Describe about the Contraction of Tissue Engineered Oral Mucosa?
An Oral mucosa which is artificially engineered consisting full thickness generally resembles the normal oral mucosa. It consists of several components as identical to the natural element (Barbagli and Lazzeri, 2015).
In order to speak to the difficulties and for the optimization in the construction of oral mucosa with full thickness, several factors need to be considered. This includes the following:
i) Scaffolds
ii) Cell Source
iii) Culture Medium
The detailed analysis of each of these structures are highlighted below:
i) Scaffolds
The scaffold is considered as in an important element of the oral mucosa. It helps to support the cells of associated to the surface. Thereby, choosing the suitable scaffold would be highly recommendable. An appropriate scaffold would include effective biocompatibility, biostability, porosity along with efficient mechanical properties(Amemiya et al. 2015).
The scaffolds, which are used in the oral mucosa along with the skin reconstruction techniques, are found to be associated with several distinct categories. These are as follows;
The details of each of the structures are mentioned below:
a) Fibroblast-populated skin substitutes
b)Naturally derived Scaffolds (acellular dermis and the amniotic membrane)
c) Collagen-based scaffolds
d) Fibrin based materials
e) Gelatin based scaffolds
f) Hybrid Scaffolds
g) Synthetic Scaffolds (polymers)
Acellular Dermis
Acellular Cadaveric Dermis under the brand name AlloDermTM is a scaffold, which is generally used for tissue engineering especially in the oral mucosa. It is non-immunogenic which has dual polarity. One side consists of the basal lamina, which is suitable for the epithelial cells. On the other hand, the perfect channels of the vessel are influenced by the fibroblast infiltration (Dickhuth et al. 2015).
The De-Epidermalized Dermis (DED) are used for the preparation of epidermal-dermal composites. It is subsequently used for reconstruction of hard palate mucosal epithelium samples. The De-Epidermalized Bovine Tongue Mucosa is used as a substrate for the keratinocyte culture (Amemiya et al. 2015). The De-Epidermalized Dermis is generally prepared from the thickned skin with split texture on removing the epidermis and the dermal fibroblasts. The basic advantages of De-Epidermalized Dermis (DED) are as follows:
a) Ability to retain the structural properties (even at low temperature or frozen)
b) Lyophilization
c) Ability to remain preserved in glycerol solution
Pure Collagen Scaffolds
Various scientists and researchers have developed the in vitro oral mucosal model by culturing normal keratinocytes on skin collagen isolated from the bovines in gels containing fibroblasts. Further, this set up was co-cultured in reconstruction medium (Barbagli and Lazzeri, 2015). By developing this technique, they have made a well defined mucosal model that is similar to the local tissues. In further research works scientists developed this model and they cultured oral mucosal tissue by using a telopeptide type I mixed with sponge matrix of contracted bovine skin collagen gels (CCG). This model was composed of lamina propia and fibroblasts embedded in CCG and collagen sponge and cell layers of stratified cell layers present in the surface of the lamina propia (Gauvin et al. 2012). The advantage of this model is that it provides a substrate and base for the formation of keratinocyte multilayer (Barbagli and Lazzeri, 2015). The significant finding of this research model was the detection of laminin expression between the epithelium tissue and lamina propia. However, expression of type IV collagen and hemodesmosome is not recognized and found during this experiment. Moreover, it was found that higher amount of extracellular matrix (ECM) was synthesized in three dimensional porous scaffold model (Heller et al. 2015). This scaffold model was named after the founder and is known as Moriyama’s model. In further research and experiments, Roubhia and Deslauriers carried out another technique in which they mixed bovine skin collagen with the oral fibroblasts of the normal human being and produced engineered lamina propia (Dickhuth et al. 2015). They further seeded oral epithelial cells on this matrix and allowed them to grow and proliferate in an air-liquid interface. However, to track the proliferation rate of the oral epithelial cells the increase in the production of marker Ki-67 and cytokeratins K14, K19, K10 was measured (Barbagli and Lazzeri, 2015). It has been found that Keratinocytes interacts by producing laminarin basement proteins and integrins with the fibroblast. Moreover, this experiment also showed that oral mucosa can produce TNF-α (tumor necrosis factor alpha), interleukins like IL-1β and IL-8, metalloproteases like gelatinase A and gelatinase B. However, it was found that collagen-based scaffolds have poor mechanical properties and cross linking of collagen tissues results in calcification (Bhargava et al. 2011).
