Discuss about the Contemporary Issues in Accounting for Wesfarmers Limited.
Wesfarmers Limited was seen to be formed in the year 1914 as one of the Western Australian farmers’ cooperative. Since then the company has grown as one of the largest listed companies. The private sector company is seen to be among the largest private sector entity in Australia. The products include retail, coal mining, fertilisers and chemicals (Wesfarmers.com.au. 2017).
Woolworths Limited is recognised as one of the major entities in Australia and second largest in terms of the revenue. The supermarket chain is seen to deal in products such as liquor and retailing products (Woolworthsgroup.com.au. 2017).
The main purpose of the sustainability reporting has been seen to create long term value creation and contributing to a positive role in the communities. The company has acknowledged that the changing weather volatility, higher temperatures and henceforth established solutions which will be based help the company reduce its own footprint while serving its customers (Wesfarmers.com.au. 2017).
Woolworth has been seen to be committed contribute to report the sustainability aspects by the initiatives taken with gender, culture and encouraging the diversity in team. It has shown the various initiatives for encouraging women in the workplace and showcasing the efforts taken for indigenous employment (Wow2016cr.qreports.com.au. 2017).
The main rationale for the sustainability reporting has been seen with the use of initiatives with has been used to reduce the carbon footprints and various types of the environmental aspects. The rationale of the CSR reporting of the company has been further seen with the reporting elements which are associated to indigenous engagement of the people (Global Reporting Initiative-GRI 2015).
Thee main aspect of the reporting elements has been further seen to be based on the use of diversity as the main component for CSR recognition. The various types of the other elements of the reporting aspects have been further able to focus on engaging and valuing people (Lähtinen and Myllyviita 2015).
The ethical sourcing team has been able to include the consideration of regular discussion and stakeholders such as retailers. The main stakeholders have included non-government organisations, third-party audit firms, industry associations and retailers (Legendre and Coderre 2013).
The stakeholder of the company has been seen with the engagement of communities, shareholders, employees and suppliers. The main involvement is identified with managing the relationships along with the stakeholders to maximise the prosperity without involving in any complexity associated to the corporate responsibilities (GRI 2013).
The main interest for the engagement of the stakeholders group has been discerned with the programs such as health and safety to focus on the main priority areas. Some of the other aspects of the rationale have been identified with Product safety and quality and the initiatives associated to the ethical sourcing (Global Reporting Initiative 2016).
The main rationale of the stakeholder’s engagement in Woolworth Limited has been identified with leveraging the trusted relationships for improving the different aspects of profitability and market performance. Another engagement with the stakeholder’s group has been further recognised with suppliers who are considered as essential for bringing about success to the goals and objectives of the organization (Global Reporting Initiative 2016).
The generic guidelines of the company have been identified to be followed with GRI guidelines under “G4-DMA-a”. This is mainly associated to the reporting of material aspects. The other initiatives have been taken with “G4-EC1”. Some of the other GRI reference has been considered with “G4-DMA (Product and Services), G4-DMA (Energy), G4-DMA (Emissions), G4-DMA (Overall), G4-EN5, G4-14, G4-EN15, G4-EN16, G4-EN17, G4-EN27, G4-EN31”. Some of the other considerations have been implied with “G4-DMA (Water)” and “G4-DMA (Environmental grievance mechanisms)”(GRI 2014).
The important difference has been recognised with the use of “G4-1 Statement from the Chairman and CEO”, “G4-4 Primary brands, products, and/or services”, “G4-17 Entities included in the organisation’s consolidated financial statements” and various types of the other GRI guidelines under “G4”. This was not seen to be specified in the sustainability reporting under GRI guidelines (Kajüter 2014).
The GRI 4 guidelines have been mainly seen with the application of workplace relations, Wesfarmers Arts, Product safety initiatives, Product safety incidents and recalls. The application of “G4-DMA (Product and Services)” has been seen to be evident with the application of Potential environmental non-conformances. The application of the “G4-DMA (Water)” has been seen to be evident with the contaminated sites (Knebel and Seele 2015). “GRI Reference: G4-56, G4-DMA (Compliance), G4-SO6” has been seen to be applicable with the Target supplier rebate arrangements investigation. The G4-DMA (Public policy) has been also seen to be applicable with the Target supplier rebate arrangements investigation. The 2016-17 priorities have been identified with the application of “G4-DMA (Product and Service Labelling), G4-12, G4- EN33 and G4-PR3” (Solsbach et al. 2014).
