Contract law is a common law, which is applicable over all of the contracts which are formed. A contract is basically an agreement having legal validity, due to which it binds all the parties to the contract, to the terms of the contract. A contract can be formed by exchanging the terms of the contract in a verbal manner, resulting in a verbal contract; and it can be formed in a written manner also where it is deemed as a written contract, as the terms on which the entire contract is based, are covered on a document and are signed by the parties to the contract. The formation of any contract requires certain key elements to be present, which are offer, acceptance, consideration, intent, legality and capacity (Nelson, 2018).
The following parts cover the analysis of the given case study in context of the two key elements of contract formation, i.e., offer and acceptance, and the resulting contractual liabilities.
Issue
Whether any contractual liabilities were born for Top Ticket Ltd owing to the incidents which took place, in context of the three customers, i.e., Bethany, Shaun and Maya, or not?
Rule
As has been stated in the introductory segment, the formation of contract requires the element of offer to be present. The offer is the terms which are offered by one party to the other, which clearly provide what is being offered and at what terms. An offer is quite different from an invitation to treat, and it becomes important for a distinction to be attained between the two. The key point of differentiation in between the two terms is that an offer has the intention of being bound by the contract. However, when it comes to invitation to treat, it simply covers the intention of getting in negotiations for a contract which may or may not take place (E-Law Resources, 2018a).
The difference in between the two concepts can further be clarified with the help of case law. The advertisements which are put in the newspapers are considered as invitation to treat (McKendrick, 2017, p. 31). An example of this can be found in Partridge v Crittenden (1968) 2 All ER 421. In this case the court held that the advert in the classified section was an invitation to treat and not an offer (Andrews, 2015, p. 40). Only when the advertisements cover a unilateral offer, as was seen in Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co [1893] 1 QB 256, can an advert be deemed as an offer, instead of an invitation to treat. This is because in cases of unilateral offers, acceptance can be given by simply performing the task stated in the advert (Stone and Devenney, 2017, p. 44).
There is also a need to distinguish when an offer is made once the invitation to treat is made. For this purpose, the case of Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots [1953] 1 QB 401 is of help. In this case, the Court of Appeal gave clarity on when an offer is made. They stated that as long as the goods are kept on the shelf of a shop, it is an invitation to treat. The offer is made when the consumer takes the product from the shelf and to the shop assistant for billing of the product. The shop assistant than has the choice of accepting or not accepting the offer. Thus, the contract is formed only when the offer is accepted by the shop assistant. So, the shop keeper is not bound to sell the displayed products at the advertised price (Latimer, 2012, p. 317).
The offer once is made, can be revoked only before such offer is accepted by the other party. In other words, so long as the acceptance on the offer is pending, the offer can be revoked. It is crucial that revocation is clearly communicated to the accepting party. Where the revocation comes after acceptance has been made, it would not be valid (Blum, 2007, p. 66). In Dickinson v Dodds (1876) 2 Ch D 463, the action for specific performance was denied by the court as they stated that the offer had been effectively revoked, when the defendant had asked the plaintiff’s friend to inform about the offer having being withdrawn (Poole, 2016, p. 74).
The next step in the formation of contract is acceptance. A valid acceptance is crucial for the contract to be binding. There are three rules when it comes to acceptance. The first one is that the acceptance has to be communicated in a clear manner to the offering party. The second condition is that the terms of acceptance have to be exactly the same as the terms covered in the offer. And the last condition is that the agreement has to be certain. It is also important that the acceptance is given within the time period for which the offer had been open (E-Law Resources, 2018a). An important aspect about acceptance is the date of acceptance. This date is deemed as the date on which the party sending the offer receives the acceptance sent by the accepting party. However, when it comes to the postal rules of acceptance, they act as an exception to the rule stated above. In such cases, the date of acceptance is taken to be the date on which the letter of acceptance is posted. When it comes to the emails, or other electronic transactions, the postal rules of acceptance become applicable (Abbott, Pendlebury and Wardman, 2007, p. 104).
The other elements which have to be present for the purpose of creating a contract include consideration, which is basically the sum paid for undertaking the contractual promise, in terms of the task performed. The consideration amount needs to have an economic value in order for the consideration to be deemed as valid consideration. The consideration has to be present not past; and also it has to be sufficient instead of being adequate. It can be mutually decided between the parties, and the contract remains invalid without a valid consideration (Mulcahy, 2008, p. 86). The next element in the process of creating a contract is for the parties to have the intention of getting in the contract (E-Law Resources, 2018b). There is a need for the parties to clearly have the intention of being bound by the terms of the contract, which include taking on the rights and liabilities arising from the contract. The parties also need to have the contractual capacity which shows that the parties can enter into the contract in a legal manner. For this, there is a need for the parties to have sane mind, capable of making sound decisions, and to hold the legal age of getting in a contract (Beatty and Samuelson, 2007, p. 237). The last element is for the parties to have clarity on terms on which the contract is formed to steer clear of any ambiguities, which could result in disputes amongst the parties and for the terms to be legal (Nelson, 2008).
