Discuss about the Ethical Dilemma and Theories.
Apple Inc is a US based company which is headquartered at California. The company manufactures and sells electronics and computer software across the globe. The company was the pioneer to introduce computers in early 90s. Apple has established its brand recognition through innovative products and services (Apple, 2017).
On one hand, Apple brings a smile on the face of its customers and on the other hand, it deploys child labor for its production and assembling. Child labor is one of the most critical issues which has shaken the world with its astonishing numbers and figures. There are more than 150 million children below the age of fifteen, who are involved in paid and unpaid form of job (Unicef, 2016). The company accepted that children between the ages of 11-15 were involved in three of the suppliers of Apple Inc. Though, the locations of the factories were not revealed by the company, but most of the assembling is done in China. The other factories of Apple are located in Singapore, Taiwan, US, Malaysia, Thailand, Philippines and Czech Republic.
Apple claimed to no longer employee child labor in its supply chain process and justified the child labor by saying that the company intended to provide financial support to the underage children and promoted Kohlberg’s stage 1 of Obedience and Punishment (Wood, 2007). This was not the first time that Apple was accused of employing child labor in its factories where the parts were assembled (Zane, Irwin, & Reczek, 2016). The child workers were forced to work under hazardous conditions which was a threat to their life. The workers at one of the factories of Apple were poisoned by n-hexane gas which is harmful chemical and affects the eyesight and muscles of the body. Further, the factories were also not ventilated properly which again threatens the life of the workers. One of the Taiwanese supplier of Apple was reported to have a suicide because of charging the worker with allegation for stealing the prototype of iphone.
Further, the factories were found to violate the rule of Apple, which states that the maximum working hour for a worker is 60 hours per week (Moore, 2010).
The problem worsened in the year 2011 and more number of children was found to be employed in the factories of Apple (Moore, 2011).
Ethical Dilemma: How Apple could address the issue of child labor in its supply chain, especially in those locations where child labor is a common phenomenon and how can Apple assure that these children would be given some better opportunity or would be forced into deeper form of exploitation.
Ethical dilemma is a scenario when one is faced with the challenge of carrying out the most ethical course of action (Nathanson, 2017). In the case of Apple, on one hand it is providing electronic gadgets to the consumers and on the other hand, children below the age of 15 are forced to assemble the parts of those gadgets. In spite of laying down its rules and regulations for the suppliers, child labor is being deployed and is forced to work under unsafe working conditions. Apple took the initiative to audit its supply chain process to identify the children involved in the process of manufacturing and assembling (Moore, 2016). The company also claimed that when it finds a child below the age of 15, it pays off the child and then financially supports him to continue his education.
The company is faced with the ethical dilemma of how to ensure that no underage children are being employed by its factories. In order to understand the ethical dilemma, the report would shed some light on the plight of a child labor. The children in the countries suffer from poverty and do not have any means to survive. The child becomes the only source of income for his family’s sustenance. The child pays for the school fees of his siblings and also takes responsibility of providing bread and butter (Srivastava, 2011). The children in developing and under developed countries do not have access to basic amenities of food, shelter and education. The surrounding circumstances force these children to work at the age of below 15, at which they are suppose to attend their classes. The situation is far worse in the countries like Uzbekistan and East African countries where children die of starvation and have no shelter. Their only source of survival is sending their child to work. Their condition may get worsened when they are asked to leave their jobs because this job is all they have. For these children, school is not an option because of poor existing policies of these countries.
The report makes an attempt to view the situation from another perspective which is utilitarianism theory that states that for a particular situation, one’s action should contribute to the greatest welfare of the people and everybody’s interest is at par (Nathanson, 2017). Now in such a scenario, it would become unethical to force these children to abandon their jobs when their entire family is dependent up on this job. On the other hand, it becomes ethical to permit child labor policy because that would go hand in favor of these helpless children (Mojonnier, 2012). Apple progressed to stage of Kohlberg (Legalistic Social Contract) by modifying the rules as per its convenience (Wood, 2007).
This philosophy of utilitarianism is not digested by the multinational corporations because they fear that the image of their brand would be tarnished in the public and they would lose their consumer base. A second thought needs to be given on the agenda of child labor that if these companies are offering these children a job, free food and education, then are they being unethical. Thus, Apple demonstrated maxim 3 of universality by offering jobs to these children (Wood, 2007).
