The globalization of the economy is an important factor in the changes expected in the cross cultural management of the enterprise. Its main element will be people able to solve problems of combining the interests of their own country and other states, partnership between business and government agencies of different countries, competition and cooperation on a global scale, ethics and social responsibility of business, integration of cultures of peoples, strengthening of the role of man as the most valuable of all the resources that society has (Berry, John W). A major role is played also by changes in organizational forms and the nature of the activity of firms, the increase in the importance of broadcasting corporations in world economic relations.
Konigsbrau-TAK has a strategy that focuses on relations with beer distributers in Ukraine’s economy. The firm’s commercial strategy is the emphasis of this case. Thus, understanding the values of Ukrainian culture will best identify the reasoning behind the firm’s approach to its operating environment. Overall assessment of the effectiveness of personnel cross cultural management on the Completeness of the use of labor resources can be estimated by the number of days and hours worked by one employee for the analyzed period of time, as well as by the degree of utilization of the working time fund. Such an analysis is carried out for each category of employees, for each production unit and for the enterprise as a whole (Bird, Allan, and Mark E. Mendenhall).
The analysis of the use of the working time fund for 2011, 2013 and 2013 at Konigsbrau-TAK shows how working time is used in the year. Based on the cross cultural management strategy, one can see that in 2011 and 2012 the fact did not exceed the plan, which is very good for the enterprise. But in 2013 the fact exceeded the plan, due to maternity leave, which caused small losses to the enterprise, but despite this, the working time at the enterprise was used rationally and without large deviations.To select motivational actions, it is necessary to assess the motivational environment that creates the necessary incentives for effective work and achievement of goals.
The results of the questionnaire on the diagnosis of the motivational environment and the definition of the motivational profile determined the degree of interest of the employees in increasing the efficiency of the enterprise’s activity .It turned out that wages are one of the main motives for the work of drivers and the chief accountant (80%), and for the director and founder the most significant motive is the expansion of the company due to the good work of drivers and the chief accountant (92%).
The second significant motivational sign for Konigsbrau-TAK employees is the need for safe working conditions and social comfort in the team. The need for good attitude on the part of colleagues is observed in 35%, and the need for respect from the leader is revealed in 52%. Evaluation of cross cultural management effectiveness is of primary importance for many aspects of cross cultural management, since it determines the correctness, validity and effectiveness of the manager’s work. According to keller, The effectiveness of cross cultural management is a relative characteristic of the performance of a particular control system, reflected in various indicators both of the cross cultural management object and the cross cultural management activity proper (the cross cultural management entity). And these indicators have both quantitative and qualitative characteristics (French, Raymond). The effectiveness of the cross cultural management system should be expressed through the performance indicators of the managed system, although it may also have its own particular characteristics.
Any changes in the organization carried out by the cross cultural management apparatus must meet certain of its goals, the achievement of which predetermines whether or not the effective work of the organization will or not.
According to Keller, effectiveness is a consequence of the fact that “the right things are being done,” and efficiency is a consequence of the fact that “these things are correctly created”. So, ” Konigsbrau-TAK ” has defined a way of preparation of beer with their low cost price and with steadily high quality and it has reached success. The level of cross-cultural management effectiveness is largely determined by the level of rational organization of the managed system and cross cultural management process. Efficiency manifests itself in various indicators of both the cross cultural management object and the cross cultural management activity proper.
The main concepts of cross cultural management effectiveness are: the efficiency of the work of workers in the administrative apparatus; the effectiveness of the cross cultural management process; the effectiveness of the cross cultural management system, the effectiveness of the cross cultural management mechanism. The general efficiency formula: the ratio of the useful result to the volume of use of resources, or the ratio of quality (as a set of useful consumer properties) to costs.
To determine the effectiveness of cross cultural management, it is necessary, first of all, to really evaluate its effectiveness. First you need to find out what to consider a useful result of cross cultural management activity, and then – how to measure it.
Of fundamental importance for assessing the effectiveness of the cross cultural management system is the choice of the basis for comparison or the definition of the level of efficiency that is adopted for the normative. Here you can specify several approaches that can be differentiated in relation to specific cases.
The essence of the benchmark approach is reduced to comparison with the indicators characterizing the effectiveness of the organizational structure as a reference version of the cross cultural management system. The characteristics of this option are accepted as normative. The Ukrainian organizational culture as a reference variant, both the projected system and the actually functioning object can be adopted (Johnson, Jean L., and John B. Cullen). Then in the first case the comparative efficiency of the analyzed system is determined on the basis of a comparison of the normative and actual (design) parameters of the system, using mainly quantitative comparison methods. In the second case, the comparison is made with the performance indicators and the characteristics of the functioning control system.
Expert evaluation of the organizational and technical level can be conducted:
– For a comprehensive assessment of the cross cultural management system;
– Evaluation of individual subsystems;
– Evaluation of design and planning decisions.
