Question:
Discuss about the Neglected Dimension of Global Security.
The recent age, technologies have mainly disrupted or transformed both the commerce as well as the environment. Few example that can be taken into consideration are the world wide web, amazon, tablets and google. The most important phenomenon which played a very vital role is the technology of the cloud computing. Likewise taking into consideration a view of a different field, in the laboratory automation, medicine, computers, monoclonal antibodies, immunoassay can be considered as example of technology which are considered disruptive technology. Currently, there are many potentially and emerging technology which can be termed disruptive that could possess threat of direct displacing a technology which is established. The technology can lead to a major change in the field of economy as well as commerce. The concept of the technology can be sub divided into two parts namely sustaining and disruptive [1]. The sustainable technology mainly relies on the incremental improvements taking into consideration an already established technology. On the other hand, the disruptive technology lacks the part of the refinement, they are often encountered with the problem of performance due to the factor that it is new, direct appealing to an audience which are limited and may not have been proven problematic in the field of application. Taking into consideration a case study it can be stated that the concept of Alexander Graham Bells’ electric speed machine which is now better known as call the telephone can be considered as one of the best example. Another term which can be directly be related with the concept is the term digital disruption. It can be referred to as a flip side of the digital opportunity [2].
In this essay the main concept which is taken into consideration is the concept of the disruptive and the emerging technologies. On the other hand, relating to the concept the use of disruptive weapons in the aspect of changing the use of the force are also taken into consideration in the discussion.
This section mainly focuses on the analysis of the emerging and disruptive technology which are very much likely to play a role in the near future. These technological aspects may include:
Additive manufacturing: This technology is under the focus of the researchers and under the research sector for more than 30 years, initially with the point of view of tool related to rapid technology [3]. Development in the sector of additive manufacturing are very much likely to create a new field of application that will have a significant impact on the methods which are related to the traditional manufacturing.
Advanced Robotics: An example of primary successful application of the industrial robotics is in the field of automotive manufacturing. The concept intensively uses the concept of the robots that are extensively implemented in the process of welding, painting process and material handling [4]. The new and the advanced robotics will be increasingly in the implementation in the precision of the concept of the assembly and manufacturing and even in the sector of human robotics environment which can be beyond the scope of manufacturing [5].
Digital manufacturing: Recent advances in the concept of the digital design, simulation and engineering have involved in a transformational impact on the enterprise which are related to the manufacturing. The experimental approach and the traditional experiential approach in order to develop the product, validation and the manufacturing process design, supply network development and the factory automation are being replaced by the concept of highly digital threats which are efficient [6]. This approach can be considered to be very much efficient. In order to conduct the analysis, the nature of the disruptive technology should be taken into consideration. The concept of the nature which is related to the disruptive technology can be divided into three parts namely changing the global landscape, effect of the education of the future generation and the attributes which are related to the disruptive technology.
The concept of changing the global landscape the global economy continued to be fuelled by quickly flow of information, swiftly knowledge generation and the myriad application found for this knowledge and information. The new global economy is mainly characterized by the increased uncertainty, flexibility and the openness and the choices all of these majorly impact the lifestyle, business model, the environment which is related to the working, the educational system and the national security [7]. On the global scale the population increase with the manpower being on the lower end and a lower cost is becoming the continual goal of all the operation, making the consistency increased which is related to the productivity a target which is relentless. Another shift in the paradigm occur when the off shore operation which is related to the US corporations, whose initial function was the manufacturing. The concept has majorly changed to the scientific research and the technological development. On the other hand, the Effect of the education of the future generation: education is another very much important aspect of the ground work for the disruptive technology which can be considered [8].
This area of the analysis mainly includes not only the aspect of the geographical and cultural influence but also take into consideration the concept of the influence it has beyond the boundary. On the other hand, the influence of the stemming from the aspect pf the demographic that is globally impacted by the technology savvy youth. Each of these dimensions may serve to impede the development and the aspect of the diffusion of the technology which is taken into consideration [9]. Taking into consideration each of the dimensions may serve to accelerate, to impede the development and the diffusion of a given technology.
