate, enhanced limit and better transport security by isolating transports from other roadway activity into an isolated transport way. BRTS (Bus Rapid Transit System) is characterized as a “flexible, high performance rapid transit mode that combines a variety of physical, operating and system elements into a permanently integrated system with a quality image and unique identity”.

Scenario of Transport for the Metropolitan Areas in India

India is the second most crowded nation on the planet and home to around 35 urban communities with populaces of more than 1 million. Despite the fact that the four urban areas (Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata and Chennai) have rail-based mass travel courses, the restricted scope of frameworks in these urban areas and for the most part chaotic, low quality, insufficient transport administrations (like other Indian urban areas) have brought about a disgraceful open transport supply in Indian urban communities. What’s more, aside from Delhi, no huge endeavors have been made as of late to enhance transport travel, which represents more than 90 percent of all open transport use in India (Babalik-Sutcliffe & Cengiz 2015).

The maximum trip length in metro cities is higher compare to medium and small cities. It has been observed that the average trip length is 2.4 km with population 5 lakh and it is 10.7 km for cities with population greater than 80 lakh. Significant decrease in public transport and a very high increase in private mode share for all city categories are predicted and due to this phenomenon, more street congestion develops in the metro city.

In 2007, it has been observed that about 39% of total trips in Indian cities are carried by walk and bicycles, whereas public transport carries nearly 27% of trips. In Pune, usage of public transport and private motorized vehicle is 41% and 22% respectively (Currie & Delbosc 2013). Cities like Kanpur and Lucknow having usage of less than 5%. Thus, the especially rapid growth of large cities suggests a further rise in future demands for public transport in India.

Approach towards BRT

A variety of transport modes, both private (strolling, cycling, bikes, and autos) and open (para travel, transports, Bus Rapid Transit System (BRTS), light rail, monorail, rural rail and metro) are utilized to meet these travel needs. While a few mass transport alternatives are accessible, BRT frameworks are picked with the particular expectation to adjust the cost viewpoint with the suitable strategy for conveying quality open transport administrations in the city (Currie and Delbosc 2014). BRTS is suggested over other Transit Systems considering the accompanying key drivers:

BRT advances amazing travel administrations on a perceptive premise to build up an astounding mass transport with reasonable framework cost (Rangarajan 2012). The inner rate of return for BRTS in city is genuinely high and achievable by open supports even in the wake of considering costs to be brought about for acquirement and operation of moving stock.

BRTS can be actualized inside shorter periods very nearly 1-3 years after origination, which is a noteworthy favorable position over rail, based mass transport notwithstanding the cost adequacy. Transport Rapid Transit System (BRTS) is another type of open transportation, which is a rising way to deal with utilizing transports as an enhanced fast travel framework (Mohan 2015).

The significant components of transport quick travel are portrayed beneath:
Running Ways: Running ways drive travel rates, dependability and personality. Choices range from general movement paths to review completely isolated BRT travel ways.

Stations: Stations, as the passage point to the framework, are the absolute most critical client interface, influencing availability, unwavering quality, solace, wellbeing and security, and additionally abide times, and framework picture. BRT station choices shift from straightforward stops with essential asylum to complex multi-purpose terminals with numerous comforts (Asadollahfardi et al. 2015).

Vehicle: BRTS framework can used an extensive variety of vehicles, from standard transports to particular vehicles. Choices change in term of size, impetus framework, outline, inward design, and flat/longitudinal control, all of which affects framework execution, limit and administration quality.

Off-Bus Fare Collection: Conventional on board toll gathering moderates the boarding procedure, especially when an assortment of passages are gathered for various destinations and/or classes of travelers (Popping 2012). An option would be the gathering of tolls after entering an encased transport station or haven territory before transport entries (like admission accumulation at a booth preceding entering a metro framework).

Administration and Operation Plan: Designing an administration plan that addresses the issues of the populace and livelihood focuses in the region and matches the interest for administration is a key stride in characterizing a BRT framework.

