1. Evaluate the literature review conducted for this research article.
2. This article uses mixed methods. Describe the characteristics of this research design and evaluate its appropriateness. Was this design sufficient to address the research objective, or would you suggest another design?
3. Evaluate the report in terms of its implications for theory and for leaders.
8. Critique the outcomes of this this research article. Did the researchers’ achieve the stated research objective?
The literature review that has been conducted regarding the respective article helps in analyzing the different kinds of theories along with models of the leadership. These are the different kinds of models that are used in different organizations by the managers or the supervisors to analyses the different kinds of tasks in an appropriate manner. The literature review is mainly on the coaching of the different executives or the leaders and this is the formal kind of relationship that includes counselling about the work culture and relationships as well as the work-related issues that takes place in the organization.
Furthermore, the different theories based on leadership have been discussed as well that will include the variety of issues that can take place or occur in the workplace such as mental health and well being of the individuals that are ineffective in the workplace. There were different theoretical kind of frameworks from cognitive and behavioral to psychodynamic that mainly focused on solutions and the entire coaching on leadership is mainly focused on the different set of principles that are common in nature (Creswell and Creswell 2017).
It has been noticed that coaching has been found that it has created positive impact after the one specific session of coaching and the literature has been able to analyze that the coaching sessions received in different organizations created a positive impact and this is associated with the self-efficacy of the different leaders as well. Thus, it has been concluded that when coaching is being utilized for the development of the leadership, this generally includes and involves several sessions of coaching as well (Creswell 2014).
In the literature review, the rigorously designed coaching session, using the single group and pre-post within the group design, this has been analyzed that the different managers who worked with the coach in the different kind of organizations were improving at a faster pace in comparison to the others in the organization. The variables are being defined through the help of focus group discussion and this will describe the two most objectives of the respective present study as to reveal the appropriate generic outcomes variables and this will help in investigating whether the coaching will help in producing the wanted outcomes (McCleskey 2014). The role-efficacy of the leaders is the other component that has been described in the literature that helped in analyzing the confidence gained by the individuals about the abilities that will help in maximizing and mobilizing the motivation and the cognitive resources that are required in order to improve the performance in specific kinds of tasks in an appropriate manner.
The leader role efficacy is required to be maintained effectively that is based on the entire performance and behaviors of the different individuals effectively. Furthermore, it has been noticed that there are different strong kinds of indications of the salience of the leader role efficacy that is as instrumental to the performance of the leadership among the managers who are working in the organization in an effective manner. The leader role efficacy is shown as the ones with strong kind of personality that helps in correlating and the studies have tried to investigate the entire effect of the leadership coaching on the different beliefs of the overall leader role responsibilities. Lastly, it helps in providing a positive impact on the performance of the transactional and transformational leadership.
The trust of the leaders for their subordinates is essential in nature and the different kind of recent developments in the leadership theory is being enabled and produced by the different relational kind of processes in an appropriate manner. In order to advance the theory along with the research on the respective issue, the different impacts of the leadership coaching on LRE and their trust on the different subordinates as well. With the help of different kinds of arguments and other empirical evidences, it can be seen that the leader coaching will help in influencing LTS and this will help them in willingness to take risks and delegating the different responsibilities as well. The leadership coaching will help in influencing the trust of the leaders on their subordinates in an effective manner.
There are different characteristics of the mixed research design that includes that the mixed research approach comes out of the environment wherein the professional researchers have the entire tendency to utilize the exclusivity in the entire usage of the either quantitative or qualitative research type of approaches. The other characteristics of the mixed research design helps in seeking approach that will minimize the weaknesses and draw the different strengths of the exclusively quantitative or qualitative research methodology.
It has been noticed that the mixed research methodology helps and assists in recognizing the value of the entire knowledge along with their experience based on the factual kind of aspects of the world wherein there can be different kinds of usage of the same. The other characteristics of the mixed method approach and this rejects the dualism that helps in setting qualitative face based as this will help in making the approach much better in an effective manner.
The mixed research design approach includes the different kinds of assessing the different outcomes wherein the entire tools are designed that comprises of the focus group discussion and the main objective was to provide appropriate outcome criteria that will help in maintaining the effectiveness of the leadership coaching as the leadership development tools across leaders and the organizations (Northouse 2018). The main strength pf the mixed approach includes the designing the different strategies with the help of both quantitative and qualitative approaches as this will assist in maintaining and analyzing the decision-making processes effectively.
Furthermore, it has been noticed that the mixed approach of the research design will help and assist in understanding the national differences in such a manner that this will provide a proper and accurate picture of the effects of the leadership development tool that any one of the specific ones. It was noticed that the mixed approach will help the company in understanding the various kinds of importance of the research design such that this will help in analyzing the cultural dimensions such as collectivism and power distance (Mayoh and Onwuegbuzie 2015).
