Elements Of Risk Management And Their Impacts In The Organization’s Risk Assessment Process

Stakeholder Management

Question:

Write an essay about the Risk Management.
 

Risk affects the smooth running of the organizations. To sustain in the competitive business environment, taking suitable initiatives to mitigate the risks is very essential. The various risk factors of the organizations lead to cause decrease in the production and profitability of the organizations. For mitigating the risks of the organizations, identification of the suitable risk management procedures is also very essential. On the other hand, it can be said that to mitigate the risk within the organisation most of the company relies on several risk management factors. Apart from all different factors the three main factors or elements of risk management process within the organisation are Stakeholder management, Communication and consultation. In perspective of this, it is once in a while extremely shocking that the administrative approach in the development organizations can in any case recognize examination and react to such hazard. These days, there are numerous apparatuses accessible which can manage the basic hypothesis idea of danger which recognize and oversee hazard(Boesso and Kumar, 2016). Danger administration also can be described as the viable formalization framework which deals with the danger exercises in the organizations. In this essay the researcher will highlight on these elements and their impacts in the risk assessment process within the organisation. 

According to the project manager body of knowledge (PMBOK), stake holders of any company means the persons who are actively involved with the business process of the organizations. Stakeholder purchasing in the organisation is vital task for any organisation and their fruitful task completion, including incline and Six Sigma actions. A main source of business or project disappointment, in any case, is carelessness to those stakeholders with the best impact over execution and maintainability(Crouhy, Galai and Mark, 2000). Successful administration requires proactive and progressing stakeholder engagement—including unique proof, correspondence and riskassessment, and dynamic shared effort—all through the business life cycle.

From the market survey it can be observed that stakeholder management starts by recognizing people and gatherings the project and business influences. To distinguish a complete rundown of stakeholders, the undertaking group needs to assess people or gatherings that add to or get esteem from the project or the business. The group have to reviewstakeholders for their impact, the degree to which they are influenced and their conducts toward the course(Das and Das, 2006). Stakeholders’ points of view, association and capacity to impact the business may change all through its length and scale. Groups have to recognize stakeholders in the business plan stage, as well as infrequently all through the business. 

Repeating stakeholder examination will help the group decide the right way to deal with compelling stakeholder correspondence, risk moderation and engagement all through the business or the project. At each new stage, the group needs to return to the stakeholder investigation, which will direct strategic choices for connecting with key stakeholders to strengthenthe project aims and objectives.

To survey every stakeholdercombined, the group can apply numerical appraisals or basically rate each as high, medium or low for stakeholder’s impact and contribution. To maintain the risk within the organisation and to control over the various risks which is connective with the trade and the project the higher management needs to analyse the effects of the stakeholders in the organisation(Eskerod, Huemann and Ringhofer, 2015). To deliver the project or the business within the exact delivery time stakeholders may also influence the company. To understand the stakeholders pretty well within the organisation the management needs to communicate with them in a proper manner to analyse and assess the importance and the impact of them.

Communication for Risk Mitigation

In any organisation macro risk depicts as a risk which linked with the financial part within the organisation. The risk is mostly linked with the political factors in the organisation. For these types financial risk the organisation has beeninfluenced by volatility, assets of the organisation, portfolio and investment within the organisation. To understand the stakeholders within the business the management needs to assess the proper understanding and better communication process within the organisation(Holmes, 2002). The stakeholder assessment within the organisation depends on three key factors in the organisation. To maintain the interest of stakeholders in the organisation the management needs to rely on the level of influence, level of interest and level of involvement. 

Communication can mitigate the micro and macro risk within the organisation. To maintain the risk in the organisation the management needs to communicate well with the stakeholders of the organisation. It can be observed that, many organisations whereby communication has been performed with the stakeholder society in the similarmethod right across the board and that doesn’t work. The management actually need to spot on their communication hard work and confirm or convince that they are modified for the exact stakeholder and the stakeholder assembly(Hopkin, n.d.). To get an effective communication process the organisation and the management needs to categories their stakeholder’s two different groups in the organisation. These two types of stakeholders in the organisation are categories as primary and secondary stakeholders in the organisation.

It is fundamental for Risk Management to wind up part of the association’s way of life. In this method conveying and making attention to relative issues over the organisation at every progression of the Risk Management course of action are essential.

Using the observational power, the stakeholders have to identify and take suitable decesions about the risk factors of the organizations (Jordão and Sousa, 2010).The decision of the risk assessment and observation can change because of contrasts in qualities, needs, suppositions, ideas and worries, as they identify with the dangers or the issues under talk. Since the perspectives of stakeholders can significantly affect the choices obtained, it is vital that conceivable varieties in their impression of risk be recognized, recorded and tended to in the basic leadership process(Krause, 2006).The organizations have to mitigate the risks factors using various tools and techniques. Outer correspondence or the external type communication and counselling by specific specialists, and in addition trade of data and participation with different associations have to equally be arranged and actualized all the time(Dionne, 2013). The contribution of this learning and experience can demonstrate to a great degree accommodating for tending to issues identified with both the dangers and the procedure to deal with these risks, driving subsequently to a perspective on dangers that is free from subjective estimations. Besides, including outside faculty in such exercises contributes towards the reestablishment of accessible skill and risk assessment and observation.

