Effect of Brexit on the Financial Sector

Brexit: A bleak future for the financial
sector?
Abstract
The word “Brexit” evolves from Britain and exit which is an unforeseeable situation that the UK is now facing. Brexit could cause damages to the UK economy in the long term, especially those in financial sector. The solutions to lessen the impacts of Brexit have been illustrated in this essay. This essay also aims to discuss the impacts of Brexit on asset management services and the banking industry. It will then evaluate these impacts on different aspects: international students, UK housing market, stock market and Britons who live in EU countries.

Get Help With Your Essay
If you need assistance with writing your essay, our professional essay writing service is here to help!
Essay Writing Service

Introduction
On 23 June 2016, the United Kingdom held a
referendum whether to leave the European Union (EU) or not. Most Britons
believed beforehand that the UK would not leave the EU. Surprisingly, the
result was 52% of the voters decided to leave the EU (CFA INSTITUTE, 2017). As
a result, David Cameron who, at that time, was the prime minister of the UK had
to resign. Subsequently, the position in charge was taken by Theresa May.
Following this step, on 29 March 2017, the UK government has formally announced
its invoking of Article 50 which is the initial step to formally exit from the
EU. Thus, the word “Brexit” evolves from Britain and Exit. The process must be
finalized within two years. This means, in March 2019, the negotiation has to
be done. However, from a very recent Guardian article, this process could be
postponed because there are new variety of
regulations which need to be implemented and many institutions that require new
staffs to operate (Miller, 2017).
It appears highly likely that once Brexit
occurs, Britain will lose its right to tariff-free access to the EU market. In
other words, UK-based firms, especially those in the financial sector, may be
unable to conduct their operations throughout the EU. As a result, overseas
financial institutions whose European headquarters are located in the UK must
reconsider their decision on whether to continue operating their management
from the UK or not. This could cause long-term negative consequences to the UK
economy. Therefore, this essay will discuss the impacts of Brexit on financial
services, particularly asset management and the banking, moving on this essay
will also evaluate these impacts on Britain’s post-Brexit future.
Financial Services
Financial services are the economic activities
that are involved in the flow of
money in the financial system. The services include asset management
which is the service that aims to allocate money to maximize the profit.
Additionally, the banking is an institution which mainly provides such services
as accepting deposits and issuing loans to clients. Those activities have
become one of the crucial parts of the UK economy and it provides an
opportunity for the UK to influence world banking industry. According to the
House of Lords EU Committee, 7-12 percent of GDP of the UK, 7-12 percent of
employment ratio and 11 percent of tax receipts are ruled by the financial
services. Furthermore, the largest trade surplus of the UK in 2014 was the
financial services which accounted for £58 billion of which £19 billion is the
trade with the EU country Austen, Hunt, Kelly, Naylor, & Sants, 2016).
However, this positive circumstance could possibly be worsened by the
referendum which was held on 23 of July 2016.
This is also a major concern for the financial
services. As a consequence of Brexit, it is forecasted that the UK could lose
31000-35000 job positions in financial services. In addition, the worst
scenario, this number could increase to 40000 (Arnold, 2016). This number
accounted for 3-4 percent of job position involving with the financial services
in the UK (Austen et al., 2016).
Asset management services
Asset management is referred to an activity of
generating returns for investors from the capital which is subsidized by investors.
According to the Investment Association and the Financial Conduct Authority,
the UK asset under management (AUM) is £6.9 trillion, approximately, of which
£2.2 trillion is the overseas client. In addition, 55 percent of the overseas
client, or £1.2 trillion, is the European clients (CFA INSTITUTE, 2017). This
can be said that the asset management industry has played a crucial part in the
UK economy. Moreover, losing the right to access the EU market could possibly
cause long-term problems to the UK economy.