Major Elements of Bus Rapid Transit System

Middle versus Side Lanes: Exclusive transport paths are for the most part at evaluation, isolated from the current volume of movement by method for a physical partition. These restrictive transport paths can be deliberately set either at the focal point of the street (Median Bus paths) or along the edge (Side Bus paths). Encounters overall recommend having BRT framework in the focal edge (middle path) of the roadway is preferred choice over check paths.

Open versus Closed System: In Open System, the BRT framework path is kept open for all current transport administrators. The advantage of committed framework is conveyed to all administrators. In Closed System, the BRT framework path is limited just for BRT transports. BRT administrators remain the main recipients and subsequently in charge of effectiveness and support (Silva 2015). It is prescribed to have a “Shut System” on the passageways where selective BRT framework path is proposed to be produced. The elite BRT paths must be physically isolated from whatever remains of the movement by a physical boundary.

Restrictive/Dedicated versus Mixed Corridor: BRTS halls having committed BRT framework paths should have just BRT framework transport administration running. No other administration should be permitted to rival BRT framework. Notwithstanding, BRTS transports will impart other feeder courses to other open transport where there is no procurement of committed transport paths (Overdorf 2012). Such an office is alluded as blended passage. BRT framework transports, different transports and other movement will share the accessible right of way.

BRTS is most appropriate in moderate size urban communities like Bhopal with insufficient transport administrations, where the white collar class shapes the social structure, where there is appeal independent of accessibility of Right Of Way, as it can work in a blended movement circumstance likewise (Lan, Xuewu and Tao 2015). Bhopal BRT framework is going through the fundamental city and business sector regions bolstered by Trunk, Standard, Complimentary and Intermediate Para Transit (IPT) courses with a hall of 24 KM long.

The Bhopal BRTS frameworks comprises of committed busways, person on foot access offices, transport stops, focuses for transport stopping and upkeep, and a propelled control framework. Busways are situated in the inside paths of the fundamental streets of the city (Sayeg and Bray 2012). These busways are physically confined from the blended movement paths, private vehicles, trucks, and taxis. Bhopal city interfacing the old and the new city was endorsed for a sum totaling to Rs.368.62Cr financed through Government of India (GoI) under JNNURM and Government of Madhya Pradesh (GoMP), involving a Length of 24.0 K.M and 30 M wide ROW in the devoted path.

BRTS in Bhopal utilizes low floor diesel transports and it proposes to utilize explained transports in future. What’s more, the framework is completely outfitted with keen transportation framework along these lines giving travelers constant data and on load up and off load up gathering of ticket passage (Mathur 2015). The transports are followed utilizing GPS through a focal control room. Likewise, there is a proposition for introducing Priority flagging framework at intersections and walker crossing signals.
Problems in the existing Bhopal BRTS (MYBUS)

Bhopal BRT System distributes space on an evenhanded premise for a wide range of vehicles like mechanized vehicles, non-mechanized vehicles and transports. The misunderstanding of devoted ways and turnpikes to a solitary right of way makes a gigantic troublesome issue that causes delays blockage, lining and so forth in numerous territories.

The buses running presently in the system are low floor A.C and non-A.C buses. The capacity of these buses is less, which might not be compatible with future demands. Current activity signals neglect to release the movement at top hour, as activity stream is not steady and makes a long line of autos in mechanized vehicle path and in addition the transport Lane (Lo and Chang 2012). As of now, static movement signal framework is introduced at BRT hall, and on commonly it is reestablished to manual operations of the signs.

Policy Issues concerning BRTS

The idea of BRTS is to empower more individuals on general society travel framework, which with brilliant administration is conveyed. It is about equivalent get to and break even with sharing of street space for individuals. The trans-vision of Ahmedabad inscribed as ‘Available Ahmedabad’ is to update the city structure and transport frameworks towards more noteworthy availability, proficient versatility and lower carbon future. Ahmedabad transport technique is centered around moving individuals and not on vehicles (Mohammad-Beigi, Nouri and Liaghati 2015). The Urban Mobility system depends on the understanding that all individuals ought to have the capacity to move around in Ahmedabad with solace and effectiveness. They should feel protected and secure.