Furthermore, the overall aim of the mixed research design is such that the employee’s participation in the decision-making process is essential in nature that will cause selection bias. The empirical evidence has helped and assisted in understanding the importance of the mixed research design in such a manner that will comprise of the focus group discussion and this will assist in maintaining the effects of the leadership training such that this will suggest leaders’ self-efficacy. There are different strong indications and this is crucial for the leaders across the organizations to thrive. The trust of the different supervisors on the subordinates will assist in the mixed method approach that will help in analyzing the different theory and practice.
The mixed theory approach will help the company in analyzing the leadership development tool as this will help the company in managing the effectiveness of the organizations and the employees in the organization as well.
There are various types of theories on leadership that have been discussed in the article that has been provided. Furthermore, the main theory is the substantive theory that helps in building the leadership coaching as the essential development tools. The recent kind of development in the essential leadership theory has assisted in suggesting that the leaderships is analyzed and this is produced by the relational processes as well. The different kinds of implications of the relational theory have been discussed in the article that includes and offers the view of the leadership that is the mutual type of influential process that the leaders require to maintain with their subordinates in an effective manner. The theory has helped in suggesting that the leaders need to have confidence on the subordinates while they are performing different kinds of objectives and tasks effectively. This will lead to optimal functioning of gaining high quality work from their subordinates and this maintains proper subordinate and manager relationship as well (Smith 2015).
The self-efficacy related theory is essential in nature as this links with the trust that is required to be attained by the managers on their subordinates and this will maintain proper relationship in the entire organization as well. The main and major objective of the entire article and study is the contribution of the substantive theory on the building of leadership coaching as one of the major development tools (Mertens 2014).
The major development in the theory is that the different leadership theory process is helpful and is being enabled in nature by various relational processes as well. The leadership self-efficacy is essential and important in nature in different organizations as this helps in performing the various activities with proper confidence and motivation. The competence of the subordinates can be attained and gained by the leaders only through proper motivation and having confidence among them as well.
Lewis (2015) has stated that the various kinds of studies related to trust helps in reducing the various risks involved in the organization that is faced by the managers along with the subordinates in maintaining proper kind of relationship with the others working in the respective team. Proper motivation is required to be provided to the various employees working in the organization as these assists in analyzing the positive outcomes in the organization effectively. Lastly, the literature review has helped in suggesting that propensity of the leaders is essential in nature as this will helps in analyzing the outcomes effectively.
There is different critique of the outcomes that have been found in the article which is based on the developmental tool of the leadership. Furthermore, the respective study helps in providing entire knowledge that is based on both formative kind of evaluation that is necessary in nature as the development tools (Day et al. 2014). Furthermore, the formative and summative kind of assessments have helped in analyzing the main strength of the entire study in an effective manner. The basic strength of the entire study is lies in the entire usage of the different mixed research design that comprises of both qualitative and quantitative methods or techniques which helps in providing various opportunities for the expansion along with development.
The appropriate combination of the various data has provided with clear picture on various effects of leadership coaching as one of the essential leadership development tools. The different researchers have helped in analyzing the potential limitations in an effective manner. The most important challenges that the coaching studies was regarding possibility of the biasness of selection. The previous studies have helped in understanding that the entire findings have been generalized and this will motivate for leader development as well (D’Innocenzo et al. 2016).
The main aim of the study was towards the contribution for development of the team and these assists in developing importance of the participation of the employees for making different kind of decisions effectively. The entire study was conducted with the main objective for entire development of team and this analyses participation of employees in analyzing making and analyzing decisions efficiently. The study was conducted in Norway and this implied the culture specific kind of attitude that is discussed in the article. Furthermore, the entire design of the entire study was prepared in a respective manner that was not being compatible in nature in other countries. Furthermore, there are different national and cultural differences that are difficult to handle in different situations in various situations.
It has been seen that the entire design of the study has been made in such a manner that there are differences in various parts of the world and this is difficult in handling the differences in an effective manner. Lastly, the main limitations of the study were mainly due to the different kinds of cultural differences that can affect the different perceptions of the individuals in the different organizations.
References
Creswell, J.W. and Creswell, J.D., 2017. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Creswell, J.W., 2014. A concise introduction to mixed methods research. Sage Publications.
D’Innocenzo, L., Mathieu, J.E. and Kukenberger, M.R., 2016. A meta-analysis of different forms of shared leadership–team performance relations. Journal of Management, 42(7), pp.1964-1991.
Day, D.V., Fleenor, J.W., Atwater, L.E., Sturm, R.E. and McKee, R.A., 2014. Advances in leader and leadership development: A review of 25 years of research and theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), pp.63-82.
Lewis, S., 2015. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Health promotion practice, 16(4), pp.473-475.
Mayoh, J. and Onwuegbuzie, A.J., 2015. Toward a conceptualization of mixed methods phenomenological research. Journal of mixed methods research, 9(1), pp.91-107.
McCleskey, J.A., 2014. Situational, transformational, and transactional leadership and leadership development. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 5(4), p.117.
Mertens, D.M., 2014. Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Sage publications.
Northouse, P.G., 2018. Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage publications.
Smith, J.A. ed., 2015. Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods. Sage.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download