• Give an account of the first TWO billion years of the planet including its formation (and its moon’s formation, if so desired). Emphasise what rock-derived evidence allows us to conclude about the effects that the first cellular life forms had on planetary conditions.
• Discuss briefly but with full reasoning and referencing your views on whether or not we are the only civilisation in the universe. ?
This report is on the evolution of Earth and its formation that took place 2 billion years ago (Bansal, 2010). The formation of the land masses or continents are discussed. A short brief is presented about the ancient landmasses or continent like Ur, yilgarin, Vaalbara, Columbia, Atlantica and Artica. Unlike some other planets in the solar system, Earth has only one natural satellite, i.e., Moon. There are many theories to the formation of this natural satellite, i.e., Moon. A brief about the formation of moon is presented in his report. Description of the cellular life forms those were present in the Earth at the very beginning is presented in this report. Some views are also presented in this report about the subject that “are we the only civilization in this world or not”. This report is mainly about the evolution of life, planet and its natural satellite, i.e. moon.
The historical backdrop of the Earth’s crust can be deduced from different antiquated rocks and areas spread over the globe today (Bansal, 2010). A few lines of confirmation are utilized, for example, the structure of minerals and rocks, the stone strata, and so forth. Closeness of structure crosswise over geologically isolated locales can be seen at this very moment contiguity previously. Paleomagnetics and geochronology have additionally been utilized to build up connections between antiquated rocks.
Over an era, presently solidifying procedure hindered, a few sections of the outside started to endure. These contain a portion of the most established shakes in presence today (Marshak, 2012). These persevering parts of the outside took after a turbulent history, some of the time uniting with other such parts to shape extensive landmasses, which then broke separated to send the pieces floating once more (Sumner, 2014). The vast majority of those that survived are a piece of antiquated cratons. Cratons are thick parts of today’s mainland plates, which have amassed material from more established mainlands and developed thick. In fact, a craton has made due in any event a large portion of a billion years of mainland development/breakups. They are the steady inside parts of huge numbers of today’s mainland plates, and the outside beneath them is thick, reaching out up to 200 km into the mantle. Cratons normally developed by a procedure of accumulation, where lighter materials from beneath (felsic shakes, for example, stone) floated upwards and accumulated.
As the plates of the Earth collide and afterward in the end separate and float separated once more, parts of one plate can get to be connected to another and float away with it. Such sections are called terranes, and they are an essential pointer of sidelong developments in the Earth’s covering, and give proof from which the developments may be reasoned.
Some of the continents that were formed in the early stage when the Earth was in unstable conditions are:
Yilgarn: It was one of the largest craton, which shaped the greater part of the Western Australian landmass. The vast majority of this craton conformed to 2.94 to 2.63 billion years prior, yet it contains parts that are much more seasoned, starting in terranes, which pre-dated it altogether.
Vaalbara: It was a supercontinent from the Paleoarchean formed, around 3.3 billion years prior. Vaalbara was most likely no greater than Australia is today. It is called “supercontinent” only because it was one of the greatest landmass around. The greater part of the Earth was sea, with scattered islands.
Ur: It was one of the earliest mainlands, conjectured by John Rogers at University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. He was contemplating the topography of Southern India in the late 80’s, during that time a large number of the world’s old cratons were first being precisely dated. He noticed that the South Indian craton was around 3 billion years of age, and on the off chance that you followed its development back to when it was a piece of Pangaea, it was encompassed by various different cratons, additionally going back 3 billion years. It was a lot of an incident to expect cratons of a comparative age to simply bunch together in the same district of Pangaea, unless they were truth be told related. Rogers theorized that these cratons were truth be told a piece of an antiquated 3 billion old landmass, which he named Ur, that survived billions of years until it at long last parted ways with the separation of Pangaea.
Arctica: It was shaped 2.5 billion years prior to the creation of cratons of the Canadian Shield or Kenorland mainland, the Siberian cratons, and the Greenland and Wyoming cratons. It was generally arranged at the present North Pole at the time, subsequently the name.
Atlantica: It was shaped around 2 billion years prior, in the region that is now known as Southern Atlantic Ocean. It was mainly composed of prehistoric cratons where Central and West Africa, and Rio Plato, Sao Francisco and Brazil cratons.