The expert evaluation on organizational culture of IKEA is based on the use of a quantitative and qualitative approach, which makes it possible to evaluate the effectiveness of cross cultural management for a large number of factors.
Performance measures
– Volume (increase in volume) of output;
– profit (increase in profit);
– Prime cost (cost reduction);
– The volume of capital investments
– The quality of products, the timing of the introduction of new technology.
This, the so-called normative and cost indicators, which allow us to estimate both the number qualitatively, and qualitatively the cross cultural management process. The following characteristics can be assigned to the regulatory characteristics of the control apparatus: – productivity, – economy, – adaptability, – flexibility, – efficiency, – reliability. The productivity of the control apparatus can be defined as the quantity of the final product produced by the organization or the amount produced in the process of cross cultural management of information per one employee employed in the cross cultural management apparatus.
The cost-effectiveness of the cross cultural management apparatus is understood to be relative costs s on its functioning, commensurate with the volumes or performance results. The effectiveness of making cross cultural management decisions characterizes the timeliness of identifying managerial problems and the speed with which they are solved, which ensures maximum achievement of the set goals. The stability of the established production and supporting processes (Thomas, David C., and Mark F. Peterson). The reliability of the apparatus and cross cultural management as a whole is characterized by its trouble-free operation. If we consider the quality of the definition of goals and the statement of problems sufficient, then the reliability of the control apparatus can be relatively fully characterized by its performance, i.e. ability to provide planned tasks within the established deadlines and allocated resources.
According to Kluckhohns and Strodtbecks dimensions of value orientation to evaluate the effectiveness of cross cultural management operating in different culture, it is important to determine the conformity of the cross cultural management system and its organizational structure to the cross cultural management entity. This conformity is expressed by the indicators reflecting its dynamics: – the balance of the complex of functions and cross cultural management objectives, – the content completeness and integrity of the cross cultural management processes, – the correspondence of the number and composition of employees to the volume and complexity of the work, – the completeness of providing the production and technological processes with the required information, cross cultural management of technological facilities, taking into account their nomenclature, capacities and speed, – ensuring the structural-hierarchical correspondence of the indicators to the system the ability to adequately reflect the dynamism of controlled processes, the balance and consistency of indicators. It should be understood that the formation and implementation of a useful cross cultural management effect is not a one-off phenomenon, but as a lengthy process that encompasses different levels and links in the managerial process.
Their quality in many respects predetermines the effectiveness of cross cultural management in general and should be the subject of special analysis, evaluation and stimulation. Comparison of useful results of cross cultural management activities with the corresponding costs or used resources in a specific cross cultural management link, as a rule, is a common basis for determining the criteria for cross cultural management effectiveness (Karin Andreassi, Jeanine, et al). However, such a base, which makes it possible to relatively well solve the problem of efficiency in the sphere of economy and production, is completely unacceptable in the sphere of social and, consequently, in the spheres of state and municipal cross cultural management.
In the methodology of determining the effectiveness of cross cultural management, indicators and criteria for cross cultural management effectiveness differ. Performance indicators quantify the effect obtained, and efficiency criteria express qualitative requirements for choosing the optimal option for a managed object.
A reliable assessment of the effectiveness of cross cultural management should be comprehensive, which is ensured by the use of a system of cross cultural management effectiveness indicators, which includes:
– Labor efficiency of employees of the cross cultural management apparatus;
– The effectiveness of the cross cultural management process (functions, communications, adoption and implementation of decisions);
– The effectiveness of the cross cultural management system (hierarchy of cross cultural management);
– The effectiveness of the cross cultural management mechanism (structural-functional, financial, marketing, social, innovation).
The performance criteria of the organization are:
social efficiency – is characterized by qualitative indicators (improvement of professional skill, improvement of working and living conditions, formation of organizational culture, satisfying In general, an assessment of the effectiveness of the cross cultural management system is to compare the results of cross cultural management activities (the organization as a whole) and the costs (resources) associated with the functioning of the cross cultural management system taking into account the time factor. There are several approaches to calculating economic indicators that allow to directly or indirectly assess the effectiveness of cross cultural management. These are the following indicators.
With the transition to a market economy, there are fundamental changes in the system of enterprise cross cultural management. They are primarily caused by a decrease in the share and role of the state form of ownership with its inherent managerial ties, mainly “vertically” and administrative-command methods of cross cultural management. Accordingly, the role of commercial structures increases, the interrelations between which are built primarily “horizontally”, on contractual bases. A consequence of such changes are new approaches to the organization and quality of enterprise cross cultural management, as well as to cross cultural management personnel. When calculating the partial turnover indicators that characterize the intensity of the use of current assets at certain stages of the circuit, the turnover can be taken as turnover instead of the proceeds from sales: by production reserves – their consumption for production, at production costs – commodity output in the valuation at cost; on finished products – shipment of products at cost; for goods shipped – sale at cost.