In the given case study, Top Tickets Ltd had published an advertisement in the Sunday Echo newspaper. A careful analysis of this advertisement shows that certain tickets were offered at a certain price. The advertisement was placed on two places, one was the website and the other was newspaper. Nevertheless, it was an advertisement and would be treated in the same manner. However, the intention of creating a contract in this advertisement was absent. This is due to the fact that the advertisement provided that those who were interested in buying the ticket could buy it from external site or by contacting them at the box office. Unlike the case of Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co, here there was an absence of a unilateral term which could be accepted by merely acting upon the offer. Also, based on the general rule given in Partridge v Crittenden, this advert would be deemed as an invitation to treat.
For the question on when an offer is raised in these cases, reliance has to be placed on the case of Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots. Based on this case and the given facts of the case study, the offer would be made by the contracting parties, to Top Tickets Ltd, when they open the external link to buy the tickets. The offer would also take place when they contact the box office. At this time, Top Tickets Ltd would have the option of giving the ticket to the offering parties or not giving the ticket to them. This view is further strengthened by the fact that the tickets were available for only the first twenty five customers, which was again a proof of Top Tickets Ltd accepting the offer or not. In the case where the advert is deemed as invitation to treat, Top Tickets Ltd is not bound to sell the products at the prices at which the ticket was advertised.
This newspaper advertisement, where is considered as a unilateral offer, owing to the possibility of the unilateral offer being accepted merely by purchasing the ticket from the portal or by contacting the company at the box office, would also not be of much help. This is because this offer was revoked on 06th August itself, which was the day of making the offer. Richard had sent the revocation and the revocation had been published in the newspaper. So, even before the offer had been accepted by any of the parties, considering the newspaper advertisement as an offer, the offer had been effectively revoked. The mode of offer and revocation was same; thus, it can be stated that the revocation had been communicated properly. So, in both the scenarios where the newspaper advertisement is deemed as an invitation to treat or an offer, the advertisement cannot be accepted. This is because the invitation to treat is not an offer, open for accepting, and where it is deemed as an offer, it was revoked.
Applying this analysis to the case of each of the three parties, Bethany cannot accept an offer which has been revoked. Again, where the advertisement is deemed as an invitation to treat, Top Tickets Ltd has the option of accepting or rejected the cheque. Till the time this is done, a contract was not formed. For Shaun, he had read the website advertisement and this advertisement was not revoked; but as this was an invitation to treat, it could not be accepted. He left the message, which was an offer in this case, which was not accepted, and so no contract was formed. For Maya also, no contract was formed as she was clearly aware of the revocation of advertisement, and her email would be deemed as an offer by her to the company to buy the two tickets, which the company can choose to accept or decline.
Conclusion
Thus, from the undertaken decision in the preceding parts, no contractual liability is raised for Top Tickets Ltd for any of the three customers. This is true when the advertisement is deemed as an invitation to treat, as none of the offers sent by the three were accepted by the company. Also, where the advertisement is taken as an offer, the offer was effectively revoked before the acceptance was given by any of the three parties. As a result of which, no contract was formed, resulting in no contractual liabilities.
References
Abbott, K., Pendlebury, N., and Wardman, K. (2007) Business Law. 8th ed. London: Thomson.
Andrews, N. (2015) Contract Law. 2nd ed. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Beatty, J., and Samuelson, S. (2007) Legal Environment. 3rd ed. Mason, OH: Thomson Higher Education.
Blum, B.A. (2007) Contracts: Examples & Explanations. 4th ed. New York: Aspen Publishers.
E-Law Resources. (2018a) Contractual agreement – offer and acceptance. [Online] E-Law Resources. Available from: https://e-lawresources.co.uk/Offer-and-acceptance-contract.php [Accessed on: 11/01/18]
E-Law Resources. (2018b) Intention to create legal relations. [Online] E-Law Resources. Available from: https://e-lawresources.co.uk/Intention-to-create-legal-relations.php [Accessed on: 11/01/18]
Latimer, P. (2012) Australian Business Law 2012. 31st ed. Sydney, NSW: CCH Australia Limited.
McKendrick, E. (2017) Contract Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 12th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mulcahy, L. (2008) Contract Law in Perspective. 5th ed. Oxon: Routledge.
Nelson. (2018) The Law of Contracts. [Online] Nelson. Available from: https://www.longchamps3e.nelson.com/instructor/03Ch03.pdf [Accessed on: 11/01/18]
Poole, J. (2016) Textbook on Contract Law. 13th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stone, R., and Devenney, J. (2017) The Modern Law of Contract. 12th ed. Oxon: Routledge.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download
