What is the problem?
Computer or Laptop is the essential things for everyone. Today we can get the laptop easily by online store. We can found many online store for purchasing desired laptops. We can get the desired product within time at home door. As the online shopping business increasing exponentially it invites opportunities and challenges for the service provider. Business competition and customer satisfactions are key challenges before all the service provider. Wolfinbarger and Gilly (2001) reported that “consumers report that shopping online results in a substantially increased sense of freedom and control as compared to offline shopping.” Lee and Lin (2005) developed the research model for examining the relationship among e?service quality dimensions and overall service quality, customer satisfaction and purchase intentions. Koufaris and Hampton-Sosa (2004) studied the development of trust among the customers for online purchase. Kim and Forsythe (2010) studied the factors affecting adoption of product virtualization technology for online consumer electronics shopping.
For this case study, we have developed the data. We have data regarding the sale of laptops (1600 products) in the month. We considered the following attributes
We defined the following variables for the study objectives as
Total Monthly sale amount (in $) = Sale Price (in $) × Number of customers
Total monthly profit (in $) = Profit (in $) × Number of customers
We concentrate on the following
In literature, we can find many tools and techniques for the data analysis. But analysis through statistical tools and techniques provide strong base to the analysis.
We presented the total monthly sale amount (in $) and total monthly profit (in $) along with profit percentage for shipping type, customer type, region, brand, CPU type, operating system, screen size, memory size, hard disk size and touch sensor in Profit analysis. We reported the descriptive statistics for number of customers for shipping type, customer type, region, brand, CPU type, operating system, screen size, memory size, hard disk size and touch sensor. We used t-test and one way ANOVA for the testing the difference between levels of shipping type, customer type, region, brand, CPU type, operating system, screen size, memory size, hard disk size and touch sensor. We carried the correlation analysis to study the correlation between variables. We predict the total monthly sale by regression analysis. We used Python 3.6.5 and MS-Excel for the data analysis. The sample code are given in appendixes. We used Grus (2015), McKinney (2012), Zelle (2004), Monk (2015), Hammond and Robinson (2000), Chun (2001), Pedregosa et al. (2011) and Schutt and O’Neil (2013)
In this section, we carried the following
We presented the total monthly sale amount (in $) and total monthly profit (in $) along with profit percentage for shipping type, customer type, region, brand, CPU type, operating system, screen size, memory size, hard disk size and touch sensor in Profit analysis. We referred Berenson et al. (2012), Black (2009), Groebner et al. (2008), Kvanli et al. (2000) and Mendenhall and Sincich (1993). In Table 1, we have reported the total monthly sale amount (in $) and total monthly profit (in $) along with profit percentage for shipping type, customer type, region, brand, CPU type, operating system, screen size, memory size, hard disk size and touch sensor.
Table 1: Profit analysis according to different attributes
Attributes |
Levels |
Total Monthly Sale (in $) |
Total Monthly Profit (in $) |
Profit % |
Shipping Type |
Free |
3093026.5 |
152231.5 |
4.92% |
Paid |
6951139.9 |
353702.9 |
5.09% |
|
Customer Type |
Existing |
1015929.8 |
49780.8 |
4.90% |
New |
9028236.6 |
456153.6 |
5.05% |
|
Region |
NSW |
1884071.5 |
91895.5 |
4.88% |
QLD |
1774342.6 |
89607.6 |
5.05% |
|
SA |
1871543.8 |
94747.8 |
5.06% |
|
TAS |
1812892.9 |
90971.9 |
5.02% |
|
VIC |
943429.9 |
50029.9 |
5.30% |
|
WA |
1757885.7 |
88681.7 |
5.04% |
|
Brand |
Dell |
2135337.4 |
99608.4 |
4.66% |
HP |
2105471.1 |
104055.1 |
4.94% |
|
Lenevo |
2537893.5 |
157358.5 |
6.20% |
|
Sony |
3265464.4 |
144912.4 |
4.44% |
|
CPU Type |
i3 |
2929859.6 |
158438.6 |
5.41% |
i5 |
3019792.6 |
152197.6 |
5.04% |
|
i7 |
4094514.2 |
195298.2 |
4.77% |
|
Memory Size |
2GB |
2213641.6 |
119639.6 |
5.40% |
4GB |
2201859.5 |
113845.5 |
5.17% |
|
6GB |
2586779.8 |
127227.8 |
4.92% |
|
8GB |
3041885.5 |
145221.5 |
4.77% |
|
Operating System |
Windows 10 |
4989962.9 |
255102.9 |
5.11% |
Windows 7 |
5054203.5 |
250831.5 |
4.96% |
|
Hard Disk |
1TB |
3434552.6 |
175334.6 |
5.11% |
2TB |
3593685.9 |
168929.9 |
4.70% |
|
500GB |
3015927.9 |
161669.9 |
5.36% |
|
Screen Size (in Inches) |
11.6 |
2531037.1 |
139326.1 |
5.50% |
14 |
2309630.8 |
120317.8 |
5.21% |
|
15.6 |
2428520.4 |
119635.4 |
4.93% |
|
17.3 |
2774978.1 |
126655.1 |
4.56% |
|
Touch Sensor |
No TouchScreen |
4749528.9 |
242770.9 |
5.11% |
TouchScreen |
5294637.5 |
263163.5 |
4.97% |
|
Total |
10044166.4 |
505934.4 |
5.04% |
From Table 1 we can claim that company earns on average 5.04% profit on each laptop. Free shipping gives (4.92%) profit less than paid shipping (5.09%). New customers produces 5.05% profit whereas existing gives 4.90%. In the region, VIC gives 5.30% profit whereas NSW produces only 4.88% profit. In the brand, Lenevo produces 6.20% whereas Sony only gives 4.44% profit. In CPU type, i3 gives more profit and i7 gives less profit. Profit percentage decreases as memory size increases. In operating system, Windows 7 produces less profit than Windows 10. Profit percentage increases as memory size and screen size decreases. Company earns more profit in non-touch screen laptops than touch screen laptops.
