INTRODUCTION
Rationale
Under the growing trend towards globalization, English is known as the most preferable language used in every field of man’s life. No one can deny the usefulness of this language in enhancing international communication among individuals, organizations, as well as nations in this fast-changing world. Not surprisingly, English is a tool for countries all over the world to participate fully in the international network.
Get Help With Your Essay
If you need assistance with writing your essay, our professional essay writing service is here to help!
Essay Writing Service
Giving speech play an important role in any kind of forums, especially in summit conferences like Shangri-La Dialogue. A good speech will show the intentions, feelings, emotions, expectation and even the criticism of the speaker to his audiences. Thus, in order to have an effective and successful speech Shangri-La Dialogue, the speakers have to provide clear and relevant messages. In addition, their intellect, understanding, political stance and consistency need to be performed when the speakers give speech. Besides, the speaker’s attitude also plays an essential part in making the address more effectively, vividly and persuasively. Not only that the goal of persuasion, the messages are more persuasively and powerfully delivered.
I realize that there are so many interesting things that need to be studied in speeches used in Shangri-La dialogues. There has been no research so far in Vietnam, to my knowledge, offering a discourse analysis of speeches in Shangri-La dialogues. From these factors, I have decided to choose “Adiscourse analysis of opening speeches at Shangri-La dialogues” as the topic of my M.A thesis because of its importance and significance. This thesis is carried out with the hope that the research will be a contribution to present linguistic knowledge and provide Vietnamese learners of English, especially students in the press and diplomatic fields with some useful information about the linguistic features of speeches in political forums.
Aims and objectives
The study aims to investigate the discourse features of opening speeches at Shangri-La dialogues in terms of their discourse topics, cohesive devices and stylistic devices.
This paper is designed to aim at the following objectives:
– To examine the discourse features of opening speeches used in Shangri-La dialogues in terms of their discourse topics, cohesive devices and stylistic devices.
– To study the significant effect of discourse features on opening speeches ( the contents of speech, the intention and attitude of the lecturer…)
– To discuss about the results of the findings so that a generalization of the language can be made.
– To suggest some implications for teaching English to Vietnamese learners especially students of the diplomacy and press fields.
Scope of the Study
Within a limited scope of an M.A thesis, this research will focus on studying the discourse topics, the cohesive devices and the stylistic devices of opening speeches used in Shangri-La dialogues.
Research questions
In order to achieve the above – mentioned aims and objectives, the research will seek to the answers for the following questions:
– What are the discourse features of opening speeches at Shangri-La dialogues in terms of their discourse topics?
– What are the discourse features of opening speeches at Shangri-La dialogues in terms of their cohesive devices?
– What are the discourse features of opening speeches at Shangri-La dialogues in terms of their stylistic devices?
Organization of the study
The study is organized into five chapters as follows.
Chapter 1, Introduction presents the rationale, the aims and objectives, the research questions to solve, the scope and the organization of the research.
Chapter 2, Literature Review and Theoretical Background consists of two parts. The first part is a review of previous studies related to this thesis. The second one is concerned with theoretical concepts of terms : discourse topics, cohesive devices and stylistic devices.
Chapter 3, Methods and Procedures concerns itself with the research method, procedure of data collection, description of samples, data analysis and research procedures.
Chapter 4, Findings and Discussion discusses the main purpose of conducting this study. It focuses on answering the research questions about the discourse topics, cohesive devices, and stylistic devices of opening speeches used in Shangri-La dialogues. It presents the results and discusses the findings of the study.
Chapter 5, Conclusion and Recommendation draws conclusions and suggests some implications basing on the results in previous chapter.
LITERATURE REVIEW AND THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
Literature Review
Discourse Analysis (DA) is a modern linguistic discipline that covers a wide variety of different fields. Discourse analysis examines language in use both written texts of all kinds and spoken data from conversation to highly institutionalized forms of talk. Analysis of discourse looks not only at the basic level of what is said, but takes into consideration the contexts which it is used. Thus, discourse analysis not only study language use “beyond the sentence boundar”, but also analyze ‘naturally occurring’ language use. It means that discourse analysis is one of the aspects which attract the interest of many linguists and researchers all over the world. Under the heading of discourse analysis, there have been a lot of studies dealing with a wide range of its subfields such as coherence, cohesion, context, conversation analysis, information structure, speech act theory and theme-rhyme. Up to present, many foreign scholars including Halliday and Hasan [30], Brown and Yule [18], Cook [21], Hatch [31], Nunan [33]… have made great contributions to the field in different approaches and methods. These publications focused on one or another aspect of discourse analysis theory which gave us an overall picture of theoretical background to examine how language is in use.