i) Cell Source
Apart from the Scaffold, the other important factor, which needs to be considered in oral mucosa, is the type and origin of keratinocytes and fibroblasts. The fibroblasts are generally isolated on the primary dermal layer of skin by an oral mucosal biopsy. These tissues are used for early passage associated with the tissue engineering (Lanzaet al. 2011). This is because the extracellular matrix production that provided by the dermal fibroblasts tends to decrease, as the passage number increases. The Keratinocytes are found to be obtained from different sites in an oral cavity (e.g. hard palate). The usual active human keratinocytes need to be used at the early passage. However, the immortalized keratinocytes (e.g. HaCaT cells or TR146 cells) can be efficiently used in the reconstruction of oral mucosal test models in respect to its extended passage (Barbagli and Lazzeri, 2015). On the other hand, the epidermal differentiation associated with the transformed keratinocytes is considered imperfect as the decisive steps of terminal differentiation does not take place. The tumor cells are considered anomalous and thereby it is not used for any clinical usage (Gil et al. 2015).
ii) Culture Medium
Frequently used cultural medium associated with the oral mucosa reconstruction is the Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM)-Ham’s F-12 Medium (3:1). This is usually supplemented with the Fetal Calf Serum (FCS) along with other elements such as Glutamine, Adenine, Insulin, Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF), Transferrin, Tri-Iodothyronine, Hydrocortisone, Fungizone, Streptomycin, and Penicillin (Heller et al. 2015).
Human Oral Mucosa which is formed by tissue engineering, was found to be equivalent to the Serum-free culture medium, was considered as an efficient protocol, associated with the context (Dickhuth et al. 2015). The elimination of the usage of serum and thereby the irradiation of mouse fibroblast feeder layers are associated with this memorandum, which minimized the exposure of human grafts recipients. This is related to the effect of the xenogeneic DNA which is present in the irradiates mouse 3T3 cells and the serum. It can be analyzed that the same techniques were followed for the human conjunctiva along with the oral mucosa corresponding (Cheng and Xie, 2012).
The demonstration was based on the fact that the keratinocytes of oral mucosa and its perfusion is associated with the medium. Moreover, it is observed that it enhances the viability of the cell along with the proliferation while cultured in porous three-dimensional (3D) matrix of collagen-GAG. This provides a cross-linkage between the glutaraldehyde structures associated with the model (Brauchle and Schenkeâ€ÂLayland, 2013).
Contraction of the tissue highlights towards the movement of the muscles, which is mainly regulated by several co-factors. Myofibroblast plays a cruicial role in the contraction mechanism. It helps to decrease the size of the muscle by gripping towards the edges of the muscles. This is mostly present within the smooth muscle cells. Both the effects of cell proliferation along with apoptosis is monitored by the phenomenon of contraction, which is effectively monitored in this experiment (Osman et al 2015).
Proper monitoring of the tissue-engineered constructs is considered as an important component for the successful implementation of any tissue engineered techniques. To demonstrate and monitor the visible biochemical changes within the collagen cross-links of both controlled and drug-induced tissue engineered model, Raman spectroscopy is primarily used (Brauchle and Schenkeâ€ÂLayland, 2013). Raman spectroscopy provides a simple and rapid method for monitoring the quality of the tissue-engineered components and thus contains information regarding the biochemical properties of the cells and tissues (Gauvin et al. 2012). The application of the infrared Raman spectroscopy may be demonstrated by monitoring the tissue engineered constructs, which are stressed by high temperature and are exposed to a high concentration of calcium (much higher than the normal value) (Gauvin et al. 2012). Thus, analyzing the Raman spectra helps in understanding the correlation of the CH2 deformation ratio about the phenylalanine ring. The histology and the morphological changes of the tissue-engineered mucosa provide the data regarding the concentration of the glucose consumption that helps in revealing information regarding the specific and sensitive changes in the secondary structure of the protein. Tissue-engineered oral mucosa cells have been treated with a particular antibiotic rapamycin, which helps in understanding the proliferation and capacity of the cells (Cheng and Xie, 2012). A separate set of control has also been kept for making a clear distinction between the control and the rapamycin treated tissue engineered cells (Cheng and Xie, 2012).