However, looking the situation from other perspective, children define the future of a country and forcing these children to work at an early age would hamper their childhood. These children are deprived of their basic rights and are being forced to work under hazardous conditions (Human Rights Watch, 2017). Since a child is ignorant and does not have any idea about their rights and freedom. They are forced to work under unsafe conditions which have declared unsafe for adults as well (Mckenna, 2012). Every year, approximately there are 2.7 million children dying because of hazardous working conditions (The World Counts, 2014). These children lack the experience to work on machinery and tools and also get an exposure to toxic chemicals (ILO, 2017). The ethical dilemma displays maxim 1 of consistency (Wood, 2007).
Thus, Apple has been continuously facing the above described ethical dilemma to employ child labor because on one hand they would deprive a child of his entitled rights and on the other hand, they would push the child towards other forms of exploitation.
After analyzing the problem, it can be assessed that addressing the issue of child labor is a challenging issue and would require the support of the company as well as government. It is clear that forcing the children to leave their jobs would affect the entire family of these children, who rely for bread and butter on these children’s income.
Now the goal would be to ensure that these children do not fall victim of some other form of exploitation and therefore, retain these children in their supply chain activity. Now, once Apple has retained these children, it now needs to consider the magnitude of consequences from the moral intensity of Jones by demonstrating maxim 3 of universality through its utilitarian aspects (Wood, 2007):
Mike Gustavsson, being a retired lecturer of Business Ethics, stood against the motion and is of the view that the top management of any company plays a vital role in integrating ethical behavior in any business, thereby supporting ethical leadership in business schools. He believes that Ethical leadership focuses on doing the right thing and seeks to serve others to make a long lasting positive impact on the business. He is of the view that ethical leaders make better business decisions which shapes the business activities of an organization. Corporate governance is required to balance the economical and social goals of a business (Zimmerli, Richter & Holzinger, 2007). Mike considers corporate governance as a business model that conducts fair dealings with all the stakeholders of the company including customers, employees, suppliers, communities and shareholders (Brink, 2011). He, therefore, displays the characteristics of discretionary stakeholder and promotes the rule of Universality which is Maxim 3 of Kant’s theory (Wood, 2007). Mike follows the universal ethical principle of Kohlberg’s which considers justice and humanity above anything else (Garz, 2009). In spite of standing in strong support of high moral values and equality, Mike could not respect the rights and equality of his daughter and began to protest against Alfaraft AB, which turns the orientation of his beliefs from stakeholder to shareholder (Fryer, 2014).
Jan Edward, being the CEO of Clean Solutions Inc, stood against the motion. She was of the view that ethics should not be separated from day to day business activities and every agenda must have ethics involved to assure ethical behavior. Jan strongly supported ethical leadership in a business and wanted to carry them together hand in hand. She engaged herself and her team in helping disadvantaged people to serve the society as a corporate social responsibility (Roa, 2007). Therefore, she strongly supported ethical leadership in education system. She belonged to the group of stakeholder because of her extended control over the business (Fryer, 2014). Her self-centered and self motivated characteristics demonstrated egoism (Osterberg, 2012). Her initiative towards corporate social responsibility and selfless concern for others demonstrated her altruistic beliefs (Vilcox & Mohan, 2007). In spite of demonstrating stage 3 attributes of conventional morality, she was being naively egoistical by wanting to change the trend by applying her own ethical principles which questions her ethical leadership mutual respect trait (Wood, 2007).
Mei-Hua Felung’s stood against the motion. Their decisions were influenced by the external factors including public opinion, laws and regulations etc. From her act and conduct, Mei-Hua demonstrated maxim 1 of consistency and utilitarian attributes (Wood, 2007). She also exhibited stage 3 of ‘good boy good girl orientation’ along with stage 5 of legalistic social contract (Wood, 2007). She is perceived as at stage 4 of law and order orientation because of her professional characteristic to abide by legal obligations. From her ability of bending the rules as per her own convenience, she is found to exhibit stage 1 of obedience and punishment orientation (Wood, 2007). She would play with the rules to suit the needs of her clients and help them in tax evasion by strictly adhering to the rules and regulations.
