1. In your own words, how would you describe the problem statement? That is, what are the Ministry’s objectives and for what purposes will the fi ndings of the ongoing surveys be used?
2. What are the specifi c measurements being taken in the survey?
3. Look at the section on the methodology used. What channel was used to obtain the information? Do you think this might create a bias in the results? If so, say why?
4. What were the fi ndings of the research? Briefly describe?
1. In the late 20th century, the world witnesses the transformation from analogue to digital television. This culminated in the development of digitally integrated world that moulds the vision of the people (Fuller & Basher, 2013). The problem statement explores the reasons for research objectives, methodology and the variants of the measurements adopted. In the section, the Ministry of New Zealand has adopted some objectives. The Ministry of New Zealand aims to supervise the swelling rates of digital television that helps shape the decision regarding the digital shift date (Oren & Shahaf, 2013). Another objective is to regulate awareness and comprehend the digital shift in the domain of Information Technology. With the help of the paradigm drift, a public awareness campaign can be targeted. The ministry aims to locate barriers to the skyrocketed results. It composes a blueprint of the awareness of the digital television. The ministry targets at the transmutation of television sets that receive the swelling targets of the digital television. The ministry intends to convert the main set to the reception of digital signals. The ministry of New Zealand targets at the comprehension of digital television. It shows how the world perceives the changing dynamic of the world of television from analogue to digital television. At the same time, it deals with the modern changes that influenced the world of television (Ellis & Kent, 2015)
The main purpose of conducting the survey is to understand the digital take-up in the households of New Zealand. The country New Zealand witnesses a revolutionary wave of change from analogue to the digital television. The survey explains that a high proportion of households in New Zealand have received digital television. The survey mentions that the regions of Hawkes Bay and South Island have drifted to the digital television from the conventional analogue systems (Barker, 2016). The survey was conducted to identify and analyze the digital progression among the domestic areas. The domestic households should have the regular television sets used in the last six months. The survey shows an ever-increasing rate of usage of digital television in New Zealand.
During that time, the country New Zealand witnessed a new wave, as far as the digitization was concerned. The country saw an absolute haul of television and the phase of digitization became a new fad. The survey report was conducted in New Zealand in the year 2013 using the last six months index. The breakdown of the survey report shows that the regions of New Zealand like Northland, Wellington and Waikato witness an ever-increasing rate of digital take up in the broader sense (McAnally et al., 2014). At the same time, the survey shows the rate of digital take up in the remote regions of New Zealand. The survey considers the age and ethnicity factors while computing the digital advancement in the varied regions of New Zealand. The survey helps to decipher many important facts related to the digital development of the regions of New Zealand for the last six months in the year 2013 (Lachapelle & Maarek, 2015). Conclusively, the survey is useful to comprehend the digital take up in variegated regions of New Zealand.
2. The measurement needs derived for two reasons. One of the components is to see measurable results from the communication activity. The section identifies and analyzes the measures adopted for the survey. The first measure is Take-up National conversion (comprising the South Island and Hawkes Bay). The survey shows that the Take-up has risen from 91% to 94%. Take-up National conversion (including the South Island and Hawkes Bay) has significantly increased from 91% to 94% (Zealand, 2015). The survey shows that conversion is 91% in the Lower North Island and 92% in the Upper North Island. Another measure is General Awareness that comprises the population of South Island and Hawkes Bay. The National awareness of the regions of the switchover is estimated at 92%. The Lower North Island residents comprise the people living in the Upper North Island and are aware of the paradigm shift (93% relative to 89%). Another measure that is considered is Cognizance of Households in the North Island (Curtin et al., 2014). It is believed that 84% of households in the North Island know that the switchover occurs. After the occurrence of the switchover, the households of North Island would not be able to watch television that are not compatible with Sky, Vodafone, Cable TV, Freeview or Igloo. Like the residents of Upper North Island, the Lower North Island has the knowledge of the switchover (88% relative to 82%). The ken of the shifting data has greatly revised for both the Lower and Upper North Island. For the case of the Lower North Island, the shift of the data has exponentially revised (from 56% to 69%) and the Upper North Island (from 46% to 56%). Like the survey of the last quarter, Lower North Island inhabitants are more knowledgeable compared to the residents of the Upper North Island (Schweizer et al., 2014). They have the cognizance of the occurrence of switchover in the regions of New Zealand. The 44% of families know that their recording gadget needs to go advanced at a rapid pace. The 45% of family units from the Lower North Island know about this and 43% of families in the Upper North Island know about these outcomes. Comprehension of their own advanced status has remained moderately reliable among both changed over family units and unconverted families. The 91% of changed over family units know they have computerized TV and 71% of unconverted families know they are simple. Barrier Cost is the essential thing that facilitates computerized TV (29% and 20% as the main barrier). Contrary to the last quarter, there has been a rise in the non-convertible household units. These households are content with the present programmes and channels (from 3% to 11%). This variant of households forms a small proportion in the index of New Zealand. Summing up, these four measures are useful in conducting the comprehensive survey adopted for the switchover regions (Oren & Shahaf, 2013). These four measures help to conduct the survey and generate results with ease.