Figure 1.Raman spectroscopy showing the change in wavelength
Introduction of a sugar molecule (for example mannitol, sorbitol, and glucose) during the process of tissue engineering has been analyzed by implementing the method of FTIR (Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy). The studies helps in understanding the interaction between the chitostana and the gelatin fibres present which helps in the formation of the ionic and covalent bonds. The bonding helps in making strong collagen fibres, which helped in revealing the structure of the collagen fibres (Cheng and Xie, 2012). Thus spectral analysis by FTIR helps in understanding and revealing the nature and bonding of the collagen fibres during the process of tissue engineering (Votteler et al. 2012). Tissue engineering is considered as one of the most dynamic and important method for assisting tissue engineering of oral mucosa. The analysis by Raman spectra also reveals the data in response to the present of an antibiotic. Thus, it can be stated that in presence of an antibiotic rapamycin there is a change little increase in the wavelength in presence of an antibiotic (Brauchle and Schenkeâ€ÂLayland, 2013). The Raman spectroscopy has been supported by the FTIR analysis, which helps in understanding regarding the various surface properties associated with the introduction of the antibiotic. The FTIR analysis also helps in understanding regarding the change in wave number in accordance with the spectral data produced and thus helps in facilitating the proper tissue engineering techniques in terms of oral cell mucosa (Gauvin et al. 2012). This also helps to assess the various numbers of biochemical changes produced in normal skin caused by the tissue engineered oral cell mucosa. Cluster analysis helps in the evaluation of the vibration modes, which is associated in understanding and revealing the structure of the associated protein, which indicates changes in the secondary conformation of the various changes in the tissue. FTIR spectra are primarily acquired in aspect of three experimental configuration which includes transmission, reflection-absorption and total reflection which includes the fraction of total attenuated radiation (ATR). The spectral analysis also helps in understanding of the various anatompophological characteristics of both the control and the antibiotic treated tissue cells (Heller et al. 2015). Thus, the present change in the wavelength and wave numbers of a particular tissue represents a valuable data for organ and tissue reconstruction (Barbagli and Lazzeri, 2015). The control has been subjected to two different kinds of stress, which includes thermal changes and increase in the concentration of the calcium. The changes helped in understanding regarding the various changes in the value of the wavelength in terms of the data obtained with the help of Raman spectroscopy and FTIR. The CH2 band ratios also helped in revealing the ratio of the phenylalanine bonds in terms of thermal stress and higher concentration of the calcium molecules. Thus, because of small variation in execution of the productive protocol, the specific variability in the tissue engineered cells can be understood (Cheng and Xie, 2012).
Thus, both Raman and FTIR provide effective data in understanding the overall change in the wavelength produced in response to the presence of antibiotic rapamycin. The antibiotic rapamycin thus disrupts the various bonds and thereby leads to an overall increase in the wavelength of the resulting spectroscopy analysis (Dickhuth et al. 2015).
The effect of APN on a drug induced model is described in the graph presented below:
It can be analyzed from this graphical interpretation that there is a considerable increase in the slope. The activity of absorbance doubles itself within 60 minutes, which highlights towards the higher efficiency of the graphical analysis (Heller et al. 2015).