For any business, total sale and total profit can be maximized by attracting more customers by different marketing strategies. In this subsection, we look at the some summary statistics for number of customers who bought the laptops for shipping type, customer type, region, brand, CPU type, operating system, screen size, memory size, hard disk size and touch sensor. We used the well-known books for this section such as Ivezi? et al. (2014), Lind (2013), Bickel and Doksum (2015), Casella and Berger (2002), DeGroot and Schervish (2012), Hodges Jr and Lehmann (2005), Papoulis (1990), Pillers (2002), Moyé et al. (2017), Larsen and Marx (2017), Devore and Berk (2007), Rao et al. (1973) and Ross (2014). Table 2 represents the size, mean, standard deviation, minimum and maximum of number of customers for shipping type, customer type, region, brand, CPU type, operating system, screen size, memory size, hard disk size and touch sensor.
Table 2: Summary statistics for numbers of customer for shipping type, customer type, region, brand, CPU type, operating system, screen size, memory size, hard disk size and touch sensor
Attributes |
Levels |
Size |
Mean |
Standard Deviation |
Min |
Max |
Shipping Type |
Free |
499 |
7.59 |
3.48 |
1 |
23 |
Paid |
1101 |
7.72 |
3.26 |
1 |
21 |
|
Customer Type |
Existing |
163 |
7.58 |
3.33 |
2 |
20 |
New |
1437 |
7.69 |
3.33 |
1 |
23 |
|
Region |
NSW |
303 |
7.57 |
3.51 |
1 |
21 |
QLD |
290 |
7.50 |
3.12 |
1 |
17 |
|
SA |
296 |
7.71 |
3.16 |
1 |
18 |
|
TAS |
269 |
8.17 |
3.13 |
1 |
21 |
|
VIC |
167 |
6.94 |
3.39 |
1 |
17 |
|
WA |
275 |
7.92 |
3.59 |
1 |
23 |
|
Brand |
Dell |
375 |
7.12 |
2.99 |
1 |
17 |
HP |
406 |
6.93 |
3.01 |
1 |
17 |
|
Lenevo |
403 |
7.29 |
3.04 |
1 |
17 |
|
Sony |
416 |
9.29 |
3.66 |
1 |
23 |
|
CPU Type |
i3 |
536 |
7.13 |
3.06 |
1 |
21 |
i5 |
525 |
7.07 |
3.01 |
1 |
19 |
|
i7 |
539 |
8.83 |
3.58 |
1 |
23 |
|
Memory Size |
2GB |
396 |
7.55 |
3.48 |
1 |
23 |
4GB |
390 |
7.21 |
2.92 |
1 |
16 |
|
6GB |
422 |
7.30 |
3.19 |
1 |
19 |
|
8GB |
392 |
8.69 |
3.51 |
1 |
21 |
|
Operating System |
Windows 10 |
804 |
7.68 |
3.25 |
1 |
21 |
Windows 7 |
796 |
7.68 |
3.41 |
1 |
23 |
|
Hard Disk |
1TB |
510 |
8.24 |
3.21 |
1 |
21 |
2TB |
555 |
7.49 |
3.47 |
1 |
20 |
|
500GB |
535 |
7.34 |
3.23 |
1 |
23 |
|
Screen Size (in Inches) |
11.6 |
408 |
8.31 |
3.48 |
1 |
23 |
14 |
393 |
7.38 |
3.30 |
1 |
20 |
|
15.6 |
387 |
7.47 |
3.25 |
1 |
21 |
|
17.3 |
412 |
7.53 |
3.22 |
1 |
18 |
|
Touch Sensor |
No TouchScreen |
811 |
7.31 |
3.26 |
1 |
23 |
TouchScreen |
789 |
8.06 |
3.36 |
1 |
21 |
|
Total |
1600 |
7.68 |
3.33 |
1 |
23 |
From Table2, we can observed following
Here we are interested to know whether there is significant difference between the mean of number of customers for shipping type, customer type, operating system and touch sensor. We have following null and alternative hypothesis.