In Vietnam, many linguists have made great contributions to the study of discourse analysis. Tran Ngoc Them [10] has investigated in detail cohesion in Vietnamese texts with “Hệ thống liên kết văn bản Tiếng Việt and Văn bản và Liên kết trong Tiếng Việt“. Nguyen Duc Dan [4] and Nguyen Thien Giap [5] studied discourse analysis from a pragmatic view. Diep Quang Ban [2] has given an overall view of text and utterance especially above the sentence level. Nguyen Hoa with “Nghiên cứu diá»…n ngôn vá» chính trị – xã há»™i” [6] and more recently Nguyen Hoa with “Phân tích diá»…n ngôn phê bình” [8].
Besides, there have been a number of master theses dealing with political speeches including:
Le Thi Hoang Van [32] made an investigation into Linguistic Features of Antithesis in Political Speeches in English and Vietnamese. In this research, she investigated argumentation power of antithesis and stylistic features of rhetorical devices in antithesis in English political speeches and Vietnamese political speeches.
Pham Khac Thu [36] did a research on Modality Markers Used in Political Speeches by US Presidents. The author investigated a wide range of modal expressions used in all the inaugural speeches of the US presidents.
Nguyen Thi Hanh [35] investigated into the structure of Theme – Rheme in English and Vietnamese political speeches. The study focuses on the structure of Theme – Rheme in English and Vietnamese political speeches in terms of characteristics, semantic and pragmatic aspects.
Nguyen Uy Dung [34] carried out an investigation into Stylistic Devices in Political Speeches by US Presidents. The study highlighted the use of Stylistic Devices in political speeches by US Presidents. Most of them studied the discourse or a small aspect of political speeches being well-prepared in written texts by the politicians.
All study above gave me a useful brief knowledge about discourse and help me have an overview of language definition, language development and its branches in general, and language characteristics in details as well. Beside that, I also recognized that there are some fields which others theses do not deal with. I, myself, would like to contribute my little more effort into them. To the best of my knowledge, up to now, there is little evidence that any research on discourse analysis of opening speeches in dialogues about political issues has been done. Thus, “A discourse analysis of Opening speeches at Shangri-La dialogues” would be conducted with the aim of contributing a minor part to the overall picture of this field.
Theoretical background
The study will make use of a theoretical framework based on these following fundamental concepts.
2.2.1. Concepts of Discourse
2.2.2. Concepts of Discourse Analysis
2.2.3. Discourse topic
a. Topic framework
b. Presupposition pools
c. Sentential topic and the presupposition pool
2.2.4. Cohesion and Coherence
a. Cohesion
b. Coherence
2.2.5. Stylistic Devices
a. Definition of Stylistic Devices
c. Notion of Common Stylistic Devices in speech
b. Function of Stylistic Devices
2.2.6. An overview of a speech
3. METHOD AND PROCEDURE
Research Design
Descriptive method seems to be the most popular tool in doing any linguistic research since linguistics is by nature a descriptive science and the analytic method is typically used to clarify and justify their features. As mentioned above, the aim of this study was to describe and analyze speeches used in Shangri-La dialogues. Descriptive and qualitative methods were used to give a detailed description of their discourse topics, cohesive devices and stylistic devices of speeches used in Shangri-La dialogues. Quantitative information was also collected to show the frequency of the discourse features of speeches used in Shangri-La dialogues along with qualitative information about the discourse features of a speech.
Data collection and data analysis
Data Collection
The data of the study appeared in the form of transcripts of Shangri-La dialogues on the Internet which are based on the criteria defined. They were selected mainly from the following website on August, 2015:
https://www.iiss.org/en/events/shangri-s-la-s-dialogue/speeches
https://www.iiss.org/en/events/shangri%20la%20dialogue/archive/sld12-43d9
https://www.iiss.org/en/events/shangri%20la%20dialogue/archive/shangri-la-dialogue-2013-c890
http://www.iiss.org/en/events/shangri%20la%20dialogue/archive/shangri-la-dialogue-2011-4eac
https://www.iiss.org/en/events/shangri%20la%20dialogue/archive/shangri-la-dialogue-2010-0a26
https://www.iiss.org/en/events/shangri%20la%20dialogue/archive/shangri-la-dialogue-2009-99ea
https://www.iiss.org/en/events/shangri%20la%20dialogue/archive/shangri-la-dialogue-2008-2906
http://www.iiss.org/en/events/shangri%20la%20dialogue/archive/shangri-la-diaogue-2007-d1ee
https://www.iiss.org/en/events/shangri%20la%20dialogue/archive/shangri-la-dialogue-2006-f1a5
https://www.iiss.org/en/events/shangri%20la%20dialogue/archive/shangri-la-dialogue-2014
Data Analysis
In this study, more than 14 samples of speeches used in Shangri-La dialogues selected for the analysis are in the form of written texts in the sources provided. After collecting these samples of answer, they are analyzed in terms of their discourse topics, cohesive devices and stylistic devices.