Historically there has been a concern for the stemming from the concept of the geopolitical influence in the areas of where transparency is minimal due to the factor of the intentional disregard for the international disregard for the international convention’s or the norms [10]. For example, although many nations have majorly accepted limitations on the use of the biological and the weapons which are chemical in nature, there is no such guarantee that can be taken into consideration that the state of the United States will not encounter such weapon on the future battle ship. Other techniques which can be considered to be symmetric made it very much possible by the technology which are merging may fall to fall into this category [11].
There are mainly two types of technology that can be termed as disruptive technologies. One type majorly displaces the incumbent technology in the transition phase during which the users adopts the new technology over a pre-defined time period. An early example of this was the major transition from the buggy to the horse to the automobile. The latter concept revolutionized disruption and transportation not only in the sphere of older transportation but also in the field of several ancillary means [12]. The second class of the disruptive technology creates a market or the capability when none of it ever existed. One of the example of this class is the personal computer. Before the invention of the computer, the services which are related to the computation are only available for the organisation of larger scale, institution and government sectors. The major key outcome which can be related to the concept when relating to the field of manufacturing as an example are:
While these disruptive and emerging technology are major causing significant excitement there are also some potential barriers that can be related to it.
North Korea: The plutonium program which was initiated in the year 1985, brought into operation a small gas cooled (carbon dioxide), moderated graphite, natural uranium (metal) fuelled “experimental reactor of power” of about 25 MWt at Yongbyon. It exhibits all the features of a plutonium production. This place was located on the west coast 55km north of pyongtyang.
Israel: Israel is one of the few counties who have initiated the process of nuclear weapon. In the year 1952 after the isreal atomic energy commission was formed and in the year 1955 the USA agrred to supply a 5MWt pool type reactor for Nahal Soreq, south of Tel Aviv. This IRR -1 required enriched uranium supplied to the USA. It started up in 1960 and from the outset which is required to be under the IAEA safeguard
Libya: after the months of continuous negotiation, Libya agreed in December 2003 to halt its process of the development of the nuclear weapon. For a tenure of more than a decade it was engaged in the process of the development of a uranium enrichment capacity and the construction of now dismantled pilot scale centrifuge facility.
It can be stated from the above example that the use of disruptive weapon has changed the use of the forces. When taking into consideration whether a technology is disruptive or not, it is very much useful to think of it as disrupt. It should be taken into consideration that disruptive technology is impactful and the affect the other technologies. In many of the cases it is not the technology that can be considered to be disruptive but on the other and how the technology combines with the other factor or is applied can be termed as being disruptive in nature [14]. Taking into example the intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) which was combined with a rocket motor, a guidance missile and a nuclear warhead. The guided system mainly made the ICBM very much effective and disruptive. The committee which was involved with the system mainly categorised the disruptive technology into three distinct categories, to one of which truly every destructive technology must belong.
The use of force in the context of the law enforcement may be directly defined as the “amount of effort required by the police to compel compliance by an unwilling subject.
A Destructive weapon can be termed as a weapon that can cause destruction or kill a large amount of people epically a chemical, nuclear or biological weapon.
Conclusion
This report mainly focuses on the concept of the disruptive technologies that should be taken into consideration. It can be stated that not all technology is destructive in nature but the affect it has on other technology are mainly considered as destructive. The concepts such as categories, attributes and the timelines associated with the technology are majorly taken into consideration. These terms play a very vital role in term associated with the technology being destructive. The timeless which is related to the deployment of the technology does not necessarily involve time period which is very short. This concept cannot be deployed for a technology which can be called a destructive technology. The life cycle of the technology can be varying, with most of the technology undergoing a series of S curves of growth and the deployment. The approach like the likelihood of a given technology disruption is also put direct limelight in the report.
