In this scenario, the ethical principle of confidentiality has been breached. This is a fundamental principle of APES 110, which forbids the practicing firm from disclosing information collected during the audit and assurance procedure about the client to other parties without taking prior permission from the client.
Mortdale accounting firm has audited companies from where he has collected working papers of the client. He has shared the information collected during the auditing process to Penshurst accountants, a peer reviewer for executing the assurance activity of Mortdale. This is unethical as such information should not be shared without consulting the client firm.
Yes, in this case, the principle of professional behavior, which is an ethical requirement of APES 110 have been breached by the CPA as well as by the accounting firm. The accounting firm should not wholly rely on the words of the applicant rather should strive to gather more information about his past engagements. It is also necessary to know whether the applicant has no conflicts of interests with the organization.
In this scenario, the recruiting firm should have conducted some basic research on Jan Dungog, a CPA before offering him the job. The information to be collected may entail reasons for living and the general opinion of the past employer. This would have enabled the firm to determine the true reasons for the dissociation of the person with his previous job and get to understand his capabilities. Therefore, the firm should have contacted the previous employer before employing Jan for the position.
The practicing professional accountant has contravened the principle of objectivity. He is not allowed to try to advertise to his current clients about his other engagements by making adverts about the other services other than auditing that he is providing. An auditor is required to strictly follow the requirements in the later of engagement so as to avoid any conflicts of interests. He should not be influenced by many factors in the course of the auditing process as this can lead to conflicts of interests.
In this case particular case study, Wendal Sailor communicated with his current clients about the other services that he was providing other than Auditing and assurance. He did this before expressing his final opinion about the true position of the client. The effect of this is that it may cause biases on the part of the auditor, due to conflicts of interests created by some factors like the expectation of favor from the client, who may purchase his other services. Professional bias is a breach of the ethical requirement of objectivity.
In this case, there is no principle of APES professional standards are not affected in this case breached. Since Judith only holds an honorary post, not connected to any management function. This means that he is not entitled to make any financial decisions regarding the firm. Therefore, Judith’s independence of opinion in auditing process may not be influenced in any way. If in case Judith was involved in making some financial decisions, then this could prejudice his independence of opinion due to some conflicts of interest
Judith Durham has merely been given an honorary post in the firm. An honorary position does not give Judith decision-making privileges. Therefore, Judith can formulate an independent opinion in an audit work. Ideally, an honorary position is a situation whereby a person occupies a position as a way of honor but he does not gain the power of making decisions.
So in line with the above discussion, it can be concluded that Judith can conduct an independent audit of the firm.
A professional accountant should not reveal any information relating to the clients without obtaining prior permission from the client. This is a breach of the principle of confidentiality. The principle of confidentiality requires that the Auditor does not disclose any information pertaining his client to third parties without permission from the client. Therefore, Ernie is not permitted to provide any financial information relating to his clients that he may have received in the course of the audit process to the acquiring firm unless he is permitted to do so by the firm.
In the case, Dengate should have sought permission from his client firm on whether he should communicate the information about the transfer of the working papers relating to the audit process to the acquiring firm. Besides the fact that he took permission before transferring the taxation working papers, he is also obliged to seek permission for the audit documents as well.
In this scenario principle of independence has been contravened. In the APES 110 section 290, it is clearly stated that an auditor should be independent in his views and should void any conflicts of interests while providing an audit opinion. He can provide taxation, management and auditing services but is not allowed to provide all the three services at once to one client. This means that if he is providing management services, he should not provide auditing services to the same client as this may cause some conflicts of interests that may lead to bias opinions.
In this case, Fred provides auditing services, management services, and taxation services to the same company. Therefore, if in case he makes a material error in tax computations, he may not reveal this in the audit opinion, making the audit report unreliable.
In this scenario, no professional principles of APES 110 have been breached as the accounting firm can maintain any information regarding the accounts of the organization in which it does not give audit opinion on accounts.
The particular accounting firm is also permitted to provide bookkeeping services to the firm. This is exactly what Allgood Chartered Accounting Firm has done, by providing assistance in maintaining accounting records of its branch.
The company’s branch lacks proper computer facilities that may enable it to keep its own records. Therefore accounting firm has taken up the role of maintaining its records. However, it could be against the requirements of the ethical standards, if the company was maintaining the accounting records of the branch and at the same time conducting the auditing activities related to the branch.
In this case, the professional accountant has gone against the requirements of professional behavior, which requires an auditor to behave in a way that does not contravene the reputation of the profession. James has therefore breached the principle enshrined in APES 110 section 150. He has indulged in illegal and unethical activities which could compromise his profession as an accountant. The legal activities include assault due to disorderly behavior drunk driving and fighting. James was also convicted in a court of law and sentenced to three months in jail making his license to be suspended for one year. Therefore, it can be concluded that James did not act in a professional way, which contravenes the principle of professional behavior.
The auditor should also take time to discuss issues regarding contingent liabilities with the management. If the management is reluctant to disclose a number of contingent liabilities, then the auditor should write a qualified report, as this would have an effect on the financial statements of the firm.
References
Banimahd, B., Hasas, Y. Y., & Yazdanian, N. (2014). Earnings Management and Audit Opinion: Evidence of Private Audit Firms.
Birt, J., et al., (2014). Accounting: Business Reporting For Decision Making 5e.
Carey, P., Potter, B., & Tanewski, G. (2014). Application of the Reporting Entity Concept in Australia. Abacus, 50(4), 460-489.
Chen, J., Cumming, D., Hou, W., & Lee, E. (2013). Executive Integrity, Audit Opinion, and Fraud in Chinese Listed Firms. Emerging Markets Review, 15, 72-91.
Habib, A. (2013). A Meta-Analysis of the Determinants of Modified Audit Opinion Decisions. Managerial Auditing Journal, 28(3), 184-216.
Newberry, S. (2015). Public Sector Accounting: Shifting Concepts of Accountability. Public Money & Management, 35(5), 371-376.
Rahman, A. R. (2013). The Australian Accounting Standards Review Board (RLE Accounting): The Establishment of Its Participative Review Process. Routledge.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download