All samples are shown in the following table:
Order
Date of Opening Dialogues
Speaker
Length
1st
30 May 2003
Lee Kun Yew
41:32
2nd
30 May 2003
Lee Kun Yew
37:26
3rd
4 June 2004
Goh Chok Tong
40:35
4th
3 June 2005
Lee Hsien Loong
32:45
5th
2 June 2006
Lee Hsien Loong
37:12
6th
1 June 2007
Lee Hsien Loong
45:23
7th
30 May 2008
Lee Hsien Loong
28:50
8th
29 May 2009
Kevin Rudd
36:48
9th
4 June 2010
Lee Myung-Bak
43:15
10th
3 June 2011
John Chipman
30:22
11th
1 June 2012
Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono
26:18
12th
31 May 2013
Nguyen Tan Dung
25:00
13th
30 May 2014
John Chipman
50:17
14th
29 May 2015
Lee Hsien Loong
38:16
Research procedures
The research was conducted with the procedures as follows:
– Identifying the research topic to study by reviewing the previous studies thoroughly.
– Collecting documents related to the research in the library and other sources from the Internet.
– Collecting samples of speeches used in Shangri-La dialogues from the Internet.
– Presenting, describing and analyzing the data in order to find out discourse feature of speeches.
– Suggesting some implications for language users and further research.
The study will be carried out following these steps:
Time
Work
Place
April-Sept, 2015
Working on proposal literature review
Äaklak
Sept-Nov, 2015
Data collection + initial analysis
Äaklak
Nov-Dec, 2015
Analysis
Äaklak
Jan, 2016
Update literature review
Äaklak
Feb-May, 2016
Writing up
Äaklak
June, 2016
Completing first draft
Äaklak
July, 2016
Updating first draft
Äaklak
July, 2016
Finishing writing MA thesis
Äaklak
Aug, 2016
Presenting MA thesis
Äaklak
Reliability and Validity
In terms of reliability, the source selected to be analyzed is derived from the Internet in English.
Regarding validity, this study meets all required criteria. In order to answer the two formulated research questions, the observation and investigation techniques have been chosen to be the main instruments for data collection. The samples are taken from famous English political speeches by a large number of prominent representatives of each nation.
REFERENCES
In Vietnamese
[1] Diệp Quang Ban (1999), Văn bản và liên kết trong tiếng Việt, NXB Giáo dục,
Hà Ná»™i.
[2] Diệp Quang Ban (2003), Giao tiếp, văn bản, mạch lạc, liên kết, NXB Khoa há»c
Xã há»™i.
[3] Diệp Quang Ban (2009), Giao tiếp, diá»…n ngôn và cấu tạo của văn bản, Nxb
Giáo dục.
[4] Nguyá»…n Äức Dân (1998), Ngữ dụng há»c, Nxb Giáo dục, Hà Ná»™i.
[5] Nguyá»…n Thiện Giáp (2000), Dụng há»c Việt ngữ, Nxb Äại há»c Quốc gia Hà Ná»™i.
[6] Nguyá»…n Hoà (1999), Nghiên cứu diá»…n ngôn vá» chính trị – xã há»™i trên tÆ° liệu báo
chí tiếng Anh và tiếng Việt hiện đại, Luáºn án tiến sỹ Ngữ văn.
[7] Nguyá»…n Hòa (2003), Phân tích diá»…n ngôn: Má»™t số vấn Ä‘á» lý luáºn và phÆ°Æ¡ng
pháp, Nxb ÄHQG Hà Ná»™i.
[8] Nguyá»…n Hoà (2006), Phân tích diá»…n ngôn phê bình, Nxb Äại há»c Quốc gia Hà
Ná»™i.
[9] Nguyá»…n Hòa (2008), Phân tích diá»…n ngôn: Má»™t số vấn Ä‘á» lý luáºn và phÆ°Æ¡ng
pháp, Nxb Äại há»c Quốc gia Hà Ná»™i.