Ahlborn, C. (2016). The Normative Erosion of International Refugee Protection through UN Security Council Practice. Leiden Journal of International Law C Foundation of the Leiden Journal of International Law, 24, 1009–1027. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156511000471
Ashenden, D., & Lawrence, D. (2016). Security Dialogues: Building Better Relationships between Security and Business. IEEE Security and Privacy, 14(3), 82–87. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2016.57
Carr, M. (2016). Public-private partnerships in national cyber-security strategies. International Affairs, 92(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12504
Chernobrov, D. (2016). Ontological Security and Public (Mis)Recognition of International Crises: Uncertainty, Political Imagining, and the Self. Political Psychology, 37(5), 581–596. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12334
Christie, D. J., & Montiel, C. J. (2013). Contributions of psychology to war and peace. American Psychologist, 68(7), 502–513. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032875
Cohen, D. K. (2016). Rape During Civil War. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. Retrieved from https://belfercenter.ksg.harvard.edu/publication/26785/rape_during_civil_war.html?utm_source=SilverpopMailing&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Cohen_RapeDuringCivilWar_Sep16%2520(1)&utm_content=&spMailingID=15360669&spUserID=Mjk4ODAxMDExODgS1&spJobID=86051625
Conklin, W. A. (2016). IT vs. OT security: A time to consider a change in CIA to include Resilienc. In Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Vol. 2016–March, pp. 2642–2647). https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2016.331
Di Sarno, C., Garofalo, A., Matteucci, I., & Vallini, M. (2016). A novel security information and event management system for enhancing cyber security in a hydroelectric dam. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 13, 39–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcip.2016.03.002
Doucet, M. G. (2016). Global assemblages of security governance and contemporary international intervention. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, 10(1), 116–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2015.1054656
Duffy, R. (2016). War, by Conservation. Geoforum, 69, 238–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.09.014
Enamorado, T., López-Calva, L. F., Rodríguez-Castelán, C., & Winkler, H. (2016). Income inequality and violent crime: Evidence from Mexico’s drug war. Journal of Development Economics, 120, 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2015.12.004
Figueiredo Pereira de Faria, A. C., Berchin, I. I., Garcia, J., Barbosa Back, S. N., & Andrade Guerra, J. B. S. O. de. (2016). Understanding food security and international security links in the context of climate change. Third World Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1129271
Foster, D. (2016). The International Test Commission Guidelines on the Security of Tests, Examinations, and Other Assessments: International Test Commission (ITC). International Journal of Testing, 16(3), 181–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2015.1111221
Garcia, D. (2016). Future arms, technologies, and international law: Preventive security governance. European Journal of International Security, 1(1), 94–111. https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2015.7
Hendrix, M., Al-Sherbaz, A., & Bloom, V. (2016). Game Based Cyber Security Training: are Serious Games suitable for cyber security training? International Journal of Serious Games, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v3i1.107
Hussein, N. H., & Khalid, A. (2016). A survey of cloud computing security challenges and solutions. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security, 14(1), 52–56. Retrieved from https://search.proquest.com.library.capella.edu/docview/1764183503?accountid=27965%5Cnhttps://wv9lq5ld3p.search.serialssolutions.com.library.capella.edu/?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&rfr_id=info:sid/ProQ:criminaljusticeperiodicalsshell&rft_
Ijaz, S., Shah, M. A., Khan, A., & Ahmed, M. (2016). Smart Cities: A Survey on Security Concerns. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 7(2), 612–625. https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2016.070277
ISO/IEC. (2016). ISO/IEC 27000:2016 Information technology — Security techniques — Information security management systems — Overview and vocabulary. ISO.org [Online]. Retrieved from https://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/c066435_ISO_IEC_27000_2016(E).zip
Kirby, P., & Shepherd, L. J. (2016). Reintroducing women, peace and security. International Affairs, 92(2), 249–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12550
Klahr, R., Amili, S., Shah, J. N., Button, M., & Wang, V. (2016). Cyber Security Breaches Survey 2016. Cyber Security Breaches Survey 2016, 56. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4332.6324
Kozhemiakin, A. V. (2016). Expanding the zone of peace?: Democratization and international security. Expanding the Zone of Peace?: Democratization and International Security. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-26687-6
Liu, C., Zhang, Y., Li, Z., Zhang, J., Qin, H., & Zeng, J. (2016). Dynamic defense architecture for the security of the internet of things. In Proceedings – 2015 11th International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security, CIS 2015 (pp. 390–393). https://doi.org/10.1109/CIS.2015.100