After Brexit, the UK-based investment firm
could witness severe problems supporting the EU clients, as claimed by
Christian Nolterieke, managing director at MyPrivateBanking Research
(Greenhalgh, Mooney, & Williams, 2017). In order to serve clients and
recruit talented people in the EU, they must acquire the tariff-free license to
access the EU market which the UK’s license will no longer be valid if they
pursue Brexit. Moreover, the advertisement and marketing are also prohibited
from the non-european economic area (EEA), as stated by Nolterieke. There might
be some solutions to cope with this issue. One of them is to establish an
office in Europe. However, to do so, the business must be in a large scale.
This is because establishing office in Europe requires high amount of capital,
well-corporate structure, office, and people, as stated by Julie Patterson who
is the consultant of asset management global Brexit at KPMG (Greenhalgh,
Mooney, & Williams, 2017). Furthermore, to establish an office in Europe,
the regulation of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive, known as
MiFID, requires 20 or more employers onshore. As a result, finding a partner of
business in Europe could possibly be the most moderate
method to lessen the effect of Brexit, as determined by Nathan
Bostock who is now the executive directors of Santander UK (Gerrard, 2017).
This is because the UK-based firm is still benefit from being a partner with
Europe-based firm, even though the benefit is not fully equivalent to the past.
It is a method called profit-sharing in which it could stimulate the UK and
Europe economy in the long-term.
Surprisingly, in 2017, the research conducted
by the CFA instituted, the institution which is the community of fund managers,
have shown that two-thirds of the fund managers have not changed their
investment horizon after Brexit. Theoretically, this might be because the fund
managers tend to invest in the equity market which the price of the equity
could increase when the pound is depreciated.
The Banks
In this essay, the types of bank will be
categorized into three types: commercial bank, retail bank and investment bank.
Firstly, commercial bank is a financial institution which mainly provides such
services as deposit and withdraw of money and offers loans to
big business. Secondly, unlike commercial bank, retail bank or consumer bank
provides the same services to customers in a non-business sector. Lastly,
investment bank is not the bank who provides such services as accepting money
or issuing loans services. On the other hand, it is the bank who provides
advises on stock market launch, mergers and acquisition or even taking over
other company.
The impact of Brexit on these types of banks
could cause the similar problems as in asset management services. This is
mainly because the EU requires the approval of Markets in Financial Instruments
Directives (MiFiD) to allow banks to operate in the EU. In order to maintain
MiFiD status, the UK must be part of the European Economic Area (EEA). This
circumstance is not likely to occur if the UK favours a ‘hard Brexit’. This is
because ‘hard Brexit’ means the UK has to relinquish its MiFid license as it
will no longer be valid. As a result, this occurrence causes the world’s
leading financial institutions to leave the UK.
Paris has been one of the biggest rivals for
the European financial centre since the UK referendum. However, due to the high
corporate tax rate, 33.3 percent, this effects Paris’s attractiveness to be
lessen (Stothard, 2017). In this sense, the opportunity is now belonging to
Dublin because 12.5 percent tax rate in Ireland could attract the firms from
all over the world. Moreover, those firms who wish to move to Ireland do not
need to establish new banking license. This is exemplified by the announcement
from the Bank of America, the second largest bank in America by total asset,
that the bank has chosen Dublin as the headquarter office for its EU operation
after Brexit (Noonan, 2017). Brian Moynihan, chief executive officer of the
Bank of America, also told the Financial Times that “We’ve been working with
the Central Bank of Ireland to get it all set up and it’s been a very smooth
process so far. The government is trying to help us get through the regulatory
process.” (Noonan, 2017). As a consequence of the support from the government
and an existing banking license of Dublin, it could support the Bank of America
to accomplish its process ahead of Brexit easily.
Frankfurt has also competed for the position of
post-Brexit financial centre. From the announcement of Deutsche Bank, the
largest bank in German, they will transfer most of their assets and operation
to Frankfurt in this autumn (Arnold,
Martin, & Noonan, 2017). This could be one of the largest transfer
of single EU bank, as stated by the chief executive officer, John Cryan.