Columbia: This was the first genuine supercontinent, shaped generally between the time of 2 – 1.8 billion years prior. This included Ur, and Nena, Arctica and Atlantica. It began dividing around 1.5 billion years prior. A percentage of the confirmation for Columbia incorporates:
The fit between the mid-Proterozoic fracture valleys in Eastern India and North America
The vicinity of 2 billion year old fluvio-deltaic stores in all cratons in South America and West Africa
The vicinity of petrologically and attractively comparative shakes in Arizona and Western Russia
The principal hypothesis keeps up that the moon was previously a planet, with a circle around the sun like that of the earth. The moon came closer to the Earth’s atmosphere and got caught by the gravity of the Earth. For such a catch to happen, the speeds, strengths, and relative situating of the earth, moon, and sun would need to have been so gently adjusted that such a fortuitous event would be about inconceivable. It is excessively likely that the moon would have either slammed into the earth, or passed close it, and afterward proceeded on its way around the sun without framing an earth circle.
The principal hypothesis keeps up that the moon was previously a planet, with a circle around the sun like that of the earth. Eventually in the not very removed past (under two billion years back), the moon verged on the earth, and was “caught” by it. This hypothesis, while maybe conceivable, can be basically discounted by the law of likelihood. For such a catch to happen, the speeds, powers, and relative situating of the earth, moon, and sun would need to have been so carefully adjusted that such a fortuitous event would be about unthinkable. It is very likely that the moon would have either crashed into the earth, or passed close it, and afterward proceeded on its way around the sun without framing an earth circle. Regardless of the fact that many bodies the measure of the earth and with comparative circles were circumnavigating the sun, the chances that one of these bodies would shape a circle around the earth would not considerably increment. A crash, while exceptionally unlikely, would have been much more probable than a catch.
The stone record gives us with remarkable proof to testing models concerning when and where cell life initially showed up on Earth. Microfossils found in antiquated rocks from Australia and South Africa exhibit that physical life thrived by 3.5 billion years back (Kulp, 2014). More seasoned rocks from Greenland, 3.9 billion years of age, contain isotopic carbon, carbon that could just have fit in with a living life form. The early environment of the Earth was an auxiliary air from volcanic out gassing, extremely CO2-rich with minimal free O2. A percentage of the earliest known single celled eukaryote fossils are acritarchs, which get to be obvious at around 2.1 billion years prior. Actually, acritarchs are the most well known fossils of the late Proterozoic.
One of the explanations behind enthusiasm for the early sea and environment is that they frame the conditions under which life first emerged. There are numerous models, yet little agreement, on how life rose up out of non-living chemicals; concoction frameworks that have been made in the research facility still miss the mark concerning the base unpredictability as a profession creature. The initial phase in the rise of life may have been substance responses that created a large number of the more straightforward natural mixes, including nucleobases and amino acids that are the building pieces of life (Rozanov, 2011).
The capacity to use atmospheric NO2 to support life that is more widespread was thought to have appeared approximately about 2 billion years prior. Indeed, even the most established specimens, 3.2 billion years of age – 75 percent of the path back to the conception of the planet – demonstrated substance confirm that life was hauling nitrogen out of the air. The proportion of heavier to lighter nitrogen iotas fits the example of nitrogen-altering compounds contained in single-celled creatures, and does not coordinate any compound responses that happen without.
A troubling observation that is subject to multiple speculations is the existence of aliens or any other forms of life. One simple possible solution to the Great Silence is that nobody exists which is not possible to believe. Enrico Fermi in this context posed a question “Where is everybody?” and why haven’t anyone experienced the presence of extraterrestrial civilization (Webb, 2002). Fermi is not convinced because he believes that our galaxy is around 13 billion years old and is a long time for the aliens to explore and colonize which never happened. There are other evidences that point out to the fact that the Earth is the only civilized planet in the universe. Michael Hart is of the view that the space faring life in the Milky Way revealed the exclusive presence of the aliens as they are non-existent in space faring (Basalla, 2006). This cannot be considered as the major reason for the sole existence of our planet. There are many instances that could have posed as a constraint for the aliens to explore the space which includes reluctance to space faring or technological intractability or it can also be the case that the aliens never existed. In spite of the several discoveries on the habitable exoplanets, there are numerous reasons to believe that the Earth is unique. Paul Davies, an astronomer stated that the planet must meet two requirements f habitation. First is that the planet must be suitable and the second is the emergence of life (Gribbin, 2011). It is known that life exists on five elements: sulfur, phosphorus, oxygen, nitrogen, carbon (SPONC). These heavy elements became concentrated in the interstellar medium to permit life only recently. Planets that are near to older stars have low SPONC but relatively young stars like Earth where emergence of life is possible (Meadows, 2007). So humanity is the sole civilization in the universe. Another Rare Earth Hypothesis where the recent findings in astronomy, paleontology and biology, Peter Ward (paleontologist) and Donald Brownlee (astronomer) suggested that our planet is the rare in the cosmos (Forgan and Rice, 2010). A new theory was also developed that states that there are 17 billion Earth sized planets in the galaxy which proves that the Universe is sparkling with life (Vakoch and Harrison, 2011).