The application of “G4-LA16” has been seen to be mainly associated with ‘Grievances about labour practices”. The inclusion of “G4-LA16” has not been identified with Wesfarmers. Some of the various types of the other consideration for the inclusion of the GRI guidelines has been further seen to be based on the Significant investment agreements that include human rights clauses. The use of “G4-PR1” is seen with the “significant product categories which health and safety is assessed” (Lin, Chang and Chang 2015). The “G4-PR2” is seen to be recognised with “Non-compliance regarding health and safety impacts of products”. The application of “G4-PR3” has been discerned in form of “Product information and labelling”. These aspects has been seen to be absent for the various types of the reporting standards which has been present in case of the Wesfarmers Sustainability Report. The various legislation under the “HR GRI” guidelines, has not seen to be present in case of Wesfarmers Sustainability Report (Hahn and Lülfs 2014).
Conclusion
Based on the various discernment made in the study, the GRI guidelines should be made mandatory for the sustainability reporting. The widespread concern has been seen to be mandatory for the reporting of the various types of the key aspects of the concerning environmental issues. It has been seen that by the consideration of the various types of the guidelines such as of “G4-1 Statement from the Chairman and CEO”, “G4-4 Primary brands, products, and/or services”, “G4-17 Entities included in the organisation’s consolidated financial statements”.
The consideration of the main aspects of the sustainability reporting for Wesfarmers Limited has been identified with has acknowledgement that the changing weather volatility, higher temperatures and henceforth established solutions which will be based help the company reduce its own footprint while serving its customers. Some of the different considerations for Woolworth Limited has been seen with the acknowledgement of various types of the other elements of the reporting aspects have been further able to focus on engaging and valuing people.
List of References
Global Reporting Initiative (2016a) Gri 101: foundation 2016 101, GRI Standards. Available at: www.globalreporting.org.
Global Reporting Initiative (2016b) Gri 103: management approach 2016 103, GRI Standards. Available at: www.globalreporting.org.
Global Reporting Initiative-GRI (2015) About GRI, Global Reporting Initiative. Available at: https://www.globalreporting.org/information/about-gri/Pages/default.aspx.
GRI (2013) ‘G4 Sustainability Reporting Guidelines – Part 1: Reporting Principles and Standard Disclosures’, Global Reporting Initiative, p. 94. doi: https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/G3-Guidelines-Incl-Technical-Protocol.pdf.
GRI (2014) GRI G4 guidelines and ISO 26000:2010 – How to use the GRI G4 guidelines and ISO 26000 in conjunction, ISO. Available at: https://www.iso.org/iso/iso-gri-26000_2014-01-28.pdf.
Hahn, R. and Lülfs, R. (2014) ‘Legitimizing Negative Aspects in GRI-Oriented Sustainability Reporting: A Qualitative Analysis of Corporate Disclosure Strategies’, Journal of Business Ethics, 123(3), pp. 401–420. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1801-4.
Kajüter, P. (2014) ‘GRI G4 Implementation Manual’, WPg, 67(12), pp. 599–607.
Knebel, S. and Seele, P. (2015) ‘Quo vadis GRI? A (critical) assessment of GRI 3.1 A+ non-financial reports and implications for credibility and standardization’, Corporate Communications, 20(2), p. 196. doi: 10.1108/CCIJ-11-2013-0101.
Lähtinen, K. and Myllyviita, T. (2015) ‘Cultural sustainability in reference to the global reporting initiative (GRI) guidelines’, Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 5(3), pp. 290–318. doi: 10.1108/JCHMSD-06-2013-0025.
Legendre, S. and Coderre, F. (2013) ‘Determinants of GRI G3 Application Levels: The Case of the Fortune Global 500’, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(3), pp. 182–192. doi: 10.1002/csr.1285.
Lin, I. H. H., Chang, O. and Chang, C. A. (2015) ‘Perceptions of gri reporting guidelines’, International Journal of Sustainability Policy and Practice, 9(4), pp. 35–54.
Solsbach, A., Isenmann, R., Gómez, J. M. and Teuteberg, F. (2014) ‘Inter-organisational Sustainability Reporting – A harmonized XRBL approach based on GRI G4 XBRL and further Guidelines’, in Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Informatics for Environmental Protection.
Wesfarmers.com.au. (2017). [online] Available at: https://www.wesfarmers.com.au/docs/default-source/reports/2016-annual-report.pdf?sfvrsn=4 [Accessed 26 Sep. 2017].
Wesfarmers.com.au. (2017). Our history . [online] Available at: https://www.wesfarmers.com.au/who-we-are/our-history [Accessed 26 Sep. 2017].
Woolworthsgroup.com.au. (2017). About Us – Woolworths Group. [online] Available at: https://www.woolworthsgroup.com.au/page/about-us [Accessed 26 Sep. 2017].
Wow2016cr.qreports.com.au. (2017). Home – Woolworths 2016 Responsibility Report. [online] Available at: https://wow2016cr.qreports.com.au/ [Accessed 26 Sep. 2017].
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download