Chemo-metrics would be an effective parameter related to the article. It reflects towards the usage of statistical and mathematical protocol in order to improve the understanding of chemical information and thereby correlate the quality parameters associated to it. The patterns of the data are modeled, which are routinely applied to the future data to predict the same quality parameters (Cheng and Xie, 2012). The result attained from the chemo-metric approach focuses towards gaining efficiencies in assessing the product quality. More efficient laboratory practices are highlighted through this quality control system. Hence, for constructing the chemo-metric modeling system for analyzing the spectral data, an appropriate instrumentation along with an effective and interconnectivity software (for interpreting the patterns of the obtained data) needs to be implemented on the primary basis (Bhargava et al. 2011).
Chemo-metrics provides the spectroscopists the various ways to solve the calibration issues, which are interrelated to the spectral data. It is recommendable that the construction of chemo-metric modeling system should be monitored is such a way that helps to enhance the developmental methods significantly and thereby make effective routine use of the statistical models for data analysis(Amemiya et al. 2015). Implementing Unscrambler® for analyzing the spectroscopic data, modeling, classifying the data analyzed and thereby predicting to meet the protocol of quality assurance and monitoring would be an effective step related to the context. The researcher would be requiring other equipments for constructing an effective chemo-metric system which are stated below:
Apart from these requirements, the spectroscopists would be requiring the following chemo-metric software package in order to deduce the data associated to the context. This includes the following:
After gathering all the equipments along with the software package, the basic data analysis process is carried out in a systematic order.
Figure: Flowchart representing the protocol for Chemo-metric System (Gil et al. 2015)
Data input is considered as the most overlooked stage associated to the protocol. This is the main crucial stage in the entire instrumentation (Gauvin et al. 2012). The data, which is analyzed, is efficiently transferred into the software device. The proprietary collection software converts this protocol in a complex manner. The outliers are removed subsequently, which is considered as a delicate procedure. This is followed by a Grubbs test, which mainly helps to detect the outliers. The false outliers, which are present at the extreme point f the system and thereby appear infrequently within the data are subsequently removed (Amemiya et al. 2015). On the other hand, the true outliers (samples and variables which are statistically different from one another) are effectively removed (Barbagli and Lazzeri, 2015).
The next stage involves the protocol of Preprocessing. The main goal associated to the preprocessing stage involves the removal of variation within the data, which does not pertain to the analytical information (Brauchle and Schenkeâ€ÂLayland, 2013). The typical preprocessing methods, which can be analyzed for evaluating the cell lines of oral mucosa, would include the following:
The output, which is attained from this experimental setup, is mainly classified into two types, i.e. Qualitative and Quantitative segments. The Qualitative model would mainly highlight the classified models, effects of classification and the evidences behind classification error. On the other hand, the Quantitative segment would focus towards the prediction models and the involvement of RMSEC and RMSEP (Bhargava et al. 2011).
References
Amemiya, T., Nakamura, T., Yamamoto, T., Kinoshita, S. and Kanamura, N., 2015. Autologous Transplantation of Oral Mucosal Epithelial Cell Sheets Cultured on an Amniotic Membrane Substrate for Intraoral Mucosal Defects.
Barbagli, G. and Lazzeri, M., 2015. Clinical experience with urethral reconstruction using tissue-engineered oral mucosa: a quiet revolution.European urology, 68(6), pp.917-918.
Bhargava, S., Patterson, J.M., Inman, R.D., MacNeil, S. and Chapple, C.R., 2011. Tissue-engineered buccal mucosa urethroplasty—clinical outcomes.European urology, 53(6), pp.1263-1271.
Brauchle, E. and Schenkeâ€ÂLayland, K., 2013. Raman spectroscopy in biomedicine–nonâ€Âinvasive in vitro analysis of cells and extracellular matrix components in tissues. Biotechnology journal, 8(3), pp.288-297.
Bucchieri, F., Fucarino, A., Marino Gammazza, A., Pitruzzella, A., Marciano, V., Paderni, C., De Caro, V., Gabriella Siragusa, M., Lo Muzio, L., T Holgate, S. and E Davies, D., 2012. Medium-term culture of normal human oral mucosa: a novel three-dimensional model to study the effectiveness of drugs administration. Current pharmaceutical design, 18(34), pp.5421-5430.
