Contract Law of Australia is governed by the common law. There are many independent contracts arrangements that used the verbal contracts that will work only if there have been no disputes. An agreement of handshake is still to be a contract and can be enforced by the Court.
Written contracts are more consistent for both the parties than the verbal contracts. They have clearly set out the details that were agreed. The matters such as materials, payments, timeframes and the procedure that has been following in the event of a dispute that all can be set out in a contract.
The verbal contract and written contracts are both legally binding on the parties. The verbal contract is not as legally binding as the written contract. The verbal contract is difficult to prove whereas the written contract is written and therefore it becomes easy to prove (FindLawAustralia, 2018).
In Gordon v Macgregor (1909) 8 CLR 316 case, it is a written contract and the Gordan has succeeded the case that was the term of the agreement by the parties that the delivery of grift could not be commenced for the three months. In this, the oral term has also been regarded in the minimum grift of the logs (Australian Contract Law, 2018).
The elements of a valid contract are:
It is an essential element of the contract. The contract cannot be made without an offer has been made by a party to the other party. The acceptance is required when an offer has been made by a party than only the contract will be enforceable.
The consideration is the price that has been paid on the promise made by a party to another party. The price is not necessary to be in monetary it can be value. Consideration can be an interest, right or the benefit going for the one party or the loss that has been suffered by a party.
The agreement between the parties does not create the legal binding contract. The intention of the party is required to enter into a legal binding contract. The law will not be considered that what the parties have subjectively intended but it depends on the circumstances the person has reached into the contract.
There are people who are not allowed to enter into a valid contract that involves the people who have the mental impairment, minors, bankrupts, corporations (The person acting on the behalf of the company) and the prisoner (The Law Handbook, 2018).
There is not a specific format that a contract must follow. Therefore, that includes some terms that are either express or can be implied that is the basis of an agreement. The terms have outlined the contract warranties or the contract conditions. Contract conditions have been the fundamentals of the agreement and if these conditions do not met then one can seek for the compensation for the damages. Contract warranties are a lesser important terms than the fundamentals to the agreement. The contract will not be terminated if the warranties will are not be fulfilled but it may claim the compensation for the damages (Goldberger, 2016).
The contracts follow a structure but it is not limited such as:
It is a contract that is pre-prepared in that the terms and conditions have been already been set with a little negotiation or maybe not among the parties. The standard form contracts are mostly designed or been printed and has the space to put the dates, names, signatures and for the other requirements.
Standard form contracts have some examples that are the employment contracts, agreements of insurance, agreements of lease and the financial agreements.
These contracts have been generally written for the benefitted in the interest of those from whom the contract has been offered. In the terms of the standard form contract the negotiation is sometimes possible. However, in the cases when the only option is left is either to take it or leave it (Trebilcock & Leng, 2006).
The terms that are unfair in accordance with the laws
In Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v JJ Richards & Sons Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 1224 case, the unfair contract terms as the respondent was entered into a contract of 26,000 contracts and where the ACCC has alleged that contract was in the unfair terms under the section 24 of the Australian Consumer Law. ACCC has able to prove his case of the unfair terms (Federal Court of Australia, 2018).
Negligence is the action in that failing to do something as the other person in his place would done that action in that circumstance and that causes the injuries to the other person and that results in the breach and will be liable for the damages (Stickley, 2016). Negligence is an expression of the law of tort. Four questions give rise by which the negligence is determined. Whether the defendant who been sued owe the person who has suffered the injury (plaintiff) a duty of care? Does the defendant have been found to be in a breach of the duty of care? Does the defendant have suffered any type of injury? Does the injury happen due to a breach of the duty of care?
These are the factors must been satisfied to prove the negligence and this burden lies on the plaintiff. The actions that create negligence for these essentials are required to be present in that are as follows:
The first element of the negligence that whether the duty of care has the existence and also will be applied on the neighbourhood principle for example if it would also affect the other person in the same circumstances as the defendant will have the adverse effect on the plaintiff. The same effect will lie on than the duty of care lies by the plaintiff to the defendant. In Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] A.C. 562, [1932] UKHL 100, 1932 S.C. (H.L.) 31, 1932 S.L.T. 317, [1932] W.N. 139 case, in this the tort of negligence was developed (Latimer, 2012). The Donoghue was the plaintiff who has purchased the ginger beer from the Stevens who was the manufacturer of the beer. The beer was in an opaque bottle in that the contents were not clearly visible. Donoghue after consuming some beer she has poured the beer into the glass and she has found the decomposed snail that has remained in the beer. The plaintiff got the gastro-enteritis and the nervous shock that has been claimed by her due to the presence of the snail in the beer. In this case, the defendant owes a duty of care to the plaintiff. Thus, the case applies that whether the Stevenson owes the duty of care to the Donoghue. Thus the liability arises on Donoghue to prove the breach of duty by the Stevenson in taking the reasonable care and to show the damages had been caused to her due to the breach. The court has found Stevenson for the breach of the duty of care and held liable to pay the damages (Latimer, 2012).
