In the modern day scenario, the legal codes form a very important part of the company and the ethics of the company. However, the most important part of this ethics is that the laws must be similar for all. The workers, CEO, Board of Directors and all the other employees of the organization must be sticking to all the aspects of the legal codes. One such incident happened in the Volkswagen Company. There was a scandal when the company installed the defeat devices into the cars that were sold mainly to the customers of the US. The CEO of this company along with the Board of Directors was responsible for this (Hotten 2015). The CEO along with the board of directors were found guilty of being dishonest and taking the undue advantage of the emotions and the faith of the customers. So this assignment will be talking about the agency theory that talks about the separation between the management t and the control, of the company.
The Agency theory separates the control and the management. This is because there is a line of difference between the owner of the company and also the ones who are in the control of the company. This is because the CEO often is busy in several other works and he gives all the power in the hands of the board of directors (Mitnick 2015). It is for this reason that often the Board of directors make different kinds of decisions that are not really conveyed to the CEO in the proper time and the proper way. The same was the case in the Volkswagen Company. It was found in the year 2015 September that all the units which the company had sold in the year 2005 and 2015 in the United Nations. It was found that there was this device called the defeat device installed in the engines of these cars. This was totally unknown to the customers who bought the car. These devices were responsible for emitting a huge amount of fumes into the atmosphere. There was a huge emission of the harmful gases like the carbon dioxide, and the other such harmful gases as well. As a result of this then there was a huge allegation on the company that it has destroyed the trust of the customers which they had invested in the company for several years. It was however for the supervisory board to look into the matter that the operation of the work is being carried on properly. It was two engineers who designed his plan and invented this device called the defeat device and installed them in the engineers of these cars. On being caught the CEO resigned saying that this was really a huge mistake on the part of the company and they have actually broken the trust of their customers. He was deeply apologetic saying that the company has really broken the trust of the customers. He realized and also acknowledged top this fact that the rules of the company are for all and even the board of directors and the supervisors must have adhered to it. However it was really the fault of the supervisors that they allowed such dishonesty and disloyalty and had broken the trust of the customers for so many years. However the board of directors did not resign and this is really very bad on their parts. This is because it was their duty to make sufficient efforts for apologizing to the customers. The person who became the new CEO of Volkswagen was also of the opinion that the first and foremost duty will be to restore back the trust of their customers that they have ruined.
In the current time, contemporary business organizations are having different and diverse set of stakeholders who all are having different level of interest and power. Thus, it is important for the business organizations to effectively determine the opinions of all the stakeholders in place. According to the stakeholder theory, it is important for the board of directors to consider the opinions and feedback of all the involved stakeholders. In addition, this theory also stated that every stakeholder should have equal representation in the board of directors and decision making process (Harrison ad Wicks 2013). However, it is also to be noted that contemporary business organizations should determine the difference between the stakeholders and shareholders. This is due to the reason that in the case of diesel gates scandal for Volkswagen, the main issue raised due to the conflict between their stakeholders and shareholders.
Stakeholders for them include the environment activists who are protesting against the unethical business practices regarding the emission. On the other hand, shareholders of Volkswagen are the investors and they are pushing for more profitability, which is further leading to the initiation of the unethical business practices. According to the stakeholder theory, all the involved stakeholders should be effectively determined in terms of their interest. Thus, the interest of environment activists is limited to the protection of the environment and regulation of the unethical business practices of Volkswagen. On the other hand, investors of Volkswagen are more concerned with the economical aspects and profitability of the business (Bridoux and Stoelhorst 2014). It is also been noted that Volkswagen’s board of directors were more influenced by the opinions of the investors and thus they initiated the unethical business practices in order to enhance their profitability.
Thus according to the stakeholder theory, board of directors is having the responsibility of determining the opinion of the stakeholders such as environment activists also. In this case, they should have the corporate government mechanism where external stakeholders such as activists and the customers will also be involved in decision making process (Bushee, Carter and Gerakos 2013). On the other hand, it is also the major responsibility of the investors to track the opinion of the external stakeholders. This will enable them to identify the potential risks in terms of their business operation. The more effective will be the determination of the opinion of the external stakeholder; the lower will be the probability of emergence of the risk
One of the major corporate governance issues being identified is the one way communication and top down approach of the management. In the given case study, it is identified that the decision of initiating the cheating device in the diesel cars is being taken by the upper level management. In this case, the feedback from other internal and external stakeholders is not being considered. This led to the lack of determination of the potential risk from the external stakeholders that further contributed in the scandal (Filatotchev and Nakajima 2014).
Another major issue in terms of the corporate governance of Volkswagen is ineffective business communication mechanism. This is due to the reason that after the revelation of the scandal, Volkswagen had not being able to effectively communicate the issue to their external stakeholders (Pearson 2017). This is due to the reason that in the case study it is stated that Volkswagen at first denied the allegations against them and again they tried to pass off the allegations to some of their employees. This caused further amplification of the issue for them in among the external stakeholders.
It can be concluded that if Volkswagen had two ways approaches in their internal management then they would have being able to determine the opinion of their external stakeholders. Thus, if the employees and the external stakeholders can get involved in the decision making process then issues and challenges of all of them can be effectively determined. This will help to reduce the probability of emergence of this type of issue for Volkswagen in future. It can also be concluded that if Volkswagen can accept the allegations against them in the first place and initiated rectifying measures accordingly, then it would become more effective for them to resolve the issues. This is due to the reason that if Volkswagen accepted their fault in the first place, then the major external stakeholders would not get to have negative impression about them. In addition, the lawsuits faced by them would be less and also the issue would have been less amplified.
So, it can be concluded that there has to be a proper connection between the owners of the company and the supervisors. This is because the agency theory says that there is a gap between the ownership and the control of the company. However, the ethical and legal rules must be equal for all and each and every one must be following those rules. Even if there are some scandals taking place in the company as happened in the case of Volkswagen then it is the duty of both the CEO and the board of Directors to resign and to apologize from the people whom they have cheated for so many years.
References
Bridoux, F. and Stoelhorst, J.W., 2014. Microfoundations for stakeholder theory: Managing stakeholders with heterogeneous motives. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), pp.107-125.
Bushee, B.J., Carter, M.E. and Gerakos, J., 2013. Institutional investor preferences for corporate governance mechanisms. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26(2), pp.123-149.
Filatotchev, I. and Nakajima, C., 2014. Corporate governance, responsible managerial behavior, and corporate social responsibility: Organizational efficiency versus organizational legitimacy?. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(3), pp.289-306.
Harrison, J.S. and Wicks, A.C., 2013. Stakeholder theory, value, and firm performance. Business ethics quarterly, 23(1), pp.97-124.
Hotten, R., 2015. Volkswagen: The scandal explained-BBC News. BBCNews.
Mitnick, B.M., 2015. Agency theory. Wiley Encyclopedia of Management.
Pearson, R., 2017. Business ethics as communication ethics: Public relations practice and the idea of dialogue. In Public relations theory (pp. 111-131). Routledge.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download