Another decision made by Citigroup’s Europe, Middle East and Afica (EMEA) chief
executive office, Jim Cowles, that the bank decided to move theirs main trading
operation to Frankfurt (Arnold
et al., 2017). This is because Frankfurt is well known for its
infrastructure and skilled workers which the bank has already had on ground, as
claimed by Mr.Cowles. These actions from two of the largest bank in the world
could threaten Britain’s economic in the long term, indeed. Undoubtedly,
international banks such as Nomura Holdings, the fifth largest bank by asset
and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation which is the third largest bank in
Japan by asset have already published their plan on moving their main operation
to Frankfurt after Brexit (Arnold, 2017).
Turning to another side of the issue, there are
several private banks who are now enlarging their services in the UK. According
to the Financial Times, the senior executives at the following banks; Credit
Suisse, UBS, Société Générale and Pictet announced that the companies will
expand their operation and investment in the UK (Arnold, 2017). This
is because the UK is still attractive in terms of market potential. In other
words, the wealthy clients still find an opportunity in the UK. This idea was
also supported by Jakob Stott who is the EU head of UBS’s wealth management
businesses (Franklin & Gruber, 2016).
Britain’s post-Brexit future
International Student
The UK has been known for its quality of
education but this might be extravagant for international student to study in
the UK. However, due to the UK referendum, the pound sterling witnessed a huge
drop after the vote had been officially announced (Broadbent, 2017). This drop
benefits international students directly because the pound depreciated in its
value, comparing to other currency. In other words, international students in
the UK spend less budget on their course and accommodation. To illustrate, one
of Thai students claimed that the cost of their study which includes tuition
fee, accommodation and living expense is now 15 percent lower, approximately. This means there would be a soar in a number of
international applicants who desire to pursue the quality of the UK education.
UK Property
Property in the UK has always been a target for
overseas investors, mainly London property. Due to the devaluation of pound
sterling, overseas investors found that the UK property is reasonably priced.
The study conducted by the property investment firm, JLL, showed that 28% of
the housing market transaction in 2016 was done by Asian investors (Vaswani,
2017). This could directly affect the Britons because those Asian investors
could inflate the housing market by their unlimited demand. This means house prices
could be overvalued for British citizen who are in need of the house.
Stock Market
The referendum also benefits the UK stock
market. This is because those multinational companies who
are listed in the London Stock Exchange (LSE) receive their revenue in other
currencies, mostly in dollars, which means the depreciation of
pound could boost the company’s profit (Inman, 2016). As
a result, the stock price of the company rocketed after Brexit which means it
creates the value for British company in the long term.
British Citizens who live in EU country
Technically, if Brexit did occur, the British
citizens who live in the UK could become the illegal evacuees overnight. This
statement was also supported by Dominic Grieve who is the UK former attorney
general. Moreover, there is a possibility that British expats could lose their
right in the EU Health care system (Bennett, 2017). Thus, the negotiation might
involve such issues as the right to work, permitted license to possess the EU
property or even the entitlement to access the EU health care system.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the UK referendum could be the
beginning of a period of unpredictability, especially for those in financial
sector. The asset management industry and the banks whose operations are based
in the UK could experience even worse predicament. As a result, some
international banks are now seriously considering the proposals of moving their
operation to the EU country, namely Frankfurt and Dublin. However, for those in
asset management, the strategies have not been changed. Fund managers still
optimistic on the UK equity market which directly benefits from weaker pound.
Moreover, for those in private bank sector, there is a determination to expand
their operations after Brexit. The weaker pound sterling also boosts the number
of international students and global investors in the UK, mostly those in
housing and stock market. For Britons who live in the EU, there is a concern
about losing their status as the EU citizens.
References
Arnold, M.
