Discuss About The Construction Forestry Mining Energy Union.
In Australia, industrial disputes in context of workplaces are on rise since 2013, and these disputes results in higher number of working days lost and also high level of disputation. Industrial action is considered as predominant action in the manufacturing and construction industry. Industrial action can be conducted in different forms such as employees of the organization can conduct strike or impose bans on work. For replying this conduct of employees, employers can lockout their employees. Under this Fair Work Act, number of actions are defined which are considered as industrial action such as employees perform their task in such manner which is completely different from the normal performance, such practices are conducted by employees that prevents delay the work performance, etc (FWC, 2017).
In this report, President of the Fair Work Commission is informed about the FWC role in the industrial dispute occurred in case law Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Oaky Creek Coal Pty Ltd (B2017/640). Structure of this report includes background of the case, main issue on part of both the parties, FWC powers to intervene, and recommendations. Subsequently, brief conclusion is stated for the purpose of concluding this report.
In this case, Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU) file application against the Oaky Creek Coal P/L (OCCPL) for seeking the bargaining order in context of workers working at the Oaky North Underground Coal Mine (Mine). Both the parties to the dispute indulged in the bargaining for replacing the enterprise agreement concluded in May 2015.
In 2017, members of the CMFEU initiate protected industrial action. After the vote rejection in lieu of proposed agreement, CMFEU revoke the notices given for the 15th and 16th July 2017 in terms of protected industrial action and workers reached at workplace to perform their work. After reaching at workplace, workers notice that they were not able to enter in the premises and after some time it was informed to them that they were not permitted to wear their CMFEU branded shirts and for entering into the premises. However, these shirts were permitted by the organization before that day.
On both 17th and 18th July, employees conduct their protected industrial action one more time. After that OCCPL issue alleged letters to almost 21 employees by making allegation on them that they breach the policy by engaging in conduct of the Picket line. OCCPL also issue letter to the other 5 employees for breaching the social media policy of the organization.
On 20th July 2017, response action of the employer was conducted by the OCCPL, and in this they locked the members of the CFMEU (employees) outside the workplace, and continue the work of mine without these workers (FWC, 2017).
In this case, allegation was made by the CMFEU against the conduct of the OCCPL, and in this context CMFEU stated that OCCPL actions include different unfair and erratic action such as they issued allegation letters to their employees, surveillance the members of the CMFEU, and they prevent the members to wear branded CMFEU shirt at the workplace. All these actions restrict the freedom of association and collective bargaining.
The main issue in this case was whether the behavior of the OCCPL complained by the CMFEU fails to meet the good faith bargaining requirement in s. 228(1)(e) of the Act for the purpose of restricting the unfair conduct which destabilizes the freedom of association or collective bargaining.
Orders seek by CMFEU were opposed by the OCCPL on different grounds such as OCCPL stated that conduct of the individuals present at the picket line was abusive, threatening and intimidating, and it also includes official members of the CMFEU. OCCPL also stated that allegation letters issued by them does not demean the freedom of association and collective bargaining.
OCCPL further submit that as per the law employer possess the capacity to regulate and take disciplinary action in context of those conducts that occurs out of the workplace but such conduct has sufficient connection with the workplace. OCCPL derived some policies which are mainly designed for the purpose of ensuring that employees are treated with respect and dignity and must be free from abuse. Code of conduct of the Glecore’s include EEO and social media policy which were also apply on conduct of the workers out of the workplace (Glencore, 2018).
It was contended by the union that behavior of the OCCPL was unfair or capricious in nature, and it demeans the freedom of association or collective bargaining. As stated by the CMFEU, behavior of the OCCPL demeans the freedom of association and collective bargaining because:
Employees were engaged in such conduct which was manly associated with the protected industrial action (CMFEU, 2018).
FWC concluded that by issuing the allegation letters, by revoking the permission in context of branded shirt, and by monitoring the activities of the employees outside the workplace, OCCPL involved in such conduct which was capricious or unfair in nature and also demeans the freedom of association or collective bargaining. Following orders were issued by the commission in lieu of this dispute:
Above stated orders are given on the basis of these reasons:
FWC step in lieu of the restricting the monitoring of the employees outside the mine can be considered as one of the most effective decision of this case because these actions of the company are fall under the category of the unreasonable actions. This action of the company is unfair as it affects the privacy of the employees and also causes threat of monitoring on the employees at all time. One more step of the employee under which they restrict the military actions implemented by the company on those operations which conducted by anti-workers is also effective and reasonable. This decision of the commission not only protects the fundamental rights of the employees but also protect reasonableness of the situation.
FWC make order that OCCPL withdraw their disciplinary actions against the workers, as this decision of the FWC ensures equality and fairness and also prevents the undue advantage cause to the company. In other words, this action of the FWC not only protects the workers but also maintain the balance between the actions of both the parties of the dispute (Stevens, 2018).
Actions of the company fail to ensure the respect and dignity of legal provisions and use unfair tactics which demean collective bargaining and freedom of association. As private security guards are used by the company for the purpose of entrapping its workers is considered as demean activity because it threat the safety and privacy of the workers. In other words, this activity of the OCCPL harms the freedom of association and cause adequate effect on the private life of the workers.