Lowe, D. (2016). Surveillance and international terrorism intelligence exchange: Balancing the interests of national security and individual liberty. Terrorism and Political Violence, 28(4), 653–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2014.918880
Mahmoud, R., Yousuf, T., Aloul, F., & Zualkernan, I. (2016). Internet of things (IoT) security: Current status, challenges and prospective measures. In 2015 10th International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions, ICITST 2015 (pp. 336–341). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITST.2015.7412116
Marr, D. G. (2013). Hanoi’s War: An International History of the War for Peace in Vietnam. Critical Asian Studies (Vol. 45). https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2013.758826
Meger, S. (2016). The fetishization of sexual violence in international security. International Studies Quarterly, 60(1), 149–159. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqw003
Odutayo, A. (2016). Human security and the international refugee crisis. Journal of Global Ethics, 12(3), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2016.1251484
Ooms, G. (2016). Disease diplomacy: international norms and global health security. Global Change, Peace & Security, 28(3), 334–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2016.1195805
Pelletier, B., Hickey, G. M., Bothi, K. L., & Mude, A. (2016). Linking rural livelihood resilience and food security: an international challenge. Food Security, 8(3), 469–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-016-0576-8
Pouliot, V. (2016). Hierarchy in practice: Multilateral diplomacy and the governance of international security. European Journal of International Security, 1(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2015.4
Qian, J., Xu, H., & Li, P. (2016). A novel secure architecture for the internet of things. In Proceedings – 2016 International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems, IEEE INCoS 2016 (pp. 398–401). https://doi.org/10.1109/INCoS.2016.36
Rashid, A., Naqvi, S. A. A., Ramdhany, R., Edwards, M., Chitchyan, R., & Babar, M. A. (2016). Discovering “unknown known” security requirements. In Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering – ICSE ’16 (pp. 866–876). https://doi.org/10.1145/2884781.2884785
Richmond, O. P. (2016). The Transformation of Peace. Transformation, 286. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230505070
Rotte, R. (2016). Western drones and African security. African Security Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/10246029.2015.1124043
Sands, P., Mundaca-Shah, C., & Dzau, V. J. (2016). The Neglected Dimension of Global Security — A Framework for Countering Infectious-Disease Crises. New England Journal of Medicine, 374(13), 1281–1287. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsr1600236
Sherif, E., Furnell, S., & Clarke, N. (2016). Awareness, behaviour and culture: The ABC in cultivating security compliance. In 2015 10th International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions, ICITST 2015 (pp. 90–94). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITST.2015.7412064
Soomro, Z. A., Shah, M. H., & Ahmed, J. (2016). Information security management needs more holistic approach: A literature review. International Journal of Information Management, 36(2), 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.11.009
Sovacool, B. K. (2013). An international assessment of energy security performance. Ecological Economics, 88, 148–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.01.019
Sovacool, B. K. (2016). Differing cultures of energy security: An international comparison of public perceptions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.144
Thakur, K., Qiu, M., Gai, K., & Ali, M. L. (2016). An Investigation on Cyber Security Threats and Security Models. In Proceedings – 2nd IEEE International Conference on Cyber Security and Cloud Computing, CSCloud 2015 – IEEE International Symposium of Smart Cloud, IEEE SSC 2015 (pp. 307–311). https://doi.org/10.1109/CSCloud.2015.71
Torabi, G. (2013). Armaments, Disarmament and International Security. Political Studies Review, 11(3), 418. https://doi.org/10.2307/2625592
van Ittersum, M. K., & Giller, K. E. (2014). The First International Conference on Global Food Security – A Synthesis. Global Food Security, 3(3–4), 119–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2014.10.008
Weeks, J. L. P. (2014). Dictators at war and peace. Cornell studies in security affairs.
Woody, C. (2016). Security Engineering Risk Analysis (SERA). 3rd International Workshop on Software Engineering Research and Industrial Practice, SER and IP 2016, 23–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/2897022.2897024
Yoo, H., & Shon, T. (2016). Challenges and research directions for heterogeneous cyber-physical system based on IEC 61850: Vulnerabilities, security requirements, and security architecture. Future Generation Computer Systems, 61, 128–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2015.09.026
You, I., & Bertino, E. (2016). MIST 2016: 8th International Workshop on Managing insider Security Threats. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security – CCS’16 (pp. 1890–1891). https://doi.org/10.1145/2976749.2990482
Zhang, H., & Mu, Y. (2016). Cyberspace security. China Communications. https://doi.org/10.1109/CC.2016.7781719
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download