Consequences Of Brexit For The UK Business Cycle

Leaving the Single Market

What are the Consequences of Brexit for the UK Business Cycle?

To begin with, it is necessary to acknowledge that Britain has the requirement to do unilateral extraction and after that it is necessary providing the scenario to initiate discussions with the European Union in respect of a deal on trade. On the other hand, in respect of the outcomes, it can be mentioned that unilateral extraction will take the British exporters too far. They will have no information relating to the potential future expenses for conducting trading with the European Union.

Taking into consideration the consequences of Brexit for the UK business cycle in terms of leaving the single market can be stated that the politicians as well as commentators are being faced with the reality that the UK will be unable to do the imposing of limitations on the free movement of citizens from Europe into Britain. It will be enjoying as well, the sustained membership regarding the single market. This will not be allowed by the rest of Europe and choices are required to be made by the UK. However, other trade-offs as well as major economic consequences are still not being identified (Johnson 2014). For instance, the consequence to leave the single market will probably end the rights of every services organization that are based in the UK for selling into the markets in Europe devoid of getting discriminated or getting faced with regulatory barriers locally. Specifically, this would be stating that the financial organizations that are placed in London will be losing their “passport” for selling the services across the bloc. Most of them have clarified that they will be moving their European head-offices out of the UK capital when this will occur and as a result, taking the jobs out of the country. To leave the single market might as well have a specific meaning that the euro-dominated derivatives clearing trade might get compelled in shifting from London into a destination in the European Union, which will again create a dearth in jobs within the City.

This will also be influencing the balance of payments. In 2015, financial services reported in respect of approx. a third of the country’s 90 billion pounds of service exports to the European Union. There was also the accounting of the excess in respect of financial services trade of the European Union regarding a quarter of the country’s overall services export surplus in the previous year. If the traditional services surplus of Britain will get corroded, then the country’s worryingly large current account shortage will be getting threatened for getting yawned even wider.

Quitting the Custom Union of the EU

Moreover, the consequences of quitting the Custom Union of the EU will be stating that there will occur the negotiation of the UK regarding an extensive free trade deal with the rest of the EU towards dismantling of every tariff regarding goods. Therefore, to leave the custom union will still be necessitating custom verifications that are considered to be costly regarding every British goods that will be making an entry into the single market. In addition, Dublin will be having the requirement for imposing custom checks on products that will make an entry into its territory from Northern Ireland. This will however, create a serious threat to unpick the peace method. The UK as well as Ireland might both possess the willingness of forgoing custom checks and they might also, be having the ability for agreeing upon an agreement on free travelling, but this is not just regarding the two governments (Stock 2015). The remaining countries of Europe will not be allowing Ireland for compromising the sole market’s integrity by permitting the importing of goods into Ireland from Britain without getting checked.

Also regarding the departing the European Union without any negotiations, it is being argued that the Government must simply be ignoring the Article 50 exit-process. Without getting discouraged in having talks with other European governments, Britain is required to unilaterally withdraw and post that it is required offering the aspect of beginning discussions with the European Union regarding a trade deal. However, taking into consideration the consequences, it can be stated that unilateral withdrawal will be taking the British exporters too far (Lane 2014). They will be having no knowledge of the probable future expenses to do trading with the European Union, considered as the country’s largest single trading partner. In addition to this, the UK will be having an instant separation from the reporting of around sixty agreements relating to free trade within the European Union as well as the remaining countries globally. This uncertain move might be resulting in a significant hit to the domestic investment as well as anticipatory action by foreign organizations in shifting operations out of the UK (Nam 2017).

In respect of unilaterally lifting every tariff barriers from the UK, it has been argued that the Government should not try to do the striking of a unique deal regarding trade with Europe. It has also been stated that as an alternative, the UK is required scrapping every tariffs in respect of products as well as service imports from anywhere else throughout the globe as well as exporting to others under the necessary rules regarding the World Trade Organization. There will occur an enormous economic proposition of this. For instance, the British car exporters to Europe will be faced in an instant manner the European Union’s 10 percent import tariff regarding motor vehicles. In addition, the manufacturing firms of the UK will be flooded with huge amount of extremely low priced competing imports from the developing nations. The consequences of this on the UK manufacturing will be shattering (Gopinath 2014).

