It has been noted that over the few decades, the nutritional, personal care and pharmaceutical industries have all come together so as to address the growing demands in the wellness, health and beauty market. The coming together has culminated to the creation of new industrial segments such as Nutricosmetics, Cosmeceuticals and Nutraceuticals.
Fig 1: Emergence of new industry segments.
The three segments are majorly driven by the ever increasing awareness and the desire to have preventive measures, anti-aging products as well as the natural therapies. It is approximated that the annual growth of the new segments could hit between 4%-8%. Major regions where noticeable dominance has been recorded are Japan and China which account for about 90% of the world sales. USA on the other hand has been noted to dominate the Nutraceutical industry with approximately 45%.
The main aim of this paper was to analyze the emergence of the three segments in the Australian market using an end-user survey that had been conducted. Two different business intelligence analytic tools were employed to analyze the data. The two tools are;
Participants in the survey were asked on which of the product type they would be most interested in. Majority (40.8%, n = 147) of the respondents were most interested with Nutricosmetic products while Cosmeceuticals has the least proportion (26.4%, n = 95) of people who are most interested in it. 32.8% (n = 118) of the respondents were most interested in Nutraceutical products.
Table 1: product most interested in
Row Labels |
Count of Product Type |
Percent |
Cosmeceuticals |
95 |
26.4% |
Nutraceuticals |
118 |
32.8% |
Nutricosmetics |
147 |
40.8% |
Grand Total |
360 |
100.0% |
Table 2: Preference of the products based on regions
Count of Product Type |
Column Labels |
|||
Row Labels |
Cosmeceuticals |
Nutraceuticals |
Nutricosmetics |
Grand Total |
12% |
62% |
27% |
100% |
|
Queensland |
48% |
7% |
45% |
100% |
Western Australia |
5% |
47% |
48% |
100% |
South Australia |
37% |
20% |
43% |
100% |
Tasmania |
28% |
37% |
35% |
100% |
Victoria |
28% |
25% |
47% |
100% |
Grand Total |
26% |
33% |
41% |
100% |
In New South Wales state, most respondents (62%, n = 37) from this state said to prefer Nutraceutical products. Cosmeceutical products was the least preferred (12%, n = 7) among the respondents from this state. 27% (n = 16) said to prefer Nutricosmetic products the most.
Unlike in New South Wales state, most respondents (48%, n = 29) from Queensland said to prefer Cosmeceutical products. Nutraceutical products was the least preferred (7%, n = 4) among the respondents from this state. 45% (n = 27) said to prefer Nutricosmetic products the most.
In the Western Australia state, most respondents (48%, n = 29) said to prefer Nutricosmetic products. Cosmeceutical products was the least preferred (5%, n = 3) among the respondents from this state. 48% (n = 28) said to prefer Nutraceutical products the most.
Just like in Western Australia, most respondents (43%, n = 26) said to prefer Nutricosmetic products. Cosmeceutical products had the second highest proportion of people who prefer it most (37%) while Nutraceutical products had the least proportion of people who prefer it most (20%).
In Western Australia, most respondents (37%) said to prefer Nutraceutical products followed by 35% who said to prefer Nutricosmetic products most while 28% said to prefer Cosmeceutical products.
Just like in South Australia, most respondents (47%, n = 28) said to prefer Nutricosmetic products. Cosmeceutical products had the second highest proportion of people who prefer it most (28%) while Nutraceutical products had the least proportion of people who prefer it most (25%).
As can be seen in figure 1 below, there is no significant difference between male and females in terms of product preference. The preference proportion of the products is almost the same for both the groups (males and females).
Figure 1: Gender versus product type
Figure 2 below gives the product preference based on age band. As can be seen, majority of age bands preferred Nutricosmetic products. However, those aged between 40-50 as well as 60-70 majority of them said to prefer Nutraceutical products (39% and 55% respectively).
Figure 2: Age band versus product type
Respondents were asked to state the form in which they would prefer to consume the products. Results are given in the table below;
Table 3: Form most preferred to consume the product
Row Labels |
Count of Form |
|
beverage |
117 |
32.5% |
food |
127 |
35.3% |
pills |
116 |
32.2% |
Grand Total |
360 |
100.0% |
As can be seen, majority (35.3%, n = 127) would prefer to consume the products as food, 32.5% (n = 117) would prefer to consume it as beverage while the remaining 32.2% (n = 116) would prefer to consume it as pills.
Social media is the most preferred channel of contacting the consumers (41%, n = 147), followed by email (36%, n = 130) while post was the least preferred (23%, n = 83). It is important to note that the channel preference for both males and females was not significantly different.