[10] Trần Ngá»c Thêm (1998), Hệ thống liên kết văn bản Tiếng Việt, NXB Giáo
dục.
[11] Trần Ngá»c Thêm (1985), Hệ thống liên kết văn bản tiếng Việt, Hà Ná»™i: NXB
KHXH.
[12] Trần Ngá»c Thêm (2000), Hệ thống liên kết văn bản tiếng Việt, NXB GiaÌo
dục.
In English
[13] Algeo, J., Pyles, T., Wadsworth, T. (2005), The Origins and Development of
the English Language, Heinle.
[14] Austin, J.L. (1955), How to do things with words, Oxford University Press.
[15] Beaugrand, R. and Dresser, W. (1981), Introduction to Text Linguistics,
London / New York: Longman. [58] Pham Khac Thu (2010), An Investigation into Modality Markers Used in Political Speeches by US Presidents, MA Thesis, The University of Danang.
[16] Biber, D., Conrad, S. & Leech, G. (2002), Longman student grammar of
spoken and written English, (3rd Ed.) England: Pearson Education Limited.
[17] Borsley, R. (1999) Syntactic Theory, Second Edition, Arnold, A Member of
the Hodder Headline Group
[18] Brown, G. and Yule, G. (1983), Discourse Analysis, Cambridge University
Press.
[19] Cambridge Advanced Learner’s Dictionary, Fourth Edition, Cambridge
University Press
[20] Coates, J. (1983), The Semantics of Modal Auxiliaries, London/Canberra:
Croom Helm.
[21] Cook, G. (1989), Discourse, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
[22] Crystal, D. (1992), Introducing Linguistics, Penguin, Harlow.
[23] Dontcheva-Navrátilova, O. (2005), Grammatical Structures in English:
Meaning in Context, Brno: Masaryk University.
[25] Erhman, M. (1966), The meanings of the modals in present-day American
English, The Hague:Mouton &Co.
[26] Galperin, I.R. (1977), Stylistics, Moscow: Higher School
[27] Gee, P. (1999), An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method,
London, Routledge
[28] Gee, P., & Green, J. (1998), Discourse analysis, learning, and social practice:
A methodological study, Review of Research in Education.
[29] Goffman, E. (1981), Forms of talk, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania
Press.
[30] Halliday, M.A.K., Hasan, R. (1976), Cohesion in English, London: Longman.
[31] Hatch, E. (1992), Discourse and Language Education, Cambridge University
Press.
[32] Le Thi Hoang Van (2008), An Investigation into Linguistic Features of
Antithesis in Political Speeches in English and Vietnamese, MA Thesis, The
University of Danang.
[33] Nunan, D. (1993), Introducing Discourse Analysis, Penguin Group.
[34] Nguyen Uy Dung (2010), An Investigation into Stylistic Devices in Political
Speeches by US Presidents, MA Thesis, The University of Danang.
[35] Nguyen Thi Hanh (2012) , An investigation into the structure of Theme –
Rheme in English and Vietnamese political speeches, MA Thesis, The University
of Danang.
[36] Pham Khac Thu (2010), An Investigation into Modality Markers Used in
Political Speeches by US Presidents, MA Thesis, The University of Danang.
[37] Widdowson, H.G. (1978), Teaching English as Communication, Oxford.
[38] Widdowson, H.G. (1994), Linguistics, Oxford University Press.
[39] Wright, L. & Hope Jonathan (1996), Stylistics-A Practical Course Book,
Routledge.
[40] Yule, G. (1996), Pragmatics, Oxford University Press.
[41] Yule, G. (1997), The study of language, Cambridge University Press.
[42] Yule, G. (2006), Oxford practice Grammar Advanced with Answers, Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Websites
[43] https://www.iiss.org/en/events/shangri-s-la-s-dialogue/speeches
[44] https://www.iiss.org/en/events/shangri%20la%20dialogue/archive/sld12-43d9
[45]https://www.iiss.org/en/events/shangri%20la%20dialogue/archive/shangri-la dialogue-2013-c890
[46]http://www.iiss.org/en/events/shangri%20la%20dialogue/archive/shangri-la-dialogue-2011-4eac
[47]https://www.iiss.org/en/events/shangri%20la%20dialogue/archive/shangri-la-dialogue-2010-0a26
[48]https://www.iiss.org/en/events/shangri%20la%20dialogue/archive/shangri-la-dialogue-2009-99ea
[49]https://www.iiss.org/en/events/shangri%20la%20dialogue/archive/shangri-la-dialogue-2008-2906
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download
