The bacterial strains which will be used for differentiation through the selective media and microscopy are: Bacillus subtilis, Enterococcus faecalis, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Proteus mirabilis, Enterobacter cloacae, Escherichia coli
Bacillus subtilis- It is a catalase positive and gram positive bacteria which is found within the gastrointestinal tract of human and ruminants and also found in soil. The various identification tests which gives positive result are: Acid from glucose, acid from sucrose, catalase activity, endospore staining, gram stain. Bacillus subtilis grows in TSA plates and broth cultures.
Under the light microscope, the flagella are clearly viewable with whip like log tails. Bacillus subtilis has peritrichous flagella. This means that the cell is entirely covered with small tails. The tails are visible under a light microscope by staining with a specialized stain (Sciencedirect.com, 2018).
Enterococcus faecalis- It is a gram positive bacterium that inhabits in the gastrointestinal tract of the mammals and other humans. The various identification test which gives a positive result are: gram staining, fermentation assays of glucose, sucrose, lactose are positive. Enterococcus faecalis grows in TSA plates, EMB plates, PEA plates, broth and slope cultures.
This bacterium is closely related to the streptococci and under the microscope appear to be cocci or spheres. It divides through binary fission and form chains of bacteria (Lebreton, Willems and Gilmore 2014).
Staphylococcus epidermidis- It is a gram positive bacteria, which is a typically found on the human skin flora and is not pathogenic. However, if a person has a weak immunity then there is an increased chance of infection development. The various identification test which gives a positive result are: gram staining, hydrogen sulphide, fermentation assay of glucose, sucrose and lactose are positive. Staphylococcus epidermidis grows in TSA plate and broth, EMB plate, PEA plate.
The colonies of Staphylococcus epidermidis under the microscopic view shows grape like clusters, the colonies are cohesive and raised and measure about 1 to 2 mm in diameter (Namvar et al. 2014).
Proteus mirabilis- It is an anaerobic bacterium that exhibits in soil and water. This bacterium is responsible for the majority of infection in humans. The various identification test which gives a positive result are: hydrogen sulphide test, fermentation assay of glucose is positive. Proteus mirabilis grows in TSA plates and broth, PEA plate, EMB plate, SIM stab culture including use of Kovak’s reagent.
The bacterium under the microscopic view is rod shaped with elongated flagella (Armbruster and Mobley2012).
Enterobacter cloacae- The various identification test which gives a positive result are: fermentation assay of glucose and sucrose is positive. Enterobacter cloacae grows in TSA plates, SIM stab culture including use of Kovak’s reagent, broth and slant cultures.
The microscopic view of the Enterobacter cloacae reveal straight rods, the colonies range from 1.2 to 3 micrometer, have 4 to 6 peritrichous flagella (Davin-Regli and Pagès 2015).
Escherichia coli- The various identification test which gives a positive result are: fermentation assay of glucose and lactose is positive and is variable is sucrose. Enterobacter cloacae grows in TSA plate and broth, PEA plate, EMB plate, SIM stab culture including use of Kovak’s reagent.The microscopic view of the Escherichia coli reveal rod shape, 2 to 6 micrometers, occur in several strains and are found to be in capsules, either occur in pairs or in single (Canada.ca, 2018).
The unknown bacteria showing following characteristics: gram negative, short rod, hydrogen sulphide producer and ferments sucrose to give acid and gas.
The bacteria identified from the given characteristic is Aeromonas hydrophila. Identification of this bacteria, involves the macroscopic tests, biochemistry test and gram staining. Microscopic tests are done through gram staining and observing the color and shape of the bacteria, including the biochemical tests. The biochemical test included the indol test, motile test and hydrogen sulphide test. The results of the identification tests revealed gram negative staining, form of short rod and motile. Whereas, the biochemical tests revealed the test results to be fermentative, negative indol, positive oxides and positive glucose. Thus, from the several tests conducted Aeromonas hydrophila can be identified to be exhibiting the similar characteristics (Kusdarwati, Kurniawan and Prayogi 2017).
In this part of the study, a pear is found to be showing signs of brown rot which is caused by an unknown bacterial pathogen. To identify this unknown pathogen, a procedure can be followed known as Koch’s postulate. Koch’s postulate is developed by a German physician named Robert Koch in the year 1890. This postulate is used to effectively judge a given bacterium which is responsible for the cause of the disease. This postulate brought the much needed clarity within the study of the plant pathology which was previously filled with confusions (Wingfield et al. 2012).
The stages that are used to carry out the Koch’s Postulates in order to identify the bacterial rot on pear are as follows:
The various stages in the Koch’s postulates requires the usage of certain instrument will be required that will assist in carrying out of the experimental procedure. Culture media (agar plates), scalpel, 70% alcohol for sterilizing the scalpel and the table surface, candle flame.
The pathogen which is causing the brown rot in pear is found to be a fungi called Monilinia laxa (Poniatowska, Michalecka and Bielenin 2013).
Reference
Armbruster, C.E. and Mobley, H.L., 2012. Merging mythology and morphology: the multifaceted lifestyle of Proteus mirabilis. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 10(11), pp.743-754.
Barak, J.D. and Schroeder, B.K., 2012. Interrelationships of food safety and plant pathology: the life cycle of human pathogens on plants. Annual review of phytopathology, 50, pp.241-266.
Canada.ca, P., 2018. Pathogen Safety Data Sheets: Infectious Substances – Escherichia coli, enteropathogenic – Canada.ca. [online] Canada.ca. Available at: https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/laboratory-biosafety-biosecurity/pathogen-safety-data-sheets-risk-assessment/escherichia-coli-enteropathogenic.html [Accessed 18 Jan. 2018].
Davin-Regli, A. and Pagès, J.M., 2015. Enterobacter aerogenes and Enterobacter cloacae; versatile bacterial pathogens confronting antibiotic treatment. Frontiers in microbiology, 6.
Kusdarwati, R., Kurniawan, H. and Prayogi, Y.T., 2017, February. Isolation and Identification of Aeromonas hydrophila and Saprolegnia sp. on Catfish (Clarias gariepinus) in Floating cages in Bozem Moro Krembangan Surabaya. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 55, No. 1, p. 012038). IOP Publishing.
Lebreton, F., Willems, R.J. and Gilmore, M.S., 2014. Enterococcus diversity, origins in nature, and gut colonization.
Namvar, A.E., Bastarahang, S., Abbasi, N., Ghehi, G.S., Farhadbakhtiarian, S., Arezi, P., Hosseini, M., Baravati, S.Z., Jokar, Z. and Chermahin, S.G., 2014. Clinical characteristics of Staphylococcus epidermidis: a systematic review. GMS hygiene and infection control, 9(3).
Poniatowska, A., Michalecka, M. and Bielenin, A., 2013. Characteristic of Monilinia spp. fungi causing brown rot of pome and stone fruits in Poland. European journal of plant pathology, 135(4), pp.855-865.
Sciencedirect.com, 2018. Bacillus Subtilis – an overview | ScienceDirect Topics. [online] Sciencedirect.com. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/biochemistry-genetics-and-molecular-biology/bacillus-subtilis [Accessed 18 Jan. 2018].
Wingfield, M.J., De Beer, Z.W., Slippers, B., Wingfield, B.D., Groenewald, J.Z., Lombard, L. and Crous, P.W., 2012. One fungus, one name promotes progressive plant pathology. Molecular plant pathology, 13(6), pp.604-613.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order formOnce we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignmentAs soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download