Cheng, J.X. and Xie, X.S. eds., 2012. Coherent Raman scattering microscopy. CRC press.
Chung, B.G., Lee, K.H., Khademhosseini, A. and Lee, S.H., 2012. Microfluidic fabrication of microengineered hydrogels and their application in tissue engineering. Lab on a Chip, 12(1), pp.45-59.
Dickhuth, J., Koerdt, S., Kriegebaum, U., Linz, C., Müller-Richter, U.D., Ristow, O., Kübler, A.C. and Reuther, T., 2015. In vitro study on proliferation kinetics of oral mucosal keratinocytes. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology, 120(4), pp.429-435.
Gauvin, R., Chen, Y.C., Lee, J.W., Soman, P., Zorlutuna, P., Nichol, J.W., Bae, H., Chen, S. and Khademhosseini, A., 2012. Microfabrication of complex porous tissue engineering scaffolds using 3D projection stereolithography. Biomaterials, 33(15), pp.3824-3834.
Gil, R.S., Pagés, C.M., Díez, E.G., Llames, S., Fuertes, A.F. and Vilagran, J.L., 2015. Tissue-Engineered Oral Mucosa Grafts for Intraoral Lining Reconstruction of the Maxilla and Mandible With a Fibula Flap. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 73(1), pp.195-e1.
Heller, M., Frerick-Ochs, E.V., Bauer, H.K., Schiegnitz, E., Flesch, D., Brieger, J., Stein, R., Al-Nawas, B., Brochhausen, C., Thüroff, J.W. and Unger, R.E., 2015. Tissue engineered pre-vascularized buccal mucosa equivalents utilizing a primary triculture of epithelial cells, endothelial cells and fibroblasts. Biomaterials, 77, pp.207-215.
Kim, C.Y., Woo, Y.J., Lee, S.Y. and Yoon, J.S., 2014. Postoperative Outcomes of Anophthalmic Socket Reconstruction Using an Autologous Buccal Mucosa Graft. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 25(4), pp.1171-1174.
Kim, R.Y., Fasi, A.C. and Feinberg, S.E., 2014. Soft tissue engineering in craniomaxillofacial surgery. Annals of maxillofacial surgery, 4(1), p.4.
Kinikoglu, B., Damour, O. and Hasirci, V., 2015. Tissue engineering of oral mucosa: a shared concept with skin. Journal of Artificial Organs, 18(1), pp.8-19.
Lanza, R., Langer, R. and Vacanti, J.P. eds., 2011. Principles of tissue engineering. Academic press.
Lu, Q., Al-Sheikh, O., Elisseeff, J.H. and Grant, M.P., 2015. Biomaterials and tissue engineering strategies for conjunctival reconstruction and dry eye treatment. Middle East African journal of ophthalmology, 22(4), p.428.
Lv, X.G., Feng, C., Fu, Q., Xie, H., Wang, Y., Huang, J.W., Xie, M.K., Atala, A., Xu, Y.M. and Zhao, W.X., 2015. Comparative study of different seeding methods based on a multilayer SIS scaffold: Which is the optimal procedure for urethral tissue engineering?. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials.
MacNeil, S., 2012. Biomaterials for tissue engineering of skin. Materials today, 11(5), pp.26-35.
MacNeil, S., Shepherd, J. and Smith, L., 2011. Production of tissue-engineered skin and oral mucosa for clinical and experimental use. In 3D cell culture (pp. 129-153). Humana Press.
Moharamzadeh, K., Brook, I.M., Van Noort, R., Scutt, A.M. and Thornhill, M.H., 2007. Tissue-engineered oral mucosa: a review of the scientific literature. Journal of dental research, 86(2), pp.115-124.
Moharamzadeh, K., Colley, H., Murdoch, C., Hearnden, V., Chai, W.L., Brook, I.M., Thornhill, M.H. and MacNeil, S., 2012. Tissue-engineered oral mucosa. Journal of dental research, 91(7), pp.642-650.