Null hypothesis: There is no significant difference between mean of number of customers for levels of attributes.
Alternative hypothesis: There is significant difference between mean of number of customers for levels of attributes.
We used two sample independent test assuming unequal variances for testing above null and alternative hypothesis. Table 4 represents the value of test statistic and p-value of two sample independent test assuming unequal variances.
Table 4: Two sample independent test for shipping type, customer type, Operating system and Touch Sensor
Attributes |
Levels |
Test Statistic |
p-value |
Shipping Type |
Free and Paid |
-0.74 |
0.461 |
Customer Type |
New and Existing |
-0.41 |
0.681 |
Operating System |
Windows 7 and Windows 10 |
0.02 |
0.985 |
Touch Sensor |
TouchScreen and No TouchScreen |
-4.55 |
0.000 |
From Table 4 we observed that
In this subsection, we are interested to know whether there is significant difference between the mean of number of customers for region, brand, CPU type, Memory size, Hard disk size and Screen size. We perform one way ANOVA for testing the following null and alternative hypothesis.
Null Hypothesis: There is no significant difference between mean of number of customers for levels of attributes
Alternative hypothesis: There is significant difference between mean of number of customers for levels of attributes.
Table 5, represents the F statistic and P value of one way ANOVA for region, brand, CPU type, Memory size, Hard disk size and Screen size.
Table 5: Output of one way ANOVA for region, brand, CPU type, Memory size, Hard disk size and Screen size
Attributes |
Level |
F Statistic |
P Value |
Region |
NSW, QLD, WA, VIC, TAS and SA |
3.33 |
0.005 |
Brand |
HP, Dell, Lenevo and Sony |
48.65 |
0.000 |
CPU Type |
i3, i5 and i7 |
51.25 |
0.000 |
Memory Size |
2GB, 4GB, 6GB and 8GB |
17.06 |
0.000 |
Hard Disk Size |
500 GB, 1TB and 2TB |
11.15 |
0.000 |
Screen Size (in inches) |
11.1, 14, 15.6 and 17.1 |
6.86 |
0.000 |
From Table 5, we observed that there is significant difference between the mean of number of customers for different region, brand, CPU type, Memory size, Hard disk size and Screen size. Mean number of customers are relatively less in VIC region than other region. Number of customers is more for laptops having following characteristics
Brand: Sony
CPU type : i7
Memory Size : 8GB
Hard Disk: 1TB
Screen Size: 11.3 inches
Here we studied the correlation between product price, Sale price, profit and number of customers. Table 6 shows the correlation matrix for product price, Sale price, profit and number of customers.
Table 6: Pearson’s correlation coefficient for Product Price, Sale Price, Profit and Numbers of customers
Product Price |
Sale Price |
Profit |
Numbers of customer |
|
Product Price |
1 |
0.994 |
0.130 |
0.186 |
Sale Price |
0.994 |
1 |
0.240 |
0.183 |
Profit |
0.130 |
0.240 |
1 |
0.011 |
Numbers of customer |
0.186 |
0.183 |
0.011 |
1 |
From Table 6, we observed that product price is positive correlated with sale price, profit and number of customers, sale price is positively related with profit and number of customers and profit is also positively correlated with number of customers.
We used simple linear regression model for predicting the monthly sale using number of customers as predictor variable. Table 7 represents the F Statistics, P value, R2 and regression coefficients of simple linear regression.
Table 7: Output of Regression Analysis
F Statistic |
14851.58 |
P Value |
0.000 |
R2 |
0.903 |
Intercept |
-407.8 |
Slope |
870.6 |
We observed that P Value =0.000 suggests that there is significant relationship between total monthly sale and number of customers. We also observed R2 as 0.903 suggests that model fitting is adequate. We fitted the following straight line as
Total sale (in $) = -407.8 + 870.6 × Number of Customers
Each additional customer gives the $870.6 sale to the company.
An implementation plan based on the recommendations you have provided
Conclusions
We observed that company earns on average 5.04% profit on each laptop. Free shipping gives (4.92%) profit less than paid shipping (5.09%). New customers produces 5.05% profit whereas existing gives 4.90%. In the region, VIC gives 5.30% profit whereas NSW produces only 4.88% profit. In the brand, Lenevo produces 6.20% whereas Sony only gives 4.44% profit. In CPU type, i3 gives more profit and i7 gives less profit. Profit percentage decreases as memory size increases. In operating system, Windows 7 produces less profit than Windows 10. Profit percentage increases as memory size and screen size decreases. Company earns more profit in non-touch screen laptops than touch screen laptops. Company get averagely 7.68 customers for each laptop.