3. In the section, the quantitative research methodology is used. Telephone survey was conducted on the household to derive substantial information. The telephone survey was conducted on households (the sample includes the heads of private residences using telephone line). The research includes eight minutes questionnaire and conducted on the household in 2013. The telephone survey records a moderate 38.06% response rate (Horrocks, 2016). While conducting the survey, a minimum of 1600 interviews were conducted in every Regional Council. At the same time, there was a uniform spread in the switchover regions. The data gathered from household composite includes household sizes blended with age, ethnicity (Maori and non-Maori) and regional variation (urban and non-urban). Differences in results between the present and past wave are estimated at the 95% from the earlier statistics (Vered & Humphreys, 2014).
Once a locale has exchanged over, they are not incorporated in the overview. For example, the West Coast and Hawkes Bay have been abandoned from wave 10 onwards and whatever remains of the South Island has been rejected from wave 13 (Crothers et al., 2016) Wave 4 rejected Canterbury, inasmuch of the tremor. Along these lines local comes about for Wave 4 bar Canterbury and national outcomes for Wave 4 speak to ‘all of New Zealand less Canterbury’. An attempt is made to revise the sample. The wave involves the respondents of the North Island (Reid, 2016). The main reason behind including the candidates of the North Island is that South Island and Hawkes Bay drifted their path. It implies that the national results from the existing quarter cannot be compared with the results of the previous quarter. Another revision is the complete questionnaire does not contain any indication of TelstraClear. Here, the response is changed to Vodafone (Hutchins et al., 2015). In the questionnaire, the ‘Choice TV’ made an entry to the list of channels that determine the digital transmutation status. In the section, an array of questions includes revised contacts that were introduced at the last part of the survey. All through the report, the nett scores have been ascertained (e.g. consolidating marginally and emphatically concur and so forth.) utilizing the crude information. Because of adjusting, physically consolidating the two separate rates may deliver a unique result. The Net score does not give us authentic information. At the same time, the survey consists of the respondents of the North Island. The respondents of South Island and Hawkes Bay are not included. Therefore, there was a discrepancy in the national survey result. The result of the previous quarter has no relation with the result of the existing quarter (Mackey et al., 2015).