Neel, E.A.A., Chrzanowski, W., Salih, V.M., Kim, H.W. and Knowles, J.C., 2014. Tissue engineering in dentistry. Journal of dentistry, 42(8), pp.915-928.
Nunes, l.f.m., de nazaré alves de oliveira, c.a.m.i.l.a., dos santos, e.b. and MESQUITA, R.A., 2014. Epidemiology of the Oral Mucosa Lesion in Elderly Patients. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology and Oral Radiology, 117(2), p.e205.
Oie, Y., Hayashi, R., Takagi, R., Yamato, M., Takayanagi, H., Tano, Y. and Nishida, K., 2010. A novel method of culturing human oral mucosal epithelial cell sheet using post-mitotic human dermal fibroblast feeder cells and modified keratinocyte culture medium for ocular surface reconstruction.British Journal of Ophthalmology, 94(9), pp.1244-1250.
Osman, N.I., Hillary, C., Bullock, A.J., MacNeil, S. and Chapple, C.R., 2015. Tissue engineered buccal mucosa for urethroplasty: Progress and future directions. Advanced drug delivery reviews, 82, pp.69-76.
Osman, N.I., Hillary, C., Bullock, A.J., MacNeil, S. and Chapple, C.R., 2015. Tissue engineered buccal mucosa for urethroplasty: Progress and future directions. Advanced drug delivery reviews, 82, pp.69-76.
Park, S.W., Lee, H., Lee, H.J., Chung, H., Park, J.C., Shin, S.K., Lee, S.K. and Lee, Y.C., 2014. Esophageal mucosal mast cell infiltration and changes in segmental smooth muscle contraction in noncardiac chest pain. Diseases of the Esophagus.
Patterson, J.M., Bullock, A.J., MacNeil, S. and Chapple, C.R., 2011. Methods to reduce the contraction of tissue-engineered buccal mucosa for use in substitution urethroplasty. European urology, 60(4), pp.856-861.
Payne, K.F., Balasundaram, I., Deb, S., Di Silvio, L. and Fan, K.F., 2014. Tissue engineering technology and its possible applications in oral and maxillofacial surgery. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 52(1), pp.7-15.
Sheth, R., Neale, M.H., Shortt, A.J., Massie, I., Vernon, A.J. and Daniels, J.T., 2014. Culture and characterization of oral mucosal epithelial cells on a fibrin gel for ocular surface reconstruction. Current eye research, (0), pp.1-11.
Sheth, R., Neale, M.H., Shortt, A.J., Massie, I., Vernon, A.J. and Daniels, J.T., 2014. Culture and characterization of oral mucosal epithelial cells on a fibrin gel for ocular surface reconstruction. Current eye research, (0), pp.1-11.
Visan, I., 2015. Oral mucosa Langerhans cells. Nature immunology, 16(9), pp.906-906.
Votteler, M., Carvajal Berrio, D.A., Pudlas, M., Walles, H., Stock, U.A. and Schenkeâ€ÂLayland, K., 2012. Raman spectroscopy for the nonâ€Âcontact and nonâ€Âdestructive monitoring of collagen damage within tissues. Journal of biophotonics, 5(1), pp.47-56.
Watanabe, E., Yamato, M., Shiroyanagi, Y., Tanabe, K. and Okano, T., 2011. Bladder augmentation using tissue-engineered autologous oral mucosal epithelial cell sheets grafted on demucosalized gastric flaps.Transplantation, 91(7), pp.700-706.
Winterroth, F., Kato, H., Kuo, S., Feinberg, S.E., Hollister, S.J., Fowlkes, J.B. and Hollman, K.W., 2014. High-Frequency Ultrasonic Imaging of Growth and Development in Manufactured Engineered Oral Mucosal Tissue Surfaces. Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 40(9), pp.2244-2251.
Xie, M., Xu, Y., Song, L., Wang, J., Lv, X. and Zhang, Y., 2014. Tissue-engineered buccal mucosa using silk fibroin matrices for urethral reconstruction in a canine model. Journal of Surgical Research, 188(1), pp.1-7.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order formOnce we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignmentAs soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download