We observed no significant difference between mean of number of customers for shipping type, customer type and operating system whereas we observed there is significant difference between mean of number of customers for laptops with touch screen and without touch screen. We observed that there is significant difference between the mean of number of customers for different region, brand, CPU type, Memory size, Hard disk size and Screen size. We also observed that profit is positively correlated with number of customers. From the regression analysis, we observed that monthly sale and number of customers are significantly related with each other.
We have also provided recommendations and plan for company.
References
Bachmeyer, C., Bensaid, P., & Bégon, E. (2009). Laptop computer as a modern cause of erythema ab igne. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 23(6), 736-737.
Berenson, M., Levine, D., Szabat, K.A. and Krehbiel, T.C., (2012). Basic business statistics: Concepts and applications. Pearson higher education AU.
Bickel, P.J. and Doksum, K.A., (2015). Mathematical statistics: basic ideas and selected topics, volume I (Vol. 117). CRC Press.
Black, K., (2009). Business statistics: Contemporary decision making. John Wiley & Sons.
Carroll, R. J. (2017). Transformation and weighting in regression. Routledge.Casella, G. and Berger, R.L., (2002). Statistical inference (Vol. 2). Pacific Grove, CA: Duxbury.
Chun, W. (2001). Core python programming (Vol. 1). Prentice Hall Professional.
DeGroot, M.H. and Schervish, M.J., (2012). Probability and statistics. Pearson Education.
Devore, J. L., & Berk, K. N. (2007). Modern mathematical statistics with applications. Cengage Learning.
Groebner, D.F., Shannon, P.W., Fry, P.C. and Smith, K.D., (2008). Business statistics. Pearson Education.
Grus, J., (2015). Data science from scratch: first principles with python. ” O’Reilly Media, Inc.”.
Hammond, M., & Robinson, A. (2000). Python Programming on Win32: Help for Windows Programmers. ” O’Reilly Media, Inc.”.
Hodges Jr, J.L. and Lehmann, E.L., (2005). Basic concepts of probability and statistics. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
Ivezi?, Ž., Connolly, A. J., VanderPlas, J. T., & Gray, A. (2014). Statistics, Data Mining, and Machine Learning in Astronomy: A Practical Python Guide for the Analysis of Survey Data. Princeton University Press.
Kim, J., & Forsythe, S. (2010). Factors affecting adoption of product virtualization technology for online consumer electronics shopping. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 38(3), 190-204.
Koufaris, M., & Hampton-Sosa, W. (2004). The development of initial trust in an online company by new customers. Information & management, 41(3), 377-397.
Kvanli, A.H., Pavur, R.J. and Guynes, C.S., (2000). Introduction to business statistics. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.
Larsen, R. J., & Marx, M. L. (2017). An introduction to mathematical statistics and its applications (Vol. 5). Pearson.
Lee, G. G., & Lin, H. F. (2005). Customer perceptions of e-service quality in online shopping. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 33(2), 161-176.
Lind, D. A., Marchal, W. G., Wathen, S. A., & Waite, C. A. (2013). Basic statistics for business and economics. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
McKinney, W., (2012). Python for data analysis: Data wrangling with Pandas, NumPy, and IPython. ” O’Reilly Media, Inc.”.
Mendenhall, W. and Sincich, T., (1993). A second course in business statistics: Regression analysis. San Francisco: Dellen.
Monk, S. (2015). Programming the Raspberry Pi: getting started with Python. TAB Electronics.
Moyé, L. A., Chan, W., & Kapadia, A. S. (2017). Mathematical statistics with applications. CRC Press.
Papoulis, A., (1990). Probability & statistics (Vol. 2). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V. and Vanderplas, J., (2011). Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python. Journal of machine learning research, 12(Oct), pp.2825-2830.
Pillers Dobler, Carolyn. “Mathematical statistics: Basic ideas and selected topics.” (2002): 332-332.
Rao, C. R., Rao, C. R., Statistiker, M., Rao, C. R., & Rao, C. R. (1973). Linear statistical inference and its applications (Vol. 2, pp. 263-270). New York: Wiley.
Ross, S.M., (2014). Introduction to probability and statistics for engineers and scientists. Academic Press.
Schutt, R. and O’Neil, C., (2013). Doing data science: Straight talk from the frontline. ” O’Reilly Media, Inc.”.
Wolfinbarger, M. and Gilly, M.C., (2001). Shopping online for freedom, control, and fun. California Management Review, 43(2), pp.34-55.
Zelle, J. M. (2004). Python programming: an introduction to computer science. Franklin, Beedle & Associates, Inc..
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order formOnce we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignmentAs soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download