(2017, July 30). MUFG eyes Amsterdam as post-Brexit EU base. Financial           Times. Retrieved
August 12, 2017 from https://www.ft.com/content/158dcffe-7535-11e7-90c0-90a9d1bc9691
Arnold, M. (2017, August 1). Brexit set to
raise UK banks’ costs 4% and capital needs 30%. Financial Times. Retrieved
August 5, 2017 from https://www.ft.com/content/9fdf35a4-7610-11e7-a3e8-60495fe6ca71
Arnold, M.,
Martin, K., & Noonan, L. (2017, July 20). Citigroup and Deutsche Bank give
Frankfurt a Brexit boost. Financial Times. Retrieved August 2, 2017 from
https://www.ft.com/content/1b38eb1a-6d55-11e7-b9c7-15af748b60d0
Austen, M., Hunt, P., Kelly, D., Naylor, L.,
& Sants, H. (2016). The impact of the UK’s exit from the EU on the UK-based
financial services sector. Oliver Wyman. Retrieved August 2, 2017 from http://www.oliverwyman.com/content/dam/oliver-wyman/global/en/2016/oct/   Brexit_POV.PDF
Bennett, A.
(2017, March 30). What will Brexit mean for British expats?. The telegraph.
Retrieved August 19, 2017 from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/0/eu-facts-what-would-leaving-the-eu-mean-for-expats/
Broadbent, B.
(2017). Brexit and the pound. Bank of England. Retrieved from http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/Documents/speeches/2017/speech969.pdf
CFA institute
(2017). What It Means for Investment Management Brexit: A guide for
investment professionals. Retrieved from https://www.cfainstitute.org/ethics/Documents/guide_to_brexit.pdf
Franklin, J.,
& Gruber, A. (2016, March 2). UBS considers acquisitions to expand wealth management
in Europe. Thomson Reuters. Retrieved August 15, 2017 from http://www.reuters.com/article/us-ubs-wealth-europe-idUKKCN0W41EB
Gerrard, B.
(2017, July 13). Spanish business leaders suggest UK could be global trade hub post-Brexit.
The Telegraph. Retrieved
August 12, 2017 from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/
business/2017/07/13/spanish-business-leaders-suggest-uk-could-global-trade-hub-post/
Greenhalgh, H., Mooney, A., & Williams, A.
(2017, August 2). Brexit is going to be a mess for UK wealth management. Financial
Times. Retrieved August 9, 2017 from https://www.ft.com/content/f2451362-147d-11e7-80f4-13e067d5072c
House of Lords EU Committee (2016). Brexit:
Financial Services (9th Report of Session 2016–17). Retrieved July 10, 2017
from https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201617/lds
elect/ldeucom/81/81.pdf
Inman, P.
(2016, October 4). Q&A: falling pound, rising markets. Why is Britain’s
currency suffering while shares in its biggest companies are soaring ?. The
Guardian. Retrieved August 12, 2017 from
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/oct/04/qa-falling-pound-rising-markets
Kelly, J.,
(2017, July 12). Investment in UK fintech tops pre-Brexit levels in first half
of 2017. Thomson Reuters. Retrieved August 1, 2017 from http://uk.reuters.com/article/us-britain-fintech-investment-idUKKBN1AA2VN
Miller, G.
(2017, August 12). Britain must ask for more time to negotiate Brexit. The
Guardian. Retrieved August 16, 2017, from https://www.theguardian.com/
commentisfree/2017 /aug/12/britain-more-time-negotiate-brexit
Noonan, L.
(2017, July 21). Bank of America choose Dublin as EU base after Brexit. Financial
Times. Retrieved August 1, 2017 from https://www.ft.com/content/1fff392a-6e17-11e7-bfeb-33fe0c5b7eaa
Stothard, M.
(2017, July 7). Paris rolls out ‘red-white-and-blue carpet’ for banks. Financial
Times. Retrieved August 12, 2017 from
https://www.ft.com/content/464c67d8-630e-11e7-91a7-502f7ee26895
Vaswani, K.
(2017, April 28). Brexit not deterring Asian investors from UK property market.
BBC. Retrieved August 17, 2017 from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-39732816