After considering the above facts, it is right to say that actions taken by FWC are effective in nature because these actions ensure fairness and equality and also provide benefit to the employees (FWC, 2018).
In 2009, Labor’s Fair Work Act states the powers related to the FWC and with the help of these imposed powers, FWC ensure the reasonable bargaining system in terms of industrial dispute. There are number of areas in which powers of the FWC are increased through this legislation and this happened at the time when this Act is introduced by the labor government. In the present case, both the parties of the dispute do not conclude any agreement and this cause harm to both community and the economy.
FWC get the power to interfere in those disputes which are serious in nature and cause threat to the community and economy of the Australia. Industrial dispute is considered as most important weapon of the employers and from last few years this weapon is used by number of employers to execute enterprise agreement in their favor. However, there are number of employees also who use this weapon in their favor for any unfair purpose. Therefore, is necessary for the government to impose more power in favor of FWC so that they can deal with any such matter which cause harm to the population and economy (Caruana, 2017).
It must be noted that, many cases related to the bargaining dispute cause threat to the community and economy, in such cases FWC must get greater power to intervene and decide the matter as soon as possible. Presently, FWC does not have any power to intervene in those matters related to the bargaining dispute which have not reach to the agreement even after the protracted period. The basic reason behind this is that, in case decision taken by the FWC is enforced then such decision cannot be considered as the agreement between the parties because this is considered as the compulsory arbitration which is oppose to the enterprise agreement. Justice and equality are the two main approaches which are considered by the FWC while providing their decisions related to the bargaining dispute and for ensuring these two elements in the decision, it is important to entrust more power in the FWC. It is clear from the above facts, that more power to the FWC in these situations make the things easy and prevent adequate effect of such matters on the economy and community.
Conclusion:
Above stated facts clearly depicts that a major role was played by FWC in this case, FWC protects the community and the employees from unreasonable acts of the company. In this case, FWC also ensured the balance between the demands of both the parties. It is clear that the actions of the company fail to ensure the respect and dignity of legal provisions and use unfair tactics which demean collective bargaining and freedom of association. In this context, FWC should take such decision which is effective in nature because these actions ensure fairness and equality and also provide benefit to the employees. FWC also stated that conduct of the organization causes irreparable harm to the relationships of workplace at the mine and it also risks the health, safety and privacy of the employees engaged in lockout, and it demeans the collective bargaining and freedom of association.
FWC must get more power in contest of industrial disputes because and the basic reason behind this is ensuring justice and while providing their decisions related to the bargaining dispute. It is clear from the above facts, that more power to the FWC in these situations make the things easy and prevent adequate effect of such matters on the economy and community.
It is important for the government to make accurate changes in the legal provisions in context of bargaining dispute, but these changes must not be of such nature which ensures decision in the favor of any one party. In this context few recommendations are defined:
References:
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Oaky Creek Coal Pty Ltd (B2017/640).
ACTU, (2018). Oaky North workers mark 6 months locked out. Retrieved on 5th May 2018 from: https://www.actu.org.au/actu-media/media-releases/2018/oaky-north-workers-mark-6-months-locked-out.
CFMEU, (2018). Fwc Orders Glencore To Cease Surveillance Of Its Employees, Withdraw Displinary Action. Retrieved on 5th May 2018 from: https://me.cfmeu.org.au/news/fwc-orders-glencore-cease-surveillance-its-employees-withdraw-displinary-action.
Caruana, L. (2017). Oaky North industrial strife continues. Retrieved on 5th May 2018 from: https://www.miningmonthly.com/company-activity/international-coal-news/1308720/oaky-north-industrial-strife-continues.
Fair Work Commission (FWC) (2017) FWC 5380; Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Oaky Creek Coal Pty Ltd (B2017/640).
Floyd, L. Fair work laws: Good faith bargaining, union right of entry and the legal notion of “responsible unionism”. Retrieved on 5th May 2018 from: https://www.tradeunionroyalcommission.gov.au/Submissions/Documents/ResponsesToIssuesPaper/FloydFairWorkLawsGoodFaithBargainingUnionRightOfEntryAndTheLegalNotionOfResponsibleUnionism.PDF.
FWC, (2017). Industrial Action. Retrieved on 5th May 2018 from: https://www.fairwork.gov.au/how-we-will-help/templates-and-guides/fact-sheets/rights-and-obligations/industrial-action#commission.
FWC, (2018). Decision. Retrieved on 5th May 2018 from: https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/html/2017fwc5380.htm.
FWC, (2018). Summer 2018: Quarterly practitioner update. Retrieved on 5th May 2018 from: https://www.fwc.gov.au/resources/quarterly-practitioner-updates/summer-2018-quarterly-practitioner-update.
Glencore, (2018). Glencore rejects CFMEU claims about Oaky North Coal Mine. Retrieved on 5th May 2018 from: https://www.glencore.com.au/en/media-centre/News/180209_Statement_Glencore-rejects-CFMEU-claims-about-Oaky-North.pdf.
Stevens, M. (2017) Ballot defeat fails to dent Glencore’s Oaky North resolve. Australian Financial Review. Retrieved on 5th May 2018 from: www.afr.com/business/glencore-deadlock-drifting-to-dead-end-20171031-gzbyxk
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download