Deshi Chen stood favor of the motion because of his practical oriented belief and considered ethical leadership as an obstacle in the path of success of an organization. He demonstrated the opinion of shareholder and strongly opposed the integration of ethics in business (Fryer, 2014). His self-centered and self motivated attributes displayed egoism. Deshi exhibited stage 2 of instrumental relativist orientation because of his failure to understand the importance of ethics in business (Wood, 2007). He was also perceived to demonstrate stage 3 on the basis of social expectation conformities.
All the parties stood in favor the motion except Deshi, who is considered to be the most transparent. On the other hand, Mei-Hua is considered the most unethical because of her persecution delusions.
After studying the debate ‘The Case of the Holiday’, the report aims to identify the ethical dilemmas of every character and reflecting upon the perspective of Boris illustratively.
Team 1 perceives the ethical dilemma of Boris from the perspective of intriguing within the interests of company, client, manager and himself. The two options of Boris were to reschedule the launch of product which would have influenced the client relationship or cancel his holiday and benefit his career opportunity by enhancing the client relationship and contributing to the growth of business which would affect the relationship with Swee Lan.
Team 2 illustrates the ethical dilemma of Swee Lan after the receiving the response from Boris. Swee Lan definitely had the authority to influence the decision of Boris to prioritize career or stay committed to the promised holiday. She was also influenced by her parents’ reaction and feared getting them upset.
Team 3 recognized the ethical dilemma of manager by evaluating company’s profit and planned holiday of Boris. It is clear that manager upholds his interests in fulfilling the needs of client to increase the business prospects which neglects the holiday of Boris. Or if he would grant the permission of holiday then that would severely influence the client relationship.
Team 4 represents Marcus and his friends, whose dilemma is being highlighted when they react to the response of Boris to cancel his planned holiday for interest of company. They perceive this decision of Boris as impractical and express their concerns for the employment standards in the company, which needs to be enhanced so as to not put any employee in such a dilemma.
Further, ethical dilemma of Boris has been illustrated.
The company had a shareholder view because of its focus on profitability where employees were asked to strictly adhere to the rules and regulations to maintain their competency. They were expected to adhere their goals and objectives with that of the company to increase the overall productivity of the organization. Boris demonstrated the characteristics of obedience and punishment orientation of stage 1 of Kohlberg during the tenure of product release (Wood, 2007). The issue can be further illustrated as negligible room for manoeuvre which states that declining the order of an authority would lead to punishment by the company. This affected the decision of Boris due to which he cancelled the planned holiday to follow the order of manager. Utilitarianism theory helps to add another perspective of the situation by reflecting the action plan of Boris as the best choice which is in the favor of client, company and himself (Smith, 2008).
Boris demonstrates the attributes of Type A which declares him as competitive, self-esteemed, ambitious and goal oriented which reflects his egoism (Osterberg, 2012). In the process, Boris begin to reflect the instrumental relativist orientation of stage 2 by thinking that this product launch would help him to advance in his career by awarding him the credit of increasing business prospects (Wood, 2007).
Further, the moral intensity of Boris circumscribes around the results of the action. The possible outcome of the situation could either put his career in danger or affect his relationship with his girlfriend Swee Lan. Boris did not receive the consent of his friends as well as girlfriend for his decision to cancel his holiday plan.
Overall, Boris used utilitarian approach for making his decision for the greater good of his company and client.
During the process of analyzing cases, we had many conflicts due to our difference of opinions, which helped us to evolve our teamwork skills and interpersonal communication. To analyze the cases and scenarios, I came across various stages of moral development and maxim of ethical theories which play a significant role in the sustainability of an organization.
The instrumental relativist orientation of Kohlberg’s stage 2 is self-interest driven wherein, one’s actions are determined from the personal gain and interest. The goal of our team was to solve the case studies by applying various ethical theories and models. The complete process involved many conflicts and arguments over the motion of the characters, yet the team stayed focused and motivated and every teammate contributed his opinion and argument to apply the suitable theory to the scenario. In order to contribute our best efforts, we segmented the task to allocate the segments to every individual which eased our efforts and served our purpose. This enabled every individual to develop his concepts of ethical theories and moral development. According to the theory of collectivism, individuals should help each other to establish mutual trust within the group. This helped us to move to Kohlberg’s stage 3 which is good boy nice girl which is requisite to meet the social expectations.