In Ahmedabad the BRTS venture includes 38m long 3m wide middle transport stations, shut with vital access controls, at level loading up landing, off-load up ticketing framework, IT empowered and Passenger Information System, security frameworks and person on foot intersections and grade isolated. The transports for the BRTS have been outlined particularly for traveler solace, wide focal entryways (1.2m+ 1.2m-section and exit), (900+/ – 40 mm floor tallness), 90 person–capacity and clean fuel Euro-III Diesel. A few exercises were attempted and finished to actualize BRTS –initial stage in Ahmedabad (Anderson and Ellis 2014). BRTS staging was done taking into account where right of way was accessible and where ridership could be accomplished from early months. BRT hallway chose was done in view of the set criteria as beneath:

The city of Ahmedabad has a well-organized road network with 5 rings and 17 radials. The BRT plan consisted of development of 217 km of BRT corridors in three phases hence it is considered as successful while compared to other BRTS in India.

The transportation system in Delhi is prevalently street based with 1,284 km of street for every 100 km2. The quantity of vehicles on Delhi’s street has expanded from 19.23 lakh in 1991 to more than 60 lakh by 2008, an expansion of 212% in most recent 18 years. Nevertheless, customary methodologies do not enhance the versatility yet move the bottleneck starting with one point then onto the next. The foundation for the presentation of BRT framework in Delhi was placed up in 1995, when Central Pollution Control Board dispatched a Study for decreasing vehicular contamination in Delhi (Currie and Delbosc 2014). The last report, with a suggestion to present isolated bike paths and transport paths, was submitted in 1997. The primary hall of BRT in Delhi, from Ambedkar Nagar to Delhi Gate, is 14.5 km long with ROW changing from 28 meters to 51.5 meters. The different view of a part in the city before and after the BRT corridor is presented as below:

In Delhi, Corridor Manager is looking after the operations and maintenance of the BRT Corridor. Despite of the Corridor Manager there are certain issues prevailing in the Delhi BRT as the traffic volume on the BRT corridor is very high. The current issues and challenges in the context of BRT operation are as follows:

The presentation of the pilot venture prompted critical movement issues, i.e. for the most part blockage and lining at the intersections in mechanized vehicle path. It has been watched that in the crest hours, there are some deferrals and clog at a few areas for the most part remarkable at Chirag Delhi (Hensher, Li and Mulley 2014). The holding limit of intersection is less when contrasted with number of vehicles on the passageway. The Bus operations for the most part take after as same to Bhopal city BRTS as it has been watched that the recurrence of transports is half at night. The transport operation is extremely wasteful. Drivers are as a rule oftentimes changed on various courses subsequently; it has been watched that all the time numerous un-prepared drivers are driving transports in the hallway. As of now, wide ranges of transports are permitted to utilize the Bus path, including numerous weakened transports and RTVs, which cause continuous breakdowns (Wang, Zhu and Wu 2012). Just more up to date transports meeting quality and support norms ought to be permitted. Subsequently, in some cases travelers board and land before the transport stage.

This research aims to evaluate the reasons behind the failure of BRT system in Delhi that will help the transportation departments of the other metropolitan areas in India to prepare the systems with better design and efficiency (Rizvi & Sclar 2014). The related literature to this research illustrates that the stakeholders and DIMTS, the authority responsible for operation and maintenance of the BRT system in Delhi were not at all happy in any cost. From this particular research, a detailed analysis can be carried out to analyze the present situation to find the reason that played a vital role behind the failure of the project. This ambitious project would have relieved and changed the meaning of Public Transportation especially Bus transportation in the Delhi city however due to certain reasons it could not be implemented successfully. In this examination, the investigator will direct a point of interest study from all edge, for example, cost, time, conveyance of administrations and partner cooperation furthermore from the key part of conveyance like convenient transport administration, agreeable voyage, lessen venture time, decrease movement blockage and cut down carbon discharge (Santos-reyes and Avalos-bravo 2014). Consequently, this exploration is a push to discover that whether this anticipate is disappointment as a rule or plugged as disappointment. This exploration is imperative to discover the purpose for continuous issues in BRT arrangement of Delhi that can enhance the general framework and will be useful for new BRT framework where the issues can be tended to on arranging stages.