Table 4: Channel preference
Count of Channel |
Column Labels |
||
Row Labels |
F |
M |
Grand Total |
|
19% |
17% |
36% |
Post |
11% |
12% |
23% |
Social Media |
23% |
18% |
41% |
Grand Total |
53% |
47% |
100% |
Majority (63.3%) of the respondents said to be willing to spend between 50-100 dollars on the products every month. 9.4% (n = 34) of the respondents are willing to spend more than 100 dollars while 27.2% (n = 98) are willing to spend less than 50 dollars a month.
Table 5: Amount in dollars respondents willing to spend in a month
Row Labels |
Count of Monthly ($) |
Percent |
<50 |
98 |
27.2% |
50-100 |
228 |
63.3% |
>100 |
34 |
9.4% |
Grand Total |
360 |
100.0% |
Table 6 provides the income levels of the respondents versus the product preference. As can be seen, majority (41.6%) of those who earn less than $50,000 would prefer Nutracutical products the most. See table 6 for more results.
Table 6: Income level versus product preference
Count of Product Type |
Column Labels |
|||
Row Labels |
Cosmeceuticals |
Nutraceuticals |
Nutricosmetics |
Grand Total |
< 50,000 |
26.0% |
41.6% |
32.5% |
100.0% |
50,000-70,000 |
27.2% |
31.1% |
41.7% |
100.0% |
70,000-90,000 |
23.8% |
29.4% |
46.9% |
100.0% |
> 100,000 |
35.1% |
32.4% |
32.4% |
100.0% |
Grand Total |
26.4% |
32.8% |
40.8% |
100.0% |
Even though Nutricosmetics was most preferred product among the respondents across all the states, the confidence scores received were still lower than the confidence scores given for Cosmeceutical which was the second among the most preferred products. Respondents were asked how confident they were of the results from using the products. They were required to rate between 1 and 5 with 1 representing least confident while 5 representing most confident.
Cosmeceutical products ranked highest in terms of the confidence scores followed by Nutricosmetics while Nutraceutical products came distant third. Of interest to note was that none of the products got a score of 4 and above.
Females rated the Cosmeceutical products and Nutraceutical products highly as compared to the male respondents who only gave a higher rating for Nutricosmetics.
Figure 3: Confidence rating of the product types by gender
Respondents were also asked to score on how confident they are to recommend the products to their friends. The scores were between 1 and 10 with 1 being least confident and 10 being most confident. The average scores were worrying. The average recommendation score for all the products was merely 5.39 out of 10. Cosmeceutical products had the highest recommendation score (5.6) while Nutraceuticals had the least score. In overall, female respondents had higher recommendation scores for all the products as compared to the male respondents. The average score for the males rating for all the products was on average lower than 5 while females rating was slightly above 6. In fact a Net Promoter Score (NPS) of -45% was obtained which means that majority were detractors (62.78%) while promoters were only 17.78%.
Figure 4: Recommendation score rating of the product type by gender
Conclusion
This study sought to analyze the emergence of three new product segments (Cosmeceuticals, Nutricosmetics and Nutraceuticals) in the Australian market using an end-user survey that had been conducted. Results showed that majority (40.8%) of the respondents interviewed would prefer Nutricosmetics the most while the cosmeceutical products had the least proportion (26.4%) in terms of preference from the customers. Nutraceutical products were most preferred in New South Wales and Tasmania, Cosmeceutical products were most preferred in Queensland while Nutricosmetic products were highly preferred in Western Australia, South Australia and Victoria. No major differences in terms of product preferences for the different sex groups
I this present times, where the new generation of people are greatly concerned with their beauty as well as health and well-being a number of manufacturing companies have no otherwise to work extra hard to provide results that are convincing to meet the consumer needs.
Australia has not yet reached the level in which countries such as China, Japan and USA have reached in terms of the three segments studied in this paper. Australia is however on the right path towards adopting the new segments in the Australian market. However, for this to be achieved, a number of measures need to be looked. The following are the recommendations based on the study;
References
Epstein , H., 2009. Cosmeceutical vehicles. Clinical Dermatol, 27(5), p. 453–60.
Kenneth , R., Feingold, M. D. & Debra , C., 2010. Elizabeth M. Zettersten, MD, Ruby Ghadially, MOptimal ratios of topical stratum corneum lipids improve barrier recovery in chronologically aged skin.
Zhou , C., Jin , Y. S. & Yeon , K. K., 2005. Heat Modulation of Tropoelastin, Fibrillin-1, and MatrixMetalloproteinase-12 in Human Skin. Volume 124, p. 70–78.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order formOnce we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignmentAs soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download