We had arguments while we tried to reach a common conclusion and I perceived it as an opportunity to utilize my ethical leadership by giving respect to every teammate’s view and opinion. I got the platform to enhance my interpersonal and teamwork skills by demonstrating my authority by paying equal respect to all. This facilitated us to progress to Kohlberg’s stage 5 of Social contract legalistic orientation. We could now conclude to a common view point by listening to every member’s perspective.
Thus, the case study helped me to understand the significance of Kant’s theory which is required to maintain the discipline in a team.
References
Apple. (2017). About. Apple. Retrieved from: https://www.apple.com/about/
Audi, R. (2009). Business Ethics and Ethical Business. New York: Oxford University Press.
Brenkert, G.G., & Beauchamp, T.L. (2012). The Oxford Handbook of Business Ethics. OUP USA.
Brink, A. (2011). Corporate Governance and Business Ethics. Germany: Springer Science & Business Media.
Fredrick, R.E. (2008). A Companion to Business Ethics. US: John Wiley & Sons.
Fryer, M. (2014). Ethics Theory and Business Practice. UK: SAGE.
Garber, P.R. (2008). The Ethical Dilemma. Amherst: Human Resource Development.
Garz, D. (2009). Lawrence Kohlberg – an Introduction. Germany: Barbara Budrich.
Human Rights Watch. (2017). Child Labor. Human Rights Watch. https://www.hrw.org/topic/childrens-rights/child-labor
ILO. (2017). Hazardous child labour. ILO. Retrieved from: https://www.ilo.org/ipec/facts/WorstFormsofChildLabour/Hazardouschildlabour/lang–en/index.htm?ssSourceSiteId=global
Lincoln, S.H., & Holmes, E.K. (2011). Ethical Decision Making: A Process Influenced by Moral Intensity. Journal of Healthcare, Science and the Humanities, 1(1), 55-69.
Mckenna, L. (2012). Child Labor Is Making A Disturbing Resurgence Around The World. Business Insider. Retrieved from: https://www.businessinsider.com/countries-worst-child-labor-risks-2012-1?IR=T
Mojonnier, T. (2012). When Child Labor Is Ethical. Business Theory. Retrieved from: https://businesstheory.com/child-labor-ethical/
Monks, R.A.G., & Minow, N. (2011). Corporate Governance. US: John Wiley & Sons.
Moore, M. (2010). Apple admits child labour used at its assembly plants. The Telegraph. Retrieved from: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/mediatechnologyandtelecoms/7332405/Apple-admits-child-labour-used-at-its-assembly-plants.html
Moore, M. (2011). Apple’s child labour issues worsen. The Telegraph. Retrieved from: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/apple/8324867/Apples-child-labour-issues-worsen.html
Nathanson, S. (2017). Act and Rule Utilitarianism. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from: https://www.iep.utm.edu/util-a-r/
Osterberg, J. (2012). Self and Others: A Study of Ethical Egoism. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers
Roa, F.C. (2007). Business Ethics and Social Responsibility. Philippines: Rex Bookstore Inc.
Shaw, W.H. (2016). Business Ethics. US: Cengage Learning.
Smith, J.D. (2008). Normative Theory and Business Ethics. UK: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Srivastava, K. (2011). Child labour issues and challenges. Industrial Psychiatry Journal. Retrieved from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3425238/
The World Counts. (2014). Blistered small hands. The World Counts. Retrieved from: https://www.theworldcounts.com/stories/Child-Labor-Working-Conditions
Unicef. (2016). An estimated 150 million children worldwide are engaged in child labour. Unicef. Retrieved form: https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-protection/child-labour/#
Vilcox, M.W., & Mohan, T.O. (2007). Contemporary Issues in Business Ethics. New York: Nova Publishers.
Wood, A.W. (2007). Kantian Ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zane, D., Irwin, J., & Reczek, R.W. (2016). Why companies are blind to child labor. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from: https://hbr.org/2016/01/why-companies-are-blind-to-child-labor
Zimmerli, W.C., Richter, K., & Holzinger, M. (2007). Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance. New York: Springer Science & Business Media.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download