The research questions will help to understand the main issues behind failure of the BRT system in Delhi. For this particular study, the research questions have been prepared as below:

• What is importance of BRT Systems in India?
• How does the design of BRT Systems satisfy the needs of commuters in India?
• What are the existing problems to implement BRTS in India?
• What problems are being faced by the BRT Systems in Delhi and other Metropolitan areas in India?

This particular research will be conducted mainly by evaluating the deliverables that were to be achieved from the Delhi BRTS project. The major concept behind the introduction of BRTS in Delhi was to provide comfortable journey to the passengers, reducing the journey time as well as bringing down the CO2 emission. The BRTS in Delhi was also implemented with a motive to reduce the traffic congestion however it resulted into a failure as it did not met with the expected outcomes due to various reasons (GUNAWAN 2014). For this study, the conceptual framework has been designed and it is the schematic diagram, which shows the variables included in the study. There are different variables included in this study out of which only some will be taken to understand the particular reasons behind the failure of BRTS in Delhi.

The Bus Rapid Transit system project has been implemented in various cities of India but out of them only Pune and Ahmedabad is considered as successful. The main reason behind their success is the fulfilment of the various criteria of BRTS (Al 2013). The Delhi BRT system in this research is considered as the independent variable and the dependent variables are Comfortable Journey, Reducing journey time, reduce emission of CO2 and reduction in traffic congestion.
Methodology

Essentially, there are three sorts of exploration theory, for example, positivism, interpretivism and additionally authenticity. In this specific examination consider, the specialist will apply the idea of positivism exploration reasoning as it comprehends the truth of the exploration work. It takes the exploration study to do exploratory examination on the gathered information to make a legitimate system (Fram 2014). Along these lines, research rationality is expected to lead the exploration study for the chose research subject.
Research Approach

Taking into account the exploration strategy, there are two sorts of examination approach that can be utilized to lead the examination concentrate, for example, inductive technique and deductive technique. In this specific examination case, the scientist will utilize the deductive strategy. Deductive strategy infers on the previous built up hypotheses and additionally information accumulation that takes care of up the hole with a specific end goal to finish the exploration study. In this specific case, inductive technique will be evaded as now and again; this methodology mirrors the genuine experimental examination structure. The examination questions talked about above will take in the more overwhelming idea identified with the Bus Rapid Transit Systems as an exploration area (Currie and Delbosc 2013).

There are two sorts of information gathering strategy, for example, essential and auxiliary technique for information accumulation. The essential information gathers the information utilizing the overview and survey technique. The other is auxiliary information that is gathered utilizing sites and in addition diaries (Alvesson and Sandberg 2014). Indeed, even the system of information accumulation is isolated into two sorts, for example, quantitative information strategy and subjective information technique. The scientist will apply two sorts of information accumulation methodology that can be executed taking into account the explanations for disappointment of BRT frameworks. Hence, blended information accumulation methodology can be utilized to break down the information with a specific end goal to meet the point of the exploration study. In the subjective information accumulation strategy, the information will be gathered through meeting. Meeting is the best research apparatus as it serves to specifically communicate with the members. In the quantitative information strategy, the information are gathered utilizing study (Hidalgo, Lleras and Hernandez 2013). Review over the populace by addressing on the examination theme is an extraordinary device keeping in mind the end goal to assess the estimation of this exploration. By studying poll, the scientist will have the capacity to get the exact measurable result.