4. Take-up National conversion (including the South Island and Hawkes Bay) is important. The overview demonstrates that the Take-up has ascended from 91% to 94%. Take-up National change (counting the South Island and Hawkes Bay) has altogether expanded from 91% to 94% (Zealand, 2015). The study demonstrates that change is 91% in the Lower North Island and 92% in the Upper North Island. Another point is General Awareness that contains the number of inhabitants in South Island and Hawkes Bay. The National consciousness of the locales of the switchover is assessed at 92%. The Lower North Island occupants include the general population living in the Upper North Island and know about the outlook change (93% with respect to 89%). As per the findings of the Colman Brunton report, the knowledge of the shifting data has greatly revised for both the Lower and Upper North Island. For the case of the Lower North Island, the shift of the data has exponentially revised (from 56% to 69%) and the Upper North Island (from 46% to 56%). Like the survey of the last quarter, Lower North Island inhabitants are more knowledgeable compared to the residents of the Upper North Island (Schweizer et al., 2014). They have the cognizance of the occurrence of switchover in the regions of New Zealand. The 44% of families know that their recording gadget needs to go advanced at a rapid pace. The 45% of family units from the Lower North Island know about this and 43% of families in the Upper North Island know about these outcomes. Comprehension of their own advanced status has remained moderately reliable among both changed over family units and unconverted families. The 91% of changed over family units know they have computerized TV and 71% of unconverted families know they are simple.
The Colman Brunton survey conducted in 2013 recorded the biggest barriers related to the take up of digital television. As per the finding of Colman Brunton, the survey covers two places Lower North Island and Upper North Island. These two places have experienced barriers regarding take up of digitization of television. The cost and lack of priority are considered the two main barriers. Other barriers are construed as: too expensive for me (Lower North Island records 39% and Upper North Island manifests 24%). The next barrier is not a priority (Lower North Island 18% and Upper North Island 21%). The next barrier is Happy with existing programmes and channels (Lower North Island 1% and Upper North Island 16%). The next barrier is I will watch TV on the internet instead (Lower North Island 8% and Upper North Island 7%). The next barrier is Happy with existing reception (Lower North Island 2% and Upper North Island 5%). The next barriers do not understand why things need to change (Lower North Island 8% and Upper North Island 4%). The next barrier is Equipment/installation too confusing (Lower North Island 6% and Upper North Island 3%). The last barrier is do not know enough about it (Lowe North Island nil and Upper North Island 2%).
5. The Colman Brunton report underscores quantitative research methodology and used telephone survey in the segment. The digital TV is a technique of transmitting TV and other data to the home. Extensively, four stages of digital television can be enumerated: earthbound, satellite, link, and system or Internet associations. Of these stages, just Digital Terrestrial Television (DTT) requires to start the government activity. The government guarantees reasonable range for accessing information. In contrast to simple TV, digital TV can provide more projects utilizing a similar measure of range, and additionally coordinated teletext, electronic program aides and components. Therefore, the digitized television brings about a host of facilities to the consumers around the globe (Norris, 2013).
A noteworthy concentration of the telecom business delineates pathway for DTT, which aims to supplant the existing simple analogue TV. Nonetheless, it is demonstrated that genuine take-up and fruitful utilization is slower than usual. The Current government and industry anticipate that New Zealand DTT depends on globally perceived models utilizing range in the UHF TV groups. The Capital speculation required for existing telecasters to set up an essential DTT stage would be generally unobtrusive. Some in the telecom business are suspicious that a monetary model for DTT will rise. For example, satellite connected television is used. Others consider DTT inescapable in the long haul for up to 80% of New Zealand’s populace. Digital TV in New Zealand comes as Freeview and Sky. The essential Freeview, Freeview Satellite, is comprised of 19 stations including radio stations (Mersham & Peart, 2009).
As per the survey that was conducted in 2013 employed an interesting tool in the research. The survey covers the regions that fall under the category of ‘switchover’, mainly the Lower North Island and Upper North Island. The survey records mixed responses from the locales of these regions. The survey considers varied measures that mould the research and give an interesting insight into it. Certainly, other interesting components shape the digitalized phase of New Zealand (Mersham & Peart, 2009).
New Zealand changed to advanced TV, giving buyers a superior quality ordeal and more channels. The change to advanced TV is a piece of an innovation development. In TV, the generation is moved from a solitary channel to a few channels, from high contrast to shading, and now from simple to computerized broadcasting. One of the Ministry’s lead programs, Going Digital aims to transform New Zealand to advanced TV. Going Digital became a fad in the national overarching program. It upheld a composite showcasing program highlighting Seymour the advanced canine. Auckland was the last district to do the change to advanced TV. It changed after the lower North Island and South Island that occurred in early 2013. This is a noteworthy point of reference in the historical backdrop of New Zealand TV. Simple administrations dominated the world of television since the 1960s. The New Zealanders had admittance to only one channel for a couple of hours every night (Mersham & Peart, 2009).