Unilaterally Lifting Tariff Barriers

Concerning the prospect regarding the UK public debt, it can be stated that he leaving of UK from the EU, will be impacting upon the UK public finances. The overall influence upon the public finances will be depending on two distinctive elements such as the mechanical effect as well as the national income effect. The mechanical effect explains that being a net contributor in respect of the European Union, separating from the EU will be strengthening the public finances since, the country’s net contribution will plummet. However, taking into consideration the improbability over the type of any subsequent agreement with the EU, it might not be plummeting to zero (Crotty 2017). The national income effect explains that any influence to leave the EU on UK national income will be affecting the public finances. A growth in national income will be strengthening the public finances, where a fall will be weakening them.

Moreover, in accord to the mechanical effect, it can be stated that the national gross contribution of the UK in 2014 was 18.8 billion pounds that is considered to be almost 1% of GDP. It is not certain regarding the trade deal that would be getting negotiated after exiting from the EU. The major campaigners of Brexit have ruled out any deal that will be having the involvement of membership of the European Economic Area such as Norway. If the country was supposed to be making proportionally the same net contributions that is being made by Norway, these might be amounting to almost half of the country’s net contribution, which will leave the country with a reinforcement of the public finances of approx. 4 billion pounds (Gandolfo 2013).

In addition, in accord to the national income effect, it can be stated that if exiting from the European Union were to have no impact on the national income, then the public finances will be getting strengthened in an unambiguous manner. On the other hand, the public finances are perceptive to even comparatively little changes in national income. Therefore, when the economy would be simply 1% bigger or smaller, then to borrow as a national income share will be in today’s terms approx. 14 billion pounds. There is uncertainty regarding the precise influence to leave the EU on national income (Bernanke 2015). There is uncertainty relating to the specific dealing the country will be reaching on trade and also the impact of each of these on development.

Concerning the impact on immigration, there is also high uncertainty regarding UK’s impact on leaving the EU regarding immigration from outside the European Union. However, it is quite certain that there will occur reduction in immigration from within the EU. It has been found that, on average, the immigrants are found at present to be paying more taxes, receiving reduced amount of out-of-work advantages and placing lower demands on public services in comparison to the native population (Ban 2015). This might change if the immigrants stay in the UK till their retirement, and it has also been estimated that lower immigration will be weakening the long-run public finance position of the UK.

In conclusion, it can be stated that the reforms to taxes as well as benefits, and changes to the way in which the planning of public spending is done, will be affecting their association with national income. Future changes in national income will not be similar from the changes that occurred earlier. In addition, there is uncertainty regarding the precise influence to leave the EU on national income. There is uncertainty relating to the specific dealing the country will be reaching on trade and also the impact of each of these on development. The national income effect explains that any influence to leave the EU on UK national income will be affecting the public finances

References

Ban, C., 2015. Austerity versus stimulus? Understanding fiscal policy change at the International Monetary Fund since the great recession. Governance, 28(2), pp.167-183.

Bernanke, B., Antonovics, K. and Frank, R., 2015. Principles of macroeconomics. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

Bussière, M., Imbs, J., Kollmann, R. and Rancière, R., 2013. The financial crisis: Lessons for international macroeconomics. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 5(3), pp.75-84.

Crotty, J., 2017. Capitalism, Macroeconomics and Reality: Understanding Globalization, Financialization, Competition and Crisis. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Gandolfo, G., 2013. International Economics II: International Monetary Theory and Open-Economy Macroeconomics. Springer Science & Business Media.

Gopinath, G., Helpman, E. and Rogoff, K. eds., 2014. Handbook of international economics (Vol. 4). Elsevier.

Johnson, R.C., 2014. Five facts about value-added exports and implications for macroeconomics and trade research. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(2), pp.119-142.

Lane, P.R. and McQuade, P., 2014. Domestic credit growth and international capital flows. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 116(1), pp.218-252.

Nam, D. and Wang, J., 2017. Understanding the effect of productivity changes on international relative prices: the role of news shocks. Pacific Economic Review.

Stock, J.H. and Watson, M.W., 2015. Introduction to econometrics. Pearson.