Cross cultural management functions are formed on the basis of connecting managed objects with the stages of cross cultural management processes, for example: analysis of the state of production, resource planning, organization and promotion of commercial activities, information support of scientific and technological development, monitoring and regulation of economic development, evaluation of social development results (Moore, Fiona).
When determining the content of each function, work and operations are distinguished in it, the description of which serves as the basis for the organization both for its implementation (in general) and for the organization of the work of personnel performing this function. In the conditions of a market economy, a combination of groups of cross cultural management functions characterizes the content and scope of cross cultural management activity in an enterprise (Triandis, Harry C). Thus, the object of cross cultural management are all aspects of the enterprise – organizational, technical, economic, social.
Currently, it is urgent to consider issues of improving the cross cultural management of the enterprise and the methodological approaches to its evaluation. The way to increase the competitiveness of products lies through the improvement of the work of the enterprise, in this connection it is necessary to consider the main ways to improve the work of the enterprise, based on the use of world experience.
Important importance in the cross cultural management mechanism is the effectiveness of the existing organizational cross cultural management structure. When analyzing and designing organizations, one should consider the relationships of their elements, the structure, and also the mechanism of interaction of these elements within the framework of certain goals and the given structure of the organization. Organizational structure and organizational mechanism in all the diversity of their manifestations form organizational forms of cross cultural management.
Finally, effective cross cultural management in leadership of a modern enterprise is impossible without using the opportunities that modern information technologies and integrated cross cultural management systems of the main processes of the modern enterprise today provide for the head.
According to Carlyle, the history is shaped by extraordinary leaders. Ability to lead is simply in born and is not something that could be developed. The implications of trait theories are that;
The managerial grid model is a leadership style that is based on the concerns for people and their production. The thesis highlights important and important for each head of the Ukrainian enterprise problems. Among the issues discussed are, above all, economic policy in the cross cultural management of the enterprise, which allows not only to keep the enterprise “afloat”, but also to ensure its effective functioning at the present stage of economic development in Ukraine.
The Vroom- Yetton contingency model is an organizational psychological model developed by Victor Vroom and is a situational leadership theory. It argues that the best leadership style is contingent to the situation at hand. The managers of the company IKEA would like to see the main motivation for their subordinates – satisfaction from a job well done (62%), the need for security conditions and the need for awareness of the social importance of workers’ work (48% received both motives).
The analysis shows how the thinking of cross cultural management and staff differs. The choice of motivational activities is usually determined by the founder and director (Stahl, Günter K., et al.). In theory, there are methods for assessing the effectiveness of personnel cross cultural management, such as:
– labor productivity;
– Labor intensity;
– Profitability of the personnel.
The calculation of the personnel cross cultural management effectiveness indicators at Konigsbrau-TAK is presented in
– Calculation of indicators of the assessment of the effectiveness of personnel cross cultural management at the company Konigsbrau-TAK
For keller, there is another group of indicators for assessing the effectiveness of personnel cross cultural management at Konigsbrau-TAK, which includes a set of performance indicators of staff, which include such indicators as staff turnover, labor discipline level and others.
Some types of enterprise assets have different turnover rates. To identify the reasons for the change in the general turnover of current assets, one should analyze the dynamics of indicators of turnover of circulating assets through the stages of the circuit (Steers, Richard M., and Carlos J. Sánchez?Runde). This will allow keller to determine at which stages the acceleration or deceleration of the movement of labor occurred, that is, at what speed each element of working capital passes from one functional form to another.
Berry, John W. “Global psychology: Implications for cross-cultural research and management.” Cross Cultural Management 22.3 (2015): 342-355.
Bird, Allan, and Mark E. Mendenhall. “From cross-cultural management to global leadership: Evolution and adaptation.” Journal of World Business 51.1 (2016): 115-126.
French, Raymond. Cross-cultural management in work organisations. Kogan Page Publishers, 2015.
Johnson, Jean L., and John B. Cullen. “Trust in cross?cultural relationships.” The Blackwell Handbook of Cross?Cultural Management (2017): 335-360.
Karin Andreassi, Jeanine, et al. “Cultural impact of human resource practices on job satisfaction: A global study across 48 countries.” Cross cultural management 21.1 (2014): 55-77.
Moore, Fiona. “Towards a complex view of culture: cross-cultural management,‘native categories’, and their impact on concepts of management and organisation.” The Routledge Companion to Cross-Cultural Management. Routledge, 2015. 69-77.
Stahl, Günter K., et al. “The upside of cultural differences: Towards a more balanced treatment of culture in cross-cultural management research.” Cross Cultural & Strategic Management 24.1 (2017): 2-12.
Steers, Richard M., and Carlos J. Sánchez?Runde. “Culture, motivation, and work behavior.” The Blackwell Handbook of Cross?Cultural Management (2017): 190-216.
Thomas, David C., and Mark F. Peterson. Cross-cultural management: Essential concepts. Sage Publications, 2017.
Triandis, Harry C. “Generic individualism and collectivism.” The Blackwell handbook of cross?cultural management(2017): 16-45
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download