Summing up, the country New Zealand intends to regulate the high rates of advanced TV that shapes the choice with respect to the computerized television. Another goal is to manage mindfulness and appreciate the advanced move in the area of Information Technology. The service focuses on the transmutation of TVs to the phase of computerized TV. The service plans to change over the primary set to the gathering of computerized signs. The service of New Zealand focuses on the perception of advanced TV. It indicates how the world sees the changing element of the world of TV from simple to advanced TV. In the meantime, it manages the present day changes that affected the world of TV.
Barker, G. R. (2016). Digital Convergence and Diminished Creative Industry Growth: A New Zealand Case Study.
Crothers, C., Smith, P., Urale, P., & Bell, A. (2016). The Internet in New Zealand. Auckland, NZ: Institute of Culture, Discourse & Communication, Auckland University of Technology.
Curtin, M., Holt, J., & Sanson, K. (2014). Introduction: Making of a Revolution. In Distribution Revolution: Conversations about the Digital Future of Film and Television (pp. 1-17). University of California Press.
Ellis, K., & Kent, M. (2015). Accessible television: The new frontier in disability media studies brings together industry innovation, government legislation and online activism. First Monday, 20(9).
Fuller, I. C., & Basher, L. R. (2013). Riverbed digital elevation models as a tool for holistic river management: Motueka River, Nelson, New Zealand. River Research and Applications, 29(5), 619-633.
Horrocks, R. (2016). The arts in New Zealand: A changing field of forces. New Zealand Sociology, 31(7), 132.
Hutchins, B., Meese, J., & Podkalicka, A. (2015). Media Sport: Practice, Culture and Innovation. Media International Australia, 155(1), 66-69.
Lachapelle, G., & Maarek, P. (Eds.). (2015). Political Parties in the Digital Age: The Impact of New Technologies in Politics. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
Mackey, T. K., Cuomo, R. E., & Liang, B. A. (2015). The rise of digital direct-to-consumer advertising?: Comparison of direct-to-consumer advertising expenditure trends from publicly available data sources and global policy implications. BMC health services research, 15(1), 236.
McAnally, H. M., & Hancox, R. J. (2014). The long-term health effects of too much television: whose responsibility?. Journal of epidemiology and community health, jech-2014.
Mersham, G. & Peart, J. (2009). Public relations and communication management: An Aotearoa/New Zealand perspective. North Shore, NZ: Pearson.
Norris, P. (2013). The progress to digital in New Zealand. International Journal of Digital Television, 4(1), 21-32.
Oren, T., & Shahaf, S. (Eds.). (2013). Global television formats: Understanding television across borders. Routledge.
Oren, T., & Shahaf, S. (Eds.). (2013). Global television formats: Understanding television across borders. Routledge.
Oren, T., & Shahaf, S. (Eds.). (2013). Global television formats: Understanding television across borders. Routledge.
Reid, D. (2016). Cooking Class: Ideology, Identity and the Commodification of New Zealand in Annabel Langbein–The Free Range Cook. MEDIANZ: Media Studies Journal of Aotearoa New Zealand, 15(2).
Schweizer, C., Puppis, M., Künzler, M., & Studer, S. (2014). Blast from the past? A comparative analysis of broadcast licensing in the digital era. Journal of Information Policy, 4, 507-528.
Vered, K. O., & Humphreys, S. (2014). Postfeminist inflections in television studies.
Winseck, D. (2014). New Zealand’s Ultra-Fast Broadband Plan: Digital Public Works Project for the Twenty-First Century or Playfield of Incumbent Interests?. Media International Australia, 151(1), 157-170.
Zealand, N. (2015). Ministry for Culture and Heritage.‘. The Passchendale.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download