Macro scale risk depicts political dangers that influence all organizations that work in an outside nation(Madsen and Ulhøi, 2001). Case of macro scale risks incorporate the conceivable outcomes that a country could raise charges, fall into common war or degrade its coin. Business supervisors must be very much educated around a nation’s laws and political circumstance to oversee macro scale risk. For example, chiefs or the project managers may abstain from putting resources into a specific nation on the off chance that they think it is likely the nation will exceed unfavourable performance. Differentiating a business by growing operations into a various outside nations is an approach to moderate danger or risk within the organisation. 

Categorization of Stakeholders

Micro scale risk depicts political risks that don’t influence all organizations(Missonier and Loufrani-Fedida, 2014). For instance, if a nation business new strict natural controls on environmental factors, it would influence modern operations in the nation; however it won’t influence certain businesses like restaurant chains and different product and services. Organizations can oversee micro scale risk by moving projects into undertakings or commercial ventures that are not influenced by critical changes.

Risk can originate from both inside and outer sources. The outer risks are those that are not in direct control of the administration. These incorporate political issues, trade rates, financing costs, and so on. Inside dangers, then again, incorporate resistance or data ruptures, among a few others.

Risk administration is imperative in an association in light of the fact that without it, a company can’t in any way, shape or form characterize its targets for what’s to come(Polonsky, 1996). On the off chance that an organization characterizes targets without contemplating the risks, odds are that they will lose heading once any of these dangers hit home.

As of late, numerous organizations have added Risk administration divisions to their group. The part of this group is to distinguish risks, think of methodologies to prepare for these dangers, to execute these techniques, and to persuade all individuals from the organization to collaborate in these procedures. Bigger companies for the most part face more risks, so their risk managementsystem additionally needs to be more modern. In addition, the riskmanagement group is in charge of evaluating every danger, hazard and figuring out which of them are fundamental and essential for the business. The basic risks are those that could critical affect the business; these have to then be given implication and have to be organized. The entire objective of risk management is to ensure that the organization just goes for broke that will help it accomplish its essential goals while holding every other risks under control(Ridley and Channing, 1999).

Because of the common spotlight on danger, hazard management occupations have opened up. Risk management employments are typically considered as money related vocations in light of the fact that the vast majority of the risks that organizations face are securely fixing to the organization’s financial standing. Risk management occupations are accessible both inside and remotely(Snider, 1964). The individual can work for an organization as an inner risk director or the individual can turn out to be a piece of a riskmanagement firm who gives riskmanagement administrations to organizations who don’t have in-house risk supervisors. Risk Management administration occupations are exceptionally compensating, essentially in light of the fact that a danger proficient plays a pivotal capacity in an association. They are additionally remunerated well in monetary terms(Taylor, 2014). The risk management administrations can figure out the risks associated with organizations. In any case, the risk management position is as of now a standout amongst the most regarded positions in firms and organizations.  

Conclusion

From the above essay paper it can be concluded that, risk management within the organisation plays a pivotal role and to employ the proper risk management process in the organisation the management needs to obtain proper tool and techniques of risk management. In this essay the researcher has highlighted various impact of the stakeholder management and better communication and consultancy for an organisation which can reduce the risk from the organisation’s business process. By the help of effective stakeholder management, communication process and consultation the organisation can get effective outcomes in their risk management operations. To maintain the stakeholders of the organisation the management needs to focus on different strategies and plans in their business operation. Formal and informal communication and understanding the business related risk and the consultant about the particular topic with the stakeholders engage them more in the business.  

References

Agrawal, R. (2009). Risk management. Jaipur, India: ABD Publishers.

Boesso, G. and Kumar, K. (2016).Examining the association between stakeholder culture, stakeholder salience and stakeholder engagement activities.Management Decision, 54(4), pp.815-831.

Crouhy, M., Galai, D. and Mark, R. (2000).Risk management. New York: McGraw Hill.

Das, S. and Das, S. (2006). Risk management. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons.

Dionne, G. (2013). Risk Management: History, Definition, and Critique. Risk Management and Insurance Review, 16(2), pp.147-166.

Eskerod, P., Huemann, M. and Ringhofer, C. (2015). Stakeholder Inclusiveness: Enriching Project Management with General Stakeholder Theory. ProjMgmtJrnl, 46(6), pp.42-53.

Holmes, A. (2002). Risk management. Oxford, U.K.: Capstone Pub.

Hopkin, P. (n.d.). Risk Management.

Jordão, B. and Sousa, E. (2010).Risk management. New York: Nova Science Publishers.

Krause, A. (2006). Risk management. Bradford, England: Emerald Group Pub.

Madsen, H. and Ulhøi, J. (2001).Integrating environmental and stakeholder management.Business Strategy and the Environment, 10(2), pp.77-88.

Missonier, S. and Loufrani-Fedida, S. (2014). Stakeholder analysis and engagement in projects: From stakeholder relational perspective to stakeholder relational ontology. International Journal of Project Management, 32(7), pp.1108-1122.

Polonsky, M. (1996). Stakeholder management and the stakeholder matrix: Potential strategic marketing tools. J Market-Focused Manage, 1(3).

Ridley, J. and Channing, J. (1999).Risk management. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.

Snider, H. (1964).Risk management. Homewood, Ill.: Published for the S.S. Huebner Foundation for Insurance Education, University of Pennsylvania, by R.D. Irwin.

Taylor, E. (2014). Optimizing Stakeholder Relationships: A Real Options Approach to Stakeholder Management.Academy of Management Proceedings, 2014(1), pp.17207-17207.