Breach of Duty of Care
If it is proved from the first essential that, the duty of care is not there than the next step is to determine whether the duty of care is breached. The breach will be considered when the defendant has not followed the minimum standard of care that is required and the reasonable person would have provided standard care in the circumstances that has faced by the defendant. If the response is yes than the defendant has breached the duty of care. In Liverpool Catholic Club Ltd V Moorcase [2014] NSWCA 394, in this case, the defendant had been held liable for not considering the care as the risk was foreseen in this and the appeal of the case was granted
To determine the damages it is important or required to be the link between the damages that has been suffered by the plaintiff and the breach. The but for test would be applied by the Court in determining that whether the causes are involved in the said negligent act and would there been a contribution of the plaintiff in the duty of care breach. The actual burden of proof lies for the negligence lies on the plaintiff. However, in some cases, it becomes difficult for the plaintiff to prove the negligence than the plaintiff lies on the maxim Res Ispa Loquitor that means the thing speaks for itself. This maxim does not make the defendant liable as the defendant still have the right to rebut the maxim by providing evidence that he acted due to the circumstances. In Oyston v St Patrick’s College [2011] NSWSC 269 case, it was alleged by the plaintiff that the reasonable care was not there by the school for the anti-bullying and therefore she has suffered the injury and the panic attacks, anxiety and the depression. The court held that the risk was foreseeable as it can be for seen by the school despite the school has published the policies regarding the anti-bullying and therefore school been found to be in the breach of duty of care and therefore school had been held liable for the damages.
There are some examples of the actions of the negligence that is personal injury, false imprisonment, trespass to the person like assault and battery, medical negligence and the harassment. The other examples like trespass to the land by entering, placing or remaining any object and doing interference in the plaintiff’s land. Trespass of the goods of the plaintiff. The other nuisance, vicarious liability, breach of the statuary duty and the occupier’s liability (Stickley, 2016).
References
ACCC (2018). Unfair Contract Terms. Retrieved from: https://www.accc.gov.au/business/business-rights-protections/unfair-contract-terms
Australian Contract Law (2018). Gordon v Macgregor (1909) 8 CLR 316. Retrieved from: https://www.australiancontractlaw.com/cases/gordon.html
Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] A.C. 562, [1932] UKHL 100, 1932 S.C. (H.L.) 31, 1932 S.L.T. 317, [1932] W.N. 139
Federal Court of Australia (2018). Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v JJ Richards & Sons Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 1224. Retrieved from: https://www.judgments.fedcourt.gov.au/judgments/Judgments/fca/single/2017/2017fca1224
FindLaw Australia (2018). Is a verbal agreement legally binding?. Retrieved from: https://www.findlaw.com.au/articles/5626/is-a-verbal-agreement-legally-binding.aspx
Goldberger, J. (2016). An overview of developments in key areas of Australian contract law. Commercial Law Quarterly: The Journal of the Commercial Law Association of Australia, 30(1), 17.
Gordon v Macgregor (1909) 8 CLR 316
Latimer, P. (2012). Australian Business Law 2012. Australia: CCH Australia Limited
Liverpool Catholic Club Ltd V Moorcase [2014] NSWCA 394
Oyston v St Patrick’s College [2011] NSWSC 269
Stickley, A. P. (2016). Australian torts law. LexisNexis Butterworths.
The Law Handbook (2018). Elements of a contract. Retrieved from: https://www.lawhandbook.org.au/2018_07_01_03_elements_of_a_contract/
Trebilcock, M., & Leng, J. (2006). The role of formal contract law and enforcement in economic development. Va. L. Rev., 92, 1517.
Van Harten, G., Heckman, G., Mullan, D., & Promislow, J. (2015). Administrative Law: Cases, Text, and Materials. Emond Montgomery Publications.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download