The Earth which is perceived to be formed about 4.6 billion years ago, evolved due to the collisions in the cloud of material that was giant disc shaped. The paper further deals in the formation of the planet during the first two billion years in which the moon’s formation has also been discussed. This paper also throws light in the context of the impact of the first cellular life forms. Lastly, it has been explored that the Earth is the only form of civilization that exists in the Universe. It is quite intriguing to absorb the solutions but these solutions and arguments seem somewhat unsatisfactory. If it has been proved that, the Earth is the only civilization in the universe then it can be said that the future is open-ended.
Bansal, S. (2010). Theory of Earth Formation. Journal of Earth Science & Climatic Change, 1(1).
Cowen, R. (2000). An Early Cosmic Wallop for Life on Earth?. Science News, 158(23), p.357.
Grossman, L. (2010). Earth: Shields were up on early Earth: Magnetic field formed in time to protect nascent life. Science News, 177(7), pp.12-12.
Kulp, T. (2014). Early earth: Arsenic and primordial life. Nature Geosci, 7(11), pp.785-786.
MacKenzie, D. (2012). Biological clock began ticking 2.5 billion years ago. New Scientist, 214(2865), p.9.
Marshak, S. (2012). Earth. New York: W.W. Norton.
Multicellular life could be 2.1 billion years old. (2010). New Scientist, 207(2767), p.8.
Rozanov, A. (2011). Life on early Earth. SPIE Newsroom.
Sumner, T. (2014). Earth & Environment: Impacts probably stifled early life: Giant asteroids hit Earth until about 4.3 billion years ago. Science News, 186(4), pp.13-13.
Wickramasinghe, J., Wickramasinghe, C. and Napier, B. (2010). Comets and the origin of life. Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific.
Yeager, A. (2014). Earth & Environment: Huge space rock rattled Earth 3 billion years ago. Science News, 185(10), pp.16-16.
Basalla, G. (2006). Civilized life in the universe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Forgan, D. and Rice, K. (2010). Numerical testing of the Rare Earth Hypothesis using Monte Carlo realization techniques. International Journal of Astrobiology, 9(02), p.73.
Gribbin, J. (2011). Alone in the universe. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley.
Meadows, A. (2007). The future of the universe. London: Springer.
Vakoch, D. and Harrison, A. (2011). Civilizations beyond earth. New York: Berghahn Books.
Webb, S. (2002). If the universe is teeming with aliens … where is everybody?. New York: Copernicus Books in association with Praxis Pub.
Essay Writing Service Features
Our Experience
No matter how complex your assignment is, we can find the right professional for your specific task. Contact Essay is an essay writing company that hires only the smartest minds to help you with your projects. Our expertise allows us to provide students with high-quality academic writing, editing & proofreading services.
Free Features
Free revision policy
$10Free bibliography & reference
$8Free title page
$8Free formatting
$8How Our Essay Writing Service Works
First, you will need to complete an order form. It's not difficult but, in case there is anything you find not to be clear, you may always call us so that we can guide you through it. On the order form, you will need to include some basic information concerning your order: subject, topic, number of pages, etc. We also encourage our clients to upload any relevant information or sources that will help.
Complete the order form
Once we have all the information and instructions that we need, we select the most suitable writer for your assignment. While everything seems to be clear, the writer, who has complete knowledge of the subject, may need clarification from you. It is at that point that you would receive a call or email from us.
Writer’s assignment
As soon as the writer has finished, it will be delivered both to the website and to your email address so that you will not miss it. If your deadline is close at hand, we will place a call to you to make sure that you receive the paper on time.
Completing the order and download