The huge component of an exploration philosophy is its all-around organized and consecutive approach that will help the analyst to complete examination work effectively. Research outline is considered as the blue print of the exploration work that talks about the examination arrangement in definite with the investigation of the information. There are three sorts of examination plan, for example, exploratory, unmistakable and illustrative. In this specific exploration concentrate on, the scientist will pick the illustrative configuration to help and comprehend the explanations behind disappointment of BRT framework in Delhi (Hsu 2013). The scientist will have the capacity to comprehend the way of examination issue, its motivation with both experience and additionally learning of the analyst. Utilizing this exploration outline strategies, the specialist will recognize the examination crevice and in addition impediments cause because of specific assets.

The exploration will be directed according to the examination rules. The examination will be submitted inside the time and additionally the information those will be gathered to direct the exploration should be exact according to the learning of the specialist (Kermanshahi, Shafahi and Bagherian 2013). The information won’t be uncovered to any outsider. The overview strategy will be led according to the guideline and no such inquiries will be asked that may hurt the ethical estimations of the members. All the exploration inquiries will be picked according to the examination theme.

Transport quick framework is at present working more than 180 urban areas on the planet yet one and only third is viewed as fruitful. In this study, India has been taken as a case, as there are eight BRT frameworks are working in various Cities of India however just few including Ahmedabad and Indore are viewed as fruitful (Mathur 2013). Then again, Pune was the primary city in India, which invented this framework; however, it was likewise unsuccessful like Delhi. This research will prove to be useful for the local communities and authorities of the Metropolitan areas in India as there are different upcoming BRTS projects as listed below:

India is developing with quick pace and the populace in Indian urban areas additionally soaring due great chances of work. This development of individuals putting more weight on the current asset of huge urban communities. These urban areas need to enhance their vehicle and other relative framework. BRT framework can be a decent choice to enhance transport and versatility. To consider this, numerous BRT frameworks are in the arranging stages however due current rate of accomplishment, their execution is promising (Tsao and Pratama 2013). To guarantee the accomplishment on expansion the odds of progress it turn out to be essential to comprehend what are the explanation for the disappointment of other BRT frameworks and how they can be controlled or dispensed with in the present and future venture. These ventures require immense speculation, which originate from the citizen and they hope to spend this cash on something, which encourages their everyday life.

The timeline for the project has been estimated as 210 days presented below:

References

Al, S 2013, “Interpretive research design: concepts and processes”, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 351-352.
Alvesson, M & Sandberg, J 2014, Constructing research questions.
Anderson, J & Ellis, J 2014, “Integrating Livability Principles into Transit Planning: Screening Chicago Bus Rapid Transit Opportunities”, Journal of Public Transportation, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 1-15.
Asadollahfardi, G, Asadi, M, Sabermanesh, A & Mirmohammadi, M 2015, “Impacts of Transit-Oriented Development in the Management of Air Pollution and Traffic Congestion: A Case Study of Tehran’s Bus Rapid Transit System”, Environmental Quality Management, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 41-54.
Babalik-Sutcliffe, E & Cengiz, E 2015, “Bus Rapid Transit System in Istanbul: A Success Story or Flawed Planning Decision?”, Transport Reviews, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 792-813.
Currie, G & Delbosc, A 2013, “Exploring Comparative Ridership Drivers of Bus Rapid Transit and Light Rail Transit Routes”, Journal of Public Transportation, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 47-65.
Currie, G & Delbosc, A 2014, “Assessing Bus Rapid Transit system performance in Australasia”, Research in Transportation Economics, vol. 48, pp. 142-151.
Fram, S 2014, “When to use what research design”, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 322-324.
Galicia, L & Cheu, R 2012, “Geographic information system-system dynamics procedure for bus rapid transit ridership estimation”, Journal of Advanced Transportation, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 266-280.
GUNAWAN, F 2014, “Design and Implementation of Discrete-event Simulation Framework for Modeling Bus Rapid Transit System”, Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 37-45.
Hensher, D, Li, Z & Mulley, C 2014, “Drivers of bus rapid transit systems – Influences on patronage and service frequency”, Research in Transportation Economics, vol. 48, pp. 159-165.
Hidalgo, D, Lleras, G & Hernández, E 2013, “Methodology for calculating passenger capacity in bus rapid transit systems: Application to the TransMilenio system in Bogotá, Colombia”, Research in Transportation Economics, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 139-142.
Hsu, L 2013, “Cost Estimating Model for Mode Choice between Light Rail and Bus Rapid Transit Systems”, Journal of Transportation Engineering, vol. 139, no. 1, pp. 20-29.
Kermanshahi, S, Shafahi, Y & Bagherian, M 2013, “Application of a new rapid transit network design model to bus rapid transit network design: case study Isfahan metropolitan area”, Transport, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 93-102.
Lan, W, Xuewu, C & Tao, L 2015, “Additional Riderships Estimation under Different Configurations of Bus Rapid Transit System”, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2015, pp. 1-7.
Lo, S & Chang, W 2012, “Design of real-time fuzzy bus holding system for the mass rapid transit transfer system”, Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 1718-1724.
Mathur, S 2013, “Self-financing urbanization: Insights from the use of Town Planning Schemes in Ahmadabad, India”, Cities, vol. 31, pp. 308-316.
Mathur, S 2015, “Sale of development rights to fund public transportation projects: Insights from Rajkot, India, BRTS project”, Habitat International, vol. 50, pp. 234-239.
McGinty, M 2015, “Writing and doing action research”, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 577-578.
Mohammad-Beigi, H, Nouri, J & Liaghati, H 2015, “Strategic Analysis of Bus Rapid Transit System in Improvement of Public Transportation: Case of Tehran, Iran”, Modern Applied Science, vol. 9, no. 9.
Mohan, D 2015, “Powerful Lobbies Want Delhi’s BRT Scrapped. Here’s Why They Should Not Succeed. – The Wire”, The Wire, viewed 19 July, 2016, <https://thewire.in/8396/powerful-lobbies-want-delhis-brt-scrapped-heres-why-they-should-not-succeed/>.
Overdorf, J 2012, “India: Delhi’s exorbitant public transport failure”, GlobalPost, viewed 19 July, 2016, <https://www.globalpost.com/dispatches/globalpost-blogs/india/delhi-bus-rapid-transit>.
Popping, R 2012, “Qualitative Decisions in Quantitative Text Analysis Research”, Sociological Methodology, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 88-90.
Rangarajan, A 2012, “Modelling, simulation and feasibility analysis of bus rapid transit system in Pune, India”, IJISE, vol. 11, no. 1/2, p. 81.
Rizvi, A & Sclar, E 2014, “Implementing bus rapid transit: A tale of two Indian cities”, Research in Transportation Economics, vol. 48, pp. 194-204.
Santos-reyes, J & Ávalos-bravo, V 2014, “A Preliminary Analysis of two Bus Rapid Transit Accidents in Mexico City”, Procedia Engineering, vol. 84, pp. 624-633.
Sayeg, P & Bray, D 2012, “Estimating changes in emissions from bus rapid transit: making best use of transport sector experience”, WENE, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 308-316.
Silva, D 2015, “P21 Reducing accident rates with the implementation of a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system: case study of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil”, Journal of Transport & Health, vol. 2, no. 2, p. S74.
Singh, D & Singh, D 2012, “Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) in Delhi: Who Failed Whom?”, Delhi Greens Blog, viewed 19 July, 2016, <https://delhigreens.com/2012/03/18/bus-rapid-transit-brt-in-delhi-who-failed-whom/>.
Singhal, S, McGreal, S & Berry, J 2013, “Application of a hierarchical model for city competitiveness in cities of India”, Cities, vol. 31, pp. 114-122.
Tsao, H & Pratama, A 2013, “Efficient Space Dedication to Bus Rapid Transit and Light Rail Systems”, Journal of Public Transportation, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 79-94.
Wang, D, Zhu, X & Wu, H 2012, “Integration of Public Transport and Bus Rapid Transit System”, AMM, vol. 253-255, pp. 1860-1863.